Scotland ‘braced for icy blast’

Mat Office weather warning mapThe Met Office said the cold snap would worsen over the coming days
Related stories

Scotland’s environment minister said the country was prepared for an “icy blast”, after forecasters warned snow and ice would hit some areas overnight.

Severe weather warnings are in place across parts of northern and eastern Scotland, and snow is expected in Grampian, the Borders, East Lothian, the Highlands and Angus.

Roseanna Cunningham said authorities had planned well ahead, following last year’s severe winter in Scotland.

The minister said lessons were learned.

“The Scottish government, councils and other key services across Scotland pulled together last year to deal successfully with the coldest winter since 1914,” she said.

“This year we are confident that we have planned well ahead, with councils reporting record levels of salt supplies and schools putting new closure alert systems in place for parents.”

A number of roads and schools were closed in Aberdeenshire on Wednesday because of the conditions, and dozens of gritters were deployed.

The Met Office forecast the cold snap to worsen over the coming days.

It said up to 20cm of snow could land on the Grampian Mountains by the end of Thursday and widespread ice would form on untreated surfaces. Drivers have been urged to take care.

Chief forecaster Andy Page said: “There is no doubt that the UK will see much colder conditions by the end of the week.

“Snow will also be a risk for many, and the public are advised to stay up-to-date with the forecast to make sure they have the latest information.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Pulled apart

A traveller being screened at Minneapolis-St Paul airportOpponents say many screening procedures are “security theatre”
Related stories

As Americans count the blessings which providence has showered over them this Thanksgiving holiday, a division has emerged over how they should view the security staff on duty at the nation’s airports.

Should they acclaim the staff of the Transportation Safety Authority – who are, after all, working on a public holiday – for protecting them with their ceaseless vigilance?

Or should they find something sinister in the new full-body screening machines and pat-down procedures which are making air travel here an ever less joyful experience?

At the heart of the debate are conflicting impulses within the American soul towards state authority.

Here in the US, there is a nearly universal patriotic regard for any uniformed defender of the land. But it co-exists with a deep-seated suspicion of any expansion of the rights of the authorities over the rights of the individual citizen.

Most Americans have a healthy scepticism towards centralised authority which one does not generally find in Europeans. In extreme cases that suspicion can develop into the view that government is a kind of larcenous conspiracy against the people.

Hence the passions aroused by changes in the way air passengers are screened as they pass through American airports.

We are all wearily accustomed to the process of passing through metal-detectors as we head towards departure gates. We throw away our half-drunk bottles of water, remove our shoes, take our laptops out of our bags and hand over our coats to be X-rayed.

As with all security measures of course, it is hard to say how well the process works.

The equipment may not be capable of detecting plastic explosives for example, yet it is possible that the very existence of the process deters terrorists who might otherwise be planning to attack our flights.

Regardless, up until now, the procedures have been largely non-invasive and some Americans are outraged that that is no longer the case.

“The hijackers of United Flight 93, the shoe-bomber and the Christmas Day attacker were all thwarted by brave and vigilant fellow passengers runs this argument, not by the authorities”

In those airports where full-body scanning machines (or “nudie-scans” as some commentators prefer) have been introduced, the choice on offer is simple.

You can pass through the scanner – which provides screeners with an X-ray image of your body beneath your clothing – or you may refuse, but then you must submit to thorough pat-down search.

The procedure is pretty intimate – there would be no point to it if wasn’t – but it has incensed some travellers who see the firm patting down of thighs, buttocks and breasts as a process which would be considered sexual assault in any other circumstances.

Those Americans have an improbable catchphrase – you can buy it on t-shirts – which was first uttered by a passenger in California who made a recording as he was frisked.

“Don’t Touch My Junk,” he warned the searchers, concerned that the pat-down was getting uncomfortably close to his genitals

Not everyone who objects to the new procedures does so on the same grounds.

There is the privacy issue of course. Those of us with groaning guts and bulging butts don’t necessarily want them displayed to the security staff, even if we have nothing on our consciences but a tendency to eat too much.

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa goes through full-body scanPoliticians like Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa had defended the full body scans

There is a constitutional matter too – the fourth amendment to the US Constitution guarantees Americans the right to be secure from unreasonable search.

