Mother charged after son stabbed

A woman has been charged with the attempted murder of her 12-year-old son at her home on Merseyside.

Police were called to a house in Wallasey, at 0525 BST on Wednesday. They found the boy with stab wounds to his chest and shoulder.

The 33-year-old woman was initially arrested on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm but charged with attempted murder overnight.

She was due to appear before Wirral magistrates later.

Police said the boy’s injuries were superficial.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Exeter city election polls open

Royal Courts of JusticeThe High Court ruled by-elections had to take place in Exeter and Norwich

Polling stations have opened in Exeter – bringing the city’s bid for unitary status to an end.

Residents will elect 13 councillors to bring the city council back to its full complement of 40 councillors.

The by-elections are being held after the High Court upheld a decision by the new government not to allow the Devon city unitary status.

Polls will close at 2200 BST. The city of Norwich is also holding elections for the same reason.

Exeter and Norwich were granted unitary status by the previous Labour administration in February, but the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition revoked the decision.

The High Court ruled the by-elections must take place to maintain legality.

Currently in Exeter, no single party has overall control.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Erdogan raps rivals ahead of poll

Recep Tayyip Erdogan at rally in Istanbul. 5 Sept 2010Recep Tayyip Erdogan has been addressing rallies across Turkey ahead of the referendum

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has criticised the tactics of his political opponents ahead of a referendum on constitutional reform.

Speaking to the BBC ahead of Sunday’s vote, Mr Erdogan accused them of using “disinformation and black propaganda”.

The proposed reforms include controversial changes to Turkey’s judiciary.

Opposition parties say the changes will give the government more control over the appointment of senior judges.

Related stories

The present constitution was introduced in 1982 by the military.

The BBC’s Jonathan Head in Istanbul says a “no” vote or only a marginal win would be seen as a blow to Mr Erdogan, who has dominated Turkish politics for the past eight years following two decisive election victories.

Opinion polls suggest the vote will be close.

Mr Erdogan has been travelling around Turkey for the past three weeks, trying to drum up support for his reforms.

But he told the BBC that the main opposition parties were deceiving voters.

“At the moment there is a flood of disinformation and black propaganda,” he said.

“They claim these reforms are my personal project or my party’s – that claim is unfounded.”

Mr Erdogan argues that the reforms will make the military-drafted constitution more democratic.

However the opposition says the proposed changes to the top levels of the judiciary, far from making it more accountable, will give the government more control over the Constitutional Court and over the selection of senior judges.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Spending cuts ‘to hit north harder’

Corus steel works in RedcarThe Corus steel works in Redcar announced 1,600 job losses earlier this year

Middlesbrough is the area of England least resilient to economic shocks, according to BBC-commissioned research.

The study, carried out by Experian, looks at the ability of each local authority area to withstand and respond to sudden changes in the economy.

With further public sector cuts on the cards, it suggests how England’s regions may cope.

Each area is ranked in order of resilience, and a clear north-south divide is evident.

Middlesbrough on Teesside is followed by Mansfield in Nottinghamshire, which is the second least resilient area according to the research, and then Stoke-on-Trent which is the third.

Elmbridge in Surrey is the most resilient area in England, followed by St Albans in Hertfordshire and then Waverley in Surrey, the information suggests.

The research looks at four key themes; business, community, people and place.

Within these categories, a number of factors have been analysed, including the amount of vulnerable and resilient industry within an area, the life expectancy of residents, earnings of workers, unemployment and crime rates.

Analysis

Today’s research reveals a clear north-south divide. It is a divide which is a legacy of government policy over decades.

The Tees Valley in general and Middlesbrough in particular are places which became rich on heavy industry.

William Gladstone famously went to the original town hall in Middlesbrough and proclaimed it an “infant Hercules”.

Go to the same spot now, as I did, and you find a sad, boarded-up building surrounded by wasteland and a few abandoned, crumbling houses.

The area found it increasingly hard to compete in global markets and, over time, government felt obliged to pump in state support to prop up and regenerate the declining economy.

The result is that a town like Middlesbrough has become state-dependent.

The BBC commissioned the research as part of The Spending Review: Making it Clear season, which looks at the government’s plans to make deep public sector savings.

