Spotify Will Launch In The US Tomorrow Morning (It’s About Time)

After tons of teasing, speculation and harsh ribbing on our part, it looks like beloved digital music service Spotify will be available invite-only tomorrow morning in the US.

The pricing is now set at $4.99 a month on the web and $9.99 a month on mobile in addition to an ad supported free plan which includes a limited amount of songs. Peter Kafka is reporting that the free plan will limit users to 20 hours a month.

After so much backtracking, how are we 100% sure that tomorrow’s the day? The following email from the Spotify PR people:

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Angie Newman

Date: Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:44 PM

Subject: Spotify Will Launch in the U.S. Tomorrow

To: Angie Newman

Cc: Alison Bonny

New York, July 13, 2011 – Spotfy [sic] the award-winning digital music service loved by millions of Europeans, will become available tomorrow morning in the United States by invitation and subscription. Spotify is a new way to listen to and manage your music, discover new tracks and share songs and playlists with friends – music whenever you want it, wherever you are.

Be one of the first people in the U.S. to experience Spotify by signing up at www.spotify.com.

Spotify will announce more details at 8:00 AM EST.

-Ends-

Well there you have it. Stay tuned!


InMobi: 78 Percent Of Mobile Ads In North America Are On Smartphones

Mobile ads in North America are reaching an inflection point. In the second quarter of 2011, 78 percent of total mobile ad impressions on ad network InMobi were on smartphones (as opposed to older feature phones), up from 67 percent in the first quarter, according to a new report it is putting out. “We expect 90% of ads by end of Q4 on a smart platform,” says VP of global research and marketing James Lamberti. And half of those ads will be inside apps.

Total mobile ad impressions in the U.S. grew 40 percent, driven by the 65 percent growth in smartphone ads. Globally, the percentage of smartphone ads was much smaller, only 38 percent, up from 32 percent in the first quarter.

InMobi, which served 18.7 billion mobile ads in North America in the second quarter, also reports on the breakdown by OS. Android leads with 33.2 percent, but it lost share to iOS which grew to 29.3 percent (RIM has 13.9 percent, also down). In January, Android had 37 percent share and iOS had 23 percent.


InstaEarth Puts The World’s Instagram Photos On The Map

Modea, a digital advertising agency focused on design and technology, claims not only to help its clients build their brands (and advertise) but also to “make and design things they would use themselves”. While this is always a good litmus for a new product or business, you’ll have to excuse my cynicism, but coming from an advertising agency, statements like these are questionable. But, that being said, it’s great to see that Modea is an agency that builds products and apps, tinkering right alongside the companies whose brands they help to hawk. What’s more, they’ve built something today, called InstaEarth, that Instagrammers may very well find usable themselves.

Instagram is fairly popular these days; the app hit 5 million users back in June and have been adding 625,000 users every month since launch. They seem to be doing with four people what Color couldn’t do with $41 million by focusing on providing a killer visual experience for their users. As my colleague MG Siegler made mention of, part of the reason they’ve been able to do this with such a small team is that they’ve focused on the mobile app and API, allowing developers to fill in the holes and help create the rest of the user’s experience.

So, if Instagram is an app that allows “users to tell the story of their lives in a visual way”, InstaEarth is an app that visualizes the story of Instagram users worldwide — in map form. And it’s trying to be more than just another Google maps mashup. I’ll let you decide whether they’ve succeeded in this endeavor, but so far, I’m impressed.

But, how in the sam heck does it work? InstaEarth allows you to navigate and explore Instagram photos on a global map layout, showing photos on the map in the location they were taken. (Though, of course, you have to connect the app to your Instagram account for it to have real useful application.) Users can organize the visual experience based on the popularity of the photos, the proximity to their current location, their own photos, photos of friends, etc.

Users can zoom into any location on the map and view photos nearby taken by any other Instagram user, or enjoy the voyeurism inherent to clicking on any Instagram user and then viewing every location in which they’ve taken a photo. Slightly creepy? Maybe. Kinda cool? Yes. Of course, Instagram users have the option in the app’s settings to decide whether or not to share publicly at scale, so if you’re not the sharing type, not to worry.

InstaEarth creators and Modea creative developers Chris Allnutt and Nathan Dicken have been Instagram users since they beginning, they say, and had long wanted to see a feature that allowed a more exploratory dimension to seeing the world through other Instagram users’ eyes. They’re off to a pretty good start, though there are some tweaks needed in the web interface. But so does TechCrunch. The founders said that they have plans to add UI enhancements soon, as well as a slide show view, “official” iPad mobile web support, realtime updates, search, and deeper integration with Google Places API.

Alnutt said that his young son will get up every morning, eager to follow the travels and photography of users around the map. While this may not be the motivation you’re looking for, it is fun to play with, if not to wake up to.

Check it out here and let us know what you think.


Dual-Core, Android-Powered Motorola Photon 4G To Hit Sprint On July 31st At $200

Hey, look at that! Just a month after Sprint and Motorola announced the beastly, dual-core, Android-powered Photon with the uber-vague launch window of “sometime in Q3″, they’re back at the well with proper launch details.

If all goes as planned, the Motorola Photon (fancy kickstand an all) will be hitting Sprint’s stores on July 31st for the totally reasonable price of $200 on a 2-year contract.

The Motorola Photon Specs:

  • 1 Ghz, Dual-core Tegra 2 CPU
  • 4.3″ qHD (960×540) display
  • Comes with Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) out of the box
  • 3G and 4G (WiMax) friendly
  • Sprint’s first “Global” WiMax phone — it runs on Sprint’s (CDMA) 3G and WiMax here in the states, but works on GSM internationally
  • Compatible with Motorola’s accessory docking system, a la the AT&T Atrix. It’s not clear yet if it plays friendly with the Laptop Dock system, though, as Sprint/Motorola only mention the TV Multimedia Dock and the Car Dock. That’s okay, though, because the Laptop Dock is hella stupid.
  • Dual cameras: 8 megapixels on the back, with a VGA resolution (sneaky way of saying 0.3 megapixel) front facing camera
  • 16GB of on board memory, with support for microSD cards up to 32 gigs
  • Bluetooth 2.1
  • 802.11b/g/n WiFi
  • Plus, it has that super sweet kickstand, which usually isn’t Motorola’s thing


Ad.ly In Play As Social Sites Look For Celebrity Connections

Ad.ly is an advertising platform that pairs advertisers with celebrities. For $1,000 to $200,000, an advertiser can get one of a thousand celebrities to publish a sponsored message, usually on Twitter. The company has raised $5.5 million, has sixteen employees, and has sold 26,000 paid endorsements in the last year and a half.

