Adobe Offers 50 Percent Discount For Final Cut Pro Users Who Switch To Premiere Pro


As you may have heard, Apple’s new version of its video editing software, Final Cut Pro X, has received considerable backlash from users. And as Jim Dalrymple reports, video editing rival Adobe has been welcoming these disheartened Final Cut Pro users with open arms. Now Adobe is taking it one step further, announcing a formal ‘switching program’ for any Final Cut Pro or Avid Media users.

Adobe says that anyone who has purchased any version of Apple Final Cut Pro or Avid Media Composer and want to switch to Adobe’s video tools (Production Premium or Premiere Pro) will be eligible for a 50 percent savings on Adobe Creative Suite CS5.5 Production Premium or Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5.

Adobe has been pretty active in its marketing efforts towards disgruntled Final Cut Pro users. For example, the company has posted a number of ‘success stories’ of Premier Pro users who have made the switch.

Of course, not everyone hates the new version of Final Cut Pro, so it’s unclear how many ‘switchers’ Adobe will gain from the backlash. Also, check out Conan O’Brian weighing in on the Final Cut Pro X debacle.


Windows Phone Marketplace Reaches 25K Apps

Clearly the Android Market is growing rapidly, and there’s no reason to even mention the Apple App Store, which just breezed by the 100,000 iPad app marker. But we can’t leave the little guys out, especially when their growth is also relatively impressive.

Specifically, Microsoft’s Windows Phone Marketplace is reported to have passed 25,000 applications by a site that tracks the app store’s activity.

Read More


Windows Phone Marketplace Reaches 25K Apps

Clearly the Android Market is growing rapidly, and there’s no reason to even mention the Apple App Store, which just breezed by the 100,000 iPad app marker. But we can’t leave the little guys out, especially when their growth is also relatively impressive.

Specifically, Microsoft’s Windows Phone Marketplace is reported to have passed 25,000 applications by a site that tracks the app store’s activity.

Read More


Ricoh Plans To Expand Camera Business, Buys Pentax Brand From Hoya

Camera brand Pentax will soon have a new owner: Tokyo-based Hoya group, which purchased the brand in 2007, is ready to sell [notice of sale as an English PDF] it to Ricoh in October this year. According to Japanese business daily The Nikkei, the office equipment maker plans to pay an estimated US$124 million for Pentax.

Read more…


New UK Accelerator Launches With £1m Seed Fund, Borrows TechStars Model

Another day in Europe, another accelerator launched. The Difference Engine – an accelerator programme in the North of the UK we covered last year which borrowed heavily from the YCombinator/TechStars model – has itself ‘pivoted’, announcing a rejuvenation and a new name. The new Ignite100 will be a startup accelerator programme with a £1m fund that will invest up to £100k per team for ten teams later this year in the North East of England. The programme set for a September launch and will take applications from across Europe anywhere.


New UK Accelerator Launches With £1m Seed Fund, Borrows TechStars Model

Another day in Europe, another accelerator launched. The Difference Engine – an accelerator programme in the North of the UK we covered last year which borrowed heavily from the YCombinator/TechStars model – has itself ‘pivoted’, announcing a rejuvenation and a new name. The new Ignite100 will be a startup accelerator programme with a £1m fund that will invest up to £100k per team for ten teams later this year in the North East of England. The programme set for a September launch and will take applications from across Europe anywhere.


Adobe Offers 50 Percent Discount For Final Cut Pro Users Who Switch To Premiere Pro


As you may have heard, Apple’s new version of its video editing software, Final Cut Pro X, has received considerable backlash from users. And as Jim Dalrymple reports, video editing rival Adobe has been welcoming these disheartened Final Cut Pro users with open arms. Now Adobe is taking it one step further, announcing a formal ‘switching program’ for any Final Cut Pro or Avid Media users.

Adobe says that anyone who has purchased any version of Apple Final Cut Pro or Avid Media Composer and want to switch to Adobe’s video tools (Production Premium or Premiere Pro) will be eligible for a 50 percent savings on Adobe Creative Suite CS5.5 Production Premium or Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5.

Adobe has been pretty active in its marketing efforts towards disgruntled Final Cut Pro users. For example, the company has posted a number of ‘success stories’ of Premier Pro users who have made the switch.

Of course, not everyone hates the new version of Final Cut Pro, so it’s unclear how many ‘switchers’ Adobe will gain from the backlash. Also, check out Conan O’Brian weighing in on the Final Cut Pro X debacle.


