Hootsuite Is Raising $50M At A $500M Valuation

hootsuite logo

It was just over a month ago that social media management platform HootSuite picked up $20 million in a secondary investment round that valued the company at $200 million. Now we have heard from multiple sources that the company is looking to better than double that: HootSuite is in the process of raising a $50 million round at a $500 million valuation.

And what’s making this even more interesting are the investors that are being mentioned in connection with the round: HootSuite is looking to have discussions with Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and Google – a sign of how the surge in social media investments is also giving a lift to companies that are figuring out ways to harness that for third parties.

Facebook, Google, LinkedIn and Twitter were described by one source as all having a “great relationship” with HootSuite already, and that the company was looking to build a deal that would give them all “upside in Hootsuite’s success.”

We also reached out to HootSuite’s CEO Ryan Holmes, who wouldn’t comment directly on who might be investing but did confirm the $500 million valuation:

“At today’s run rate this would be a very fair valuation for investors, but we have yet to determine if we will bring in additional partners. That said, we have had quite a few inquiries,” he told me.

Facebook, Google, LinkedIn and Twitter’s networks already form the core of the HootSuite social media dashboard. Enterprises (and individuals) use that dashboard to monitor social media interaction across those networks, and they also use HootSuite for custom analytics and for executing and monitoring campaigns using other services like MailChimp, which HootSuite allows users to do through the web and via mobile apps. Customers include PepsiCo, Fox and the NBA among 3.5 million others.

You can see how that relationship could become even closer and be even more beneficial for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and Google. Companies like Twitter and Facebook, built on consumer bases, need more inroads into the enterprise sector to further build out their businesses. LinkedIn, built on an enterprise customer base, needs to build out more products to serve them. And Google needs a lot more traffic and traction for its Google+ social media strategy.

A $50 million round would be a huge step up for HootSuite, which is profitable already but has reached that end at a relatively modest pace.

When HootSuite reported that OMERS Ventures, a Canadian VC firm, had taken a $20 million stake in the company in March, that was done through secondary purchases from existing shareholders, which included employees and also Blumberg Capital, Hearst Ventures, Geoff Entress and Millennium Technology Value Partners.

Before that $20 million deal, HootSuite had picked up investments worth $4.9 million: $3 million in debt and only $1.9 million capital investment.

Earlier this year HootSuite had reported an annual run-rate of $11 million in revenues. At the time it reported 140 employees and now expects to double that by the end of 2012.


Touché Teaches Objects To Sense Your Touch

Screen Shot 2012-05-03 at 7.10.39 PM

Researchers at Disney and Carnegie Mellon University have created an interesting new technology using Swept Frequency Capacitive Sensing that allows nearly any object to sense multiple points of contact on its complex service. This would allow, for example, doorknobs to understand when to lock and unlock based on your finger position and environmental controls based on the user’s current body position. Lying down? The lights go out. Feet on the floor? The lights go up.

The technology, built jointly by CMU and the Disney Research Institute in Pittsburgh, Penn., can also add more interesting interaction to smartphones. Even bodies of water can turn into “touchscreens”, with your position inside the liquid registering as a touch event.

“When combined with gesture recognition techniques, Touché demonstrated recognition rates approaching 100 percent. That suggests it could immediately be used to create new and exciting ways for people to interact with objects and the world at large,” said Ivan Poupyrev, senior research scientist at Disney Research.

Quoth the release:

By monitoring a range of signal frequencies, however, Touché can derive much more information. Different body tissues have different capacitive properties, so monitoring a range of frequencies can detect a number of different paths that the electrical charge takes through the body.
Making sense of all of that SFCS information, however, requires analyzing hundreds of data points. As microprocessors have become steadily faster and less expensive, it now is feasible to use SFCS in touch interfaces, the researchers said.In another proof-of-concept experiment, they showed that SFCS could enhance a traditional touchscreen by sensing not just the fingertip, but the configuration of the rest of the hand. They created the equivalent of a mouse “right click,” zoom in/out and copy/paste functions depending on whether the user pinched the phone’s screen and back with one finger or two, or used a thumb.

You can also sense hand position using the technology, allowing users to mute cellphones by covering their ears. I suspect future implementations in toys of all varieties will scare the heck out of us all.


Smart Education: How Lynda.com Hit $70M In Revenue Without A Penny From Investors

lynda_com_logo

As Ned Flanders would say, education in the U.S. is in “a dilly of a pickle.” At the risk of sounding like a broken record, the cost of education has become unsustainable. Student loan debt is over $1 trillion, unemployment remains high for the recently graduated, and non-traditional students — older people, single mothers, workers looking to re-train — are returning to academia and learning programs in droves, putting even more competitive pressure on already-scant on-site resources. Higher ed institutions struggle with the cost of expanding to meet demand. Yale, for example, recently decided to add 250 students to its incoming class, which came with a price tag of a quarter of a billion dollars.

Luckily, a number of startups are tackling the problem, which, along with the maturation of online content distribution channels, are helping to lower the cost of higher, primary, and continuing education — both making it easier for teachers to do what they do best as well as transforming learning into something that’s more engaging and personalized for students. Startups like Khan Academy, 2tor, ShowMe, Udemy, Udacity, Grockit, Coursera, and StraighterLine are all beginning to show how easy it is to flip the educational process — in other words, to use video and advanced web platforms to make learning more affordable and effective.

However, while these startups should be recognized for their mission-driven approaches, some of these startups evidence undercooked business models, obviously a problem for for-profit businesses when the funding (if there is any) dries up. There’s also plenty of money to go around in Silicon Valley right now, and many startups have become way too focused on raising seed and Series A financing, which can be detrimental to the system and a distraction for founders.

