Mervyn King: ‘There is evidence of a significant margin of spare capacity in the economy’
Freelance Projects, Design and Programming Tutorials
Mervyn King: ‘There is evidence of a significant margin of spare capacity in the economy’
The Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, has said inflation will rise sharply in the first half of this year before falling back next year.
But he said there were “large risks” that inflation could overshoot or undershoot the Bank’s 2% target.
He reiterated his belief that external factors, such as rising food and energy prices, are the main cause of rising prices in the UK.
Mr King said growth would be weaker than the Bank forecast in November.
He said that once cost pressures from high commodity prices subside, “CPI inflation will then fall back. But the extent to which it will do so is uncertain, and there are large risks in both directions.”
On Thursday, official figures showed that inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), rose to 4% in January from 3% in December. Measured by the Retail Price Index (RPI), which includes mortgage interest payments, it rose to 5.1% from 4.8%.
Mr King was forced to write a letter to the Chancellor, George Osborne, to explain why CPI inflation was twice the Bank’s target rate.
“Only time will tell. The judgements are difficult.”
These words from Mervyn King, from his opening remarks at the media conference, summed up the Bank’s dilemma.
Raising interest rates too soon could stifle a fragile recovery – and the Bank has revised down its growth projection for 2011.
Continued high inflation could push up inflation expectations – which would force the bank to intervene.
The governor and his colleagues will have several more uncomfortable months and tricky decisions.
The governor said if businesses and households expected that high inflation was here to stay, prices and wages might rise even more quickly.
On the other hand, as the effects of the rise in VAT to 20% implemented in January and imported cost pressures began to diminish, there was a risk that weak growth “will push inflation well below target,” he said.
Mr King said there were “real differences of view” in the Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee, which sets interest rates, about “the likely path of inflation in the medium term”.
Two members, Andrew Sentance and Martin Weale, have already voted to raise interest rates, currently at a record low of 0.5%, to combat rising prices.
The split reflects the wider debate among economists, with some arguing that rates should be increased to prevent inflation rising further, and others maintaining that a rate rise would jeopardise the fragile economic recovery.
In light of the latest figures showing inflation rising faster, and Mr King’s letter to the chancellor, more observers now believe the Bank could raise rates sometime over the summer.
Mr King said the recovery was “unlikely to be smooth”, while the Bank’s economic growth projection for most of this year was now “weaker” than it forecast towards the end of last year.
The UK economy shrank by 0.5% in the final three months of last year, but had it not been for the heavy snow in December, Mr King said growth would have been 2% for 2010 as a whole.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
There have been repeated warnings about the threat of cyber attack A cyber attack by one state on another could be considered an “act of war”, Tony Blair’s former top national security adviser has said.
Sir Richard Mottram told a House of Lords inquiry new “laws of war” were needed to cope with such a threat.
He also criticised the EU after the multi-million pound theft of carbon credits, saying its apparent lack of cyber security “took my breath away”.
It comes amid claims the threat of cyber war is being exaggerated.
Earlier this month, Foreign Secretary William Hague called for countries to come together to agree a set of rules to prevent cyber war.
He revealed that the Foreign Office IT system had come under attack from a ”hostile state intelligence agency” as recently as January.
Sir Richard, a former top civil servant at several government departments, who ended his Whitehall career in 2007 as chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, appeared to back Mr Hague’s call for new international rules in evidence to the Lords EU sub-commitee on Home Affairs.
“Could a cyber attack constitute an act of war? Absolutely. If you could establish who had done it of course… is it feasible to imagine laws of war that could apply in relation to cyber attack? Answer – it is feasible,” said Sir Richard, who was also in charge of the previous government’s counter-terrorism strategy.
He was also asked for his reaction to the theft last month of 7m euros (£5.9m) of emission permits from the European Commission’s carbon trading system.