Adobe Offers 50 Percent Discount For Final Cut Pro Users Who Switch To Premiere Pro


As you may have heard, Apple’s new version of its video editing software, Final Cut Pro X, has received considerable backlash from users. And as Jim Dalrymple reports, video editing rival Adobe has been welcoming these disheartened Final Cut Pro users with open arms. Now Adobe is taking it one step further, announcing a formal ‘switching program’ for any Final Cut Pro or Avid Media users.

Adobe says that anyone who has purchased any version of Apple Final Cut Pro or Avid Media Composer and want to switch to Adobe’s video tools (Production Premium or Premiere Pro) will be eligible for a 50 percent savings on Adobe Creative Suite CS5.5 Production Premium or Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5.

Adobe has been pretty active in its marketing efforts towards disgruntled Final Cut Pro users. For example, the company has posted a number of ‘success stories’ of Premier Pro users who have made the switch.

Of course, not everyone hates the new version of Final Cut Pro, so it’s unclear how many ‘switchers’ Adobe will gain from the backlash. Also, check out Conan O’Brian weighing in on the Final Cut Pro X debacle.


Ricoh Plans To Expand Camera Business, Buys Pentax Brand From Hoya

Camera brand Pentax will soon have a new owner: Tokyo-based Hoya group, which purchased the brand in 2007, is ready to sell [notice of sale as an English PDF] it to Ricoh in October this year. According to Japanese business daily The Nikkei, the office equipment maker plans to pay an estimated US$124 million for Pentax.

Read more…


Ricoh Plans To Expand Camera Business, Buys Pentax Brand From Hoya

Camera brand Pentax will soon have a new owner: Tokyo-based Hoya group, which purchased the brand in 2007, is ready to sell [notice of sale as an English PDF] it to Ricoh in October this year. According to Japanese business daily The Nikkei, the office equipment maker plans to pay an estimated US$124 million for Pentax.

Read more…


Bespoke Builder Reinvents Off-Road Icon

<< Previous
|
Next >>


FJ44_f1

<< Previous
|
Next >>

Perched on the edge of a cliff so steep and so high it feels more like you’re piloting a helicopter than a $140,000 custom truck, it’s actually reassuring to think that the vehicle you’re about to drive down it has more in common with pontoon boats, fancy fridges and expensive watches than it does most other land-bound transportation.

That’s because the vehicle you’re driving, thanks to overbuilt materials and construction, achieves a level of ruggedness only hinted at by other off-roaders’ aggressive looks. That vertical drop you’re staring it? This thing will walk you down in low range with your hands off the wheel.

It’s no coincidence that this completely bespoke vehicle looks like an old Toyota Land Cruiser. Jonathan Ward, the man responsible for both this vehicle and the Icon 4×4 company, also runs TLC, a Land Cruiser restoration specialist.

This new FJ44 is a four-door riff on Icon’s existing FJ40. The longer platform means more seats; up to six total, counting the foldaway rumble seats in the rear.

Ward has spent years driving old FJs (an internal designation for Toyota 4×4s and already legendarily capable vehicles) across rugged terrain. His experience has helped him realize the limitations of trucks built on stock platforms. So for his own built-to-order creations, he takes the principles of utility and simplicity to their logical extremes, even if that means looking outside the car world for his components.

“Most car bodies are as thick as coke cans,” Ward says, pointing out his 5/32-inch hand-crafted aluminum bodies. They’re built by a pontoon boat maker more accustomed to the needs of heavyweight party boats and are incredibly strong, rust proof and infinitely repairable. You could paint that body and it’d last a lifetime, but that’s not enough for Ward, who instead specs a rugged polyurea coating for the floor and underbody that should defy brush, rocks and the occasional rollover.

Not that rollovers should be a problem. Rather than build a ridiculous and precarious monster truck, Icon instead took an holistic approach, creating something that’s capable, but easy to drive. Ground clearance is a modest 12 inches, but the approach and departure angles are virtually vertical. While driving the Icon FJ44 in Texas Canyon, north of Los Angeles, I tackled the same rocky slope as a tube-framed, off-road only, purpose-built rock crawler, seemingly with greater ease.

Ease is a good word to describe what driving the FJ44 off-road is like. In an older FJ, you have to take care to keep your thumbs on the outside of the steering wheel; the wheels are jerked so hard side to side that you run a real risk of breaking bones just driving over difficult terrain. Not so with the Icon’s Caterpillar earth-mover-sourced wheel. Complete with power steering, you don’t need to watch your thumbs or even hold on, it’ll track straight and true over even the most difficult of obstacles.

