Update: TechCrunch Ad Hoc Meet-Up In Hong Kong And Shenzhen

scaled

I’ve been able to finalize the TechCrunch Shenzhen and Hong Kong meet-ups and thought I’d post here for folks who RSVPed and didn’t get an email response.

The Hong Kong Event (Facebook Link) will be held at 7pm on November 2 at Pier 7 Cafe in Central Hong Kong. I may be slightly late – I’m landing at 6:30 and will take the train straight there, but I look forward to seeing you all.

Thanks to Michael Tanenbaum for setting this up and thanks to our first sponsor, SecondMarket, for supplying some of the booze.
We’ve confirmed the spot for the TC Meet-Up in Hong Kong next week.

The Shenzhen Event will be held on Friday, November 4 at 7pm at Le Bistro. Thanks to Michael Michelini for setting things up and I look forward to seeing you there.

You can contact me at weibo.com/johnbiggs or twitter.com/johnbiggs OR text me at +16462515666. My week will be fairly packed in both cities but I’ll be around on Thursday during the day in Hong Kong (until I head over the border) and Saturday morning (until I head back to Hong Kong.) If you have a start-up or product you wanted to discuss, please prep a card with some information and a website with images etc. and pass it to me during the meet-ups. I can’t carry much paper.


TechCrunch Disrupt Beijing: What’s In Store For Day Two

In case you haven’t read through the 50 or so China posts on the site right now, the last day of our first international Disrupt conference will be starting at 9 am Beijing time/6 pm PST today. If you need even more reason to watch, catch Sarah and I above, talking about who we’re most excited about in today’s lineup.

And for some reason you can’t make it to China this morning/afternoon, you can find the livestream here.


Company:
TechCrunch
Website:
techcrunch.com
Launch Date:
November 6, 2005

TechCrunch, founded on June 11, 2005 by Michael Arrington, is a network of technology-oriented blogs and other web properties.

Learn more


Who Will Win The TechCrunch Disrupt Beijing Startup Battlefield?

What’s most amazing about TechCrunch Disrupt Beijing is that our Startup Battlefield format has proved applicable internationally; There’s something universal about giving your all in a pitch to people with money I guess. After watching the seventeen companies take the stage yesterday (and blogging all day), TechCrunch’s John Biggs, Greg Kumparak and I went backstage, exhausted and inspired, to discuss our favorites and who we thought had the best chance of winning.

Because startups are serious business, the three of us tried our best to be professional. Unfortunately (or fortunately) a maintenance woman accidentally walking through our set about one minute in put the kibosh on that plan. The resulting hilarity was so good we couldn’t help but post it exactly how it happened.

This is how the sausage is made folks.


Company:
TechCrunch
Website:
techcrunch.com
Launch Date:
November 6, 2005

TechCrunch, founded on June 11, 2005 by Michael Arrington, is a network of technology-oriented blogs and other web properties.

Learn more


Watch The Last Day Of TechCrunch Disrupt Beijing 2011 Here!

disrupt_beijing_photo1

We are kicking off the last day of TechCrunch Disrupt Beijing 2011 at 6pm PST. Thanks to Ustream, we’ve embedded the livestream of the event here.

Be sure to tune in and don’t forget to follow along by searching for the #disruptbj hashtag on Twitter!

The agenda for today is below.

Tuesday, November 1st

9:00am – 9:10am
Opening Remarks by TechCrunch

9:10am – 9:40am
Fireside chat with Lei Jun (Angel Investor, Co-founder of Xiaomi), with Sarah Lacy

9:40am – 9:50am
Xiaomi Demo

9:50am – 10:15am
Founder Stories with Kevin Systrom (Instagram), with Gang Lu (Editor of TechNode.com)

10:15am – 10:40am
Attack of the Clones: How Some of the Largest Group Buying Companies are Killing Groupon in China: Yinan Du (24quan), and Xing Wang (Meituan), with Bill Bishop

10:40am – 11:00am
BREAK

11:00am – 11:30am
Ecommerce Panel: Ecommerce Finally Takes Off In China, Lu Dong (La Miu), Ye Haifeng (Mbaobao), Fangfang Wu (Greenbox), with Bill Bishop (Digicha)

11:30am – 12:00pm
Why do Westerners Always Fail in China? With Fritz Demopolous (Qunar.com) and Sarah Lacy