That’s why the story of Lynda.com has such relevance in today’s landscape. Founded in the ’90s, the company is, compared to the slew of year-old edtech startups, an old-hand. For those unfamiliar, Lynda.com offers a virtual video library of over 1,200 educational, how-to videos. Unlike the awesome Khan Academy, Lynda’s video courses are taught by industry experts, working professionals, and veteran teachers, served up in installments for a monthly subscription fee of about $25.

In 2010, Lynda delivered over 1,000 hours of content, and while it provides its paid online learning content to individuals, today it also works with nearly all of the Ivy League schools as well as companies, like Disney, Time Warner, Sony, Pixar, ABC, and HBO to supplement their learning content. What’s also different about Lynda, and perhaps old-school given today’s emerging DIY online video models, is that it produces 90 percent of its content in-house. It’s a big video production operation beyond simply being an online distribution platform.

Since the beginning, Lynda.com has been focused on tech content, offering videos how-to videos on some of the most popular apps from Adobe, Apple, Autodesk, and Microsoft — on everything from web design to learning to use Excel in a way that doesn’t make you want to blow your brains out.

Content companies have struggled to monetize on the Web, and there has been plenty of debate over the effectiveness of paywalls. Newspapers are finally starting to see growth in their circulations, and ABC’s figure for daily Times paid digital subscribers was 807,000, with the WSJ in second at 552,288. Of course, as the NYTimes points out, under audit rules, newspapers can count paid digital subscribers more than once if they have access to multiple platforms, like apps, tablets, etc.

This means that, as a content company, Lynda.com is looking pretty good in comparison. Yes, the Times’ digital offerings are much younger, but Lynda currently has over 1 million paying members, and saw 42 million uniques over the last 12 months, a 20 percent increase from the year prior. That’s not mind blowing, as there are a number of digital publications and blogs that see that much unique traffic in a month, rather than a year. But the real kicker is that Lynda hit $70 million in revenues in 2011.

Co-founders (and couple) Lynda Weinman and Bruce Heavin started by sinking $20K from their savings into Lynda. They were profitable, Heavin says, within a few weeks, and they haven’t taken a penny of outside funding since. And that’s not for lack of offers, as both founders hinted that sizable investment offers have been put on the table on a number of occasions, but the company has been content to fly under the radar and rely on word-of-mouth marketing, subscribing to a “if you don’t need money, don’t take it” policy.

The real key to the company’s success is how it’s become an alternative to the Demand Medias and eHows of the world. Lynda.com won’t blow you away with shiny graphics or interactivity, its videos often consist of basically what is the equivalent of screen-sharing, with narration from experts laid over it. But, as the company now has some-300 employees and has a serious studio north of Los Angeles, the production quality of its videos is high.

Compared to Khan, or YouTube how-tos, or eHow, Lynda’s videos are offered in installments, and depending on what users want to learn, they can graduate to more advanced content that goes high up the ladder. For example, Lynda is about to publish its 500th course on Adobe apps and software. CS6 begins shipping on Monday, and Lynda already has courses for the creative suite ready to go.

These courses on advanced PhotoShop, for example, may include up to 10 hours of content, broken down into 60-odd subgroups. While it’s not true for every subject, Lynda.com can be as basic or as advanced as you’re willing to go. And, with the growing interest in programming and coding education, the buzz around CodeAcademy being one example, the company is beginning to get very serious about expanding and diversifying its content around programming languages and web development.

For educators and teachers, part of the appeal of Lynda is that they’re guaranteed a paycheck for the content they help produce. Since Lynda is a veteran of the publishing industry, Lynda’s compensation model is not unlike book deals. Once teachers are vetted (and the co-founders told me they find more than 50 percent of the time that authors don’t necessarily make great teachers), they’re given an advance for their work. From there, the company offers a cut of revenues depending on the popularity of their videos.

Even if their videos don’t blow up, they’re guaranteed that supplementary revenue stream. But, somewhat surprisingly, the co-founders tell us that nearly 90 percent of its educators earn their entire annual income by producing videos for Lynda.com.

In the end, having been able to weather the stampede of content producers to the Web, and grow its business to $70 million in revenues, it seems that its founders might have some valuable perspective for startups and young entrepreneurs looking to do the same. Like many others, the co-founders began the process with other income streams, and it took almost 5 years before its online content was outpacing the number of courses they themselves were teaching in the classroom.

But what they kept coming back to was the fact that they started their business not as eager young people looking to get rich quick or find some niche to exploit, like becoming the Airbnb for pets, they were experts — and they were passionate about education. Weinman herself had been working in web design and film special effects, along with teaching, for years — and had published several books.

The co-founders attribute the success to becoming industry insiders before becoming entrepreneurs, and on focusing on the product before profit, allowing customers to keep you honest, and listening to their feedback to help push your business forward. Early on, everything they had and made was poured into Lynda.com. As Heavin said, it took years of “walking through the desert,” before they were able to see any real profit, but being passionate about finding better ways to educate people using online tools, and taking into account the modalities of learning — being intimately familiar with their user or target customer — can lead to a positive result.

As to what’s next, Lynda.com just added a course queue so that users can keep track of and save subjects or chapters they’re interested in watching later, and continuing to ramp up its educational content for developers. And, since 20 percent of its users are international and its content is presently English-only, the company hopes to begin translating its videos into other languages. Hopefully sooner rather than later.

For more on Lynda.com, check them out at home here.