Underneath, the Icon probably shares more commonality with that rock crawler than it does the original FJ. Engines are Corvette V-8s making 350 to 450hp. A five-speed manual transmission is standard, but an automatic (the same as that used by a Chevy Suburban) is optional. Brakes are gargantuan 6-piston, custom billet aluminum items designed to resist fade and bring the FJ’s 4,250 pounds to a halt, even on 55-degree-plus slopes.

Many of the rest of the Icon’s greasy parts are sourced from defense contractors or made to military spec. That helps with more than just toughness. The military’s philosophy of parts commonality comes with them, meaning that parts like the differentials can be replaced with off-the-shelf items you could find at any Pep Boys. Those replacements might not offer the same capability as Icon’s own, but they’d save a weekend if you needed to replace one a long way from your local handmade vehicle builder.

All those best-possible parts go a long way to justifying the $140,000 and up price tag. But Icon’s challenge is enabling customers to appreciate six-figure amenities in a vehicle that’s designed to allow water to flow through the removable doors, flooding the cabin during river crossings.

To that end, no expense is spared inside either. Those round air vents? Those are milled, anodized aluminum, not plastic. The transparent green sunshades? Lexan items from a Lear jet. The chunky steel handles that allow the windscreen to fold down are from a Sub-Zero fridge. The gauges are housed in an indestructible polymer developed by watchmaker Bell and Ross.

Perhaps the neatest detail, however, is the Chilewich material used for the seating surfaces. You’ve probably seen that adorning the tables at a fancy restaurant, where it resists stains and is easily washable. Here, its open weave allows the heated and cooled seats to work to their maximum efficiency and stands up to all the rocks, mud and dead animals likely to make their way inside an Icon vehicle.

All this talk of indestructible materials and military-grade hardware belies the most surprising thing about this ridiculously capable off-roader. The thing that sets this vehicle apart isn’t its ability to scale nearly any obstacle, it’s its ability to do that, then drive home on the highway in complete comfort.

At 6 feet 6 inches tall and 5 feet 5 inches wide, it easily dwarfs anything this side of an 18-wheeler. But sitting way up there, you’re air-conditioned, reasonably isolated from engine and road noise and operating a powerful, fast, nice-handling vehicle. That’s more than can be said for most sedans.

Because of the solid axles, strong wheels and big tires, an enormous amount of unsprung weight should negatively impact the ride. But it’s nearly as good as a modern sports car on big rims, and all that weight down low keeps the center of gravity relatively low, meaning the truck never feels as if its heaving side-to-side in corners.

And it just exudes rugged, old-school cool. On the paved canyon roads between the mountains and Icon’s headquarters north of Los Angeles, the FJ44 left every other SUV looking utterly weak and incapable, which is exactly what its buyers are paying the big bucks for.

WIRED Overbuilt to the point that every handle and switch prompts gasps of surprised delight. Quadruple the horsepower and double the torque of the 1966 Land Cruiser, with lower emissions. Apocalypse-proof capability in a package you could live with until the zombies rise. Built to order and made to measure, Icon builds you the truck you want.

TIRED Way, way outside our budget for off-road entertainment. Tackling difficult obstacles becomes almost too easy. You’ll still be able to hear the kids complaining at highway speeds.

Photos by Sean Smith/Wired.com

Onswipe Wants To Make Slate, Forbes And Your Website Feel Like A Native Tablet App

Onswipe, the publishing platform that allows any content site to create an app like experience on the iPad and other tablets, is coming out of beta this week and will be available to the public tomorrow at 3:00pm EST. With the launch Onswipe will also be adding former CNN president John Klein as an advisor.

Launching with partners like Hearst’s Marie Claire, Slate, Ziff Davis’ Geek.com and Extreme Tech, Thomson Reuter’s PE Hub, Forbes, Hollywood.com, StockTwits and advertisers American Express and Sprint, Onswipe promises clients touch device optimization in three minutes. All publishers and advertisers need to do to achieve a native app feel is pick and customize a layout, import content and then embed a piece of javascript into their site.

With tomorrow’s launch, OnSwipe will be unveiling its three pronged approach to tablet content viewing 1) Its publishing platform that lets publishers provide a fluid tablet-like experience to users. 2) An interactive ad platform that lets clients make money off of tablet-specific advertising and the Onswipe ad network. 3) A social platform that allows users to share and save content for later.

Says co-founder John Baptiste on the the motivation behind the startup’s tablet-centric approach this early on, “The tablet is the TV of this generation, and we’re letting publishers make their content look great on there, but also make money off of it. And lastly we’re saying, ‘Hey, if we have this new network of sites, how can we leverage that?’