The founding fathers, who authored the Constitution, could not have foreseen the threat of airborne terrorism of course (or indeed the possibility of powered flight) but constitutional rights are the cornerstone of the American sense of liberty. Government tinkers at its peril.

Some critics believe all the airport screening is part of a kind of “theatre of security” which is designed to reassure the public but wouldn’t actually deter a sophisticated terrorist.

The hijackers of United Flight 93, the shoe-bomber and the Christmas Day attacker were all thwarted by brave and vigilant fellow passengers runs this argument, not by the authorities.

And finally there is a kind of techno-libertarian point at stake in all this. Who exactly gets to see these scans and how long are they kept?

Over the last week, as the US prepared for the busiest travel day of the year, senior security officials have popped up repeatedly on television to remind Americans that the new procedures have a purpose, are designed to keep them safe, and have been made as non-invasive as possible.

A traveller being screened at Minneapolis-St Paul airportAmputees, cancer survivors and young children are also subject to “pat-downs”

It’s a tough argument to make when TV producers have dug up disturbing stories like the experience of a flight attendant – a cancer survivor – who was forced to remove a prosthetic breast when it showed up on a scan. Her dignity and patience struck a rather humbling note in a week of strident opinions.

Thanksgiving Day was seen as a kind of frontline in this debate when protesters talked of deliberately slowing down security in protest the increasing demands of aviation safety.

As I prepared to join the great exodus to the mid-west, the early signs were that those calls for protest had been largely ignored. Largely, of course, because Americans want to get where they’re going.

But it might also mean that for all the anger, irritation and uncertainty over the new procedures, many air passengers grudgingly accept that they’d rather be safe than sorry.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Fake troop death calls in Canada

A Canadian soldier in AfghanistanAt least three families of soldiers in Afghanistan have been targeted by the phoney calls

Canadian military police are investigating fake calls to families of soldiers in Afghanistan claiming their relative has died in combat, authorities have said.

At least three families at a military base in Quebec have been targeted, according to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

One woman was reportedly told her husband had been killed by a bomb.

Police say those responsible could face jail time if caught.

Canadian Forces always deliver news of a soldier’s death in person, National Defence spokeswoman Chantale Le Bouthillier told AFP news agency.

“Military personnel should not be needlessly worried about their families when they are fighting for our country in far away lands,” said Defence Minister Peter MacKay, adding that the imposters responsible for the calls were “insensitive, amoral and disgusting”.

He added: “It is our hope that the perpetrators of this despicable action are brought to justice.”

A family centre at the Canadian Forces Base Valcartier in Quebec has offered counselling to those who have been targeted by the phoney calls.

The news follows last week’s announcement by Canadian government ministers that the country would send up to 950 military trainers to Afghanistan after its combat troops leave the country next year.

Canada has nearly 3,000 troops in Afghanistan.

The country has come under international pressure not to pull out at a time when the US is boosting its military commitment.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Street star’s husband punched fan

Vicky EntwistleMs Entwistle said she felt intimidated by the approach
Related stories

The husband of Coronation Street actress Vicky Entwistle, who plays Janice Battersby, has been found guilty of attacking a fan seeking a picture.

Andrew Chapman, 48, lost his temper and punched Michael McWhirter in the face on a train, Salford magistrates heard.

The 23-year-old was knocked unconscious by Chapman, a black belt in karate, who had denied common assault.

Ms Entwistle said she was intimidated by the approach, which had sparked her decision to quit the soap.

The victim told the court that he had asked: “By any chance please can I have a photo of you because my mum really likes your programme?”

The defendant, represented by lawyer Nick Freeman, had claimed Mr McWhirter looked “menacing” and had lurched at his wife while they travelled home on a train from Manchester after a beer festival on 12 April.

Mr Freeman suggested the victim was verbally aggressive and his client had acted in self- defence – but district judge Jonathan Finestein convicted him.

“I really did feel very frightened indeed”

Vicky Entwistle

Ms Entwistle, of Clitheroe, Lancashire, told the court it was the first time she had used public transport for 13 years because of unwanted attention from people who recognised her from the programme.

After the incident she decided to leave the programme to get “normality and privacy”. It was announced in August she was leaving the soap.