LinkedIn’s Mobile Future: 22 Percent Of Visitors Are Mobile, In-Stream Ads Coming?

linkedin mobile

During the conference call this afternoon for their first quarter earnings, LinkedIn executives boasted about the impressive mobile growth they’re seeing. In the last week of March, the company says mobile accounted for 22 percent of unique visitors, up 8 percent from the same period last year.

And although he wouldn’t share any numbers, CEO Jeff Weiner said adoption of the recently launched iPad app has exceeded the company’s “aggressive” expectations. Weiner mentioned the iPad app again when asked about the areas where the company is strongest right now.

But one analyst asked: Is that entirely a good thing? Since LinkedIn (and other Web companies) have been slower to monetize on mobile, could the shift actually hurt the company’s revenue? Weiner argued that it should be “accretive” because “our intention is to bring all of our business lines into the mobile environment.” That means premium members should get premium access on the mobile app, and yes, it also means mobile advertising.

Weiner has already talked about his plans to bring ads to the app, but he offered a few more details today. For the iPad app, the ads will probably resemble those already found on the website. On the other hand, since smartphones have less screen real estate, the company will be experimenting with custom ad types designed specifically for the iPhone and Android, such as promoting companies to follow or posting relevant ads in the news stream.


Brightcove Reports Q1 Net Loss Of $4.3 Million, Revenue Up 53% to $19.9 Million

brightcove

Video platform Brightcove just released its first earnings report after going public in March. Brightcove posted a net loss of $4.3 million – that’s down from $5.8 million last quarter. The company’s revenue for the first financial quarter of 2012 was $19.9 million, an increase of 53% compared to the first quarter of 2011 when the company made $13.1 million. Non-GAAP net loss per share was $0.17. Analysts expected a loss of $0.16 per share.

Brightcove’s gross profit for the first quarter was $13.6 million (up 56% from $8.7 million in Q1 2011). Non-GAAP loss from operations was $2.3 million for the first quarter of 2012, an improvement compared to a non-GAAP loss of $3.4 million during the first quarter of 2011. Brightcove also announced that it had 4,254 customers at the end of the quarter. That’s up 49% compared to Q1 2011.

“We are pleased to announce strong financial results, highlighted by 53% revenue growth year-over-year, in our first quarter as a public company,” said Jeremy Allaire, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Brightcove. “Brightcove continues to expand its market share leadership position, and we believe the company is well positioned at the center of multiple powerful growth trends – video, mobile, cloud and social.”

Brightcove raised $54.6 million through its IPO earlier this year. Thanks to this, the company currently has $60.6 million in cash and cash equivalents – up from $17.2 million at the end of 2011.

For the next quarter, Brightcove expects revenue to be $19.5 to 19.9 million and a non-GAAP operating loss between $3.5 and $3.8 million. For the full year, Brightcove currently expects revenue to be $81 to $82.5 million and a non-GAAP operating loss around $10 million to $11 million.

A few more highlights from the earnings report:

  • Added 264 Express customers and 118 Premium customers during the quarter, including Allianz France, Pfizer International Operations, Toyota and Starwood Hotels & Resorts.
  • Successful initial public offering raised $54.6 million in net proceeds through the sale of 5,750,000 million shares of common stock.
  • Unveiled a major new release of Brightcove App Cloud, which adds new cloud services for intelligent cross-platform push notifications and content-level analytics that are intended to enable app owners to more easily engage their installed base, track campaign effectiveness, and identify their most impactful content.
  • Announced that NBC chose the Brightcove App Cloud content app platform to support the first-ever Emmy screener app for iPad, NBCU Screen It. With App Cloud, NBC was able to quickly roll out a powerful native iOS app for the iPad that can also be easily extended to other iOS and Google Android devices in the future.
  • Announced the Brightcove Content Exchange, which enables Video Cloud media customers to access libraries of third-party video content and to execute advertising strategies around licensed content. Third-party video content libraries that are making their content accessible include AOL Video, Diagonal View, Internet Video Archive, NewsLook, ScreenPlay Inc., and Touchstorm.


Krossover Makes Athletes, Coaches Smarter With Business Intelligence For Sports

video-breakdown

Anyone who’s played competitive sports knows how important stats, analysis, and post-game film are. They’re an excellent way to improve both personally and on a team level, yet it usually takes a dedicated staff to push out rich, thorough analysis.

Luckily, a new startup called Krossover is ready to help solve that problem.

They call themselves “business intelligence for sports,” offering youth, amateur, high school and college sports teams fully indexed game footage within 12-36 hours of uploading. This includes searchable film, box scores, shot charts and drive charts, and thorough analytical reports for every player on the team.

The service also auto-generates a game recap story and a highlight reel, allowing the footage to be properly edited and syndicated to news sources. More sports will be added soon, but as it stands now, Krossover currently only supports basketball, volleyball, lacrosse, football and hockey.

The beauty is that you can refine searches to find all the clips where the point guard took a shot behind the three-point line, or the average time the quarterback was in the pocket before completing a pass. These stats themselves are certainly helpful, but having the ability to search through video and find clips based on certain criteria is invaluable to coaches and players alike.

Krossover boasts over 600 customers, including the title-holding University of Kentucky men’s basketball team, and expects to see that number expand to 2,000 within the year. It costs between $500 and $1,000 per season to use and is available to all, which means big money for Krossover. It costs the company approximately $7 per game to index the film.

Click to view slideshow.


Balderton Capital Invests In Web Backup Startup Archify

archify logo

One of the most frustrating online experiences for me is trying to track down a web page or tweet that I saw a few days ago. If I’m lucky, I bookmarked the page or favorited the tweet, but most of the time I haven’t, and so I can only sit there and fume.