“I think it is pretty clear that cyber security is inadequate both in a number of the national offices that run the emission trading scheme and in Brussels”
Lord Hannay Lords EU Home Affairs Committee
According to the Financial Times, it was believed to have been the work of computer hackers who used a hoax bomb threat to get a building in Prague evacuated before stealing codes and allowances from computers.
The allowances could be sold on the open market for “millions of euros” before anyone would have noticed, the newspaper said.
It said there have been at least six attacks on operators of the EU emissions trading system in eastern and central Europe in the past three months – with thieves taking more than 50 million euros – before trading was suspended.
Asked if he had confidence in the EU’s cyber security systems following these incidents, Sir Richard said: “I wouldn’t have generalised confidence in those systems – no.”
He said the Prague incident, in particular, highlighted the vulnerability of EU-wide computer systems.
“These are all systems issues where people seek out the weakest point. So it’s no use the UK having the most fabulous security, which I don’t suggest it has, but it has in many areas adequate security, if it is also sharing information with others who aren’t anywhere near our level,” he said.
Commenting specifically on the carbon credits theft, he said: “They (the EU) don’t seem to have realised until quite recently that they were an attractive target, which rather took my breath away.”
Committee chairman, crossbench peer Lord Hannay, also criticised the EU’s cyber security systems following the Prague incident.
“We have asked the government to give us the best knowledge they have about what happened in this case.
“But I think it is pretty clear that cyber security is inadequate both in a number of the national offices that run the emission trading scheme and in Brussels.
“That would not be a particularly surprising discovery but it does have important implications for the need for the EU to do something about its own security, its own institutions’ security, as well as looking into the wider issue of all the member states.”
The Lords EU Home Affairs sub-committee is investigating the EU’s internal security strategy.
It comes as one of Britain’s leading cyber security experts, BT’s head of security Bruce Schneier, told BBC News the threat of cyber war had been exaggerated and was based on only a handful of incidents around the world.
His view appeared to be backed by Howard Schmidt, cyber security co-ordinator for the White House, who called for an end to the use of inflammatory language when talking about internet security.
“Cyber war is a turbo metaphor that does not address the issues we are looking at like cyber espionage, cyber crime, identity theft, credit card fraud,” he told reporters at a conference in San Francisco.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Why go through online slides alone when you can do it with other people? If you are one of the 45 million people who go to SlideShare every month to check out slide presentations like this one from Mary Meeker on mobile Internet trends, you are probably going to like Zipcast. Slideshare is launching the new service today with Zipcast buttons on every public slideshow that turns the slides into a Webcast with video, audio and chat.
There are plenty of virtual meeting services on the Web—everything from Cisco’s WebEx and Citrix’s GoToMeeting to Adobe’s Acrobat.com, which have been out for years. But Zipcast is, well, zippier. It doesn’t require a software download or plug-in, and it doesn’t take over your entire screen. Instead, it is just a tab in your browser (thank you, HTML5 Websockets).
Zipcast is also stripped down compared to other existing virtual meeting products. There are the slides, a one-way video stream of the person hosting the meeting, a conference call line for audio, and a text chat window. And if you are board during the presentation, you can skip ahead through the slides on your own. That’s it, and that’s all most people probably need for giving a pitch, presentation, or remote talk.
And to share the slideshow meeting, all you have to do is pass out a regular link—every SlideShare user will get a customized link that looks something like www.slideshare.net/erick/meeting and that can be used over and over again for every meeting that person hosts. Participants can sign in with Facebook and can choose to send their chat comments out to their Facebook streams, along with a link back to the meeting, which is a good way to gather an audience for live events. Zipcast will have its <a href="“>own page with an activity stream showing what meetings are going on right now , along with comments, which could also drive more people into public meetings.
There is no limit to how many people can join a meeting, Meetings can be public or private, but anyone with the link can view the presentation.
If you are a SlideShare Pro member, which starts at $19/month, you can get password protected meetings, along with other bells and whistles. Zipcast will be bundled in with the other SlideShare Pro features such as analytics and removing ads. SlideShare just launched subscriptions a few months ago, and paid subscribers are “doubling every month,” says CEO Rahsmi Sinha. She plans on rolling out more premium features for Zipcast such as two-way video and the ability to embed Zipcasts.