The 41-year-old told the court she felt “intimidated and vulnerable” when Mr McWhirter was “encroaching” on her with a mobile phone.

“I really did feel very frightened indeed,” she added.

Her husband jumped out of his seat and punched the victim in the face, the court heard.

Pc Mark Haviland, from British Transport Police, told the court he had been called to the platform when the train pulled into Salford Crescent train station and had cautioned, arrested and handcuffed Chapman on suspicion of assault.

Chapman, who is paid £200 a week to look after the couple’s home, was convicted of common assault and fined £1,250, ordered to pay his victim the same amount, along with prosecution costs of £1,309 and a £15 victim surcharge.

Judge Finestein, sentencing, said: “You have been convicted of an unpleasant attack on this person. This young man was simply trying to take a photo.

“You became far more protective of your wife than you needed to be and lost your temper.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Chairman has resigned, says S4C

S4C logoThe meeting of the S4C Authority was said to be “lengthy and difficult”

The chair of S4C resigned at a meeting of its governing body before reversing his decision, BBC Wales understands.

John Walter Jones initially indicated at a meeting of the S4C Authority on Tuesday night that he would stand aside next spring when he turned 65.

But following an exchange with other members of the authority, Mr Jones, taking part via video link, said he would resign immediately.

However, he later rejoined the meeting and said he had rescinded his decision.

On Wednesday morning, the Welsh Conservative MP Guto Bebb, speaking on behalf of his Tory colleagues, publicly called on the S4C Authority as a whole to step down, with the exception of Mr Jones as chair.

The Welsh Affairs Select Committee of MPs is examining the channel after the loss of its chief executive and the decision to part-fund the Welsh language broadcaster from the BBC licence fee.

Meanwhile, Mr Jones had told the authority meeting, described as “lengthy and difficult”, he would resign immediately, before informing the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) of his decision.

But some time later he said he had reversed his decision.

“Some members of the S4C Authority are more concerned with scoring political points against the coalition government than trying to move S4C forward to a secure future”

Guto Bebb MP Conservative, Aberconwy

S4C has faced months of turmoil following the departure of its former chief executive Iona Jones.

The UK coalition government then announced its intention to sever S4C’s guaranteed inflation-linked funding settlement, which is expected to lead to cuts of at least 25% in its budget.

UK Culture Minister Jeremy Hunt revealed the BBC is to take over part-funding of the channel from 2013.

Tory politicians said they believed that members of the S4C Authority are “part of the problem”.

Aberconwy MP Mr Bebb told BBC Wales: “Some members of the S4C Authority are more concerned with scoring political points against the coalition government than trying to move S4C forward to a secure future.

“We’ve come to the conclusion as a group of MPs, especially after yesterday’s evidence to the Welsh Affairs Select Committee, that the S4C Authority are part of the problem rather than part of the solution.”

Giving evidence to Welsh MPs on Tuesday, the executive chairman of the independent television company Tinopolis, Ron Jones, said S4C had thought of itself as a “big and important organisation” and should think more like a “small organisation once again”.

Former BBC Wales controller Geraint Talfan Davies told the inquiry that he believed the details of the deal to fund the channel from BBC funds “sounded cumbersome and expensive”.

He told MPs that the arrangements being suggested by the DCMS, were “not a workable structure”.

The S4C Authority took effective control of the channel after its chief executive quit.

It is currently advertising for candidates to replace Ms Jones.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

‘Clashes’ increase Sudan tensions

Map

The Southern Sudanese army says six of its men have been wounded by gunfire from a northern helicopter.

The commissioner of Aweil North county, where the alleged clash happened, told the BBC that four people had been hurt.

But a spokesman for the northern armed forces denied that any clashes had taken place.

A fragile ceasefire has held since 2005, but tension is growing in the run-up to January’s referendum on possible Southern independence.

“Today SAF [northern army] helicopter gunships attacked our position, injuring four soldiers and two civilians,” southern army spokesman Philip Aguer said.

“The SAF is trying to drag Sudan back into war again and to disrupt or prevent the referendum.”

But he said the southern army was committed to the ceasefire and would not respond militarily.

Northern army spokesman al-Sawarmi Khaled said the claims were “absolutely not true”.

