Keeping it local

'Boycott Tesco' mural in BristolCampaigners in Stokes Croft, Bristol objected to the opening of a Tesco store in their neighbourhood
Related Stories

Campaigners are calling for greater transparency in UK planning law so communities are made more aware of new businesses opening in their area.

The Tesco Express which was the focus of riots in Bristol in April is still boarded up and has now been covered in graffiti.

“I love community,” has been daubed on one of the hoardings.

Another scrawled message reads “not welcome”.

For those who witnessed the disturbances in the Stokes Croft area of the city earlier this year, it is clear who the messages are meant for.

For years Stokes Croft has been a bohemian area, crammed with independent shops, squats, bars and clubs.

It is this individual character which some people felt would be compromised by the arrival of supermarket giant, Tesco, even in its smaller Tesco Express guise.

These objections were not confined to a few disgruntled squatters, say campaigners, who claim thousands of people sent postcards to Bristol City Council objecting to the opening of another supermarket, with thousands more signing a petition.

Much of the anger is directed at the planning process which failed to make it clear a new supermarket was on the cards.

The Tesco case prompted Bristol City Council to write to the Department for Communities and Local Government.

Vandalised Tesco store in BristolThe Tesco Express store in Stokes Croft remains closed after it was vandalised in April this year

Along with the London Assembly, they have called for a new ‘supermarket’ classification in planning law.

At present, express supermarkets come under the ‘A1’ classifiction which can cover any type of retail outlet – a vintage clothes shop, a hairdressing salon, even an undertaker.

The impact a new supermarket can have on an area, such as frequent deliveries from heavy goods vehicles, should put Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Lidl and the like, in a class of their own, say campaigners.

Professor Cliff Guy

“Despite the recession it’s hard to see any sign of the supermarket expansion slowing down”

Professor Cliff Guy Cardiff University

Bristol councillor, Alex Woodman, said “what we’re asking the government to do is refine the A1 class so that it distinguishes between, say, small local independent retailers and national chain stores, where the impact on the local area is potentially more significant.”

He told BBC Radio 4’s The Report, that had his committee known about Tesco’s interest, they would have given more consideration to the potential impact the store would have on the local area.

“Because we didn’t know that at the time, the council wasn’t able to consider the impacts and we were in a situation where planning permission was granted without any thought being given to them,” he said.

In response to Bristol City Council’s call for changes to planning regulations, the Department for Communities and Local Government said that it was not the role of the planning system to restrict competition, or give preference to one retailer over another.

Claire Milne, coordinator of the ‘No Tesco in Stokes Croft’ campaign, believes Tesco deliberately kept quiet about their intentions.

“We know from various people in the community that Tesco have been looking in this area for at least a few years,” she said.

Hear the full story on BBC Radio 4

You can listen to The Report on BBC Radio 4 on Thursday, 19 May at 2000 BST

Download the podcast Listen again on the BBC iPlayer Share your comments on this story on Twitter

“If they were genuinely being true to what they claim in their social responsibility report and on their website – that as soon as they identify a site they start talking and listening to the local community – then we would have heard from them.”

But Tesco’s head of property communications, Michael Kissman, says there was nothing underhand about the way Tesco went about setting up in Stokes Croft.

He said the original planning application was put in by the administrators of a comedy club, who were struggling to find someone to takeover the property.

“They were clear that the purpose of its change of use was to make it more marketable to future occupiers,” he said.

Mr Kissman told the BBC that Tesco had decided to invest in an area which had long been abandoned by other retailers, creating jobs and providing products and services.

Despite the campaigners’ plea for greater restrictions on supermarket chains, retail experts believe there could be a continued expansion in the number of supermarket convenience stores in the future.

Professor Cliff Guy, from the School of City and Regional Planning at Cardiff University, said “despite the recession it’s hard to see any sign of the supermarket expansion slowing down.”

Up until now it has mainly been Tesco and Sainsbury’s which have been opening smaller, convenience-style supermarket stores.

But Professor Guy believes fellow retail giants, Waitrose and Morrisons, have clear plans to develop more shops in this field and the current economic climate could make their ambitions easier to fulfil.

“In one sense the recession helps because it makes property more available and so there is more opportunity.”

“Despite worries about this, lots of planners will be quite receptive to [the supermarkets] because they want to see their town centres functioning properly – they don’t want empty shops.”

The Report will be broadcast on Thursday 19 May at 2000 BST on BBC Radio 4.

You can listen again via the iPlayer or download the podcast.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Queen’s sympathy for Irish people

The Queen

Live: The Queen is attending a state banquet at Dublin Castle where she will make her only public speech during the historic trip

The Queen is due at Dublin Castle for a banquet at which she is to make her only public speech of her Irish visit.