With Zipcasts, you can see how SlideShare will start to fold in new products to tackle the enterprise market from the ground-up, using its installed base of loyal SlideShare users to spread the word about new products. Socialtext founder Ross Mayfield recently joined the company as VP of business development to help pursue this strategy.
We’ve been expecting Google to launch a one-click payment system for online publishers for some time now, but today the search giant is finally unveiling One-Pass, a Google Checkout-powered service that lets publishers set their own prices and terms for their digital content.
Google One Pass allows publishers to embed a simple e-commerce functionality to content that will require readers to purchase the content for viewing. Google says that publishers have the flexibility to charge for a variety of models including, subscriptions, day passes, metered access, pay-per-article, multi-issue packages and more. Users can purchase the content once and view it anywhere using the technology. Readers who purchase from a One Pass publisher can access their content on tablets, smartphones and websites using a single sign-on with an email and password, says Google.
Google One Pass also enables metered models, where a publisher can provide some content or a certain number of visits for free, but can charge frequent visitors for additional views. Publishers can also use a coupon-base system to grant access to existing subscribers. And One Pass offers payments in mobile apps (i.e. in Android apps), in instances where the mobile OS terms permit transactions to take place outside of the app market (which seems to be a direct hit at Apple’s subscription announcement yesterday).
Google says that One Pass is a fairly lightweight technology to implement on publisher sites. Here’s how it works: publishers host their own content and can upload the list of the content they want to monetise into the Google interface. Publishers then need to add a small amount of code to their website, and One Pass will be implemented.
The technology is currently available to publishers in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.K. and the U.S. Already a number of customers are using One Pass, including Axel Springer AG, Focus Online (Tomorrow Focus), Media General, NouvelObs, Popular Science, Prisa and Rust Communications.
Clearly, this format will compete with Apple’s subscription model, as well as PayPal, which launched its own micropayments product recently. Details are still vague, but One Pass does seem to be more publisher friendly that Apple’s subscription product. And this could be a big boost for Google’s own payments product—Checkout.

Oddly named ThingWorx, which markets an application platform designed for apps connecting people, systems and devices, has raised $5 million in Series B funding. The round was led by Safeguard Scientifics.
Founded in 2009, ThingWorx has developed technology that lets companies create and deploy secure connected applications, whether they’re in the cloud, on an intranet or on an embedded platform.
The company emphasizes the platform’s value in industrial markets like manufacturing, utilities and energy, as well as in emerging “Internet of Things” markets, which includes smart homes, cities and transportation.

On Monday, Marvell announced they were acquiring Kinoma. To the man on the street, that sounds more like the plot of a comic book and not the merging of some pretty serious players in the mobile industry, which is what it actually is. And they’ve got some ambitious plans, but I found myself questioning whether many end users will feel their effect.
Marvell is a player on the pre-OEM level, providing tech and chipsets to companies putting together devices like handsets, tablets, and e-readers. Kinoma, which I hadn’t heard of until today, is working on a sort of thin OS layer that goes on top of Android and a few other OSes, adding functionality and connectivity while keeping the footprint small and the compatibility level high. But could they be mistaken on where the platform is going?

Lookout, a company that offers security services for a number of smartphones, is releasing a new study today examining the Android Market and Apple’s App Store for U.S. users. It’s worth a look—the report has a number of interesting data points relating to growth, developers, mobile ad networks and more.
According to Lookout, the number of apps available for Android increased approximately 127% since August 2010, while iPhone saw a growth rate of 44%. Of course, the fact that the Android Market is growing faster isn’t new. And if apps continue to be developed for each platform at the same rate, Android apps will overtake iPhone apps in mid-2012.