“We have not attacked anywhere near the border,” he said.

The head of the United Nations in Southern Sudan said a UN team would be sent to the remote area to investigate.

The BBC’s James Copnall, in Khartoum, says the accusation made by the southern army is the latest in a growing war of words as the referendum approaches.

Despite attempts by senior politicians and international mediators to calm things down, the militaries from both sides have traded allegations, and several politicians have made inflammatory comments.

Analysts say the south is almost certain to choose independence if it gets a fair vote.

But there are fears about a return to war around the time of the referendum, says our correspondent.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Swinney sorry over Tartan tax row

Finance Secretary John SwinneyJohn Swinney is expected to defend his decision to let the tax powers lapse
Related stories

Scotland’s Finance Secretary John Swinney will confront his critics later in the row over his decision to allow Holyrood’s tax-varying powers to lapse.

Opposition parties are angry that Mr Swinney decided to abandon the Scottish Parliament’s power to raise or lower tax by 3p in the pound.

They also accused him of a “cover-up” after the “Tartan tax” decision was taken without consulting parliament.

Mr Swinney will insist that he acted in the best interests of Scotland.

The public voted for the Scottish Parliament to have tax-varying powers in a specific question which was part of the 1997 referendum on devolution, but the power has never been used by any administration.

It emerged last week that the Scottish government had declined to pay £7m to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to upgrade their IT systems.

This meant the ability to use the Scottish Variable Rate (SVR) had lapsed and it now could not be made available for at least another two years.

BBC Scotland’s political editor Brian Taylor said Mr Swinney was expected to pursue a dual strategy during the emergency debate in the Scottish Parliament.

He said: “Mr Swinney will robustly defend his actions at a time of spending restraint and indicate that the tax system he inherited three years ago was not in good shape – implying that the previous Labour/Liberal Democrat Scottish Executive had slipped up.

TAX RAISING POWERSTax varying powers agreement set up in 1999Start-up costs of £12mThe power has not yet been used£50,000 annual maintenance costsCurrent SNP government stopped maintenance payments in 2007HMRC confirmed in 2007 it was planning an IT upgradeRead more on Brian Taylor’s blog

“But it is thought there may also be a note of contrition, perhaps a recognition that parliament’s finance committee should have been briefed.”

In his budget statement at Holyrood last week, Mr Swinney specifically ruled out use of the power to raise revenue, leading to opposition claims that he misled parliament.

It subsequently emerged that the SNP administration had refused to pay an annual £50,000 fee for the SVR to be maintained since they took power in 2007.

And in August this year Mr Swinney told HMRC he was not going to pay £7m to upgrade the computer system which would allow the tax-varying power to be activated.

Labour finance spokesman Andy Kerr said of the finance secretary: “The facts are that he misled parliament in successive budgets by keeping this decision a secret.

“His refusal to provide straight answers to straight questions or offer any regret is beginning to make his position look very difficult.”

Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Tavish Scott said: “I expect a full apology from the Scottish government, both for abandoning the tax-varying power and the subsequent cover-up.”

Scottish Conservative finance spokesman Derek Brownlee said: “Most of all he needs to give a convincing explanation as to why he and his SNP government kept the facts secret and hidden from the finance committee, the Scottish Parliament, and the Scottish people.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Dark energy flattens the Universe

Binary galaxy pair (Nasa/Esa/STScI/AURA/A Evans)The measurement depends on hundreds of pairs of “binary galaxies”
Related stories

Researchers have developed a simple technique that adds evidence to the theory that the Universe is flat.

Moreover, the method – developed by revisiting a 30-year-old idea – confirms that “dark energy” makes up nearly three-quarters of the Universe.

The research, published in Nature, uses existing data and relies on fewer assumptions than current approaches.

Author Christian Marinoni says the idea turns estimating the Universe’s shape into “primary school” geometry.

While the idea of the Earth being flat preoccupied explorers centuries ago, the question of whether the Universe itself is flat remains a debatable topic.

The degree to which the Universe is curved has an effect on what astronomers see when they look into the cosmos.

A telescope on or near Earth may see an image of a celestial object differently from how the object actually looks, because the very fabric of space and time bends the light coming from it.