Earlier she visited sports stadium Croke Park in Dublin, where 14 people were killed by British forces during a Gaelic football match 91 years ago.

Gaelic Athletic Association president Christy Cooney said her presence “does honour to our association”.

On the second day of her visit to the Republic of Ireland the Queen also laid a wreath honouring Ireland’s war dead.

She is the first British monarch to visit the country for 100 years.

The Queen was met at the main entrance of Croke Park by Mr Cooney and President Mary McAleese, who is hosting the visit.

A display of Irish set dancing was followed by a meeting with GAA officials.

Addressing the Queen, Mr Cooney said the visit would underpin and advance the peace process and “go down in the history of the GAA”.

He said: “Your presence does honour to our Association, to its special place in Irish life, and to its hundreds of thousands of members.”

At the scene

On Tuesday, the Queen had laid a wreath in memory of those who died fighting for Ireland against her own country’s forces.

Less than 24 hours later, she was on the opposite side of Dublin for another memorial – this time, honouring Irishmen who fought and died for Britain in WWI.

Dignitaries, including the Northern Ireland First Minister Peter Robinson and many other representatives from the unionist community, looked on as the Queen laid a wreath of poppies.

A lone piper played a lament and the band the Last Post before the Queen went to look at the Roll of Honour – the names of 49,400 men who went to war for the crown and did not return.

He added that he was “deeply saddened” to attend the funeral of GAA member PSNI Constable Ronan Kerr last month.

The Queen was presented with a limited edition book outlining the GAA’s history, and Prince Philip was presented with a hurley stick and a sliothar (hurling ball), with the aside that he should use it “in the back garden”.

Dublin footballer Kevin Nolan, who was one of four players from across Ireland to meet the Queen at Croke Park, told Radio Ulster’s Evening Extra it was a “great honour” to represent the GAA at the event.

On 21 November 1920, during the War of Independence, 13 spectators and one player were killed when British forces opened fire at a football match at the home of Gaelic sports.

Earlier that day, IRA assassination squads had shot dead 14 suspected British intelligence agents in Dublin.

The BBC royal correspondent Peter Hunt said the Queen walking out on the hallowed nationalist turf at Croke Park represented “the once unimaginable becoming the norm”.

Her speech at Wednesday’s state dinner is likely to acknowledge past UK-Irish difficulties without offering an apology, he added.

The Queen has laid a wreath at the Irish War Memorial in Islandbridge.

The Queen laid a wreath at the Irish War Memorial in Islandbridge.

The Queen and Prince Philip were shown how to pour a pint of Guinness on their first stop of the day, but declined a taste of Ireland’s most famous export.

They then met Prime Minister Enda Kenny and were shown around government buildings in the capital.

The Queen then laid a wreath honouring almost 50,000 soldiers at the Irish National War Memorial.

The Queen’s attendance at the ceremony honouring the Irish soldiers who died in World War I reflects an aspect of history that has been troubling for her hosts.

For decades, when the focus of admiration was on the rebels who fought and died in the 1916 Easter Rising, the soldiers’ contribution went unrecognised.

“At the Guinness Storehouse Prince Philip leaned on the bar. Looked relaxed”

Peter Hunt Royal correspondent, BBC NewsFollow Peter Hunt’s coverage of royal visit Ireland correspondent Mark Simpson on Twitter

Northern Ireland First Minister Peter Robinson, who was among the dignitaries at the ceremony, said: “Everyone remembers the past but we have to look to the future, but there are clear indications as a society – in the UK and Republic – people are moving on.

“They want better relations and we are in a new era.”

In Dublin Castle, which used to be the seat of British rule, the monarch will deliver a speech in the same room where Queen Victoria once dined.

UK Prime Minister David Cameron will be present at the state dinner, after flying in and holding talks with the Taoiseach, Mr Kenny, on Wednesday evening.

Mr Kenny has said he wishes to discuss the release of UK government files on the 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings, in which victims’ relatives believe there was British state collusion.

At prime minister’s questions on Wednesday, Mr Cameron told MPs that the relationship between Britain and the Republic of Ireland “probably has never been stronger”.

“I think the scenes on our television screen last night of the visits that Her Majesty made, to heal the wounds of the past, but also to look to a very bright future between our two countries, are remarkable and hugely welcome,” he said.

The first day of the royal visit went smoothly, although there were some protests.

During the Queen’s visit to the Garden of Remembrance, in Dublin, riot police officers jostled with demonstrators at two separate protests on streets several hundred yards away.

The garden is dedicated to people who fought for Irish independence from Britain.