While the Android Market may be growing at a faster rate than the Apple App Store, the Apple App Store continues to attract a significant portion of developers. The App Store attracted nearly 24,000 developers between August 2010 and February 2011, whereas the Android Market attracted just over 4,000 developers in the same time period.

The number of unique developers in the Apple App Store grew by approximately 48% over the past 6 months, while the number of unique developers in the Android Market grew by just over 40%. The Android Market generally has more apps per developer than the App Store. The average number of apps submitted per developer is 6.6 in the Android Market and 4.8 in the App Store.
In terms of free versus paid apps, previously, apps in the Android Market have been primarily free; however, over the past 6 months, the Android Market has seen an influx of paid apps. In contrast, the Apple App Store has seen an increase in the proportion of free apps, with prices of paid apps remaining steady, says Lookout. The Android Market saw its prevalence of paid apps grow from 22% to 34% during the past 6 months. The number of paid apps in the Apple App Store decreased from 70% to 66% in the past 6 months.

In terms of mobile ad networks, the AdMob SDK is integrated into more free apps in both the Android Market and the Apple App Store than any other ad platform. However, Lookout says that iAd is quickly gaining traction on the App Store and expects to see iAd surpass AdMob in prevalence amongst free Apple App Store apps during the first half of 2011. iAd has grown in prevalence from just 5.6% of free Apple App Store apps to 15% during the past 6 months

Lookout also examined the number of apps that access users location, claiming that the App Store has a higher percentage of apps that access contacts and location. According to the report, 28% of all apps in the Android Market and 35% of all apps in the Apple App Store access location. Plus, 7% of Android Market apps and 13% of Apple App Store apps have the capability to access contacts.
Lookout’s web-based, cloud-connected applications for Android, Windows Mobile and BlackBerry phones help users from losing their phones and identifies and block threats on a consumer’s phone. Users simply download the software to a device, and it will act as a tracking application and a virus protector much like security software downloaded to a computer. The startup also sponsors the App Genome Project, which is a mobile app dataset created to map the anatomy of mobile applications across multiple mobile platforms and app markets, to provide insight into mobile market dynamics and identify security threats in apps.
Why is Mozilla harshing on Internet Explorer 9 ? The company’s tech evangelist, Paul Rouget, said in a recent blog post that Internet Explorer 9 isn’t a “truly modern” browser, specifically calling out its implementation of HTML5. I don’t understand why the average person couldn’t use both (along with Chrome and Opera) to browse the Web as they see fit, but let’s hear Rouget out for a bit.

Could his beautiful, svelte, and decidedly black laptop be the new Macbook Pro that should land in stores on or around the ides of March or early April?
Probably not, but a girl can dream. Why does it look fairly convincing? Well, as 9to5mac points out, Intel has leaked future MacBooks before and there is some evidence of new MacBooks in the pipe for Best Buy and others.
Online marketing company Constant Contact has acquired social CRM startup Bantam Live for $15 million in cash, subject to certain post-closing adjustments.
Bantam Live, which has raised $1.7 million in funding, provides an online workspace for business teams that has “social CRM” features, which include a real-time dashboard stream of messaging and workflow activity along with a native CRM application. Members can share information, track activity, and manage contact and company relationships both inside and outside the organization via a real-time activity stream.
Bantam extends a company’s sales outreach and customer relationships out to the social Web. For instance, with Bantam, a user can search Twitter, import a new contact with one click, initiate task workflows with team members to engage this new contact, and then converse with the new contact for lead generation. Bantam also integrates with Facebook as well.
The company debuted its product at TechCrunch’s RealTime Stream CrunchUp two years ago and exited beta early last year.
Bantam’s CEO and founder John Rourke told us that he was pursued by a couple of public companies to be acquired but chose Constant Contact because it was the best fit.
Bantam Live’s technology will help offer a communciations and social CRM product to Constant Contact’s more than 400,000 small business customers, helping them better track, measure and increase customer engagement. Social CRM functionality will eventually be built into all of the
company’s products, including a paid social media marketing offering, which the company
expects to release in the second half of 2011.
