Unemployment in UK rising again

Woman entering a jobcentre

Unemployment in the UK increased by 35,000 in the three months to October to 2.5 million, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has said.

It was first time that the jobless measure has risen for six months.

The increase pushed the unemployment rate up to 7.9%, a higher rate than analysts had expected.

However, the number of people claiming the Jobseeker’s Allowance in November fell fractionally, by 1,200 to 1.46 million, the ONS said.

The pound dropped half a cent on the news, to $1.573.

The data could also heighten the policy dilemma for the Bank of England, coming only a day after figures showed consumer price inflation had risen to 3.3%, well above the Bank’s 2% target.

In recent meetings, the UK Bank’s monetary policy committee has been split three ways, with one member voting in favour of gradual interest rate rises to head off inflation, while another has voted to increase the Bank’s purchases of government bonds in order to boost the recovery.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Fears over nurse eye assessments

Michele PaduanoBy Michele Paduano

Claire Holmes, who was left almost blind in one eye after a referral delayMiss Holmes would not have lost any sight if a specialist had seen her earlier, her solicitors claim
Related stories

An eye specialist has voiced concerns about nurses making decisions that “go beyond their training”, after a woman was left virtually blind in one eye.

Claire Holmes, 24, from Worcestershire, twice visited the minor injuries unit at Kidderminster hospital in 2008.

Nurses she saw prescribed ointments, but they did not refer her case.

Ophthalmologist Paul Chell said by the time she was referred she had lost 95% of the sight in her eye. The trust has now changed its referral policy.

Miss Holmes wore contact lenses, which some doctors believe can increase the risk of developing a corneal ulcer that destroys vision, as the lenses can scratch the cornea.

Paul Chell, the clinical director of ophthalmology at Kidderminster General Hospital at the time, sent an e-mail to the chief executive John Rostill in which he said the case was indefensible.

The e-mail, obtained by the BBC, claims that Miss Holmes was the second eye patient who had been put at risk in two weeks in September 2008.

Mr Chell wrote: “This had come on top of another risk from another nurse the week before where completely inappropriate decisions had been made on one of my [highly complex] cornea transplant patients.

“I had already written to the nurses pointing out the danger of treating complex eye conditions beyond their skills.

“I am angry that the hospital didn’t do its job properly… because of their mistake I am worse off.”

Eye patient Claire Holmes

“I am afraid that this is an area of care (not only in Worcestershire) where nurses in general acute care settings are making decisions way beyond any training or skills they possess.

“I have for many years stated that putting nurses in these positions will eventually lead to a wave of litigation.”

Miss Holmes, from Hagley, first attended Kidderminster General Hospital on 13 September 2008.

She was told that she had a scratch and was given an ointment. The following day she was in pain, but was told over the phone to continue using the ointment.

Her mother became so worried about her condition that she took her back on 15 September.

Another nurse briefly examined Miss Holmes and prescribed another ointment with instructions to persevere for another 24 hours.

By 17 September there was a discharge from her eye and she could not see out of it.

When Miss Holmes went back to hospital for a third time she was assessed by an ophthalmologist who examined her with a specialist lamp, diagnosed an ulcer and referred her to the Midlands Eye Centre in Birmingham.

“I am angry that the hospital didn’t do its job properly,” Miss Holmes said.

“You put your trust in the hospital because you think that is the best place to go, which obviously it was not, and they diagnose you wrongly. So because of their mistake I am worse off.”

Kidderminster General Hospital minor injuries unit waiting roomEye patients are now X-rayed on arrival to help ensure speedy referrals, the trust said

Solicitors acting on Miss Holmes’ behalf have obtained substantial, undisclosed, compensation.

Tim Deeming, of Irwin Mitchell, said the firm’s expert evidence was that if Miss Holmes had been seen by an ophthalmologist on the first day, she would not have lost her sight.

“The ulcer at that time was on the very top of her eye so she could have been treated and saved all the sight in her eye.

“If she had we would not be here today and Claire would not have suffered the traumatic damage she has.”

Earlier this year, the BBC tried using the Freedom of Information Act to find out about eye injuries, but the trust denied there had been any.

Worcestershire Acute Hospitals Trust also denied there had been any communication to a senior manager or any actions taken as a result of concerns.

The trust said it was a misunderstanding. Miss Holmes’ case should have generated a serious untoward injury report, but it was never written up.

John Rostill, the trust’s chief executive, said he apologised unreservedly for the upset and distress that had been caused by the delay in Miss Holmes’ treatment.

“We recognise that Claire should have been referred to an ophthalmologist within 24 hours. Clearly we failed to meet this criteria.

“This incident occurred in 2008 and since then we have reviewed our procedures for patients presenting with an eye problem.