So basically, a startup called Archify is the answer to my prayers. It’s a browser plugin that tracks every website you visit (excluding https pages and websites you visit in Incognito mode), and also allows you to connect your Facebook and Twitter accounts for archiving. Then, when you’re trying to find something later, you just search the archives like you’d search the Web.

Archify, which was founded in Vienna and is moving its headquarters to Berlin, just announced that it has raised a seed round of undisclosed size from Balderton Capital.

The service is still in closed beta testing. The founders invited me in, but I haven’t played with it enough to write much of a review. I will say that the figuring out all the knobs and dials is a little confusing, but hey, that’s what private betas are for, and I like the concept enough that I’m willing to persevere.


Facebook Releases IPO Prospectus and Roadshow Video Featuring Interviews With Zuckerberg

Facebook Roadshow Video

Watch Zuck, Sheryl Sandberg and the rest of the gang go to bat for Facebook in the promo video for its pre-IPO roadshow. For your reading pleasure, I’ve written a sportscaster-style play-by-play followed by some highlights. Check out to learn about Facebook’s mission, products and platform, advertising, finance, and future without having to click past all the SEC disclaimers and sit through the 30-minute video.

The roadshow site also hosts the prospectus for investors (embedded below). The prospectus include essentially the same information as Facebook’s S-1 filing to IPO, but with more polished formatting.

Facebook IPO Roadshow Play-By-Play

[Be warned, I’m going to mix a bunch of sports metaphors, and even anthropomorphize several Facebook products.]

First we’ve got a brief intro from Facebook’s CFO, and already the video begins to lose the favor of this commentator, as it frustratingly does not allow fast-forwarding or rewinding:.

Then Mark Zuckerberg slides in(to) second.

“I grew up with the internet. You know in middle school I used search engines like Google and Yahoo and I just thought they were the most amazing thing. This complete symbol of the age we live in, where now you have access to all of this information. The thing that seemed like it was missing was always just people, right. So, the most interesting stuff that you care about the most is actually whats going on in the lives of your friends, or the people around you. And, um, there wasn’t really any way for that to be on the web. People had to share that themselves. That wasn’t just out there ready to be indexed.

Even from very early on when we were just building this thing for one school, there was this concept of what it could turn into. We just weren’t sure then we were the ones to do it.”

VP of Product Chris Cox is next up to bat, discussing how when Facebook started, you only had one photo. Your profile photo. But people were changing it a lot. Facebook realized it should let users upload whole albums — the feature that would cause Facebook’s popularity to boom.

After a few words about the social graph and The Hacker Way, Zuckerberg and Cox tag-team the Products segment. First they take a swing at Timeline, which Zuckerberg calls “the story of your life on a single page”. Next is your personal, always-up-to-date news feed.

Looking to keep morale high as they enter the second quarter of the video, Cox announces “We’re now changing within a generation the fabric of how humanity communicates with itself.” Then he follows it up with a flurry of stats, though the video shows its age as some are already outdated.

Hoping to gain favor with the roaring crowds of developers, Zuckerberg claims that as much traffic as Facebook gets, the company thinks what other people can build on top of it will be even more important. Long-time teammate The New York Times and new draft pick Spotify are commended for their contributions to the platform.

Cox then brings in Facebook’s new bruiser, the powerful but controversial frictionless sharing. This commentator applauds him for his traffic driving abilities and sees his style as the future, but others say auto-publishing in-app activities is fighting dirty.

Just before half-time, COO Sheryl Sandberg takes the field defend Facebook’s business model. Name-checking Nike and J.Crew, Sandberg says people connect to businesses just like they do to people. Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream handles the half-time show, singing that it makes $3 in sales for every $1 it spends on Facebook.

Sandberg kicks off the second half with heavy hitting stats about how Facebook ads are 90% accurate compared to an industry average of 30%. For the 7th inning stretch entertainment, American Express performs a presentation about Small Business Saturday.

Facebook subs in its CFO David Ebersman to power through its financial info give its starters a rest. He scores with a previously unseen graph of average revenue per user broken out by geography, and by confirming Facebook may charge non-game app developers less than 30% in taxes on payments.

In the final minutes, Zuckerberg predicts his team’s success next season. “5 years out..almsot every app you use is going to be integrated with Facebook in some way.”

And for the buzzer beater, Facebook’s star player announces. “We make decisions not optimizing for what’s gonna happen in the next year, but what’s gonna set us up to really be in this world where every product experience you have is social and that’s all powered by Facebook.”

…but wait. Extra innings! After the video’s listed stop time, liquor brand Diageo makes one last play to convince investors that advertisers are loyal to Facebook.

Highlights

Overall, the Facebook team performed well but dazzle us with many new moves. Cox and Zuckberg had solid ball control, with the CEO looking more nimble and confident than in past season. Ebersman’s late score with geographic ARPU graph was critical, and pinch hitting by Ben & Jerry’s and American Express also deserves a mention.

The judges are now making their decisions, and we’ll have to wait until the actual IPO later this month to see if Facebook brought home the win.


Facebook’s “Offers” News Feed Coupons Launch In Self-Serve Beta For Local U.S. Businesses

102534329872055_1296335536

Today any local U.S. business can start using Facebook’s Offers product – free-to-create coupons that businesses can share to the news feed, and that users can bring to brick-and-mortar stores for redemptions. First announced in February at the Facebook Marketing Conference, the product has been in private testing with a select group of brands who worked with Facebook reps to run the offers. Now the promotional product is available in a self-serve interface.