The company occasionally pops up in the news. They were banned from Facebook, for example, and they were right in the middle of the whole Charlie Sheen is now on Twitter thing.

But for the most part, Ad.ly has been quietly operating out of their Beverly Hills headquarters without a ton of notice in the tech press circles. But suddenly there’s a lot of interest in them. And multiple sources have told us that a handful of companies are looking to buy Ad.ly.

The value of Ad.ly isn’t really in the paid endorsement revenue. What buyers are looking at are the company’s deep ties with a ton of celebrities. And the fact that a lot of celebrities looking to get involved on Twitter start by calling the company and asking for advice.

Those relationships are hugely valuable. To companies like Twitter, who owe much of their success to celebrities embracing the product. And to companies like Google, who are looking for celebrities to jump start growth at Google+.

Although neither are confirmed potential buyers, our guess is they and others are among those taking a look. And don’t be surprised if one of them, or someone else, acquires the company sometime soon.


With T-Mobile Name ID, You’ll Know Whose Call You’re Ignoring

You know what’s really annoying? Calls from numbers you don’t have stored in your contacts. If you don’t answer, you could end up missing out on a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, or getting some much-needed good news. If you get brave and answer, you could end smack-dab in the middle of a conversation that you never wanted to have in the first place.

Landlines have long been spoiled with Caller ID, and now T-Mobile customers will be equally privileged, as the carrier has introduced “Name ID.”

It’ll be available for free for the first ten days, and after that cost $3.99 per month. As of right now, the service is only available on the Samsung Exhibit 4G and the forthcoming myTouch 4G Slide.

[via TmoNews]


Hold Your Applause: Ovation Lets Your Live Audience Rate You In Real Time

Uh oh. Now you’ve done it. You’ve lost your audience. The crowd that was once hanging on your every word and gasping for breath between laughs is now sending back nothing but vacant stares. A few people just snuck out the back door, and you’re pretty sure that dude in the back row is snoring. Where, oh where, did things go so wrong?

A new app called Ovation is trying to help productions of all sorts (both live and online) figure out exactly where things start to suck, with a tool much like that used to gauge audience responses to TV pilots. It requires no downloads, and no sign-ups on the user’s part. Oh, and it’s totally free right now.

The idea is simple. So simple, in fact, that it’s easily described in two pictures.

First, you create a URL for your event. You give your audience that URL, which they load up on their smartphone. This is what they see (here’s an interactive demo):

Members of your audience then use the on-screen slider to provide feedback. If they’re loving a certain section, they slide the bar up. If they hate it? They slide it down. Simple. There’s no signup process, and, as it’s a web app, it works across a ton of smartphones and mobile devices without any sort of installation.

As the event unfolds, users see a real-time time line of their feedback thus far, with a second line showing the averaged response of everyone participating. After the event wraps up, you can peruse all of the feedback data in an interactive, second-by-second plot graph (demo here) like the one below:

The whole thing is executed well, and the idea itself is great… if they can get people to use it. Though the horribly impolite patrons of my local theater tend to forget it, there’s quite a stigma around busting out your phone during events (mainly because that bright screen is like a little tiny flashbang grenade when used in a dark theater). Even if the folks behind the production request that people provide live feedback, I’d imagine some folks would innately hesitate to do so.

Another bit they might consider tweaking: it might be nice for the second line — the one that shows the average opinion of all participants — to be optional as set by the event coordinator. If user A loves something but sees that everyone else hates it (or vice versa), they might taper their response a bit for sake of going with the grain.

The whole service is entirely free during this initial beta phase, but it’s also currently limited to 10 simultaneous responders per event. Need a bigger sample group? The team says they’re willing to help out.

Not much of a live performer? Prefer to sit in front of your webcam with your bed sheet pinned to the wall and rant about why Ryan totally should have been kicked off of So You Think You Can Dance? Ovation also has an online video version of their tool, which applies the same gauging tools to videos posted on Youtube, Vimeo, or through their standalone player.

So, the big question: would you use it?


Not So Crazy Rumor: Amazon To Release An Android Tablet And Two New Kindles This Fall

The fabled Amazon tablet: Oh how you tease us so. You come from the maker of the world’s most beloved ereader and are said to run the versatile Android OS. (hopefully skinned, though) But there’s just so much we don’t know about you. When are you coming? How much are you going to cost. What’s your name? Are you even real?

The Wall Street Journal thinks it’s real. In fact they just named October as the release month and state new Kindle models are coming soon, too. Details are understandably on the light side, but there are some interesting specs concerning the tablet: 9-inch screen, no camera, and running an unnamed Android release. Doesn’t sound like an iPad killer to me.

Chances are it won’t be positioned as an iPad killer but more as a Nook Color competitor with a major focus on the Amazon marketplace. Amazon has made a big push over the last year to bolster and better position its streaming video content. A tablet would be a great outlet for that service.

The same WSJ report states that Amazon is prepping two new Kindle models. This is less of a surprise giving that the current Kindle is nearing its first birthday. Reportedly, two Kindle versions are on tap: a low-cost retooling of the current version and then a high-cost touchscreen model. (sigh)

Still, you may want to keep your current Kindle 3G away from ebay for the time being. As likely as this report is, it’s still a rumor until Bezos does his best Steve Jobs impression and unveils the Amazon tablet to the world.


Is Nothing Sacred? First Broadway Cam Surfaces

It seems the the Book of Mormon is one of the first Broadway musicals to receive the popular pirate treatment. As of yesterday, there was a bootleg version of the show floating around the sharing sites complete with instructions on how to improve your watching experience.

A bootlegger shot the show in March, 2011 on a video camera, thereby assigning it the BROADWAYCAM moniker – a CAM being a video shot surreptitiously by a pirates. Ironically, one could say that the rise of bootlegging came with the recording and distribution of live shows by audio-savvy bootleggers, leading to the regency of the Grateful Dead and other jam bands. Thus far, however, Broadway shows have been immune to this kind of wholesale theft although I suspect the next show to get this treatment will be that Spiderman musical.