Startup Battlefield with Richard Robinson

12:00pm – 1:15pm
Final Session

Judges:
Peter Fang (Innovation Works)
Steve Ji (Sequoia Capital)
Hurst Lin (DCM)
Hugo Shong (Accel-IDG)
Greg Tseng (Tagged)

1:15pm – 2:30pm
LUNCH

1:45pm – 2:30pm
Lunch-time Startup Marketing Roundtable; experts provide tips for best marketing practices
Hosted by Ogilvy & Mather

2:30pm – 3:00pm
Building the Anti-Zynga: Founder Stories with Phil Libin (Evernote), with Sarah Lacy

3:00pm – 3:30pm
Is the IPO Party Over? The Future of Returns In China: Steve Ji (Sequoia Capital), Rocky Lee (Cadwalader), Hugo Shong (Accel – IDG), Hans Tung (Qiming Ventures), with Sarah Lacy

3:30pm – 3:45pm
BREAK

3:45pm – 4:15pm
Founder Stories with David Li (YY.com) and John Biggs

4:15pm – 4:45pm
ShoeDazzle: Where Chinese Manufacturing Meets Kim Kardashian: Brian Lee (ShoeDazzle), with Sarah Lacy

4:45pm – 5:15pm
Internet Memes and How Everyone is Ruining Content with Ben Huh (Cheezburger)

5:15pm – 5:45pm
Closing Awards Ceremony


You Know, For Kids!

<< Previous
|
Next >>


2012 Hyundai Veloster

<< Previous
|
Next >>

Car companies spend a lot of time talking to young people. They aim ads at them, target jingles at them, even go so far as to build entire cars for them. From a marketing standpoint, it makes sense — get someone young, latch your hooks into them, hang onto their business forever.

Problem is, young people don’t always know what they want. (Full disclosure: At time of publication, the author of this review is 30, which makes him neither young nor old but still losing hair at an alarming rate. Also, it makes him really uncomfortable when he refers to anyone as “young people,” as he sounds like a senile Amish grandmother.) Building cars for this crowd is a mixed bag — you have to balance appealing to a short attention span and fad-friendly taste with actually building a consumer good worth a damn.

In the best of all worlds, you end up with a good car that happens to be charmingly different. (See: Honda CRX.) In the worst, you end up with a rolling, trend-happy gimmick that no one over the age of 25 would be caught dead in. (See: Any Scion loaded down with tasteless dealer “aftermarket” options.) Either way, you’re treading a fine line between genuine style and cynical marketing, one that even the dumbest of admen won’t pretend to understand.

Car magazines will tell you the Veloster’s unique parts are important, that they herald the arrival of something new, or perhaps Hyundai brewing up some kind of secret engineering plan. No matter. All you really need to concern yourself with is how the Veloster drives. And it drives impressively.

What, then, to make of the three-door, uniquely shaped 2012 Hyundai Veloster? Hyundai launched this oddball in Portland, Oregon, city of hipster progress. Company execs hoped the city’s fixie-forward crowd and put-a-bird-on-it culture would rub off, or maybe just remind journalists of who they wanted to buy the car. Either way, the Veloster looks like nothing else on the market.

Let’s take inventory: A hatchback. Three doors, four if you count the rear hatch. A 28/40 city/highway EPA fuel-economy rating, and a 138-hp, 1.6-liter four-cylinder powering the front wheels. MacPherson struts up front, a non-independent torsion beam — think old Volkswagen or Honda Civic here — in the back. You get your choice of a six-speed manual or six-speed, dual-clutch transmission (the latter is Hyundai’s first), as well as a shockingly low curb weight of 2,584 pounds with a manual transmission. Funky 1970s stick-on body stripes are optional, and I have a sneaking suspicion that this means something. Perhaps that funky 1970s stick-on body stripes are currently hot in South Korea. Here, they just look a bit too Starsky and Hutch.

Hyundai is cagey on the Veloster’s mechanical origins, insisting only that its chassis is largely new, albeit peppered with a few Accent and Elantra parts. This is odd for a small, inexpensive ($18,060 base) economy car, in that most machines of this nature share a platform with something else in order to keep costs down. Car magazines will tell you the Veloster’s unique parts are important, that they herald the arrival of something new, or perhaps Hyundai brewing up some kind of secret engineering plan. No matter. All you really need to concern yourself with is how the Veloster drives. And it drives impressively.