As the Queen, with President Mary McAleese alongside her, laid a wreath in the garden, the sounds of protesters could be heard and black balloons were released by some demonstrators.

Broadcaster RTE reported that 20 men had been charged with public order offences on Tuesday night in relation to the afternoon’s violence.

Early in the day it emerged that a pipe bomb found on a bus bound for Dublin on Monday had been made safe by the Irish army.

One of the country’s biggest security operations is in place for the Queen’s four-day visit.

President’s residence

The Queen and Prince Philip’s signatures on the visitors’ book at the official residence of the Irish president

Garden of Remembrance

Wreath-laying at the Garden of Remembrance, the Queen (left) with President Mary McAleese (right)

Trinity College

The Queen inspects the Book of Kells at Trinity College

–>

Government Buildings

The Queen signs the visitors’ book at Government Buildings, while meeting the Irish prime minister, on right

National War Memorial Gardens

Irish veterans meet the Queen and the Irish president at the Irish War Memorial Gardens

Guinness Storehouse

The Queen visited Dublin's Guinness Storehouse, where she was served a pint of Ireland's famous tipple.

The Queen is offered a pint at the Guinness Storehouse

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Huge rise in Brazil deforestation

Man made fires to clear the land for cattle or crops in Sao Felix Do Xingu Municipality, Para, Brazil - 2008Official satellite images shed a new light on the pace of deforestation
Related Stories

Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest has increased by almost six times, new data suggests.

New satellite images show deforestation has increased from 103 sq km in March and April 2010 to 593 sq km (229 sq miles) in the same period of 2011, Brazil’s space research institute says.

Much of the destruction has been in Mato Grosso state, the centre of soya farming in Brazil.

The news comes shortly before a vote on new forest protection rules.

Brazilian Environment Minister Izabella Teixeira says there is cause for alarm and has announced the setting up of a “crisis cabinet” in response to the news.

“Our objective is to reduce deforestation by July,” the minister told a news conference.

Analysts say the new figures have taken the government by surprise.

Last December, a government report said deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon had fallen to its lowest rate for 22 years.

However, the latest data shows a 27% jump in deforestation from August 2010 to April 2011.

The latest data comes amid a heated debate in the lower house of Congress on whether to ease an existing law on forest protection.

Observers expect the issue to be put before the Chamber of Deputies again this week.

Brazil’s Forest Code, enacted in 1934 and subsequently amended in 1965, sets out how much of his land a farmer can deforest.

Regulations currently require that 80% of a landholding in the Amazon remain forest, but that falls to 20% in other areas.

Proponents of change say the law impedes economic development and contend that Brazil must open more land for agriculture.

However, opponents fear that in their current form some of the proposed changes might give farmers a form of amnesty for deforested land.

The changes were put forward by Aldo Rebelo, leader of Brazil’s Communist Party (PCdoB) and backed by a group in Congress known as the “ruralists” who want Brazil to develop its agribusiness sector.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Pakistan ‘not aware of Bin Laden’

Defence Secretary Robert Gates (left) and Admiral Mike Mullen (right)Adm Mike Mullen (right) said it might take a while to find out if Bin Laden had Pakistani protectors

US officials have said there was no evidence indicating leaders in Islamabad knew Osama Bin Laden had been hiding in Pakistan.

But defence secretary Robert Gates said he believed “somebody” in Pakistan knew the whereabouts of the al-Qaeda chief.

Top military officer Adm Mike Mullen said it might take a while to find out if Bin Laden had Pakistani protectors.

Amid increasing pressure from US lawmakers, both men advised against cutting off aid to Pakistan.

In a joint news conference at the Pentagon, Mr Gates and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm Mullen said the US must continue to work with Pakistan and provide aid to the country.

But the officials said Pakistan must take action to eliminate the safe havens where militants are allegedly hiding along the border with Afghanistan.

Mr Gates said that though he believed “somebody knew” Bin Laden was hiding in the country, he had seen “no evidence at all” that the senior leadership knew before the raid.

“In fact, I’ve seen some evidence to the contrary,” he said.

The Pentagon has come under increasing pressure from US lawmakers to find out if Pakistan knew of Bin Laden’s whereabouts.

US intelligence agencies have been analysing notebooks, computer data and other materials taken from Bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad since it was raided by American operatives on 1 May.

Mr Mullen said the Pakistani military’s image had been tarnished by the US operation, which took place without the knowledge of the Pakistani government.

On Saturday, Pakistan’s parliament condemned the raid and called for an end to unilateral action within its borders, including attacks on suspected militants by US drones.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

US sanctions target Syria’s Assad

Bashar al-Assad (19 April 2011)President Assad has said the security forces made some mistakes in their handling of protests

The US is to impose sanctions on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for human rights abuses, sources have said.