Last year Constant Contact acquired social email and messaging manager Nutshell Mail.
ZocDoc, an insanely easy service for booking same day doctor appointments, has launched service Los Angeles with more than 100,000 appointments ready to be booked. This should be welcome news: ZocDoc says the average wait time for an appointment in LA is 24 days. The easier appointments are to book, the less the burden on emerging rooms and urgent care centers.
This is ZocDoc’s sixth location, and while the roll out is methodical, the service has grown bookings by more than 42% in the last month alone. As a consumer, I’m a huge fan of ZocDoc– it’s stunningly efficient and the customer service is stellar. But is the site too good to be true?
We interviewed CEO and co-founder Cyrus Massoumi via Skype to talk about the new location, and how even with $20 million in venture capital the site can roll out to every metro market and continue to provide expensive customer service from SoHo– the antithesis of outsourcing. (We also discover a surprising secret about Massoumi’s past around the 11 minute mark…)
To lobby for ZocDoc opening in your city, go here.
<div><div><script src=”http://www.crunchbase.com/javascripts/widget.js” type=”text/javascript”></script><div><a href=”http://www.crunchbase.com/”>CrunchBase Information</a></div></div><div><div><a href=”http://www.crunchbase.com/company/zocdoc”>Zoc Doc</a></div><div><script src=”http://www.crunchbase.com/cbw/company/zocdoc.js” type=”text/javascript”></script></div><div>Information provided by <a href=”http://www.crunchbase.com/”>CrunchBase</a></div></div></div>
Intuit raised eyebrows in early January when it rolled out a free version of its Square-competitor, GoPayment, which is a mobile payment application and small credit card reader that attaches to smartphones. The caveat to the free version, as reported by Fortune, was that businesses had until mid-February to sign up for the free service, whereas Square is and always has been free to users (minus the credit card and processing fees). Today, Intuit is announcing that it will continue to offer GoPayment with a free credit card reader and no monthly fee for an indefinite amount of time (the offer was originally scheduled to end yesterday). The company also says that since the initial free offer, Intuit’s customer acquisition rate for GoForward has more than tripled.
Launched two years ago, GoPayment offers a complimentary app and credit card reader to allow small businesses to conduct charges via their smartphones. GoPayment is available for iOS, Android and Blackberry phones.
GoPayment now offers two payment plans to choose from: For lower or intermittent credit card processing volume, Intuit offers a free credit card reader, no monthly fee; and discounted rates (2.7 percent for card swiped; 3.7 percent for both key entered and non-qualified transactions; $0.15 per transaction.) For higher credit card processing volume (recommended for more than a $1,000 per month), Intuit offers a free credit card reader; $12.95 monthly fee; and further discounted rates (1.7 percent for card swiped; 2.7 percent for key entered; 3.7 percent for non-qualified transactions, such as corporate cards; $0.30 per transaction).
That compares to Square, which has always offered a free reader with no monthly fee and currently charges 2.75 percent and $0.15 for swiped transactions and 3.5 percent and $0.15 for keyed-in transactions.
While Intuit is clearly growing in terms of usage and sign-ups, so is Square, which is unarguably a smaller operation with a lot of buzz. Fresh off a $27.5 million funding round, Jack Dorsey’s startup is expected to process $40 million in transactions in Q1 of 2011.
Clearly, this is a competitive space. What Intuit has in its favor is that it already has a built in small business network with users of its popular business applications, including Quickbooks, Quicken and TurboTax. And another player has joined—VeriFone entered the mobile payments arena with a deal with PayPal. Intuit is no doubt extending its free version because it is getting more traction from small businesses with a less-costly GoPayment product.
Perhaps Intuit should spring for a Times Square billboard.
1000Memories has raised a $2.5 million round led by Greylock Partners, with the participation of some high-profile angel investors including Caterina Fake, Ron Conway, Keith Rabois, Mike Maples, Paul Buchheit and Chris Sacca. Greylock’s David Thacker is joining the board.