Christian Marinoni and Adeline Buzzi of the University of Provence have made use of this phenomenon in their technique.

The current model of cosmology holds that only 4% of what makes up our Universe is normal matter – the stuff of stars and planets with which we are familiar, and that astronomers can see directly.

The overwhelming majority of the Universe, the theory holds, is composed of dark matter and dark energy. They are “dark” because they evidently do not absorb, emit and reflect light like normal matter, making direct views impossible.

Dark energy – purported to make up 73% of the known Universe – was proposed as the source of the ongoing expansion of everything in the cosmos. Astronomers have also observed that this expansion of the Universe seems to be accelerating.

“Once you measure the abundance of matter and energy in the Universe, you have direct information on its geometry; you can do geometry as we learn in primary school”

Christian Marinoni University of Provence

Even though gravity holds that everything should attract everything else, in every direction astronomers look there is evidence that things are in fact moving apart – with those objects further away moving faster.

Dark energy is believed to pervade the essence of space and time, forcing a kind of “anti-gravity” that fits cosmologists’ equations but that is otherwise a mysterious quantity.

“The problem is that we do not see dark energy because it doesn’t emit light, so we cannot measure it by designing a new machine, a new telescope,” explained Professor Marinoni.

“What we have to do is to devise a new mathematical framework that allows us to dig into this mystery,” he told BBC News.

The technique used in this study was first proposed in 1979 by researchers at the universities of Princeton and Berkeley in the US.

It relies on measuring the degree to which images of far-flung astronomical objects are a distortion of their real appearance. The authors originally suggested a spherical object would work.

The way the image is distorted should shed light on both the curvature of the Universe and the recipe of matter, dark matter and dark energy it is composed of.

The problem until now has been to choose an object whose real, local appearance can be known with certainty.

Professor Marinoni and Dr Buzzi’s idea was to use a number of binary galaxies – pairs of galaxies that orbit each other.

Since nature shows no preference for the direction these galaxies would be orbiting one another, a look across the whole sky should spot the full spectrum of orbital planes – up, down, left, right, side-on and so on.

Put all of them together and they should approximate a sphere.

Sloan Digital Sky Survey telescope (SPL)The idea was checked using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

The team formed a kind of average of all of those binary galaxies, and corrected for the varying speeds at which the galaxies might be orbiting each other.

The calculation also takes into account the relative proportion of dark energy in the Universe.

The equation was then juggled until the collection of binaries did indeed look like a uniform mix of directions.

The results suggest that the Universe is made up of about 70% dark energy.

“In general relativity, there is a direct connection between geometry and dynamics,” Professor Marinoni explained, “so that once you measure the abundance of matter and energy in the Universe, you have direct information on its geometry; you can do geometry as we learn in primary school.”

The team’s conclusions suggest the Universe is indeed flat – an assumption first put forth by Albert Einstein and seemingly confirmed by more recent observations but that remains one of the most difficult ideas to put on solid theoretical footing.

Alan Heavens, a theoretical astrophysicist at the University of Edinburgh, said that the strength of the result lies in that it requires few assumptions about the nature of the cosmos.

“The problem that Marinoni and Buzzi have attacked is to see if we can get another, rather clean way of working out what the geometry of the Universe is without going through some fairly indirect reasoning, which is what we do at the moment,” Professor Heavens told BBC News.

“They get complete consistency with [results from] existing methods, so there’s nothing suprising coming out – thankfully – but it’s a neat idea because it really goes rather directly from observations to conclusions.”

However, while the abundance of dark energy seems on an ever-firmer footing, its nature remains a mystery.

“I don’t think it can tell us in a lot of detail what the dark energy is,” Professor Heavens said. “I think it’s probably not precise enough – certainly not yet.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Leaders clash over school sports

David Cameron

Prime Minister David Cameron was repeatedly asked about funding for school sports

Related stories

David Cameron and Ed Miliband have clashed over plans for the future funding for schools sports in England.

Labour’s leader said proposed changes were “daft” as, due to its efforts in office, the number of children doing more than two hours of sport a week had risen from about 25% to more than 90%.

He accused Education Secretary Michael Gove of being “high-handed and unfair”.