This is not a sports car. Sixty mph comes up in 8.5 seconds, or just fast enough that you don’t find yourself getting run over by traffic during merges. The chassis is astonishingly rigid and free from scuttle shake or resonance; a Toyota Camry and Honda Civic driven on the same day felt limp and noodly by comparison. The steering offers little feedback, but decent feel and resistance. The chassis is nimble without being twitchy, which means it essentially fades away in traffic, the car shrinking around you. Winding roads are dispatched competently but without any real sense of fun; the engine drones a little at high rpm, but both transmissions work relatively well when pushed. Around town, the twin-clutch box actually falls down compared with the manual — it seems sluggish and jerky.

Oh, and that third door: It actually makes getting into the back seat easier. There’s room back there for a grown man, but the car doesn’t look big or bulbous in back. This is significant, as it’s almost unheard of in a car this size.

Regardless, what counts here is what you get for the price. In addition to standard Bluetooth with voice recognition, an auxiliary and USB input jack, Pandora/iPhone compatibility, you also get optional park-distance sensors, a panoramic glass sunroof, a rearview camera, navigation, and pushbutton start.

The Veloster looks great, it offers a crazy amount of positives for the price, and chiefly, it’s stylish without being faddish. It oozes that most ethereal of consumer-good qualities: cool.

In other words, young people will probably flock to it in droves. Which is good, because it means they’ll be out driving their new car and will likely stay off my lawn.

WIRED Looks the business. Implies you know something everyone else doesn’t. Reminds you of the legendary Honda CRX. 40 mpg paired with sheet metal that doesn’t make you feel like a heinous dork.

TIRED Still drives like an economy car, albeit a very good one. Dual-clutch transmission feels unfinished. Cargo area is a bit tiny with the seats up.

Photos by Sam Smith/Wired

Suit Up for Stealth

Two ninjas: Airblaster Ninja Suit (gray, left) and I/O Bio Contact Pilot Suit (black)

Few things are cooler than dueling ninjas. Few things are warmer than dueling merino wool ninja suits.

Merino wool is widely regarded as the ideal base layer for its ability to adjust its properties to differing situations. It keeps you warm when it’s cold outside, it breathes well when it’s hot outside, and it wicks away sweat when you’re exerting yourself. Heck, it doesn’t even pick up body odor.

As a big fan of merino wool, I’ve always said that if I could drape my whole body in it, I would. Turns out that I can. Two companies, I/O Bio Merino and Airblaster, both offer one-piece baselayers made entirely of merino wool to provide warmth for snowboarding, skiing, mountaineering, infiltrating castles, and other cold-weather pursuits.

Ninja suits. Made of what is arguably the finest performance material ever. Excellent.

The two suits share a host of similarities: Both are made of the soft wool of the Merino sheep; both are full-length, one-piece suits; and both have tight-fitting hoods, thumb loops, and drawstrings around the waist. Both companies make men’s and women’s versions.

A friend and I first tested the Airblaster Ninja Suit on a Summit of Mount Shasta, a 14,162-foot volcano in Northern California, and then took the I/O Bio Contact Pilot Suit on a weeklong trip through Colorado’s Rocky mountains.

On Mount Shasta, the Airblaster proved more than capable of handling the temperature swings that come with the higher elevation. When using it as a base layer, my tester found that he didn’t need any other layers under his shell jacket and pants to provide further insulation. The thin merino provided heat when it was cold and kept him from overheating when he started pushing uphill toward the summit.

In the Rockies, the temperatures dipped below 30 degrees at night, but the I/O Bio Pilot suit did a great job of keeping me warm. The form-fitting hood and thumb-looped sleeves kept warm air in the suit. The merino wool wicked away sweat and made it through the whole week without picking up any odor. The stitches started to show some gaps after a week of abuse, however, which doesn’t inspire confidence in its durability.

You’re probably wondering: “How the heck do you go to the bathroom in these things?” Glad you asked, because each suit tackles that problem in very different ways, and therein lies the main difference.

I/O Bio’s Contact Pilot suit sports a U-shaped zip that runs from the front of the waist (think belt buckle region) down under the legs up to the back of the waist. Airblaster’s Ninja suit uses a zipper that goes around the waist from the left to right and a brief-style opening in the front to accommodate the standard male peeing posture.