It would be the first time Mr Assad has been targeted personally by the international community for his government’s crackdown on protesters.

President Barack Obama last month imposed sanctions on his brother Maher, his cousin and an intelligence chief.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Tuesday that the US would be taking “additional steps” against Syria.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Clubs urged to pay more to police

Aidan BurleyMr Burley said he is questioning why the taxpayer is subsidising wealthy football clubs

Premier League football clubs should pay more towards the cost of policing games, a Staffordshire MP has said.

Conservative MP for Cannock Chase Aidan Burley said as police funding is cut, top-flight clubs should make bigger contributions.

Clubs pay for policing inside and immediately outside grounds but forces cannot claim back what they spend on using extra officers for big matches.

West Midlands Police spent £2.2m policing the four top clubs in 2008-9.

Speaking at a debate at the House of Commons, Mr Burley revealed the figures which were obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

“The idea the taxpayer pays for the adverse affect is what I’m challenging”

Aidan Burley MP for Cannock Chase

He said last season West Midlands Police recouped £1.4m of the £2.2m it spent – but up to £722,232 of the cost of policing games was met by the taxpayer.

The force is looking to make a budget cut of £123m by 2014.

Large policing operations are put in place for certain games, including derby matches between Birmingham City and Aston Villa.

Last December, dozens were arrested and treated in hospital after a Carling Cup game between the two clubs.

At the debate, Mr Burley said the heavy police presence at such games costs more than flagship events like Wimbledon or rugby internationals at Twickenham.

He said: “The taxpayer is subsidising wealthy football clubs to the tune of millions of pounds a year and my simple question… is why?

Police filming hooligansTrouble has flared at several derby games in the West Midlands

“The idea the taxpayer pays for the adverse affect is what I’m challenging.”

But a spokesman for the Premier League said clubs should not be singled out.

Dan Johnson said: “There are lots of events in big cities like Birmingham, be they at the NEC, be they party political conferences which come to Birmingham on numerous occasions and that’s all paid for by the taxpayer.

“But I come back to the fundamental point that football is an industry and individuals who attend football matches have already paid for their policing.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Formula 1 enjoys bumper profits

F1 cars on starting gridThe racing teams will demand a bigger slice of F1 revenues during forthcoming contract talks

New analysis of the finances of Formula One motor racing has revealed the huge profits made by the sport’s owners.

The Formula Money report says that F1’s holding company made net profits in 2010 of $137.1m (£85m) after costs, which included paying race teams $658m.

It brings the net profits made since private equity firm CVC took control of F1 in 2006 to $1.22bn, the report says.

Formula Money’s release on Thursday comes amid speculation that potential bidders are circling F1.

CVC, which now owns 63.4% of F1’s Jersey-based parent company Delta Topco, made $87m from the sport in 2010, Formula Money estimates.

The remaining $50m in profits was split between investment banks and individuals who own the rest of Delta Topco, including Sir Martin Sorrell, boss of advertising giant WPP with a 0.3% stake.

And it brings to $800.8m the profits CVC has made in the five years since it paid $1.7bn for 69.6% of F1’s commercial arm, the report says.

Christian Sylt, who with colleague Caroline Reid publishes the annual dissection of F1’s finances, said that Delta Topco made revenues of $1.6bn last year, and $5.9bn over the five years. “It’s an astonishing return,” he said.

CVC bought majority control of F1 from Bernie Ecclestone’s family trusts and a group of investment banks. Mr Ecclestone remains the sport’s chief executive and a large shareholder in Delta Topco.

The analysis reveals that Mr Ecclestone and his family trusts have earned more than $148m in five years from their stakes in Delta Topco. The F1 ringmaster has also received $31m in salary.

The biggest single source of revenue last year was the race-hosting fees of about $567.5m, paid by governments and track owners to stage the events.

Owners of F1 parent firm Delta Topco63.4% CVC Capital Partners15.3% Lehman Brothers8.5% Bambino (Bernie Ecclestone’s family trusts)5.3% Bernie Ecclestone3.1% JP Morgan2.7% F1 directors1.0% Paddy McNally (F1’s advertising guru)0.7% Churchill Capital

The increase in profits came despite a small fall in television audiences to about 527 million last year, and a decline in ticket sales, which Mr Sylt attributes to an increase in prices.

He said that Delta Topco paid off $338.5m of debts – and $59.2m in interest payments – last year, leaving the holding company with about $2bn of debts.

Based on the latest figures Mr Sylt puts a $5bn-$7bn price tag on F1. “It’s at least worth that, and may be worth more to a determined buyer,” he said.