To be fair, Book of Mormon is a perfect storm of pirate-able performance. The provenance, the hype, and the creators all make this a must-see in the geek set and the fact that tickets are sold out and that the only performance in New York will encourage folks to download it. While I doubt Cats or Mama Mia! will ever get a bootleg, I’m surprised the Monty Python musical didn’t show up as a shaky cam on the Interwebs a few years back.


College2Startup Wants To Connect Startups To The Best Young Talent (And Vice Versa)

Those media experts among us may be familiar with “Help A Reporter Out”, or HARO, which brings reporters and bloggers to quotable sources, and helps small businesses promote their brands. It’s an interesting, if not completely proven, model. Now, what if you apply that model to startups, and the startup hiring process? This was Tolu Babalola’s thinking when he created College2Startup, a resource for startups looking to find quality collegiate or postgraduate talent.

Startups are always looking for talent, and it’s not unusual to see established companies acqu-hire a startup just to get access its talent. In fact, Mark Zuckerberg is making a company out of it. But, that being said, it’s no easy feat to find talent that is the right fit for your startup, especially with all the white noise coming out of sites like CareerBuilder, Monster, and Craigslist.

In creating College2Startup, Babalola did some quick surveys of those currently employed at startups and found that nearly two-thirds of them were hired based on referrals by friends, former colleagues, etc. It would stand to reason, then, that it can be pretty difficult for undergraduates and recent graduates to find openings at startups if they don’t happen to know someone who’s already inside.

Thus, College2Startup allows prospective employees to subscribe to a daily newsletter (that Babalola curates) to receive job opportunities. College2Startup’s daily newsletter is opt-in and meant to target only those that have job-specific talent. When a prospective employee receives the newsletter, he or she can scroll through the list of job openings to find the opportunity that best suits them, and click to apply right from the newsletter. And, once a user has signed up, they can filter results from jobs listings as well.

Of course, the model may not sound particularly mind-blowing, as sites like Mediabistro (and many others) offer the ability to get tailored email alerts for the types of jobs you’re looking for, and you can apply straight from those emails. So, while opt-in and apply-straight-from-an-email are cool features, the founder says that what distinguishes College2Startup is in how it treats the application process. The questions that companies ask prospective employees on the big job sites tend to be generic, and they don’t do a great job of finding out what the applicant’s specific skills are.

Babalola said that he wants to get the interview process rolling right from the first application, which is why candidates are asked questions about their specific skill sets. Once the user has clicked the “apply to” link in the email, for example, they are taken to an application page in which Babalola has arranged a series of questions he knows startups will be eager to see the answers to, before calling the applicant in for the interview. If the job is for a backend developer at Groupon, for instance, candidates will be asked questions like, “What languages do you code in?”, or asked to talk about (and provide links to) sites they’ve built in the past, links to their GitHub profile, or even provide a video introduction.

Babalola said that he thinks sending the answers to these questions directly to startups can help streamline the process and get the ball rolling faster, so that startups have a relevant sneak-peek at prospectives before interviewing. It also helps limit the often labyrinthine application process inherent to larger sites.

But the big goal with College2Startups, the founder reiterated, is to target a younger crowd that is desperate to work at a startup but may not yet have connections or people to refer them. While this may sound silly or even alien to talent in Silicon Valley, outside of the Bay Area, things aren’t quite so easy. “When I graduated”, Babalola said, “I looked for startup jobs everywhere and really struggled to find for 6 months before a friend referred me to a friend who knew someone. The same is true in my local Baltimore startup meetups. There is a lot of promising talent that doesn’t know where to find startup jobs”.

While I’m all in favor of resources targeting startups specifically and young talent that might go undiscovered otherwise, a potential drawback to College2Startups is that it charges $100 to startups that want to post a job on the site. InternMatch, which we wrote about back in April, charges a similar fee, while Internship.com is free and Urban interns charges $40. Yes, College2Startup is targeting real jobs, and not internships, but startups aren’t always flush with cash — every penny counts.

Another somewhat comparable and cool service to check out is RescueTime Introductions, which is like a CarFax for job candidates, and also targets startups and the tech industry. (In fact, College2Startups may be more similar in conception to Jobby, which the RescueTime guys sold to Jobster in 2006.)

College2Startups is obviously still in the very early stages, though it has racked up over 3,200 subscribers in lead up to the first newsletter, which went out last week. Check it out, and let us know what you think.


OMG/JK: Yes, Of Course You’re In My ‘Friends’ Circle. Swear.

Hey, we’re here for a new episode of OMG/JK? I am Jason Kincaid in New York.

And I am MG Siegler. As you can see this is a little bit different. Jason abandoned ship and moved to New York. So this is how we’re gonna do it, split screen now, I guess, which is kinda cool. You’ve got a nice bloody hamburger in your background. That’s pretty awesome.

Could reach over and pat you on the head, almost.

And I’m sitting in your old seat so this is…

Yeah.

This is kind of interesting. But let’s dive into what we’re actually going to talk about. All right. Let’s do this.

First thing is Google+. This was finally announced. This is Google’s, of course, big social strategy. We’ve known a bunch of things that have been sort of involved in this for a while. We’ve leaked some things, but now it’s all together and actually out there in the wild and people have been playing with it for a little over a week.

So what are your initial thoughts on it?

So, I think it’s way better than what everyone was expecting. I think that Google has built something that’s pretty compelling here. It doesn’t have any clear privacy issues, the UI is much better looking than much Google products are. I think it’s still too early to say whether or not this is something people are going to stick with think it’s got all the, the tech people love it.

But they tend to love anythings that new and that they have early access to. So I think it’s going to be another 60 days or so until we see if it really has staying power.

Yeah, I agree. I mean, right now we’re seeing what we see with many services when they initially launch, is that almost everyone on it seems to be talking about Google plus. They are not actually using it as they might use another social network, you know, twitter, facebook or whatever they talk about, daily things, regular things that hopefully I’m sure what Google wants to be able to talk about right now it’s all Google Plus.