While it doesn’t cost businesses anything to run offers, Facebook could still make money on them. If they perform well in the news feed and drive business to physical stores, those stores may spend more on Facebook ads that increase their Page fan counts — and the subscriber bases for the coupons.

To create and distribute an Offer, U.S. businesses that list a local address can go to the post composer on their Page’s Timeline. There they’ll be walked through a tour of the product. Then they can add a thumbnail, headline, and fine print before being able to post the coupon to their fans.

Facebook warns that businesses need to train their cashiers or other staff members on how to process offers when customers bring in a printed email or show the confirmation message on their phone. Otherwise they could end up with confused employees and angry patrons.

Facebook tells me Offers is rolling out to local U.S. businesses today, so Page admins in the States should see the option soon if they don’t already. Facebook does plan to roll the product out further, so if past releases are any indication, the U.K., Canada, Australia, and Japan may be next in line to get customers lining up at their stores with Offers in hand.

Businesses have spent years building their fan counts, both organically and through paid Facebook ads. However, many have wondered what the actual value of a fan is. With the launch of Offers, Facebook has given them a clearer answer to how fans drive a return on investment in fans. Pay for ads, get more fans, Offer a free drink with entree purchase, recoup ad costs with sales of entrees. Boom. ROI.


LinkedIn Beats The Street, Q1 Revenue Up 101 Percent To $188.5M; Net Income Up 140 Percent

linkedin

Professional social network LinkedIn has just released Q1 earnings. Revenue for the first quarter was $188.5 million, an increase of 101% compared to $93.9 million in the first quarter of 2011. Net income for the first quarter was $5 million, compared to net income of $2.1 million for the first quarter 2011, in increase of 140%. Non-GAAP EPS for the first quarter was $0.15. Analysts expected earnings of $0.09 cents per share, with quarterly revenue in at $179 million. Clearly, the company blew past Wall Street expectations.

“LinkedIn’s solid performance in the first quarter built on the company’s momentum in 2011,” said Jeff Weiner, CEO of LinkedIn. “We saw strength across all key metrics from member signups and engagement to significant revenue growth across our three product lines.”

LinkedIn says this is the seventh consecutive quarter of revenue growth for the company.

Revenue from Hiring Solutions products totaled $102.6 million, an increase of 121% compared to the first quarter of 2011. Hiring Solutions revenue represented 54% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2012, compared to 49% in the first quarter of 2011. Revenue from Marketing Solutions products totaled $48.0 million, an increase of 73% compared to the first quarter of 2011. Marketing Solutions revenue represented 26% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2012, compared to 30% in the first quarter of 2011. Revenue from Premium Subscriptions products totaled $37.9 million, an increase of 91% compared to the first quarter of 2011. Premium Subscriptions represented 20% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2012, compared to 21% of revenue in the first quarter of 2011.

Revenue from the U.S. totaled $120.8 million, and represented 64% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2012. Revenue from international markets totaled $67.6 million, and represented 36% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2012.

Revenue for the second quarter of 2012 is projected to range between $210 million to $215 million.

For LinkedIn, it’s been nearly a year since the company’s IPO in May of 2011. And the company has been steadily increasing revenue and profits. In Q4 of 2011, LinkedIn doubled revenue and increased profit, surpassing Wall Street expectations. And the company is currently valued at over $11 billion.

From the product iteration standpoint, Q1 was a slightly slower quarter for the network.

In March, LinkedIn introduced a new version of People You May Know. LinkedIn also launched an embeddable “Follow” button that companies can add to their websites. And LinkedIn made the acquisition of contact manager Rapportive official.

Last week, the company debuted its iPad app, which was a key step in the company’s mobile strategy.

We’ll be following the earnings call in an hour and updating this post with additional details.

Earnings Call:

LinkedIn now has 161 million members, adding 15 million members over the past quarter. The company is seeing the fastest growth in Latin America, Asia Pacific, and Europe.

The company will refresh many of its pillar products this year. LinkedIn is expected to have 5.3 billion professional searches in 2012.

Mobile continues to be the fast growing product for LinkedIn.


Facebook’s Early Shareholders Will Sell Up To $5.5 Billion With IPO. Here’s Who’s Selling What:

markzuckerberg

Facebook’s early investors and employees may sell up to $5.5 billion alongside the company’s offering. Facebook said today that it is selling 180 million shares of stock at $28 to 35 a share. On top of that, other stockholders are selling 157,415,352 shares. Those proceeds will not go to Facebook.

Chief executive Mark Zuckerberg is selling 30.2 million shares, or up to $1.05 billion, which will mostly go toward settling the multi-billion dollar tax bill he’ll face when he exercises his options. Zuckerberg has an outstanding stock option to purchase 120,000,000 shares of our Class B common stock at a strike price of 6 cents. He’ll exercise half of it. That’s why he needs to sell 30.2 million shares to cover the taxes.

Even so, he’ll still have 57.3 percent voting control over the company, thanks to an extra 470 million shares over which he has “irrevocable proxy.” That means that while other people own those shares, they’ve given up the votes tied to them to Zuckerberg.

Zuck’s not the only one selling shares either. So are Accel’s Jim Breyer*, Peter Thiel, LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman and Zynga CEO Mark Pincus. Then there are the institutional entities like Accel* and DST. In fact, it’s Breyer and his firm Accel that are walking away with the biggest immediate payday from the IPO.

Who’s not selling in this offering? Sean Parker, Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg and Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz.

The last important thing to note is that no one is selling a majority of their stake. Everyone who is selling is giving away somewhere between 1/10th and 1/4 of their stake.