After extensive testing, I found that the Pilot Suit has the slight edge in convenience; the u-zipper stays out of the way a lot easier than the Ninja Suit’s butt flap, the positioning of which keeps you on guard with the slight yet terrifying chance of crapping into your pants.

However, the danger factor in zipping the Contact Pilot suit up just about negates any other conveniences. If you’re squatting in the snow at high elevation, or even if you’re trying to go about your business in the middle of the night and you’re only half awake, there’s way too much of a chance for an accidental reenactment of There’s Something About Mary. The women’s version has the same mechanism, but women may find such dangers to be more easily avoided.

Airblaster’s Ninja Suit’s pee-hole and behind-the-back zipping style pretty much eliminate any chance of bloodletting. I declare it the winner by a deuce.

Airblaster Merino Ninja Suit

$180, myairblaster.com

WIRED Regulates temperature in cold weather. Lots of insulation in a thin package. Easy to poop while wearing it.

TIRED Material feels a bit scratchy. The fit is baggy.

 

I/O Bio Merino Contact Pilot Suit

$200, io-bio.com

WIRED Soft wool feels great on skin. Form-fitting. Doesn’t pick up body odor.

TIRED Shows wear after a few uses. There’s a very real danger of zipping up your goodies after dropping the kids off at the pool.

Photos by Keith Axline/Wired

The Phatty Is a Phave

Not the recommended playing position, but why not?

Moog Music is known for making some freaky instruments. The company started out in 1954, producing a theremin, an instrument you play by moving your hands through thin air, and later became famous for hulking modular synthesizers that were controlled by messy and confounding patch bays.

However, Bob Moog’s legacy as an electronic music innovator was cemented by a few key products: 1970’s Minimoog, a small, stage-ready version of those huge early synths; the Taurus, a floor-bound bass synthesizer you play with your feet; and the Voyager, an updated take on the Minimoog released in 2002.


bff_reviews

Join us as we step away from the daily gadget deluge to review some of our personal favorite products

This particular keyboard I’ve been testing, the Moog Little Phatty, is destined to one day also sit at the top of Mount Moog.

It’s simple and easy to play, so it’s great for newcomers or the synth-curious. Compared to the massive Voyager and Taurus synths, it’s easy to schlep, making it an attractive synth for gigging musicians. And while it isn’t cheap (street price is around $1,300), it’s certainly easier on the wallet than other Moogs, which cost twice as much.

It’s a standard monophonic synth, and fairly stripped-down (hence “Little”). On the base are 37 keys, a mod wheel, a spring-loaded pitch wheel and switches for changing octaves. Up top are knobs for controlling the dual analog oscillators, modulation, filters and envelope generators. There are 100 preset voices, and the keyboard is loaded with fun sounds for all tastes — classic funky leads, super-fat bass tones, wooshy-washy psychedelia and plinky percussion.

The Little Phatty has been around for a spell — the original version was released in 2006. On this model, the Little Phatty Stage II, some key features have been updated (so excuse me while I geek out for a moment).

There’s a new arpeggiator that can be applied to any preset, with a selectable latch mode. The tempo of the arpeggiator can be set using tap-tempo, or by using the new MIDI clock sync feature that matches the rate of the arpeggiator or LFO with your other MIDI sequencers. If your world is strictly post-five-pin, there’s a MIDI-over-USB function. The addition of the USB port means the LP Stage II can also be used as a USB controller for whatever software you’re using. In my tests, I never had to install a driver.

Oh, and one other new feature here: all-black side plates have replaced the wood-clad design of yore. So it looks a little more “nouveau goth” than “British prog.”

Most of those updated features will probably only appeal to synth-heads or serious electronic musicians. To everyone else, all that really matters is what it sounds like when you turn it on and start playing it. And that’s where the Little Phatty really shines.

This is one of the easiest synths to grok, and, consequently, one of the most fun to play. You just switch it on, touch a key, and it starts making cool sounds.

I’m no Geddy or Herbie, but I’ve fiddled with a lot of synths. This is one of the easiest synths to grok, and, consequently, one of the most fun to play. You just switch it on, touch a key, and it starts making cool sounds. You don’t really need to know much about how the knobs work — in fact, there are so few knobs, the intimidation factor is very low and it’s easy enough to reach up and start experimenting. When demonstrating the test unit it for friends, a ten or fifteen-second orientation was all that was required.