And the one thing that I’ve noticed about it I usually do like a lot too. I think that it’s way above like the expectations were which is not saying much because they were so low giving what happen with Buzz and to some extent Wave and some of the other things that they’ve done. But the one thing I will say is I really am not sold on the Circles idea.

I like the the concept of it and I like how you have to kind of use it in order to first, initially set up Google Plus. You know, you have to drag someone into at least, like, one circle to be able to follow them but I’m not just sure that a lot of people are going to end up using that. We’re already seeing right now, everyone is posting to public and maybe that’s because there’s not that many people on the service, but I don’t know if that’s not going to be the way it always is.

Part of the reason why people are posting in public, I think a lot of the people that we’re following tend to be those those people all go on twitter and so on, but I think you are right, as far as the circle model. I think it is really complex relative to what people are used to and, you know, Facebook did launch friend lists, which are very similar to what circles are.

Now, they did that years ago and people didn’t use them. And part of that is probably a UI issue that the wasn’t so true as this far as building on the list and the incentives to do so wasn’t really made that apparent but at the same time I think there’s a reason why Facebook has never moved to emphasize it despite the fact that they’re getting all this privacy criticism over all these years and that’s because it’s pretty confusing.

I mean, by and large, I think all Google the way Plus approaches falling is very confusing. You don’t necessarily have to understand how it works uses the surface? But the notion of, “I’m following someone and they’re sharing with me and it’s my incoming stream.” It’s just all very.

That’s very, I totally agree. That’s totally confusing, like, when you compare this to Facebook groups, which is, you know, the newer group thing that they launched last year, you know, some would say to get out ahead of ask his people knew that this kind of thing was coming from Google. If you compare to that, it’s really interesting and I think Zuckerburg mentioned this in a press conversation and talk about that in a little bit, but, it’s,it’s the concept of the circles with the following.

I can share something to a bunch of people in my circle but they don’t realize that they’re in that circle so when they share back not sharing to that same people in that circle. And that’s totally different from what a Facebook group is which is where everyone knows everyone else is in that circle.

So I think that that’s kind of a complex thing that they really need to figure out how that’s going to work.

I think that’s the case, I think the use case for groups versus circles is still different so I don’t know if there’s going to be too much, I’ve seen one criticism of circles that I actually ran into is that, when you post something, even if you make it public, you don’t necessarily realize that anyone is going to be able to comment on that post, so you start getting comment like I’ll post a a goofy Justin Bieber fragrance commercial.

Allright. I don’t mean, that’s also interesting too, because they’re in many ways this reminds me a lot of FriendFeed the way it was and still is but no one uses that anymore, but it’s like, you know, you’ve got this stream of stuff. But it’s a little bit better because FriendFeed was dominated by tweets coming in and Google Plus doesn’t allow you to do that, so it’s focused on things that people actually want to share which is good and that will lead to more interaction, I think on the content itself but the notion that when comments if bubbles backup to the top, it’s really starting to annoy people.

I mean, I look at it and I see the same content over and over again.

Well, also the fact that everyone can comment like, I guess, this is my fault because I share it publicly, but it’s still sort of a jarring moment when you share something that you think is goofy and then some random person starts criticizing your post.
Yeah.

Wait, this wasn’t what I was going for when I shared this.

And the idea, and I know they’ve changed this now, they have a drop down thing to be able to lock this feature but anyone can re-share something that you’ve shared. So it’s like, you can share it with a specific circle of people, but if someone else shares it with another circle, it’s like, then who knows who’s commenting? Who knows who’s seeing it. It’s really kinda weird. And they did fix that, and their, so their credit, their doing a great job I think of tweaking things on the fly.

There all, a lot of the team seems to be in there from Vic Gundotra on down. You know, kind of responding to things and just saying, like, “Oh, yeah, we’re listening to feedback and they really are tweaking things on the fly”. Also we have to mention My Space Tom using it he did a guess post for us about it — and it’s like, that’s kind of hilarious how much he’s involved in it.

I think one other thing we definitely have to talk about is the fact that the mobile app, at least on the Android is really well done.

And so I hear. I there is no iPhone at yet. Supposedly it’s in review?

Oh, there is an iPhone app. Apple hasn’t approved it yet.

I mean there’s no reason that they won’t approve it, I assume. I don’t think that it’s doing . It’s not going to have all the same functionality that the Android app will have like the, the instant share a thing which is pretty awesome.

I mean, actually, one point on that. It’s really cool to understand it. To be perfectly honest, the first time I use it, I was suprised, because I was under the impression that it would automatically upload photos that you took within the Google Plus application. And what I’ve found is that it uploads those automatic but it also uploads a photo taken with any other camera app or at least the default camera app. Which sort of surprised me.

Because I was like, “Oh”. Because the description when it tells you what instant upload is is doesn’t really get into the “by the way, every single photo your taking on this phone is going to be according to Google servers.” I would not be all surprised if we see some back-lashed unless Google preempts it with a really thorough explanation, a walk-through video saying “hey, you’re uploading this.

It’s really really cool but just be aware of it.”

But they do to their credit, they do set it to a private album that’s not shared with everyone at first right?

That’s one of those things I just don’t think people are going to recognize that it’s private. I think they’re going to post some photos they don’t want on the Internet and they’re going to see it on the Internet and they’re going to freak out regardless if anyone can access it, I mean there’s always on Google servers now, maybe the Google people are looking at it, or wherever, that sort of thing.

So I think we should move on to our second topic. Facebook, in substance, has countered the launch of Google Plus although, you know, they’ve been working on these features for awhile I’m sure. And the biggest of them was Facebook Skype-powered video chat.

Right.

Which I think we had the sense of this coming for a long time and it was really obvious speech integrate at the same time I think it’s a pretty big deal. So what’s your take on it so far?

So, yeah, I wasn’t at the press conference. I know you were watching remotely live But I followed along right afterwards, and, you know it’s like, we did know that a lot of that was coming. So I was a little bit disappointed that there were no huge surprises,they did a new chat thing were the chat is long the right inside which actually is pretty nice I think because that really spurs you to use it more.

But in terms of the video chat feature itself, I tried it out a few times. It does work very well. You have to download a plug-in which is a little bit annoying to have to do that but once you do that, it works very well. It’s interesting how it’s set up as opposed to a feature of Google Plus which is called hangouts which is also a video chat thing but it’s really kind of different I think Mike hit on that in a post he did.