But Mr Cameron said participation levels in competitive sports was poor and Labour’s record was “terrible”.

The two leaders clashed over the proposed changes at Prime Minister’s Questions on the day the government outlined proposed legislation on schools reform.

Instead of handing out money for individual projects, the prime minister said school sports funding would, in future, be included within the basic schools budget which would rise by £3.6bn over the next four years.

Head teachers would be given more freedom to decide where the money was spent, he told MPs, arguing that the current system had “tied them up in red tape”.

The prime minister said Labour had failed in the area since the number of schools offering sports such as rugby, hockey and gymnastics had actually fallen since 1997.

Only two out of five children were currently playing any competitive sport, Mr Cameron told MPs, saying this was a “terrible record”.

“Over the last decade we saw a lot of money put into school sport but we did not see a lot of progress,” he said. “This approach did not work and it is time for a new one.”

But Mr Miliband said the government would “live to regret” its approach.

More than a million more children were taking part in competitive sports between schools now than in 1997, he said, supported by a network of 200,000 volunteers.

“This is frankly a daft decision which he should U-turn on as soon as possible,” he told Mr Cameron.

“I am afraid it sums up this education secretary – high-handed, incompetent and unfair.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Saudi king’s ‘successful surgery’

Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah at Riyadh airport before flying to the US, 22 November 2010King Abdullah has complained several times recently about back pain
Related stories

Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah has undergone a successful back operation in the US, according to media reports.

The 86-year-old Saudi ruler arrived in New York on Monday seeking treatment for a herniated disc, complicated by an accumulation of blood around the spine.

Al-Arabiya TV reported that King Abdullah was “doing much better following the operation”.

A Saudi diplomat told Associated Press that the operation at New York Presbyterian Hospital went well.

Crown Prince Sultan, the next in line to the throne, is running Saudi Arabia in the king’s absence.

The crown prince is also in his 80s and suffering his own health problems, from which he had reportedly been recuperating in Morocco.

Before the king headed for New York, Saudi officials had reassured the public and international allies that there was nothing to worry about.

Saudi Arabia has more than 25% of the world’s known oil reserves and is a key ally of the US in the Middle East.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

China urged to act on North Korea

Aerial view of damaged buildings

Aerial view of Yeonpyeong island damage

China should use its influence over North Korea to defuse the crisis sparked by the North’s shelling of a Southern island, US officials say.

State department spokesman PJ Crowley said Beijing’s role was pivotal and urged Beijing to be clear on the issue.

China is the only nation with influence in the North but Beijing has so far issued statements urging restraint and has refused to blame the North.

Two South Korean civilians and two marines died in Tuesday’s shelling.

The burnt bodies of two men in their 60s were found on Wednesday on the island, which lies near the disputed Yellow Sea border.

The latest TV pictures of the island show neighbourhoods reduced to rubble with shops and homes burnt and destroyed.

NORTH KOREAN ATTACKSJan 1967 – attacks South Korean warship near border, killing 39 sailorsJan 1968 – commandos storm presidential palace in Seoul in a failed attempt to kill President Park Chung-heeJan 1968 – captures USS Pueblo – one crew member dies and 82 held hostage for 11 monthsDec 1969 – hijacks South Korean airliner taking dozens of passengers hostageOct 1983 – bombs hotel in Rangoon, Burma, in failed attempt to kill South Korean President Chun Doo-hwan – 21 people dieNov 1987 – bombs South Korean airliner, killing 115Mar 2010 – torpedoes Cheonan warship, 46 sailors killed. N Korea denies responsibilityHow the ship was sunk

The US, which is due to hold joint military drills with the South from this Sunday, urged China to take a tougher stance with its ally.

“China does have influence with North Korea and we would hope and expect that China will use that influence,” said Mr Crowley.

“First to reduce tensions that have arisen as a result of North Korean provocations and then secondly [to] continue to encourage North Korea to take affirmative steps to denuclearise.”

Mr Crowley described the shelling as a “one-off, premeditated act” and said the US did not think Pyongyang was preparing for an extended military confrontation.

Japanese officials have also encouraged China to take the lead with Pyongyang.

Earlier, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said they “regret the casualties and property losses, and are concerned about the situation”.