The simplicity of the thing can feel limiting in the age of the does-it-all digital synth. Newbies ask why you can’t play a chord (it’s monophonic, and only sounds one note at a time), and there aren’t any digital representations of pianos or organs.

But while those digital synths do more for around the same price, they don’t have this much charisma or personality. And the Little Phatty has that special sauce, that “natural” quality that Moog does so well. As you flip through the Little Phatty’s 100 presets and surf the dual oscillators, you’ll find dozens of those classic sounds that are all Moog, just dripping with pure analog authenticity.

Moog Music chief engineer Cyril Lance says this is because Bob Moog’s DNA is inside the Little Phatty.

Development on the keyboard began in earnest when Lance first joined the company in 2005, he tells me in a phone interview. Unfortunately, company founder Bob Moog died soon after the team got started. Because everyone knew this would be the last Moog instrument actually designed by Bob, the team took great care in making sure everything about the Little Phatty was spot on — not only the aesthetic and the sound, but also the deeper, intangible aspects of what makes an instrument special.

Bob’s passing gave the project an unprecedented weight. “It was the product that was going to show to the world what Moog would be like without Bob Moog. Everyone involved poured their hearts and souls into the project as a tribute to Bob,” says Lance.

Once a working prototype had been created, Lance took it home and plopped it onto a table in his house. It was nothing more than a bunch of circuits and wires connected to a keyboard and an array of knobs.

“My neighbor’s four-year-old son came over. His eyes got wide and he immediately started playing with it. He was totally consumed for the next hour and made incredible sounds,” he says. “That was my confirmation that we got it right.”

WIRED An honest-to-Bob analog synth in a stripped-down package. Portable and compact, great for performers. USB features make it feel more at home in modern, software-based situations.

TIRED Simplicity of the design is somewhat limiting. Quality is expensive. Menus on the tiny LCD are tough to decipher, you gotta RTFM. I kind of miss the wood side-pieces.

Photo by Jim Merithew/Wired

Nokia Vs. The Industry: A Look At The Global Battle Over Mobile Advertising [Infographic]

nokia-logo-may-08

Mobile advertising as you’ve likely heard, is hott right now. (With two “t’s”, yes.) According to comScore, mobile advertising spend is projected to hit $2.5 billion by 2014, with $2.7 billion projected in mobile ad revenues for this year and $6.6 billion by 2016.

What’s more, in August, 84.5 million people in the U.S. owned smartphones, and that number continues to grow. In the U.S., the bigs in mobile OSes, Android, iOS, RIM, Symbian, and Windows, are duking it out for market share, with Android presently leading the pack. You can check out our post (and infographic) on the battle between iOS and Android for mobile advertising dominance here.

In Europe, the numbers for smartphone usage are very similar to the U.S.: As of July 2011, comScore reports, 88.4 million mobile subscribers (in the EU5) were using smartphones. Of the top smartphone platforms in Europe, Symbian led the way with 37.8 percent market share, with Android grabbing the second spot at 22.3 percent over iOS at 20.3 percent.

But what about the other players? Until Apple overtook it back in June of this year, Nokia was the largest manufacturer of smartphone devices by volume in the world. Earlier this year, Nokia loudly announced plans to replace Symbian and MeeGo with Windows Phone on most of its high end devices. The Finnish manufacturer has always had a wide array of products, but it’s struggled to find a foothold in the U.S. And, what’s more, it’s taken its fair share of heat in the press over the last 6 months.

The company’s new Windows phones won’t be hitting U.S. stores for at least a few more months, but as Chris pointed out earlier today, “these Windows Phones will be the first high-profile Nokia launches in years”, and no one is more aware of this than Nokia, which is struggling to maintain its relevance. As U.S. President of Nokia Operations Chris Weber said earlier this year about the company’s renewed focus on the U.S. market: “The reality is if we are not successful with Windows Phone, it doesn’t matter what we do elsewhere.”

But, there is some hope. As Johnny Biggs wrote a few days ago, with Windows Phone, Nokia just may be poised to make a big comeback. Taking Apple’s table scraps and pushing RIM down may prove to be a good strategy for Nokia going forward, especially (as John points out) two familiar brands — Microsoft and Nokia — are better than one — RIM.

Nokia has been successful in Europe because its phones, stores, and service were local, useable, and cheap. If they can capitalize on brand recognition and first-time smartphone buyers, it just may work.