Right. Definitely, confirmed these different things. Hangouts is cool. I mean, to be perfectly honest, I’m still waiting for that, like my good friends who aren’t in the tech scene. Like they say all the people I went to school with and on. I want to get to hang out with them.

And just kinda shoot the shit for an hour because I think that’s really where the potential is. As far as the Skype integration on Facebook I don’t, I don’t think it’s a feature that tech geeks like us are necessarily gonna get super excited about because we’re fairly adept at using Skype and if one of our friends doesn’t no how to use it we can probably walk them through the install process.

Right.

And this is something that Facebook emphasized during the presentation: it’s the easiest way to initiate a video chat. And yes, you still have install a browser plugin but I mean, it’s quite streamline but at the same time it’s not perfect right? Right. Back then you still have to click the installer that I’m sure some people are gonna be hung up on that you know, but we don’t have the web based Skype yet.

Right.

But like I said, I, I think the power of this is not necessarily gonna be readily apparent to people who have been using Skype for years.

Yeah, what do you think about, like so, I actually have it open right now in my computer, you know,the side-chat thing, you think, that’s something that will like, because obviously a big part of this is that people have to be looking at the chat window to see like whose online and lot of people had that just collapsed and now it’s open by default or whatever you can see who you chat with.

I mean is that, do you think that’s something that’s actually going spur usage of this, this feature in particular?

I think that’s the goal, I think, it annoyed me. When I log into Facebook, it’s like “Oh by the way your chat window like you had closed for how many months now. Now, filling up like a significant person of your screen.” I was sort of, “Thanks Facebook.” And the funny thing is, it’s actually unnecessarily difficult to get rid of that because not only do you have to say that you’re not available, in other words, you sign out.

Right.

But a second time to minimize that window. It doesn’t really take the hint. It still stays there. Oh, thanks, I really want that there.

I think it only shows that if your browser is wide enough to accommodate.

Yeah Both the main site and the chat window. Is it going to spur usage, I’m sure it’ll get a lot of, one of the things they’re doing is actually when that’s, when that’s open and you click on it,
it’ll
actually prompt you to start a video call with somebody. It’ll say hey here’s a new video I got.

Right, right.

So, it, I do think it gonna introduce it to plenty of people. Do I think it’s longer term it’s going to make, the fact that that bar is there is going to shift a lot of people off like G Chat.

Right. What about this? So, they don’t have a mobile component for this yet which seems natural thing. Obviously, they’re going have to update their apps and working on it. They’re going to wear an iPad and etc. Do you think that would be a big component? Now, it seems, you know, if they really want us to compete on a larger scale with Facetime then what Google is doing now with Android be able to do video chat from the mobile.

It seems like a pretty big component of this but again Facebook doesn’t have their own Phones, so they have to do it through these applications. Do you think that’s a problem for them to have to do that?

So, I think I’m in the minority here. I don’t think video chat on mobile is that great yet? And I just, I think it’s the sort of thing that you try.

Well, you have an Android phone, so we’ll forgive you for that. No, I mean Android for several months now has had video chat available through the Nexus apps.

Right.

And through the tablets and I tried it out on both of them, but it this. Even though I have it available, you know, I have never felt compelled while walking down the street to video chat anyone.

Yeah .

Maybe this is something I might do with my family at some point, or I guess, with a really, really good friend. But it’s not the sort of thing I just casually want to start doing. I think compared to say like Google Hangouts.

Yeah.

And be a bit more casual. I don’t think it’s going to be like a huge deal if Facebook doesn’t launch a mobile version of this in the near future.

I agree with that. I think that you know, it will take something like this, where you know, 750 million users and by default now they all have this chat window open so many people will become more comfortable with using video chat. There really hasn’t been anything like that that has made people comfortable using it and I think the key to that may be not only this and you know the one for the one-on-one chat, but even better is what you’re saying the Google Plus Hangouts feature because they really thought about that, like why don’t use video chat.

When I met with them to talk about this, it’s like they were really thinking about then, it’s like, ” Well, you know, maybe we really need to rethink if from the ground up and using this kind of super social way of doing things for many people can be in the room and you cut between people as they’re talking, that’s really interesting and maybe that does for usage of video chat in general like on mobile devices I think one of the reasons why hangout is so, not that it jumps between multiple people and the fact that it’s work based, but also because the way that you initiate the chat.

It’s not this weird, because anytime I want to start a video chat with someone.

Right.

It’s like a big social hurdle, if you want to call it that. It’s,it’s more than even a phone call. Right now if I get a phone call and I don’t want it, I feel irritated. If I get a video chat invitation and I don’t want it, I’m like, “What do you want?” So Right.

So, that’s the nice thing about hang outs. Where it’s just sort of like, “Hey, I’m hanging out” if you’re bored.

Right, if you’re interested, you click the button and you’re all set to go. That’s very true. Facebook could do a status option, where you can click, “I’m bored. Come video chat with me.” I doubt that that will be that difficult for them, but I do think the way Google’s done it is pretty smart.

So,let’s, we’ll move on then to the final topic.

Are you doing? So, please correct me where I’m wrong. I read a post and you’re apparently giving up email, what is it, for a month?

Well,till the end of July. So, I’ll give the back story here. We all hate email. You hate email as much as I do. It’s a super large problem. Especially, those of us in this kind of blogging world, the journalism world. Because this is how so many people reach out to us, and try to contact us and especially when we’re hooked into the Tipps Tech Crunch account.

We’re seeing hundreds and hundreds of emails every single day.

So, I fully realize that the problem that I have is maybe more pronounced than what an average user would have. But I do, at the same time, I do think that over time this is going to be a problem that everyone has. And this is how this came to be. I came home one night. I was actually in Washington, DC to see the President the first visit…

Your just in DC seeing the president.

Just meeting the president, it was pretty cool. But so, I was coming home from that event and I’m just like I get bombarded by email. I hadn’t checked my email in a few hours, and all of a sudden I had like, I don’t know Eighty-five unread email messages. Many of which people wanted a response to about something like, “Hey, MG, do you want to check this out?

Blah, blah, blah.” Over time, I’ve slowly just unfortunately had to not respond to many of those, because it’s just completely untenable. I mean, I couldn’t possibly do that without being it my full-time job.

