The 12 are locked to immobilized vehicles
Twelve women climate campaigners are blocking access to an oil refinery in Essex.
The group outside the Coryton refinery said it was affiliated to the campaign group Crude Awakening.
The 12 are locked to immobilized vehicles on both lanes of the refinery access road holding back oil tankers.
A spokeswoman for Petroplus who own Coryton refinery said the site operates seven days a week, with tankers leaving and returning every day.
‘Devastating local environments’
Protest spokeswoman Terri Orchard said: “We don’t have a hope of tackling climate change if we don’t find a way to start moving beyond oil.
“Big Oil is relentless. From the Gulf of Mexico to the Arctic to the Canadian tar sands, oil companies are devastating local environments, trampling the rights of local communities, and pushing us over the edge to catastrophic climate change.
“We are here at the source of the problem, at the UK’s busiest oil refinery, to stop the flow of oil to London.
“We’re here to put a spanner in the works of the relentless flow of oil and to say no more.
“This place, this whole industry, must become a thing of the past.”
Road closed
Essex Police confirmed there was a protest in the road at Coryton oil refinery, near Thurrock and and they had closed the road called The Manorway.
Officers were called to the scene at about 1130 BST and said they would not be giving an estimate of numbers of demonstrators.
The headquarters of Petroplus are at Zug in Switzerland.
The company has six refineries across Europe.
Send your pictures and videos to [email protected] or text them to 61124 (UK) or 0044 7725 100 100 (International). If you have a large file you can upload here.
Read the terms and conditions
At no time should you endanger yourself or others, take any unnecessary risks or infringe any laws. In most cases a selection of your comments will be published, displaying your name as you provide it and location unless you state otherwise. But your contact details will never be published.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
Save the Children has called for the unconditional and immediate release of a British security consultant who was kidnapped in Somalia.
The consultant, and a local worker, who was later freed unharmed, were seized in Adado near the Ethiopian border.
A spokeswoman for the charity said: “The other man abducted at the same time – a British national who was born in Zimbabwe – remains captive.”
She said the charity was extremely concerned for his welfare.
She added: “The two men were working with Save the Children whilst the agency carried out a feasibility assessment into setting up a programme to help sick and malnourished children and their families in the area.”
She added the charity, which has been working in the country for more than 40 years, had not yet been contacted by the group behind the kidnapping.
The BBC’s Mohamed Mwalimu had earlier said the kidnapping came amid fierce fighting involving tanks and heavy artillery around the town of Adado.
The security consultant had gone to the area to see if it was safe enough for Save the Children to set up a new base to help malnourished and sick children, along with their families.
But on Thursday evening, a group of masked gunmen stormed the building used as a staff residence.
High walls and a heavy steel gate reportedly forced the kidnappers to climb in through a window before they fled with their hostages into an area said to be controlled by the hardline Islamist group al-Shabab, which has links to al-Qaeda.
Adado is also closely linked to pirate groups who routinely take ships and crew hostage and demand hefty ransoms.
Until now, Adado had been seen as a relatively stable part of Somalia, with aid groups considering relocating there after being forced out of more volatile regions.
Several foreigners have been kidnapped in Somalia in recent years.
Most have been freed unhurt after a ransom has been paid.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
The government has to recruit regularly as soldiers often disappear
“If you see any of the Afghan army smoking dope,” said the US sergeant major, “don’t just bitch about it, pass it up the line.”
There were nods from the platoon of American infantry taking shelter from the heat in the shade of a mud-walled compound. They had all seen Afghan troops smoking marijuana – and opium – on duty.
The exit strategy in Afghanistan is the same as it was in Iraq: equip, train and then handover to the local forces.
The handover is starting now in some places, to enable the American draw down of forces to begin next summer.
But American soldiers, speaking to us privately, told a story that contradicted the upbeat official assessments of the Afghan army.
The problems included:
Insubordination: in one incident, the Americans said Afghan soldiers pointed guns at an officer reprimanding them. We saw a fist fight between a sergeant and a soldier unwilling to wake up to go out on patrol.Unreliability: one US soldier said the Afghan army drove off at speed during an ambush, leaving the Americans to fight on their own.Poor discipline: US soldiers said operations were often delayed because the Afghan troops do not arrive on time.Corruption: an Afghan farmer told us the army and police arrested people without evidence to demand bribes for their release.Drugs: At the base we joined, two Afghan sergeants and two soldiers were removed for drugs offences. The US troops we spoke to said four arrests did not reflect the widespread use of drugs among the Afghans.
This is, of course, anecdotal evidence, based on talking to troops in one base.
Marijuana grows in the fields patrolled by the Afghan soldiers
But figures show that the Afghan army as a whole is suffering very high rates of desertion and soldiers going absent without leave.
In any given month, close to one fifth of soldiers in Afghan army combat units are absent without leave, according to Nato figures. For units involved in the worst fighting, that may be much higher.
The Afghan battalion at the base we joined should have been just under 800 strong. Some 200 men disappeared in Kabul rather than go south to fight. Around 150 went missing later.
Almost half the men supposed to be in the battalion were simply not there.
“They have to lock the doors on the buses after they tell the recruits they are being sent to the south,” a senior Western official told me.
There are good soldiers among those who remain in uniform. Troops in one US infantry platoon were overjoyed at the accuracy with a rocket-propelled grenade of an Afghan attached to their unit. He had learned his skills as a former mujahideen fighter.
Sitting around a fire with his men, an Afghan sergeant told me: “I am very happy to serve my country. I want to fight for my country because it is weak. I want to help my people and my government.”
But, precisely because they were good soldiers, his infantry squad had not been given leave in eight months.
“It is a sovereign country. It is their armed forces. They eventually will have to take over security for their country”
Lt-Col Peter Benchoff US Army
Stuck in the middle of nowhere, they were unable to get money to their families for much of that time. That is why many others had deserted, they said.
The Afghan government’s answer to this is to keep recruiting new soldiers – and to do that very fast.
It has to. In a typical month the army writes off at least 2,000 soldiers and officers, accepting that they have been absent without leave for so long that they are not coming back.
This means that new and inexperienced troops are being fed into the fight.
The American commander at the base we joined, Lt-Col Peter Benchoff, said he was training the Afghan battalion through operations. The bad soldiers were being weeded out and the good ones promoted.
Hearing the list of his own soldiers’ complaints about the Afghan troops, he said: “Clearly all those things are signs that there is work to do.”
He went on: “It is a sovereign country. It is their armed forces. They eventually will have to take over security for their country. Though with this battalion we do have a long way to go. But we are not going to hide from that challenge.”
Gen Nick Carter, the British commander of multi-national forces in southern Afghanistan, told me he thought there were many examples of good Afghan National Army (ANA) battalions.
“We started the ANA as a project in 2002,” he said, “now a lot of Afghans have respect for it.”
Gen Carter explained the “population centric approach” to counter insurgency. The conflict, ultimately, is over the loyalties of the local people.
“It is not the clearing which is decisive but the holding,” he said of the battle with the Taliban. “We are helping the Afghan government to win an argument.”
A shura, or council, was held at the US base where we were embedded.
The area around the base had in recent memory been run by the Taliban. But an Afghan army colonel was leading the discussions at the shura: Afghan speaking to Afghan in a way that foreign troops could not.
This is the Afghan army’s indispensable role – winning over the local people. Because which side those people eventually back will decide the outcome of this war.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
