Errors this year have included impossible questions
Related Stories
A series of at least nine errors in this year’s GCSE, A-level and AS-level exam papers is “not an acceptable situation”, Prime Minister David Cameron has said.
He said England’s exams watchdog Ofqual would take the “toughest possible action” to stop further errors.
Ofqual said it was meeting with exam board heads and would launch an inquiry this summer.
Three more mistakes emerged on Tuesday, in AQA and OCR exam papers.
Both exam boards apologised for the mistakes, which affected OCR’s A-level physics and GCSE Latin papers, and AQA’s GCSE maths foundation paper.
Speaking at prime minister’s questions, Mr Cameron said he had discussed the issue with Education Secretary Michael Gove, who had spoken to Ofqual.
The qualifications regulator was “taking the toughest possible action to root out this failure and make sure it doesn’t happen again”, he said.
In a statement on Wednesday morning, Ofqual said it was “unacceptable” that candidates had faced fresh errors after exam boards had provided written promises that additional quality checks would take place after the first wave of errors.
“Our concerns are serious enough that our director of regulation is meeting with the chief executive of OCR today to understand how these recent errors occurred and to make sure, so far as possible, that there will be no more avoidable errors,” the statement said.
Regulators would be meeting on Thursday with heads of other exam boards and would “again ask for confirmation that there will be no more avoidable errors”, Ofqual said.
When the exams are over, full details of an inquiry will be announced, it said.
“We want to understand how this pattern of errors occurred, how errors remained after additional checks had been made and what needs to be done to prevent any recurrence of such avoidable errors.”
On Tuesday, a spokesman for the Department for Education said the latest errors were “completely unacceptable” and that Mr Gove was “angry”.
“He has said repeatedly that the exam system is discredited and action must be taken,” the spokesman said.
In the Latin GCSE error, a paper taken by up to 8,000 pupils contained three errors, representing 14 out of 50 marks.
An error in a question in the A-level physics paper, taken on Tuesday morning, meant that pupils were asked to answer a question which included incorrect units of measurement.
And a printing error on a maths GCSE foundation paper, also taken by pupils on Tuesday morning, had questions from a previous paper accidentally printed in the middle of it.
An OCR spokesman said the exam board was “deeply unhappy” about the latest errors. It said there would be an investigation, and jobs could be lost as a result.
AQA said it was sorry that the error had caused some students distress. It said the batches of papers that were checked were all fine, and it was investigating with its printer how the problem had arisen.
Six other errors in previous papers taken this year have included a multiple-choice question where all the answers were incorrect, and a question where the information needed to make a calculation was missing from the paper.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
It’s safe to assume the strip wouldn’t look like this
A “historic deal” paving the way for a united UK football team at the 2012 Olympics has been announced. But how will supporters used to celebrating rivalries between the home nations adjust?
It is, depending on your viewpoint, either a neighbourly display of unity or an affront the proud traditions of four nations.
The British Olympic Association has declared that it has struck an agreement with England’s Football Association over fielding teams at the 2012 Games.
It means that, for the first time since 1960, a team made up of players from all England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales nations could compete in the competition.
The football associations of the latter three have reacted angrily to the move, fearing that it puts their national sides’ independence at risk as well as complaining that they were excluded from the decision-making process.
But what has received less attention is the question of how exactly four distinct groups of supporters, each with their own identities, traditions and songs, are meant come together and put their rivalries aside.
Even the players are divided about the impact on their sense of nationhood. On the one hand, the Wales defender Gareth Bale has indicated that he will go against the wishes of the Welsh FA and play for Team GB, citing approvingly the example of the British and Irish Lions in rugby who “come together as a unit and play against other countries”.
Fan songsEngland: God Save the Queen, St George in My HeartScotland: Flower of Scotland, We’ll Be ComingWales: Hen Wlad Fy Nhadau/Land of My FathersNorthern Ireland: We’re not Brazil we’re Northern Ireland
The former Wales captain Neville Southall was, however, less sanguine, fuming: “What flag are they going to put up if they win it? [The] Union Jack? It’s not my flag. My flag’s a dragon.”
If the players are split, then the fans can be forgiven for experiencing an identity crisis of their own.
Mark Perryman, author of Ingerland: Travels with a Football Nation, says the fusion of supporters who are accustomed to decades of rivalry is the equivalent of asking north London’s opposing fans coming together to cheer on an “Arsenal Hotspur” side.
“It’s going to be a very strange tournament,” he says. “I don’t think there will be a public order problem. But I really can’t see many regular football supporters from the four nations showing much enthusiasm towards it.”
Sat alongside each other on the stands, the fans will not be able to draw on their usual songs or chants, he says. God Save The Queen may be a UK-wide anthem, but its line about crushing “rebellious Scots” means it is unlikely to be sung enthusiastically by many Tartan Army followers.
Likewise, it is difficult to imagine England fans joining in a rousing chorus of Flower of Scotland, which celebrates Robert the Bruce’s victory over England’s Edward II at the Battle of Bannockburn in 1314. “I’m really not quite sure what the protocol will be,” says Perryman.
Gareth Bale would be a likely choice
The colours worn by the squad and its followers is a potential minefield as well, he warns, with white associated with England, red with Wales and blue with Scotland.
Perryman suggests the best solution will simply be to, literally, drape the players in the UK’s flag.
“That’s one thing I can see working,” he says. “I’m a big enthusiast for the St George’s cross, but there’s quite a lot you can do with the Union Jack – it’s an iconic design. Just think of Oasis’s guitars and so on.”
All this fails, however, fails to answer the broader question of how exactly these long-standing rivals will cope with sitting alongside each other.
Former Scotland international Pat Nevin is one of those who was opposed to Team GB on the basis that it potentially threatened the long-term status of his former national side.
In principle, he says, he has no problem cheering on an all-British squad, which will comprise 18 players – 15 under-23s and three of “open age”.
But he suspects that most keen followers of football will be put off for reasons that have little to do with patriotic sentiment.
“Now that it’s going ahead, I have no problem getting behind a Great Britain team,” he says. “But the crowds who go to watch them won’t be the sort of fans who go along week in week out to see Motherwell versus Aberdeen with their scarves.
“They’ll be people who want to see the Olympics – which is fine. But I suspect most core football supporters will shrug their shoulders and go, ‘So what, it’s only an under-23s tournament.'”
If Nevin is right, all four sets of fans can unite around their shared apathy. And what could be more British than that?
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.