So, anyway, so I started tweeting some things along those lines. If I were to answer all my emails that I just got right now, it would be a full-time job. And I get dozens and dozens of responses on Twitter coming back at me like, “Totally agree the system is broken.” And we’ve all known this for a while, but it’s like So, why don’t I just do something about it?

So, why don’t I just do something about it. Why don’t I just do an experiment and see what happens, if I just don’t look at my email at all for a month. Will anything really change? And so that’s what I’m doing. I have some emails that I promised that I would get responses to. And so, I’ve been slowly working through those so I still have to check a few emails here and there.

But hopefully, in a few days I’ll be completely removed from email whatsoever. And even just doing this limited amount that I had been doing, it’s awesome. So much more free time. It is great.

Well, the rest of us pick up his slack. No, I’m just kidding.

Yeah, I mean there are going to be ramifications of this. Maybe the Tips account. I have this little auto responder set up saying like basically, I’m not going to be responding to emails for the rest of this month. If you really need to get in touch with me, I’m sure you can figure out another way.

If not, maybe you can at the Tips text, if you really need something.

Well, how many midnight phone calls this leads to or text messages?

Yeah, I mean so far, it’s lead to a lot more DM which I think is great also, because DM is a white-labeled, basically messaging service where only people can DM me who I’ve chosen to follow. So, that’s a very limited way so, more Facebook messages. Go ahead.

It’s not necessarily white label, it’s Twitter.

I don’t know if Yeah right.

People necessarily messages.

Sorry, white listed not white white label, yeah. Right. White-listed.

So, yeah, I mean one of their, so, it’s a white, you’re saying, “Yes, email sucks.”

Right. the reason why its so rad it’s like no one came up with a better solution. Obviously, Google is actually, trying, they are doing a lot to make it better with Priority Inbox and so on. And
I think.
One thing we have to make clear is email’s an issue for a lot of people. I think we are probably in the top like point five percent of people, in terms of the amount of email we’re dealing with.

Right.

One interesting idea though, I saw recently. I think it’s called ShortMail. I’m not so sure. It’s a service where you sign in and you basically create an alternate email account, but it restricts the length of an email, it’s 500 characters.

It’s 500 characters.

I’ve been talking with those guys a bit and using that service in a very limited fashion. Right now, most people don’t know. Like when I address there, so you know they’re still reaching out on the other things. But something like that is totally compelling. And I’ve actually, I wrote a post several months ago asking Google you know like asking them for a feature.

I want Gmail light. That’s what I really want. I want something that doesn’t have all of the baggage of email systems. I mean these have been around decades now. And everyone’s been using the same basic thing, where it’s you have a person, an email address that you send it to. You have the subject line, maybe you have a CC and then you have a message.

And then you have to click this button. In many ways, Facebook I think has done the best job so far of getting people to a little bit, at least, move away from that with Facebook messages. People aren’t using it enough, and it hasn’t been rolled out enough. But I think as a communication platform, basic messages I find really unreliable primarily because it highlights the messages that are from your friends, but makes the ones that aren’t from your friends so unintrusive that you’re probably going to miss them entirely.

Yes.

They aren’t even included in the unread account. Right, you have to click messages, I think, and then you’ll see you have three other.

Ya.

Messages from people you don’t know. But I mean those could well be important messages. You just haven’t gotten a social connection with that person previously. So, I mean I think they’re making some strides there. I could I never use Facebook messages instead of my email.

But at the same time they do even have email integration, like you can email someone at their Facebook.com address and that will get sent to them. But yeah, I totally agree they need to kind of rethink that interface for it, I guess. But I like the mechanism of it. I just love that that it has like a little sliver for the respond thing, so it’s almost like a chat, an IM instead of a message, and if you click the little box to enable quick send And you don’t even have to hit a send button, you just have to hit enter after you’re done, and it’s the little things like this I think that really do matter.

Okay. Stuff like that, I’d rather just not get messages I don’t care about, but I guess I’ll take what you can get.

I mean that’s kind of what it, what it’s all about really, me, not checking my email is providing a new filter for messages as they come to me.

This is an idea that I see come up every once in a while and I think Mike tweeted about it and some point got some flack for it. It was the notion having sort of like a postage.

Yes, right. This is the old Bill Gates. Bill Gates wrote about this in the 90s, I remember and got a lot of flack. It was like what if we made email message where you basically had to pay a penny or a fraction of a penny even, because the problem was to prevent spam which spammers where sending millions of messages, so pennies at a time leads to a lot of money that they would be charged but most people won’t mind spending a penny or a fraction of a penny sending emails if it’s important enough.

Right, which I actually think the more I think about it that would not work for us at all because most of the people who are trying to reach us are very driven. And they’re willing to send us cake and stuff we don’t we don’t.

It’s certainly going to be willing to pay.

They would just have a budget for the spam Tech Crunch.

Exactly. Well not, they probably wouldn’t call it spam, they’d call reaching out or pitching or something.

Yes.

So anyway so I think that does it for this episode of OMG/JK. I’m going to be in the studio next time hopefully, so I’ll look even better.

No hamburger, no hamburger in the background?

Yeah, that’s actually exactly why I picked this room. I don’t even what room I’m in. I’m in the AOL brand room, or something, that’s what I do, I just barge into rooms. Join me next week.

All right, thanks.

We’re back for a new episode of OMG/JK, and, in the spirit of Skype’s new integration with Facebook, we’ve decided to try out this nifty video conferencing technology for ourselves!

Okay, so the split-screen action was primarily motivated by the fact that I’m now out in New York, but it’s certainly timely. In this week’s episode we discuss the new Skype/Facebook launch at length, and we also do a deep dive on that other social network that now has a heavy emphasis on video calling: Google+. I think that’s how it’s spelled.

We also touch on MG’s recent decision to ditch email for the month of July, which will only make his August that much worse.

Oh, and don’t worry — video quality for my half of the screen will be much better starting next week, as I’ll be beaming in from AOL’s studio.

Here are some recent posts relevant to this week’s episode:

Subscribe to us on iTunes!


Soap Media

Oh lord won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz. That’s how I feel about the strange trip we’re on with our social studies. Used to be that I could just sit back and wish for a Mickey Mantle home run, and sure enough, it would be there. The powerful compact swing generating an arc unlike any other, still rising as it cleared the outfield wall.