We have the actual table from the S-1 here, and then we have a table calculating proceeds for every major shareholder right below that.

*Note: The amount sold by Breyer in the second line conflates shares that he personally owns and shares that his fund Accel Partners owns.


Folding Time

The Tern P7i is a folding bike made for city commutes. Photo by Jon Snyder/Wired

The only reason to consider a folding bike is if you really need a bike that folds.

For the general cycling public, they are impractical machines. The tiny wheels, odd weight distribution and freaky frame shape all make for an awkward ride filled with huffing and puffing. But for those forced to take a commuter train or subway, they’re a godsend. Fold up your ride, and you can bring it with you on crowded trains and buses. Stash it in the closet at work or in your studio apartment. You can even check a foldie as luggage, so when you land in Beijing or Istanbul, you can pedal yourself around and play hipster tourist.

If you’re looking to buy a folding bike, I’d encourage you to test ride a Tern Link, an entry from the relatively new Taiwanese manufacturer. At around $1,000, they’re well priced, sitting just above the budget Dahon bikes and below the comparable Brompton models. Tern bikes in general are well appointed, and feature some impressive construction that makes for a comfortable ride that rivals more expensive folders.

Tern’s Link platform isn’t as fancy or as swoopy as its performance-minded Verge frame. Instead, it’s set up for commuters — the P7i model we tested came with a very nice rear rack, a BioLogic Joule II dynohub that powers an integrated front light, and a fully enclosed internally geared Shimano Nexus 7 hub. The 20-inch wheels are topped with fenders and have V-brakes. There’s even a bike pump built into the seat post.

With all that trim, the price sits at $1,200. The most basic Link configuration, the C7, is only $450, but the frame and components are not as nice. Most Link models run closer to $800.

The P7i has a one-size-fits-all 6061 aluminum frame with a rather utilitarian shape, cutting a straight line from the head tube back to the main hinge. One unique feature is the double truss construction of the main tube, which splits and wraps around the seat tube on its way back toward the rear hub. This increases the frame’s stiffness (always a problem on folders) and allows for a more efficient power transfer when pedaling.

The folding routine requires practice. You start at the handlebars, which are double-hinged to allow adjustment for bar height and rotation. To fold up the bike, you first undo the handlebar clasp and pull the bars up, so they’re in a straight line with the stem. Then, undo the joint clasp at the base of the handlebar stem and fold the bars down next to the fork. (All of the joints have sturdy safety releases that are easy to work.) Drop the seat post down, fold the pedals up, then unclasp the over-center lock joint above the cranks. The bike swings at the two pivots to collapse into a sort of “N” shape below you. A magnetic clasp keeps everything from swinging apart.

Folded. Photo by Jon Snyder/Wired

Tern lists the maximum rider weight at 242 pounds, which is very close to my weight (I rarely miss a meal). So I was really pushing the envelope. Still, the bike was stable on all different terrains. I rode it mostly on the flats, commuting to work every day, but I also took it up and over a couple of San Francisco’s hills during my two-week-long testing period. Through some stroke of weird luck, I rode it in the rain almost the whole time.

The P7i was far less sketchy than other folding bikes I’ve ridden.

One note of praise: Tern has made a remarkably stiff frame. The P7i was far less sketchy than other folding bikes I’ve ridden. There was almost no unwanted flexing or creaking happening below me as I was pushing the bike over hills or cooking along at full speed.

Keeping it properly adjusted was an issue. When I first started riding it, things were slipping here and there — the pitch of the handlebars, the seatpost, the position of the rear wheel. (Maybe my weight is to blame.) But the good news is that almost every joint on the Tern can be adjusted roadside using minimal tools. So, I was able to keep loose nuts in check using only a hex wrench multi-tool and a small box wrench.

One thing that did slip on me more often than I liked was the Shimano hub. I’ve experienced the same thing with these hubs before — I felt it slip when under load or while applying a lot of torque. I expected more stability out of it. One other quibble with the drivetrain: The gearing isn’t quite wide enough. I wanted more gear choices on climbs, and craved a higher top speed during cross-city commutes. A 9-speed or better would solve this, so it’s no fault of the manufacturer, just the wrong hub for me. You may feel differently.

And of course, this being a folding bike, I traveled with it. The folded P7i frame can be carried comfortably with one hand (it’s about 30 pounds) using either the seat or the rack as a handle. You can also wheel it along beside you by holding the seat. On the commuter train, it slots into the nooks reserved for luggage and it’s not too much of a hassle to navigate a station platform while carrying one. For longer hauls, the better choice is to pick up one of Tern’s bags or rolling travel cases. There’s a collapsable, wheeled trolley rack ($150) that fits all Link models, and two suitcase-style carriers ($250-300) that work as checked luggage. I should note that the bike is far too large to carry onto an airplane, so you’ll need a case if you’re flying with it.

Beware, though — it’s a bike-nerd magnet. While toting it around, I got a lot of questions and requests for demonstrations. All the talking and explaining was more tiring than carrying around a 30-pound bike.

WIRED Nice, stiff frame design makes for a stable, efficient ride. Attractive design. The D7i is well equipped for a wet urban commute. Folds up relatively easily, and stays there. Price is right for what you get.

TIRED Shimano Nexus 7 hub isn’t a top performer. Could be lighter. You’ll get really good at making adjustments. It’s still a folding bike.

Cut Hair the Ferrari Way, Sort Of

The BaByliss Pro Volare clippers have a Ferrari-inspired motor (and paint job). Photo by Jon Snyder/Wired

“Aerodynamics,” Enzo Ferrari once said, “are for people who cannot build engines.”