“Patients with eye injuries or conditions are now X-rayed on arrival as routine and processes are in place to transfer, if necessary, to a consultant ophthalmologist 24 hours a day,” he said.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Council pension deficit ‘£100bn’

A crumbled £10 noteMr Ralfe says the scheme’s liabilities have soared 41% over the past three years

The deficit in the Local Government Pension Scheme in England has more than doubled in the last three years from £42bn to £100bn, research suggests.

This deficit is equivalent to about 7% of the UK’s annual economic output, and compares with a shortfall of £42bn three years ago.

The report was conducted by John Ralfe, an independent pension consultant.

The Local Government Pension Scheme in England has four million members including 1.7 million current workers.

It is a single scheme, although it is administered through 81 regional pension funds.

According to Mr Ralfe, the value of assets in the scheme have risen just 8% in the past three years, to £132bn, whereas liabilities have soared 41% to £232bn.

This increase in liabilities has been caused by a number of factors, including a rise in the value of benefits for local authority staff, and a fall in interest rates.

In future, the scheme will be uprated in line with the Consumer Prices Index – a generally lower measure of inflation than the Retail Prices Index.

Mr Ralfe estimates that will save £20bn, but he believes that taxxpayers and scheme members will have to pay more into local authority pensions – some £4bn extra a year.

However, Mr Ralfe says that the official actuarial deficit which the scheme will unveil next spring will be considerably lower, because it is allowed to use much less conservative valuation methods than private sector schemes.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Wikileaks appeal set for Thursday

Julian Assange in his prison van en route to court (pic: Dec 14)Julian Assange, photographed inside a prison van, is fighting extradition to Sweden

The founder of whistle-blowing website Wikileaks, Julian Assange, will know by Thursday if he will be freed on bail.

Mr Assange remains in Wandsworth Prison after Swedish authorities appealed against a decision to grant him bail.

His lawyer Mark Stephens said about half the £240,000 bail money had been raised and the High Court appeal would be heard on Thursday at the latest.

Mr Assange is fighting extradition to Sweden where he denies sexually assaulting two women.

He was granted bail on condition he provides a security of £200,000 to the court, with a further £40,000 guaranteed in two sureties of £20,000 each.

Mr Stephens said he was confident all the money would be raised before the appeal hearing.

Mr Assange must also surrender his passport, obey a curfew at an address in Suffolk, wear an electronic tag and report to a local police station every evening.

Speaking outside court, Mr Stephens said: “The Swedes won’t abide by the umpire’s decision. They want to put Mr Assange through yet more trouble, more expense, more hurdles.

“They clearly will not spare any expense but to keep Mr Assange in jail.”

Mr Assange said the charges were politically motivated and designed to discredit him, while Mr Stephens said the case was turning into a “show trial”.

A large crowd including demonstrators, reporters and a number of Mr Assange’s high-profile supporters gathered outside City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court for the bail hearing on Tuesday.

Julian Assange's lawyer, Mark Stephens

Mark Stephens: “They clearly will not spare any expense but to keep Mr Assange in jail”

In his first appearance at court last week, Mr Assange was refused bail on the grounds he could flee – despite the offer of sureties from figures such as film director Ken Loach.

Mr Assange’s other supporters include human rights campaigners Bianca Jagger, Jemima Khan and Peter Tatchell, and journalists Yvonne Ridley and John Pilger.

Mr Assange is accused of having unprotected sex with a woman, identified only as Miss A, when she insisted he use a condom.

He is also accused of having unprotected sex with another woman, Miss W, while she was asleep.

The extradition case is due to return to the magistrates’ court on 11 January.

In recent weeks, Wikileaks has published a series of US diplomatic cables revealing confidential information on subjects such as terrorism and international relations.

These have been detailed in the Guardian in the UK, and several other newspapers around the world.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Kosovo denies organ traffic claim

Kosovo PM Hashim Thaci at a post-election rally, 12 December 2010, PristinaKosovo PM Hashim Thaci is named 27 times in the highly critical report
Related stories

Former Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) commanders are accused of serious human rights abuses, including organ and drug trafficking in a report from the human rights body, the Council of Europe.

A draft copy, seen by the BBC, names Hashim Thaci, Kosovo’s current prime minister and wartime political leader of the KLA, 27 times in as many pages.

The Kosovo government has dismissed the draft as “baseless and defamatory”.

The report is due to be published on Thursday.

The draft report is the result of a two yearlong investigation by the special rapporteur of the Council of Europe, Dick Marty.

The version seen by the BBC confirms many of the details of a special BBC investigation in April 2009.

That BBC report presented evidence of the cross-border transfer of both Serb and Albanian prisoners of the KLA from Kosovo to Albania.

The Drenica group within the KLA which was led by Mr Thaci is accused of involvement in organised crime, including drug trafficking and the trafficking of human organs.

Evidence is also presented of organised crime activities continuing up to the present day.

In its first reaction, the Kosovo government warned of legal and political steps against what it described as ‘slanders’.

The report is due to be presented to the legal and human rights committee of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg on Thursday.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.