At some basic level we’re trying to find a home we can invest in. The social networking landscape seems to be shaken by Google’s new network product, but in a way it’s become more solidified. The monolith, Facebook, remains undamaged. The experiment, Twitter, no less unsure about what it is but confident of its value. What’s left, Microsoft.

It’s way early to handicap anything along the scale of winners and losers, but many things are already obvious. Plus has conquered the media, but what of it? Unlike Apple, which changed the media with the iPad, Google has slapped a fresh coat of paint on the social chat room that was Friendfeed and provided a reasonably safe bet that the work we put in will be accessible for some substantial time to come. Worth investing in the stream of notifications as we remodel our graphs one more time.

Without the aggregation of citations, Plus is more an interactive manual for itself than anything disruptive. Google has the time and motivation to get everyone in their seats before starting the game, and we’re comfortable enough waiting while we check our old familiar streams to see what we’re missing. This time around, we’re dealing with a platform that won’t collapse when Track is turned on. The question is when, not if.

Twitter has already voted on this question by shutting down its firehose to Google Realtime Search. Basically, no way you get Track handed to you on a platter, just like no way we’re for sale. At stake: Twitter’s social graph and how it can be used to personalize the content stream. All the talk of overlapping Circles on Plus speaks to the same problem, how to derive signal on information other than how cool Plus is.

Does Twitter have a price at which it caves? Not really. The second such a price is established, the overall value of the entire market segment collapses. Let’s say Google acquires Track and lets us bind our content stream to Plus identity with one click. Suddenly Facebook (and Microsoft) have a huge problem, as we use Circles to obsolete the Facebook personal graph while selling our media preferences to the highest bidder.

So Facebook counters with a bigger number, which would be rejected because of Facebook’s scale. Back and forth, to the point where the numbers would be so far out of whack that only Microsoft could afford them and to what end? Whoever closes that deal loses an AOL/TimeWarner chunk of its value. In effect, Twitter would be acquiring a big chunk of either company that would evaporate on close. And what would they do if the deal was all cash? Nothing to buy into except the loser of the auction.

More likely, Google will continue to be successful at building out its alternate identity graph, starting with the (social) media and moving into the content aggregation space with brands. An interesting test case will be what happens with the All My Children/One Life To Live deal, where the two soaps are moving to the iPad platform. How they will monetize this with a projecting $50 million in production costs depends on just the kind of Track or @Mention targeting that Apple just announced with, wait for it, Twitter in iOS 5.

Coming as it does just in time for the new fall season, soap media may turn out to be the reason Twitter stays independent. With Netflix as the new upfronts, producers will launch on iPad and bankroll production with the streaming afterlife. It’s not coincidental that ABC retained the IP for the series, given Steve Jobs’s huge stake in the network. It also suggests broadcast will be used to launch shows and push them through the new soap media pipeline via iPad and AirPlay.

As long as Google keeps Plus open and builds content aggregation traffic through API connectors, the quality of the network will help unbundle Facebook identity. Plus Track will encourage Twitter to syndicate its data, and Facebook to emulate Circles, Hangouts, and even Track. Instead of puncturing the bubble, Plus is buying enough time for the social media networks to transition to the new dynamics of Soap Media.


A Groupon For Sports? Crowd Seats Brings The Daily Deal Model To Sports Tickets

Daily deal sites, by and large, seem like they’re here to stay, much to Rocky Agrawal’s chagrin, surely. Whether or not you agree with Rocky’s flurry of posts last month about Groupon and its claque of clones, the daily deals model is not perfect, and it’s certainly a worthy endeavor to make sure that small businesses and merchants are not coerced into structuring one-sided relationships with daily deals sites. Justin Cener, the Founder and CEO of Crowd Seats, agrees that the daily deal model is not ideal for every industry and merchants shouldn’t force the model just because daily deals are all the rage these days.

That being said, Cener thinks he’s found a niche that is suited well to the daily deal and group buying model: Sports tickets. The Crowd Seats founder told me that he thinks businesses with perishable inventory stand to gain the most from the daily deals model and that sports tickets are a prime example: If tickets to Sunday afternoon’s football game go unsold, those particular tickets can’t just be sold on Monday. Those tickets are lost. For good.

What’s more, businesses that make money on complementary goods and can create purchases that make up for the money lost in the discount stand to do more than just break even on these kind of deals. Generally speaking, when a discount comes out to be 75 percent or more, it’s a losing proposition for the merchant — depending of course on the deal provider’s cut.

The daily deal model can be successful in niche markets, Cener said, because in the case of sports tickets (and, really, any other ticket-selling business — movie theaters would be another), there can be “guaranteed overage” revenue generated from complementary sources, like parking, concessions, beer, souvenirs, and so on.

The niche focus is also a leg up for Crowd Seats (especially in the face of the Groupon haters out there). When a user signs up for the startup’s service, they are signing up to buy sports tickets — and sports tickets only — compared to Groupon, where a user might be interested in massage deals, or restaurant deals, or movie deals.

Targeting a niche market can also address the issue of long-term value; Groupon deals are becoming famously questionable as a means for creating loyal customers, but in a niche market, Cener thinks that sports fans are already rabid by nature. They’re also going to be encouraged to become repeat visitors, because they want to support their teams and get to as many games as possible, especially when they can take advantage of highly discounted deals. (Rates are negotiated on a game by game basis, and normally range from 30-45% of the total deal revenue, Cener said.)

Another point: Daily deals sites don’t do a great job of conveying extra value to the merchants they partner with, which is why Cener hopes that by including social media links to teams’ Facebook and Twitter pages, and encouraging its users to “like” and “follow”, teams can connect with their fans on their own terms. Crowd Seats also provides “best practices” for merchants, offering teams advice on how to retain new customers, like encouraging them to sign up for an email list, or including marketing materials and flyers at the point of voucher exchange, or even welcoming Crowd Seats users via Jumbotron signage.

The Los Angeles-based startup, which initially launched last month, offers discounts between 50 and 90 percent off the face value of sports tickets. At this point, the service is available in Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, Chicago, and Boston, but Cener says that he wants to continue expanding to all major cities in the U.S.