Ferrari built his eponymous brand on the back of exceptional powerplants — a series of small-displacement engines, chiefly V-12s, designed by legendary names like Jano, Lampredi and Colombo. They were artful pieces, hand-crafted works that produced great power and unholy noise. They collected races and championships like a fameballer gathers marriage certificates.

We live in an age where a brand’s history and core values often have little to do with its licensing potential.

How does a $200 Chinese-built hair clipper with a “Ferrari-inspired engine” (to quote the press release) fit into that lineage? It doesn’t, of course. But this is irrelevant. We live in an age where a brand’s history and core values often have little to do with its licensing potential. Maybe the famously mercurial Enzo, dead since 1988, would have approved of a hair clipper licensed to wear his name. Maybe not. It’s probably best that we don’t know.

So here we have the BaByliss Pro Volare clipper. Your $200 gets you a three-speed cordless haircutting device with an easy-grip rubberized back, a one-hour quick-charge time, a moving steel blade coated in diamond-like carbon, and a fixed steel blade coated in titanium. It is red. Its “Ferrari-inspired” electric motor runs for a claimed 70 minutes with a full charge and comes with an assortment of useful accessories — a charging stand, oil, a cleaning brush, a selection of comb attachments. A dial at the top of the clipper lets you adjust cutting depth from 0.8 to 2.0 millimeters in increments of 0.3 millimeters. The blade has a one-year warranty. The clipper itself is good for two.

My test unit came in a gloss-black presentation box, one festooned with slogans like “success is built upon the performance of the engine and blade,” and “finest professional clipper made.” It also came covered in someone else’s hair, the leftover snips of a previous reviewer. This was harmless, albeit slightly creepy. As a result, I did not try it on my own hair, though I did use it to cut the locks off a Barbie doll bought specifically for the purpose. When I was done, Barbie’s head felt smooth as suede and she looked like a young Debbie Harry. I suppose that’s what you’d call a success.

This was admittedly not the most trying of tests. I briefly considered offering the BaByliss to my local salon for an extended evaluation, but then I remembered a conversation I once had with my barber regarding hair clippers. It went something like this:

Me: “Is that clipper a Wahl? I hear those are pretty decent.”

Him: “Eh, yeah, but a clipper is a clipper. As long as they don’t jam or fall apart that often, they’re all the same.”

Me: “Which ones don’t jam or fall apart?”

Him: “The expensive ones.”

Me: “Is the one you’re using expensive?”

Him: “Your head’s moving too much. Stop talking. How high do you want your sideburns?”

A quick Google search shows the BaByliss Pro Volare to be among the more expensive clippers on the market. Make of that what you will.

Babyliss Pro is a respected firm in the styling industry, and these clippers don’t tarnish the company’s name — they’re sharp, the blades cut cleanly and aren’t prone to jams, and the graduated clipping-height dial feels like it will last. It’s the other brand on the box that irks. What, exactly, are you paying for here? Despite a host of Ferrari logos on the BaByliss’s box, there’s no prancing-horse badge on the clipper’s exterior, and the electric motor at its heart doesn’t seem to be anything special. It sounds and feels just like every other clipper I’ve used.

There is one benefit, though: A Ferrari-branded hair clipper lets you indulge your inner monologue nerd, crossing hair terminology with car-review patter ad infinitum. To wit, the following popped into my head while trimming Barbie:

“Modern technology? I miss the days when cars and hair were dangerous, when clippers didn’t have electronic stability control and drew blood if you got sloppy around the ears. That separated the men from the boys! Oh, those hair-clipping men of old! Remember Mario Maruzzi, the Barbasol Beast of Burbank? From 1925 to 1973, he cut hair with his elbows, his hands lost in a tragic Brylcreem accident. Drove his Ferrari to work every day, never left a sideburn uneven. What a pro.”

On second thought, maybe it’s best to just find a good barber.

WIRED Designed to cut hair, and does just that. Blade trims evenly and doesn’t jam. In the words of an old hot-rodding maxim, red makes anything faster.

TIRED Seems less sturdy than the industry-standard Wahl clipper, though cutting performance is similar. Ferrari tie-in offers diddly, and it’s not like the prancing horse needs your money. Repeated use does not give you awesome Fernando Alonso hair.

Can you feel the road? Photo by Jon Snyder/Wired

Bigger Jambox Makes a Bigger Boom

The Big Jambox from Jawbone (the red one) is much larger – and louder – than the original Jambox. Photo by Jon Snyder/Wired

The Jambox is back. But now, little baby’s all grown up.

The Big Jambox from Jawbone (yes, the hands-free headset people) builds upon the success of the company’s original Jambox portable speaker, keeping the attractive no-frills design, but wrapping it around a larger box that’s louder and has more battery life.

The new model will be available this week at a price of $300. That’s pretty steep for a portable speaker, and a full $100 more than its smaller sibling. But the sound it puts out is much more satisfying, making it worth the extra Benjamin.

Like the original Jambox, the Big Jambox is a simple brick with small speakers inside. It pairs wirelessly with any Bluetooth device to play any audio source you want, it runs on a rechargeable battery, and has a built-in microphone so it can be used as a speakerphone. Unlike the original Jambox, which measures 6 inches wide, 2.2 inches tall and 1.6 inches deep and weighs 12 ounces, the Big Jambox is a beast. It’s 10 inches across, 3.5 inches tall and 3 inches deep, and it weighs 2.7 pounds.