What’s more, thanks to a nifty infographic from inneractive, the mobile ad mediation platform, we have evidence of more good news for Nokia, and it comes in the form of mobile advertising.

As you’ll see below, Nokia’s absolute ad requests (which are what makes mobile advertising tick) continue to grow month-to-month, and when it comes to click-through-rates (CTR), Nokia has been consistently outperforming the rest of the industry (abroad), which includes the likes Android, iOS, and RIM.

As the infographic astutely reveals, with high ad requests and CTRs, this makes for a lot of happy Nokia developers and advertisers. Whether this trend can continue has Nokia moves its Windows Phone-powered devices into the U.S. remains to be seen, but, at the very least, it’s certainly a silver lining.

Without further ado, a look at global Nokia ad requests, CTR, distribution, and top countries:

(We’ll be updating with comparable fill rates and eCPM on Android and iOS for top European companies soon.)


Company:
Nokia
Website:
nokia.com
IPO:

NYSE:NOK

Nokia is a Finnish multinational communications corporation. It is primarily engaged in the manufacturing of mobile devices and in converging Internet and communications industries.

They make a wide range of mobile devices with services and software that enable people to experience music, navigation, video, television, imaging, games, business mobility and more.

Nokia is the owner of Symbian operation system and partially owns MeeGo operating system.

Learn more


(Sort Of) Live From The Beijing Hackathon: We Talk To The Hackers

Our own Greg Kumparak walked through the Hackathon Hall this evening, talking to all and sundry about their projects. Some notable hacks included an app for the ladies. How does it work? In Asia, guys buy girls gifts before they ask them out. With this app, the ladies can take a picture of an item and then broadcast her desire for it to the men nearby. The fellow who is quickest to his wallet will, it is assumed, receive a date. For those still working on projects, may I suggest a related app that would involve a system for giving me beer and Peking duck on demand, no dates promised or expected?

Take a look at our long walk through TCDBJ and watch tomorrow as the finalists compete for wonderful prizes including cash, iPads 2, and more cash.


Daily Crunch: Glass

1460

Here are some of yesterday’s stories on TechCrunch Gadgets:

Glareless Glass, Flexible Solar-Powered E-Paper, And More From FPDI

Best Buy Has 32GB TouchPads For $149, But There’s A Catch

Video: Murata Shows Robotic Walking Aid / Shopping Cart

Nintendo Is Planning In-Game Virtual Item Sales For 3DS

Google TV Update Rolls Out On Sunday: Better Content Discovery, Android Market, But Hulu Is Still Blocked


Meet The Disrupt BJ Hackathon Hackers

header

And we’re off! These are some of our Hackathon Hackers, bright-eyed and bushy-tailed and ready to hack here at TC Disrupt BJ. We tried our hardest to grab some great folks and it’s a pleasure working with these hardcore coders. I wish we could interview everyone but here are eight random hackers working on changing the world (or their corner of it).

Justin Hsiao

Justin is CTO of Gulu.com and he loves – loves! – his team. “These guys are my hacker heroes,” he told us.

He and his merry band will build something called iTrust or iTrusting or something. “It’s about trust,” he said, and we believe him.

Kevin Butler

Kevin is a developer/traveller who is working on an API for a social game. His hacker hero is Kevin Rose and he’s working with a great team from Beijing to build out gaming APIs into a working project.

Erik Chen

Erik Chen is an accomplished hacker in his own right but he admires Mark Pincus and loves social gaming. He’s working in mobile game payment systems and he’s planning on building an API for a social game during the hackathon.

Guo Ying

Taciturn Guo Ying’s hacker hero is her friend, Yichun Zhang, and she’s still undecided as to what she and her team are building. However, the’s an engineer so it shouldn’t be too difficult for them to turn around the next Linux in 24 hours.

Yichun Zhang

Knowing that Guo Ying dug Yichun’s work, I had to talk to him. His heroes are Larry Wall and Linus Torvalds. He, like Guo, has no idea what he wants to build but he’s well on his way to coding greatness.

Chet Huang

Chet is a programmer for Wenquxing and is building a social game for the hackathon.

Tom Wang

Tom works for Nezsoft.com consulting and is working on an API integration with Tianji. His project? A headhunter portal using Tianji’s database as well as some translation APIs to make it international. His tech hero is Anonymous.