1000Memories aims to be a site where loved ones can commemorate the lives of those that have passed away. Several sites have tried to do this, and previous attempts have come off as cheesy or morbid. 1000Memories has struck a chord with its stylish design, and its commitment to always offer the product for free without garish ads.
Obituaries are one of the only bastions of newspaper classifieds that haven’t been disrupted, Thacker says. In San Francisco, a basic obit can cost up of $1,500, and it’s a static, non-collaborative mention that only runs one day.
1000Memories’ timing couldn’t be better. Facebook and other social networks have brought people closer to people they’d fallen out of touch with, providing an efficient medium for communicating a death and for sending condolences and remembrances. And increasingly, those memories are already captured digitally, via photos, videos and emails. And as newspapers become increasingly irrelevant, it’s natural that there’s some solution for celebrating someone’s life online.
So while it’s easy to see that something like 1000Memories should exist in the world, the question is how long it will take to build a laudable service like this into a real business. Co-founder Jonathan Good stopped by our studios to talk about the news– unfortunately he didn’t come prepared with many details on what the funding means for the company or what the money would be used for. He also refused to give us any sense of how big the user base was or even any basic idea of how much the service has grown or how many tribute pages have been built.
It’s a shame, because those are key questions. Customer acquisition will be a challenge for the site, since most people don’t have a death in their families or communities several times a year. Given the emotional investment people make in 1000Memories, I hope the company will be a bit more forthcoming in the future.

I caught up with Bob Kimball and Peter Kellogg-Smith, respectively the chief executive and VP of emerging products at RealNetworks, at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona.
Like most people, I knew Real mostly from their media player and their former subsidiary Rhapsody (they still own 47 percent of that business), but I must admit I was only vaguely familiar with their other activities.
Kimball pointed out to me that the media player currently represents merely 10 percent of Real’s business, with the majority of revenues actually coming from products and services it provides to mobile operators worldwide and its booming casual gaming operations (already a $111 million business and growing).
At the Congress, the company, which significantly downscaled operations last year, previewed its new digital media management service Unifi. It hasn’t publicly launched yet, so I won’t elaborate too much about it, but suffice to say I think it could easily become a great, popular product, if they can get the pricing right.
Expect a full review of Unifi as soon as it launches.
Lots of hullabaloo about Apple’s iOS subscription product. The basics – everyone pays 30%, you can’t charge more on the iPhone for the product than you do on other platforms, and you can’t link out from the app to the browser to handle subscriptions without Apple being in the middle. It’s not even clear that apps will be able to just post a message telling people to create an account from their computer and then come back to their iPhone and use the app.
That’s all well and good for apps that have zero marginal costs. But for some content providers, specifically the music streaming services like MOG, Rhapsody, Rdio, etc., this is crushing. It effectively pushes them off the iPhone, iPad and other iOS devices. They’ve been keelhauled.
That’s because they don’t have 30% margins to begin with, the labels and publishers take somewhere around $8 of the $10 subscription fee. We saw Rhapsody balk at Apple earlier today. On Wednesday morning, we hear, most of the online music streaming services will be issuing a joint statement condemning the policy.
Does Apple’s move violate antitrust laws? The Wall Street Journal seems to think probably not. Of course, if Apple now launches their own music streaming service, that may change. Apple will be the only company that doesn’t have to pay Apple’s 30% subscription fee, so they’ll be the only company that can offer a $10/month music streaming service without losing money on every user.
How does this all play out? We hear the music labels are torn between waging an all out legal war against Apple and just capitulating and lowering their fees enough to keep the streaming services in business.
The problem isn’t that Apple is asking for 30%. It’s that the apps can’t charge more to cover those costs. In the end Apple may get what they’re asking for, but if they do it will only be because the labels cave and because Android has gained so much market share that Apple may be able to effectively beat an antitrust action.