As to how it works? Users sign up for Crowd Seats and confirm by email, whereupon they can the search for deals by city. Once a user chooses one of Crowd Seats’ deals, they enter billing information in a secure checkout and submit the order. They’ll then be redirected to their profile, or “My Stuff” page, which lists a user’s purchases and account information. Crowd Seats then sends the user an email, where they can view and print their tickets. Fairly straightforward.

Crowd Seats has not yet received any outside funding, it’s completely early-stage bootstrapping at this point, but Cener said he hopes to being raising a round of seed funding once the model gets some traction. It’s going to be tough for Crowd Seats in the early going, because of the deep resources of sites like StubHub, users will quickly become disenchanted when they find that their favorite sports team isn’t yet on board, offering deals.

But Crowd Seats seems to have picked a great niche market in which to leverage the daily deals model, and if the team can forge some early partnerships with big sports franchises, the startup could be headed for long-term viability.

Check it out and let us know what you think. Oh, and Cener also did some due diligence and research on early daily deal experiments among sports teams, and found that revenue from ticket sales plus supplemental revenue generated at the stadium averaged out to over $50K per deal — at least for those NBA teams that tried out daily deals. You’ll find more in the infographic below:


Justin.TV: The Movie


While the historical accuracy of Facebook tell-all The Social Network was questionable, the movie did tremendously well at the box office. And at the Golden Globe Awards and the Oscars. Now Hollywood producers are looking for the next big story around a tech company. Next up—Justin.TV.

LA-based production company Riche Productions has bought the rights to the story behind the development and founding of live video streaming startup Justin.TV. For background, the startup was founded by Justin Kan, Michael Seibel, Kyle Vogt and Emmett Shear, who were all buddies from college (Vogt went to MIT, the others graduated from Yale).

Prior to starting Justin.TV Kan and Shear founded an online calendar program Kiko, and even got funding from Y Combinator. Unfortunately the product failed and the pair sold the business on eBay for around $250,000.

Justin.TV got its start back in 2007 as Kan livecasted his life with a camera hooked up to a backpack that was loaded with batteries and modems, letting thousands of viewers watch his every move. It was basically the beginning of the live stream era. Even the Today Show took notice of Kan’s stunt .

Flash forwards four years, the Y Combinator-backed company has become one of the most popular live streaming platforms on the web. And Justin.TV has spawned a few businesses, including an Instagram for video, Socialcam, and a live-streamed gaming portal. You can watch our TC Cribs feature on Justin.TV’s office here.

So why did Riche Productions, which has produced Starsky and Hutch, Family Man, Bride Wars, and many other blockbuster movies, choose to buy the rights to the story of Justin.TV out of the thousands of other successful tech startups that have been launched by college kids? Peter Riche tells us in an exclusive interview that compared to some of the previous movies that have profiled tech startups (i.e. The Social Network), he wanted to find a story where success in the entrepreneurial tech world has helped bring founder friendships closer (as opposed to spurring lawsuits).

It’s true—despite the complications of founding a startup, and dealing with all of the challenges that fledgling businesses face in the tech space; Kan, Seibel, Vogt and Shear all remain close friends. And all are still actively a part of the company and involved in its day-today activities and development.

Riche says he still isn’t sure what will make sense for Justin.TV in terms of the format of a piece; and his company is evaluating whether a movie or TV show make sense.

While it’s impressive that the Justin.TV guys have been able to grow their friendship despite being on the roller coaster of creating and sustaining a startup, I have to wonder whether this would make a movie that would have the same appeal as The Social Network. I’m no filmmaker or screenwriter, but drama and conflict does seem important in developing a quality, dimensional film.

As my colleague Alexia Tsotsis wrote in her initial review of The Social Network, the movie was built around heavily dramatized controversy and the exposure of the cold, calculating (and fictional) Mark Zuckerberg. Despite the fact that Aaron Sorkin’s adaptation of the story included inaccuracies and fictional story lines, the drama, ruthless characters and arrogance were all part of what made the movie so fascinating to the mainstream public.

On the other hand, considering Riche’s experience in producing comedies, a comedic movie or TV adaptation of Justin.TV’s story could be interesting.

Would you watch a TV show or movie based around the Justin.TV story?

Information provided by CrunchBase


Power To The People

As I type this, a UPS beeps furiously behind me, over the growl of half-a-dozen diesel generators on the street outside. I’m in an Internet café in Leh, a city nestled in a Himalayan valley surrounded by 6,000-metre / 20,000-foot peaks, the fast-growing capital of India’s northernmost territory Ladakh. It’s clearly outgrown its electrical capacity; power cuts hit several times a day.

Power generation is a deeply unsexy but profoundly important subject in the developing world. Technology is busily transforming lives all around the globe even as you read this—but a dearth of reliable electricity is a massive obstacle even in major cities, much less faraway villages.

People do find various imperfect and ingenious ways to cope. I was once on a riverboat in Guatemala whose captain distributed newly powered phone batteries to inhabitants scattered along the river, and collected their old ones to charge when he returned to civilization. You’ll find stores selling small-scale solar power equipment in remote small towns throughout Uganda, and occasional microhydro generators in the Himalayas; and people everywhere burn through enormous (and toxic) amounts of scarce (and expensive) diesel to power generators when their lights go out.

But there has to be a better way: and, increasingly, there is. In particular, I’ve had my eye on Fenix International for awhile now. Their ReadySet battery has two cigar lighter and two USB outputs to charge radios, lights, and batteries, and can itself be recharged via solar, bicycle, or wall power. Plus, they’ve recently released a universal charger that can power up almost any lithium-ion battery via a USB plug. (I wish I’d known this before I’d set out on this trip; I could have left both of my camera-battery chargers at home.)

It gets better, and wackier. There is also this BioLite stove that charges your cell phone And the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently awarded $100,000 to a project that seeks to use soil microbes to power fuel cells, which, it is claimed, could be built from scratch, in a few minutes, for pennies. I have to confess I’m a little skeptical, but I’ll be watching with interest.

In the long run, of course, localized micropower projects aren’t enough for serious economic development; you need a sizable and stable electrical grid. But in the interim, a little power is a whole lot better than none, and can and does make a huge difference. So here’s hoping that those microbes are a megahit.