The results of the coalition government’s spending review will be announced in October, when it will be revealed which departments will see their budgets cut and by how much.

The Experian research suggests Middlesbrough will be the least resilient to such public sector cuts.

It is ranked at number 324 out of 324 council areas. The Teesside town also appears as the least resilient in the business section.

Alastair Thomson, dean of Teesside University’s business school, said Middlesbrough had a high number of workers employed in the public sector, particularly in the NHS and education.

The three largest employers in the town were public sector, he said.

Public sector employment, along with other industries like construction, engineering and metals, is classified as vulnerable in the Experian research.

Mr Thomson said there was very little of the traditional heavy industry associated with Teesside and the North East left, but new industries were emerging.

“We are seeing a lot of growth in the digital sector,” he said. “It is an area we see as having a lot of potential for the future.

“Renewable energy is big business in this part of the world.

“We are a significant player in terms of bioethanol production.”

The North East as a whole does not fair well in the Experian study.

Spending review branding

A special BBC News season examining the approaching cuts to public sector spending

Spending Review: Making It Clear

Redcar and Cleveland, Hartlepool, South Tyneside and Sunderland are all in the bottom 20 of the overall resilience table.

One of the area’s large industrial employers, Corus steel works in Redcar, announced the partial mothballing of the plant and loss of 1,600 jobs in February.

John Crook lost his job at the plant in March after working there for 25 years.

He and his wife Jan decided to start their own catering business and obtained funding from their local council and from the government’s Business Link scheme.

Mr Crook said if such funding was cut by the government in the future, many people in Teesside would be unable to start their own business.

“I can only hope that the new government is sympathetic to the area, that there’s no north-south divide,” he said.

“We have relied very heavily on steel and heavy industry and most of that has gone now.”

He said the mood among former Corus workers who have been made redundant was very “downbeat”.

“There does not seem to be work out there,” he said. “What new skills can they bring to steel workers? That’s the worry.”

At the top of Experian’s resilience table is Elmbridge in Surrey, followed by St Albans in Hertfordshire.

St Albans also topped the business resilience section, which looked at a range of variables including the amount of vulnerable sectors, key high-growth areas, new business start-ups and the percentage of working-age population that is self-employed.

John CrookJohn Crook and set up his own business after being made redundant

Mel Hilbrown, director of St Albans and District Chamber of Commerce, said the main industry in the city was knowledge-based, working in areas such as finance and consultancy, which had proved resilient in the recession.

“It’s always been quite entrepreneurial as an area,” said Mr Hilbrown, who is also executive director of the St Albans Enterprise Agency.

“In the last five to 10 years, it’s had a high number of business start-ups.”

He said the recession had provided opportunities for such businesses in the area, and the city’s proximity to London helped them.

“Even in the financial recession, things that the larger companies were not so interested in, there were businesses in St Albans starting to develop that niche.

“Small businesses can often be more resilient in a recession.”

The Spending Review: Politicians come face to face with the public across England to talk about the cuts. BBC One at 2235 BST on Thursday, and on local BBC radio at 0900 BST on Friday.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Fees rise ‘best’ for universities

GraduatesHigher university fees are opposed by the National Union of Students

University vice chancellors are set to be told that raising student tuition fees is the best way to ensure future finding for higher education.

Universities minister David Willetts is expected to make the argument during a speech to vice chancellors later.

The Tory MP will say the approach is better than cutting student numbers or reducing the standard of courses.

In the past his Lib Dem partners in the coalition government pledged to abolish tuition fees in England.

Related stories

In England, students pay fees of £3,225 a year, for which they take out loans, repayable after their income reaches £15,000.

Tuition fees are free for Scottish students in Scotland, and capped at £1,285 for Welsh students studying in Wales.

Graduate tax alternative

Mr Willetts’s speech will take place as university vice chancellors will meet later for a conference at Cranfield University, in Bedfordshire.

Universities in England are waiting for two major announcements – the result of the government spending review, which could cut higher education budgets by 20% or more – and the outcome of the review by Lord Browne of long term university funding.

Both are due this autumn.

The university minister’s speech is expected to discuss three options open to the government – stepping back from the rapid rise in student numbers, allowing funding cuts to decrease the standard of university teaching, and higher fees.