“We strongly urge both sides retain calm and restraint and engage in talks as quickly as possible in order to prevent similar incidents from happening again,” Mr Hong said in a statement carried by state-run Xinhua news agency.

At least 18 people were injured in Tuesday’s attack.

Hundreds have since fled the island, taking ferries to the mainland where they described what happened.

“I heard the sound of artillery and I felt that something was flying over my head,” said Lim Jung-eun, a 36-year-old housewife who fled the island with her three children. “Then the mountain caught on fire.”

Map showing Yeonpyeong and the disputed border between North and South Korea

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

UKIP MEP ejected over Nazi jibe

European Parliament, StrasbourgGodfrey Bloom was ejected from the European Parliament chamber in Strasbourg
Related stories

A UKIP MEP has been ejected from the European Parliament after directing a Nazi slogan at a German colleague.

Godfrey Bloom said “Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer” – One People, One Empire, One Leader – as Martin Schulz was making a speech.

He was ordered out of the chamber and will face disciplinary measures.

Mr Bloom told the BBC he stood by his words, describing the leader of the socialist group in the parliament, as “a national socialist”.

Mr Bloom made the comments as Mr Schulz, a member of Germany’s Social Democratic Party and leader of the socialist bloc in the Parliament, was speaking during a debate on the economic crisis in Ireland.

President of the European Parliament Jerzy Buzek told him: “As you know, most of the members of the chamber cannot accept your behaviour. I will therefore ask you to leave the chamber at this point.”

BBC Correspondent Hugh Schofield in Strasbourg said Mr Bloom was likely to face disciplinary measures following his outburst.

It is not the first time that Mr Bloom – who represents Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire – has courted controversy with his comments.

He has argued that man-made global warming is a myth and praised the sinking of the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior in 1985, in which one man died.

In 2004, he said no “self-respecting” small business owner would employ a woman of child-bearing age.

UKIP leader Nigel Farage was, himself, disciplined by the European Parliament earlier this year after saying the president of the European Council, Herman van Rompuy, had “the charisma of a damp rag”.

After refusing to retract the comments, Mr Farage was fined £2,700 by the parliamentary authorities.

UKIP has 12 MEPs in the European Parliament.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Somalis guilty of US ship attack

Breaking News

A US jury has convicted five young Somali men of piracy in connection with the April attack on a US Navy ship.

Prosecutors said the men attacked the USS Nicholas after mistaking it for a merchant ship.

But the men’s lawyers maintained the five only fired their weapons to attract attention and get help.

The case marks the first piracy trial in the US since the American Civil War.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Obama spares turkey from ‘shellacking’

US President Barack Obama has pardoned a turkey at the White House as part of an annual presidential tradition held in advance of the Thanksgiving holiday.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

University ‘broke redundancy law’

University of StirlingThe university could face a bill of thousands of pounds in compensation
Related stories

Stirling University could be forced to pay out hundreds of thousands of pounds in compensation after terminating staff contracts without consultation.

An employment tribunal has ruled the university broke the law when it ended up to 100 fixed term contracts without consulting with unions.

The staff, who were earning between £20,000 and £30,000, could receive 90 days pay compensation.

Employers are required to consult when 20 or more staff face redundancy.

The university had argued the law did not apply to fixed-term contracts being ended.

But the University and College Union (UCU) said they should be classed as redundancy and that the university had a legal obligation to consult with unions on ways to mitigate and avoid dismissals.

Employment judge Paul Cape ruled in favour of the UCU at a hearing in Glasgow.

The tribunal will reconvene at a later date to consider the awards in the case.

It is estimated the total bill could be as high as £500,000.

UCU Scottish official, Mary Senior, said: “This is a very important victory for the former members of staff at the University of Stirling who should not have been dismissed as they were.

“It is also an important ruling for the thousands of university staff on fixed-term contracts around the UK.

“Universities have to understand that they cannot just wait for fixed-term contracts to expire to get rid of staff.”

The university’s HR director Martin McCrindle said: “This is a complex judgement and the university needs time to consider its detailed implications.

“We, like other universities, will continue to employ academic staff on fixed-term contracts to ensure we achieve our research goals in the difficult funding environment that we are experiencing, in common with the rest of the sector.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.