Onswipe’s platform will allow publishers and advertisers to not only to add and customize content from article, but also from social media sources like Twitter, YouTube, Quora, Instagram, and Tumblr. In addition the launch will feature the addition of myOnswipe, an Instapaper-like offline reading service for sites in the OnSwipe network.

Baptiste tells me that Onswipe doesn’t charge companies for its publishing platform, and instead monetizes by taking a share of revenue from its ad platform, “We’ve already let publishers make more on the tablet than they have before.  It’s a significant amount,” says Baptiste.

Onswipe currently has $6 million in funding from Spark CapitalLightbankYuri MilnerLerer VenturesSV AngelBetaworksMorado VenturesENIAC VenturesThrive Capital and assorted angels.


Like+1 Turns Facebook Likes Into Google +1s

As what exactly the Google +1 Button does continues to mystify some users, security researcher Ashkan Soltani and Brian Kennish, former Googler and the mind behind Facebook Disconnect, have decided to kill two buttons with one browser extension, creating  Like +1.

Unlike the +Like extension, which allowed you to Facebook Like Google search results, Like +1 turns all offsite Like Buttons into hybrid Like+1 Buttons, allowing you to consolidate some of your social button clicking behavior into one click, so you can simultaneously +1 something while you also Like it.

In addition to saving you the exertion of clicking two different buttons and letting you view your Facebook Liking behavior on your Google profile, the extension saves all your Like+1 activity locally. So if you ever want to export a Facebook independent record of your Liking, or +1ing you’re good.

Like +1, compatible with Chrome, Firefox, IE and Safari courtesy of WebMynd, is great news for people who are suffering from button fatigue. Now you’ll only have to do 50% of the work and actually get to see the fruits of your labor in your Facebook feed.

“The web has too many buttons,” Kennish says. Yeah, just look at the top of this post.


Dropbox Security Bug Made Passwords Optional For Four Hours

This morning a post on Pastebin outlined a serious security issue that was spotted at Dropbox: for a brief period of time, the service allowed users to log into accounts using any password. In other words, you could log into someone’s account simply by typing in their email address. Given that many people entrust Dropbox with important data (one of the service’s selling points is its security), that’s a really big deal.

We’ve now confirmed with Dropbox that the service did have this issue yesterday — Dropbox says that it began after a code push at 1:54 PM PDT and was fixed at 5:46 PM PDT (they had the fix live five minutes after they discovered it). So, in total, the bug was live for around four hours.

The question now is how many people were affected. The company will be announcing that “much less than 1 percent” of users logged in during this time, and that all sessions have now been logged out as a security precaution. The team is now investigating if any accounts were improperly accessed, and says that anyone who was impacted will be notified.

Update: Here’s the company’s blog post, which just went live:

Hi Dropboxers,

Yesterday we made a code update at 1:54pm Pacific time that introduced a bug affecting our authentication mechanism. We discovered this at 5:41pm and a fix was live at 5:46pm. A very small number of users (much less than 1 percent) logged in during that period, some of whom could have logged into an account without the correct password. As a precaution, we ended all logged in sessions.

We’re conducting a thorough investigation of related activity to understand whether any accounts were improperly accessed. If we identify any specific instances of unusual activity, we’ll immediately notify the account owner. If you’re concerned about any activity that has occurred in your account, you can contact us [email protected].

This should never have happened. We are scrutinizing our controls and we will be implementing additional safeguards to prevent this from happening again.

-Arash

The issue was posted to Pastebin by Christopher Soghoian, who has previously criticized Dropbox for the company’s misleading description of its security practices (Dropbox used to claim that employees at the company had no way of viewing user files, but in reality a small number of them do have administrative privileges). Soghoian didn’t discover the password issue himself — it was relayed to him and he anonymized the email exchange.

Security scares are the last thing Dropbox needs. The company has seen very strong growth over the last year and is rumored to have a valuation that may be as high as $1.5 or 2 billion. But all of this growth is contingent on people trusting the service — the whole point is that you’re mirroring your most important and most frequently-accessed files between multiple computers. If people start worrying that their Excel spreadsheet or banking data or private IMs could be exposed, they’ll turn elsewhere.

Most people probably don’t care if Dropbox employees could conceivably access their files (after all, the same is true at Google and Facebook). But an authentication system that’s accepting the wrong password? That’s something that anyone can understand (and get scared about). I love Dropbox and have been using the service for years now, but gaping security holes like this simply aren’t acceptable — especially when there are other services that offer similar functionality. Even if nobody accessed my account (which is probably the case), the fact that this could happen is unnerving.