It is understood the universities minister will suggest asking students to pay more is the best option.

Business Secretary Vince Cable, meanwhile, has suggested a graduate tax linked to postgraduate salaries as an alternative.

Under a graduate tax, the amount the student pays would be a percentage of his or her income, rather than a fixed amount linked to a specific university fee – so some students could end up paying more than the fees for their own degree.

However, the idea has not received strong support in government.

Senior Conservative sources said the coalition government wanted to maintain the direct payment from the individual to the university, and that ministers believed it would be unfair for high-earning graduates to pay back more than the cost of their degrees.

Labour have accused the two coalition partners of squabbling over the issue.

Cost-cutting suggestions

It has also been reported that Lord Browne will reject a graduate tax and instead raise fees to around £7,000.

Higher university fees are also opposed by the National Union of Students which has supported proposals for a variable graduate tax.

Other moves to cut costs have also been mooted in the past, such as two-year degrees, more students studying part-time, by distance learning or living at home, and expanding the role of private institutions.

In the UK as a whole, income from fees – including fees paid directly by students such as postgraduates and overseas students – makes up about 29% of universities’ total funding, which was £25.4bn in 2008/09.

Another 35% comes from government funding bodies, while the rest comes from other sources such as research grants, endowments and investments.

In addition, students are eligible for loans towards their maintenance costs, which they pay back in the same way as their fees.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Mexico crime ‘like an insurgency’

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Mrs Clinton said the Obama administration’s foreign policy was working

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has declared that a “new American moment” has arrived in global politics.

Speaking at a Washington think tank, Mrs Clinton said the model of American leadership “offers our best hope in a dangerous world”.

The speech comes amid renewed US efforts to broker Middle East peace.

But the Obama administration has been criticised over a perceived lack of progress on its international goals.

Critics argue that Iran and North Korea maintain nuclear ambitions, the security situation in Afghanistan continues to be perilous and Israeli-Palestinian relations have yet to improve.

But Mrs Clinton said that US had “begun to see the dividends of our strategy.”

“We are advancing America’s interests and making progress on some of our most pressing challenges,” she said.

Mrs Clinton also noted that the world continues to look to the US for leadership in times of crisis, calling that both a responsibility and an unparalleled opportunity to seize upon.

“The world is counting on us. When old adversaries need an honest broker or fundamental freedoms need a champion, people turn to us,” she said.

But she stressed the importance of international partnerships.

“This is no argument for America to go it alone,” Mrs Clinton said.

“The world looks to us because America has the reach and resolve to mobilize the shared effort needed to solve problems on a global scale – in defence of our own interests, but also as a force for progress. In this we have no rival.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Koran bonfire ‘still going ahead’

Terry JonesTerry Jones says he doesn’t think backing down is the “right thing”

A US pastor says he is not “backing down” from plans to burn copies of the Koran on the anniversary of 9/11, despite international outrage.

“We are not convinced that backing down is the right thing,” said Terry Jones of 50-member Florida church, the Dove World Outreach Center.

The group’s plan has sparked condemnation from Muslim countries, Nato and the top US Afghan commander.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the plan “disgraceful”.

On Monday, General David Petraeus, the top US commander in Afghanistan, warned troops’ lives would be in danger if the church went through with its bonfire.

The US Attorney General, Eric Holder, called the idea “idiotic and dangerous”.

Related stories

But organiser, Pastor Terry Jones said on Wednesday that his plan to burn the Islamic holy book is intended to draw attention to his belief that “something’s wrong.”

“It is possibly time for us in a new way to actually stand up, confront terrorism,” Mr Jones told reporters.

He acknowledged Gen Petraeus’ concerns, but claimed to have been contacted by a special forces officer who told him US troops were supportive of his plan.

“So on September the eleventh we shall continue with our planned event.”

Analysis

The Dove World Outreach Center may only represent a handful of people, but its incendiary plans haven’t emerged out of nowhere.

The role of Islam in America has become a hot button issue with social and political implications.

While most Americans would probably take issue with exhortations to burn the Koran, there is clearly widespread concern about the influence of Islam.

Protests over the planned location of an Islamic centre close to Ground Zero in New York, and similar controversy in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, have highlighted popular anxiety about Islam in America.