There has been a series of reports recently linking Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation as a possible bidder for F1’s commercial rights.

New Corp was rumoured to have sounded out a number of potential bid partners, most recently Exor, the Agnelli family’s investment vehicle, which indirectly owns Ferrari, F1’s star team.

However, Mr Sylt, business editor of the website pitpass.com, believes a News Corp bid is highly unlikely.

Firstly, News Corp, which owns television stations, would face regulatory hurdles, he said.

More significantly, he believes, the terms of the Delta Topco share structure and complex contracts with the racing teams make any attempt to buy the business extremely difficult.

“From what I hear from the inside, this idea of a News Corp bid is a non-starter. All it’s done is just focus attention on how valuable F1 is,” Mr Sylt said.

The contracts with the teams, called the Concorde Agreement, expire in 2012 and preliminary renegotiations have already started. “I think all this stuff about bids has a lot to do with a new Concorde Agreement,” he said.

Several team owners have already indicated that they would like a larger slice of revenues from F1’s commercial operations. The teams received $215.7m in 2006, rising to $658m last year.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Split over Airbus subsidy ruling

Airbus A380s under constructionThe decision is a major victory for the EU in its longest-running trade dispute with the US

Both the US and Europe have claimed victory after the World Trade Organisation (WTO) partly overturned an earlier ruling that Airbus received billions of euros in illegal subsidies.

Airbus chief executive Tom Enders said it was “a big win for Europe”, and the EU had won “on all key elements”.

However, US officials called it a “definitive victory” for their side.

They said $18bn in subsidies were still deemed to have broken rules and “caused serious prejudice” to US interests.

“We’re enormously pleased with these findings,” said Tim Reif, the US general counsel for trade, commenting on the latest decision in the longest-running transatlantic trade dispute.

“This report confirms for decades the European Union… [has] provided massive amounts of market-distorting launch aid and other subsidies that are inconsistent with WTO rules.”

However, Airbus’ Mr Enders claimed the decision meant Germany, France, the UK and Spain could continue providing funding for Airbus via public-private partnership arrangements.

“Congratulations to the EU for managing the case so successfully and winning on all key elements,” he said.

Earlier this month in a separate case, Boeing was found guilty of receiving over $5bn of unlawful subsidies from Washington.

Boeing and Airbus both put out press releases detailing why the decision represented a resounding victory for their side.

“This is a clear, final win for fair trade that will level the playing field for America’s aerospace workers,” said Boeing’s head, Jim McNerney.

In contrast, Airbus’ head of communications, Rainder Ohler, called on Boeing “to accept this legal defeat and end the masquerade”.

Meanwhile, the WTO warned the long-running dispute was not yet at an end.

“We realize that, after five years of panel proceedings and almost ten months of appellate review, there are a number of issues that remain unresolved in this dispute,” said the WTO in the conclusion to its 600-page report.

“Some may consider that this is not an entirely satisfactory outcome.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Sudan jets ‘bomb Darfur village’

Sudanese government paramilitary force in Darfur. Nov 2007The UN has been heavily involved in easing the humanitarian crisis in Darfur

Sudan has carried out an air strike on a village in the troubled western Darfur region, the UN says.

A team of peacekeepers is trying to enter the area of Sukamir in north Darfur to assess the damage, UN officials say.

If confirmed it would be the second Sudanese air strike in Darfur in three days.

The UN has accused pro-government Arab militias of a campaign of ethnic cleansing against non-Arabs in Darfur.

It says as many as 300,000 people have died, although Khartoum contests this.

Unamid, the UN mission in Darfur, said in a statement on Wednesday that warplanes on Tuesday had struck Sukamir, which is near Kuma, about 100km (60 miles) north of the main regional city of El Fasher.

It said a team had been sent to the area “to collect information on possible casualties and newly displaced persons”.

The statement added that UN flights to the regions of Shangil Tobaya, Fanga Suk and other regions in north Darfur had been suspended.

It said Sudanese officials had restricted the movement of aid workers in the region, citing security concerns.

On Sunday, Sudanese warplanes bombed the town of Labado and the village of Esheraya in southern Darfur, according to the UN.

It was not clear if there had been casualties.

Unamid head Ibrahim Gambari expressed concern over the air strikes.

“I call upon all parties to exercise the utmost restraint in the use of lethal force,” he said.

Sudanese President Omar Bashir is wanted by the International Criminal Court in The Hague on charges of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity relating to the conflict in the western Darfur.

He has dismissed the allegations.

South Sudan will become independent in July following a referendum in February. The vote followed years of conflict.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.