Here’s one of the email messages posted to Pastebin that describes the issue:

Hi Chris,

If you’re still involved in the dropbox investigation, there was an interesting development this afternoon. I found I was able to log into my account using an incorrect password, and on further investigation I found I could log in and access files on any of the three accounts I tested (mine and two friends’) using any password.

This is corroborated by the admittedly-thin dropbox tech support thread below.

So evidently they fail open when auth is busted, or sometimes they roll dev code, or….? This has me really bummed because I just “fixed” my exposure to website password theft by generating gnarly passwords with keypass and storing them on dropbox. Sigh.

And here’s a response that, according to the Pastebin post, came from Dropbox CTO Arash Ferdowsi:

Arash Ferdowsi, Jun-19 06:08 pm (PDT):

hi XXX,
there was a very brief glitch and this should never happen/be possible again. thanks for the email.

Information provided by CrunchBase


Color Me Badd

Come inside, take off your coat
I’ll make you feel at home
Now let’s pour a glass of wine
‘Cause now we’re all alone.

The opening lines of Color Me Badd’s seminal “I Wanna Sex You Up” sort of perfectly encapsulates Color — the company/photo-sharing app, not the band. After one of the most-hyped launches in recent memory, it was supposed to be the app that changed proximity-based sharing. Instead, it was an app used to share a lot of drinks, often with yourself or one other person.

Unfortunately, also like the song, it was all foreplay. No sex. And now even Color is admitting that.

In an interview with The New York Times over the weekend, Color founder Bill Nguyen essentially admits defeat — at least with regard to their eponymous first app. This follows our story from last week that co-founder Peter Pham had left the company. While we had heard conflicting stories about the exit, Nguyen doesn’t beat around the bush, telling NYT that Pham was fired.

Whether Pham was a fall guy or not doesn’t really matter. What does matter is that Color has to figure out what the hell they’re doing now. NYT suggests they know:

Mr. Nguyen outlined an ambitious plan to compete with Apple, Google and Facebook by tying together group messaging, recommendations and local search, all while making money through advertising.

If you thought the initial Color idea was crazy, this must sound absolutely insane. Talk about setting a high bar! Color will apparently release such an app later this summer. The original photo-sharing idea? That has likely been totally scrapped.

But the truth is that I’m not sure that a lot of people thought the original Color idea was all that crazy — they just ran head-first into a poor initial experience. And that was compounded by the almost comically absurd $41 million pre-launch funding round.

Fundamentally, there’s still an interesting concept there. Using the location element baked into all of our smartphones to automatically create implicit networks is something that we’re going to keep seeing startups working on. Others, like Yobongo, are already working in this space as well.

I’m still not convinced that if Color had simply launched a couple weeks earlier, at SXSW, it wouldn’t have been a hit (for that week, at least). Certainly, it would have been the perfect environment to showcase the impressive technology being utilized behind the scenes. Instead, the app ran into the problem where early-adopters were often trying it out with no one around them.

It often looked like ghost town. And because of that, that’s exactly what it became.

Imagine for a second if Foursquare hadn’t launched at SXSW a few years ago. The early-adopters would have booted it up for the first time and not seen any friends checking in around them and would have wondered what the hell the app was good for? Foursquare has since expanded the product to add a lot more value. But remember that at first, there weren’t deals or recommendations — there was just the check-in (and yes, the badges and game element related to it).

Further, while this isn’t a popular sentiment, I actually quite like Color app itself. I completely agree that the initial version had some major UI/UX issues, but the more refined version is actually pretty slick. It’s well-made. It’s fast. It’s not like these guys are a bunch of jackasses who took $41 million and built nothing. So part of me is sad that it’s already time to die.

At the same time, there’s no denying that the $41 million was jaw-dropping. But I also thought the company was being unfairly pre-judged because of that. As Nguyen tells the NYT, they took that much money because they could. He’s had success in the past when he’s had a lot of capital to work with. Had the company raised the $14 million they originally intended to, people would have buzzed, but we would not have seen the same level of backlash.

I’m just not sure how you can hold that against the entrepreneurs. An insane amount of pre-launch funding is on the investors. For whatever reason, Sequoia wanted to put in $25 million by themselves. Maybe Color shouldn’t have accepted all of it, but again, Nguyen has had success doing just that in the past. Kids don’t turn down candy. It just doesn’t happen.

So now we move into the really interesting time for Color. They’re essentially working with a gun against their head. Working on an app, mind you, that’s going to be a Facebook/Apple/Google-killer. Or something.

The mulligans are over. They’ve still (hopefully) got $35 million+ in the bank, but that won’t save them if they flop in a similar manner.

They really need to sex us up this time.

Information provided by CrunchBase