Earlier this year, an opinion poll found that 53% of Americans view Islam unfavourably, with only 42% viewing the religion favourably.

Reports about young American Muslims being radicalised on the internet have helped to stoke fears about the nature of a religion indelibly associated, since 9/11, with a violent assault on the US.

Far from subsiding over time, anxiety seems to have deepened. As a result, American Muslims say they feel more isolated than at any time since the 2001 attacks.

The controversy comes at a time when the US relationship with Islam is very much under scrutiny.

There is heated debate in the country over a proposal to build a mosque and Islamic cultural centre streets from Ground Zero, site of the 9/11 attacks, in New York.

Gen Petraeus said on Monday that the bonfire could cause problems “not just in Kabul, but everywhere in the world”.

“It is precisely the kind of action the Taliban uses and could cause significant problems,” he said in a statement.

Pastor Jones – author of a book entitled Islam is of the Devil – has said he understands the general’s concerns but that it was “time for America to quit apologising for our actions and bowing to kings”.

The Vatican, the Obama administration and Nato have also expressed concern over the plan.

Nato chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen blasted the plans, telling reporters that burning Korans violated the Nato alliance’s “values”.

Muslims consider the Koran to be the word of God and insist it be treated with the utmost respect. Any intentional damage or show of disrespect to the holy book is deeply offensive to them.

An interfaith group of evangelical, Roman Catholic, Jewish, and Muslim leaders meeting in Washington on Tuesday condemned the proposals as a violation of American values and the Bible.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Rig firms hit back at BP report

Deepwater Horizon ablaze in the Gulf of Mexico. 21 April 2010The explosion on the Deepwater Horizon killed 11 workers and injured 17

Contractors who worked for BP on the ill-fated Deepwater Horizon oil rig have criticised the company’s report into the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Drilling firm Transocean branded the report “self serving” while cement contractor Halliburton said it contained “omissions and inaccuracies”.

BP blamed a “sequence of failures involving a number of different parties” for the spill.

It faces billions of dollars worth of compensation claims over the disaster.

Transocean dismissed BP’s report, accusing the oil giant of having designed a “fatally flawed” well and making “cost-saving decisions that increased risk – in some cases, severely”.

“This is a self-serving report that attempts to conceal the critical factor that set the stage for the Macondo (well) incident: BP’s fatally flawed well design,” the Swiss-based group said in a statement.

Halliburton also hit back at the 193-page report.

“As we continue to review BP’s internal report published earlier today, we have noticed a number of substantial omissions and inaccuracies in the document,” it said.

“Halliburton remains confident that all the work it performed with respect to the Macondo well was completed in accordance with BP’s specifications for its well construction plan and instructions, and that it is fully indemnified under its contract for any of the allegations contained in the report.”

The rig exploded in April, killing 11 people, and an estimated 4.9m barrels of oil then leaked into the Gulf.

GULF SPILL TIMELINE20 April: Deepwater Horizon rig explodes, killing 11 people28 April: Coastguard fears one of worst spills in US history8 May: Giant metal dome fails to cap leak2 June: US government begins criminal inquiry15 July: New cap brings temporary halt to spill4 August: BP says “static kill” of well successful. President Obama says battle to stop leak close to an endWhat do we know about the disaster? Stopping the oil – an interactive guide

The well was capped on 15 July, and an operation to permanently seal it is due to take place in the coming weeks.

BP leased the Deepwater Horizon rig from Transocean, and its cement contractor was Halliburton. The BP report was critical of the processes and actions of teams from both firms.

The report, conducted by BP’s head of safety, Mark Bly, highlighted eight key failures that, in combination, led to the explosion.

BP said that both BP and Transocean staff incorrectly interpreted a safety test which should have flagged up risks of a blowout.

“Over a 40-minute period, the Transocean rig crew failed to recognise and act on the influx of hydrocarbons into the well” which eventually caused the explosion.

BP criticised the cementing of the well – carried out by Halliburton – and repeated previous criticism of the blowout preventer.