Probably the greatest joy of the original Jambox is its go-anywhere portability — it’s literally small enough to slide into a jacket pocket, a purse or a fanny pack. With the Big Jambox, you lose that. It’s fine in a backpack or a tote bag, but a three-pound brick made of plastic, rubber and perforated steel simply isn’t as travel-friendly.

You can turn it down when it’s time to play nice, but crank it up and you get an impressively loud and clear speaker system with serious muscle.

In exchange for portability, you get much-improved sound. Jawbone loaned me a Big Jambox to test for a week, and I used it in a variety of settings, indoors and out. While the original Jambox does fine for adding a little ambient noise to a dinner party or supplying background music in an office, the Big Jambox commands attention. Sure, you can turn it down when it’s time to play nice, but crank it up and you get an impressively loud and clear speaker system with serious muscle. The highs are crisp and the mids are precise. While the lows could be meatier, the bass response was still better than I expected, given the size of the speakers — it has a stereo pair of 2.2-inch neodymium drivers1 and a pair of rectangular passive radiators (one in front, one in back) to cover the low end, all housed in a sealed cabinet.

It’s even more impressive when you take it outside. I plopped it on the back deck, and it had enough brawn to fill the whole back yard with great-sounding audio. Even when I turned it up as loud as it would go, the distortion was barely perceptible — the things around it started rattling from the vibrations before the speakers began to distort. It employs some compression where needed to keep the distortion at bay, but the audio processing didn’t leave any noticeable sonic fingerprints.

Bluetooth pairing is simple. Just press the “Pair” button on the side and pick the Big Jambox from the list of devices on your screen. I tried three iPhones, an Android tablet, a laptop and an iMac, and it’s obvious Jawbone has the Bluetooth connectivity dance steps down pat. The Big Jambox will remember 8 paired devices at any given time, and its claimed 33 feet of range worked as advertised, though it does require line-of-sight once you get further away than about 20 feet.

The lithium-ion battery lasted over 12 hours in our tests. That’s listening mostly at full volume and making a couple of hour-long phone calls. You can probably eke out another hour or two if you use it at lower volume levels, but either way, it easily lasts long enough for a day at the beach or a party that stretches to the wee hours. A tiny icon in your phone’s status bar shows the speaker’s remaining battery life on iOS devices (natively) and on Android (via Jawbone’s companion app). It takes about 2.5 hours to fully charge it using the included AC adapter. You can also trickle charge it using a USB cable, but you’ll have to leave it plugged in overnight to juice it up all the way.

The Big Jambox comes with Jawbone’s LiveAudio feature installed — basically, a software trick that gives the stereo image a big “3-D” feel via some artificial spatial widening. It sounds cool if you stay seated, centered and perfectly stationary about 3 or 4 feet from the speakers. Stand anywhere else (like across the room) and it sounds like crap. Also, LiveAudio drastically alters the dynamics of recorded music. I only enabled the feature while watching movies, as it generally made music sound worse.

The lithium-ion battery lasted over 12 hours in our tests.

Overall, however, Jawbone’s new speaker sounds great, and I’m a big fan of the design. But its ability to fill a larger room — rather than just add some ambience — is what makes the Big Jambox a success. I’d recommend it, even at the relatively high price of $300. There are similar speakers at $200 or less (Altec Lansing’s $200 inMotion Air IMW725, or Soundfreaq’s $100 Sound Kick) but they lack the power, the speakerphone features, and battery life of the Big Jambox. If you don’t want to make compromises in those areas, you have to spend money.

If you find the original Jambox endearing, but (like me) wish it went louder and offered more clarity, put the Big Jambox on your short list. But beware: it’s more of a hassle to schlep it to a picnic, so I’d only recommend it for people who always carry a backpack, or who mostly use their Bluetooth speakers around the house. If you split your time between a traditional home office and a sunny spot like your back deck or rooftop terrace, this thing is your new best friend.

WIRED Big, clear sound. Tight package. Controls for skipping tracks, changing the volume and answering calls are right on top. Over 12 hours of play time on a rechargeable battery. Solid Bluetooth performance. Under three pounds. Eight rubber feet keep it from shimmying around.

TIRED Price makes you think too hard. Size matters: requires an external method of conveyance, and it won’t squeeze into your travel carry-on. Bass is clear and not flabby, but it could pack more punch. Needs the wall wart to charge quickly. Spatial enhancement feature is meh.

Note 1. The original version of this story incorrectly stated the size of the drivers. They are 2.2 inches in diameter each.

Google Graduates Automatic Email Translation Feature From Gmail Labs, Expels Old Snakey And Others

translation_comic

In 2009, Google brought its translation feature to Gmail as a Gmail Labs experiment. Today, almost exactly two years after it first launched, this features is finally graduating from Gmail Labs. Starting in the next few days, you will see an option to “Translate message” in the header at the top of every message that is written in a foreign language.

You will, of course, have the option to turn this feature off as well. If you always want Gmail to translate a message in a particular language, you can also turn translation on as a default for that language.

Also Graduating: Title Tweaks

In addition to automatic message translation, Google also graduated Title Tweaks from Labs today. Thanks to this, your Gmail browser tabs will now read “”Inbox (20) – [email protected] – Gmail” instead of “Gmail – Inbox (20) – [email protected].” That’s not a major change, obviously, but for users with a large number of tabs open, this tweak will make it easier to see how many new messages they have.

Gmail Labs Dropouts

Not everybody is graduating today, though. Google is also retiring a number of Labs products. These include Old Snakey, Mail Goggles, Mouse Gestures, Hide Unread Counts, Move Icon Column, Inbox Preview, Custom Date Formats and the SMS in Chat gadget. These experiments will be retired over the next few days.