Aaron Farr

Aaron Farr is doing something secretive with his start-up Vdio and he’s still trying to get Internet to work at the venue before he even starts working on his project. Until things speed up, he’s relaxing calmly in the back of the room.


New Site Wants To Crowdsource Stories And Photos From The Peace Corps

peace

To celebrate the fifty years of the Peace Corps’s work in 139 countries, journalist and former Peace Corps volunteer Maureen Orth has created an online platform, called PeaceCorpsPostcards, for former volunteers to contribute their own stories, pictures and “Video postcards.”

In case you aren’t familiar, The Peace Corps is a volunteer program run by the United States Government. Post-college grads work abroad for two years; volunteering in building schools, infrastructure development, government, agriculture and more.

Orth has been traveling to Morocco, Colombia, Mongolia, Costa Rica and Mexico to film volunteers in action to add content to the new site. Stories are captured in digital ‘postcards’ on the site. For example, a young woman named Stephanie is featured helping an orphanage in Mongolia to become more self-sustaining by building a greenhouse and growing produce to sell for profit. A volunteer herself in the sixties, Orth helped build a school in a mountain village in Colombia.

The project, which is funded by American Express and Bank of America, is looking for additional volunteers from the past 50 years to contribute their own stories, pictures and videos.


California Finally Approves Online Voter Registration (Sadly, It’s Just 1 Of 11 States To Have Done So)

lgFP2529

So, this piece of news managed to sneak under the radar, but it’s worth recognizing as a victory for the Internet and for the state of California. Digital technology has been slow to come to some offline institutions, a glaring (and sad) example being the very democratic process of registering to vote (and then actually voting) in local, state, and federal elections. A few weeks ago, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill that (once again) legalizes online voter registration in the state of California.

As TheVotingNews points out, while California does in fact have a voter registration database, until the passage of 3B 397, residents could not fully register to vote online. Instead, voters could go through the process of filling out registration forms, but instead of hitting “approve” or “send” and closing the loop, Californians had to then print out the completed form and send it to their local county election office for approval.

Considering California is responsible for the development of a wide array of mind-blowing technology, including that which allows disabled and paralyzed people to walk again, it’s kind of embarrassing that our state can’t even offer a workable way to register people to vote online.

Until now, that is.

Lawmakers had been waiting for the state’s “federally compliant statewide voter registration database to come online”, TheVotingNews said, but apparently San Francisco Senator Leland Yee was tired of twiddling his thumbs and authored the new online voter registration bill, which was then signed into law by Jerry Brown.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, more than 39 percent of the Californians that were eligible in 2010 did not register to vote. That’s nearly 9 million people. What’s more, only eleven states in the U.S. (Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Washington) currently (or will soon) offer online voter registration — oh, and North Carolina is considering implementing online registration, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. Though 34 states do offer residents the opportunity to access voter registration online, it is appalling how few states have implemented statewide voter registration databases, let alone allow people to take advantage of online registration or voting.

In a statement about the new legislation, State Senator Lee seemed to agree: “In the 21st century, especially here in California, it is long overdue to have online voter registration. SB 397 will not only help protect the integrity of the vote, but will allow many more individuals the opportunity to register and participate in our democracy”. Nearly 9 million people, in fact.

Under the new law, California residents will now register to vote online, at which point the county elections office will use the voter’s signature from the DMV to verify authenticity. Then, when residents actually go to vote, their signatures will be matched against those records at the polls.

As to the timeline for the implementation, well, Yee and other representatives said that they hope to have the new system live in time for the 2012 presidential elections. If they don’t, I encourage all Californians (and Americans, for that matter) to write strongly-worded letters to their local politicians.

Now, of course, the question becomes: When do we actually get to vote online? 2020?

Excerpt image from PopArtUK


The TechCrunch Hackathon Beijing Is About To Begin #disruptbj

scaledwm-0773

We’re about fifteen minutes away from the start of Disrupt Hackathon Beijing and it looks like we have about 350 people on the floor and teams are forming now. It will be interesting to see what folks come up with at this our first Disrupt in China – let alone our first Disrupt event outside of the US.

Our intrepid photographer Duncan Leung of GreatWallClub and the TCTV crew will be shooting stills and video from the event and we should be able to get out some live streams as the event progresses. Watch this space.

Click to view slideshow.