Among the other findings, the report said:

There were “no indications” that Transocean had tested intervention systems at the surface, “as was required by Transocean policy”, before they were deployed on the well”Improved engineering rigour, cement testing and communication of risk” by Halliburton could have identified flaws in cement design and testing, quality assurance and risk assessmentA Transocean rig crew and a team described as “mudloggers” working for Halliburton Sperry Sun may have been distracted by what are described as “end-of-well activities” and, as a result, important monitoring was not carried out for more than seven hoursCrew may have had more time to respond before the explosion if they had diverted escaping fluids overboard.

“To put it simply, there was a bad cement job and a failure of the shoe track barrier at the bottom of the well, which let hydrocarbons from the reservoir into the production casing,” said outgoing chief executive Tony Hayward.

“The negative pressure test was accepted when it should not have been, there were failures in well control procedures and in the blowout preventer; and the rig’s fire and gas system did not prevent ignition,” he said.

The blowout preventer that failed was recovered from the Gulf of Mexico on Saturday. It will be placed in the custody of the US Justice Department and examined.

BP’s incoming chief executive Bob Dudley said the report proved that the explosion was “a shared responsibility among many entities”.

The company said it had accepted all the recommendations in the report, and would implement them worldwide.

“We are determined to learn the lessons for the future and we will be undertaking a broad-scale review to further improve the safety of our operations,” Mr Dudley said in a statement.

BP says dealing with the aftermath of the spill has cost $8bn (£5.2bn), and it has already paid out about $399m in claims to people affected by the spill.

A national commission is expected to submit a report to President Barack Obama by January. A Congressional joint investigation will submit a report later than month.

The US justice department is also investigating the disaster.

Graphic showing oil rig and well

19 April – ‘Bad’ cement pumped down casing to stop gas and oil leaking into wellbore20 April – Gas and oil leak through shoe track barrier and float collar20 April – Tests carried out on the rig incorrectly suggest pressure is at a safe levelThe crew do not recognise there is a major problem or act to control it until the hydrocarbons are flowing rapidly up the riserThe crew close the blowout preventer and diverter, routing oil and gas to the mud gas separator (MGS) system rather than diverting it overboardThe MGS is overwhelmed by the force of oil and gas which leaks into the rig’s ventilation systemThe heating, ventilation and air conditioning system is thought to have sent a gas-rich mixture into the engine rooms2149 local time There are two explosions, killing 11 menApril 21 – 22 – The BOP designed to work automatically failed to seal the well as control pods and cutter (blind sheer ram) were not working

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Boundary move ‘gives Tories hope’

Brian TaylorBy Brian Taylor

holyrood chamberBoundary changes could have affected Holyrood’s political make-up in 2007

Boundary changes for the next Scottish Parliament elections suggest a possible electoral boost to the Conservatives, according to expert analysis.

Professor David Denver’s study said that if the new constituencies had been in place at the 2007 poll, the Tories might have won three extra seats.

However, the Scottish National Party would have remained the largest party.

Next year’s Holyrood elections will be fought on re-drawn boundaries designed to even out seat sizes.

Nearly all first-past-the-post constituencies are changing, most substantially.

It is calculated that one in six electors in Scotland will now be in a different seat as a result of the re-drawn boundaries.

STUDY EXPLAINERStudy done by Professor David Denver of Lancaster University for the Press Association and BBC ScotlandScottish Parliamentary constituencies have been unchanged since 1997The 2011 Holyrood election will use the re-drawn boundariesThe figures in the study are estimates of what might have happened in 2007 had the new boundaries been in place thenThey are not predictions as to what will happen in next May’s pollThere is a large margin of errorOf all the seats there is no change in four, minimal change in five, minor change in nine, significant change in 13, major change in 25 and 17 were classed as new constituenciesBoundary Commission for Scotland – Maps – Scottish Parliament constituencies 1999-2011 Boundary Commission for Scotland – Maps – Scottish Parliament constituencies 2011 onwards

There are also smaller changes to the top-up regional seats as a result of constituencies being moved to different regions.

An expert report for the BBC and the Press Association has calculated the potential impact.

Prof Denver of Lancaster University said that if the new boundaries had been in place last time the Tories might have taken 20 seats rather than 17.

The Liberal Democrats would have been up one, on 17 rather than 16.

Labour would have been two down, winning 44 seats in total rather than 46 and the SNP would have been one down, with 46 seats rather than 47.

Overall, that implies a slightly improved net lead for the SNP over Labour.

Professor Denver, who is an acknowledged expert in this field, reckoned the Greens would have had one seat, instead of two and the Independent MSP Margo MacDonald would still have won.

However, the academic stressed that caution must be taken in interpreting the results. He pointed out that constituencies were now built from much larger, more diverse council wards, making it very difficult to offer projections.

Document

PDF download Prof David Denver’s boundary changes study in full[218 KB]

Most computers will open PDF documents automatically, but you may need Adobe Reader

Download the reader here

In addition, he noted that he calculated what might have happened in 2007, had the new boundaries been in place then.

He pointed out that he was not offering a forecast for next year’s elections which would be influenced by political developments since Holyrood last went to the polls and issues like the incumbency of sitting members.

Prof Denver estimated seats which might have had a different political colour by contrast with comparable previous constituencies.

Seat changes

He calculated that the Tories might have taken both Eastwood and Dumfriesshire ahead of Labour.

He suggested that Aberdeen Central might have been won by the SNP rather than Labour while Stirling could have been Labour, not SNP.

The new Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale seat, he reckoned, would have been SNP, not Liberal Democrat.

The study classed certain constituencies as “new” in that they have experienced the greatest change.

Among these, he concluded that Glasgow Southside would have been Labour, not SNP. That seat includes a large part of the Govan seat presently held by Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP deputy leader.

In this category, the professor also calculates that Edinburgh Central might have been won by the Liberal Democrats, over Labour.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Nutrient clue to common birth defect

pregnant womanPregnant women take folic acid to prevent neural tube defects

Scientists have begun a study to determine if an everyday vitamin supplement could help prevent one of Britain’s most common birth defects.

Every year about 100 children in the UK are born with spina bifida and other neural tube defects.

Prospective mothers are advised to take folic acid as a way of preventing the condition.

However, scientists think the vitamin inositol, taken with folic acid, may be more effective at preventing defects.

Despite taking folic acid, also known as vitamin B9, some woman still go on to have children with neural tube defects.

Many more pregnancies are terminated when the condition is diagnosed by ultrasound scan.

Scientists think inositol could prevent these extra cases.

Tests on mice suggest it stimulates tissue growth in the embryo to prevent neural tube defects.

Related stories

Dr Nick Greene is one of the researchers working on the project at the Institute of Child Health, University College London.

“Inositol is a naturally occurring molecule a bit like glucose”, he said.

“It’s in meat, fruit and vegetables.

“We don’t think the women are deficient in inositol in their diets but from our experimental work we know inositol can stimulate cells in the developing embryo to proliferate more quickly, and that corrects the defect that would develop in spina bifida.”

Anne Marie Hodkinson’s daughter, Yasmin was born with spina bifida, despite the fact Anne Marie took folic acid for two years before getting pregnant.

“In all the books I had read, I read about spina bifida and then read about folic acid and turned the page, thinking, ‘that’s fine, done that’, so it was quite a shock”

Anne Marie Hodkinson Mother

She said: “We went for the 22-week scan, and it was quite a long scan, and at the end of it they told me that there was a problem.

“They said the baby had spina bifida.

“In all the books I had read, I read about spina bifida and then read about folic acid and turned the page, thinking, ‘that’s fine, done that’, so it was quite a shock.”

When Anne Marie decided to have another baby she enrolled in the clinical trial and is now seven months pregnant.

Although she doesn’t know whether she’s been taking inositol or a placebo, antenatal tests have shown her second baby is free from the condition.

“Everything’s fine, which is lovely,” she said.

“Had this little one had spina bifida as well, we’re pro’s now so it would have been fine, but nobody wishes that on anybody so it’s lovely that this one’s ok.”

Dr Greene is now looking for more women from all over the UK who’d be willing to take part in the trial.

“We’ve invited women who’ve had a pregnancy affected by spina bifida or another neural tube defect and who are planning another pregnancy to contact us.

“The trial is conducted by telephone and e-mail so people don’t need to come to us in London to take part.”

Further trials are needed but if the evidence suggests inositol can prevent spina bifida, it could be combined with folic acid as a simple and cheap supplement available to all women of childbearing age.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.