Batsman Kevin Pietersen says England will be better prepared for Australia’s swing bowling in the fourth Ashes Test after struggling badly in Perth.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Lehman Brothers was the first major bank to collapse during the financial crisis in 2008
Related stories
Accountancy giant Ernst & Young has been sued by New York’s attorney general over its role in the collapse of Lehman Brothers during the financial crisis in 2008.
Andrew Cuomo claimed the firm was complicit in a “massive accounting fraud” perpetrated by Lehman.
Ernst & Young said that it would “vigorously defend” itself.
“There is no factual or legal basis for a claim to be brought against an auditor in this context,” it said.
“Lehman’s audited financial statements clearly portrayed Lehman as a highly leveraged entity operating in a risky and volatile industry.”
Mr Cuomo takes a different view.
“At a time when it was critical for investors to make informed decisions as to whether to keep or to buy Lehman, Ernst & Young assisted Lehman in defrauding the public,” the lawsuit clams.
The case centres on Lehman’s use of an accountancy practice known as Repo 105, which involves removing temporarily money from the balance sheet.
Observers suggested the two parties may settle out of court, rather than enter a long and expensive court battle.
“It tends to be a lot less expensive for both parties to resolve it through settling and getting it behind them,” said Bruce Pounder at US firm Leveraged Logic.
Lehman Brothers was the first major bank to collapse as part of the global financial crisis in September 2008.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson: “This is as challenging a period as we have ever faced”
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Mouchel part-owns a company that has a contract to grit roads in south London
Related stories
Engineering group Costain has confirmed that it has had a takeover proposal rejected by outsourcing company Mouchel.
Costain said it contacted Mouchel’s board on 2 December, only for its approach to be turned down on 6 December.
Mouchel had already said it had received a preliminary takeover offer, but did not name the interested party.
Costain said it was now uncertain whether it would make a formal bid.
When Mouchel made its announcement on 6 December, its shares ended that day’s trading up 28%.
Prior to that they had fallen by 80% so far this year, as a result of the UK government and local authorities reducing spending on the new infrastructure development that the company provides.
Costain said it had proposed making an all-share offer for Mouchel at a 87% premium to Mouchel’s closing share price on 3 December.
David Allvey, Costain’s chairman, said: “The board of Costain believes that there is a compelling strategic rationale for combining Costain and Mouchel.”
Mouchel was founded in south Wales in 1897 by Frenchman Louis Mouchel. Today it has its headquarters in Woking.
Some of its earliest contracts included helping to build London’s Earls Court Exhibition Centre and stands at Manchester City’s former Maine Road stadium.
Mouchel’s current operations include half-ownership of Enterprise Mouchel, which has a contract to grit roads in south London.
Costain was established in Liverpool in 1865, but is now based in Maidenhead. It was involved in building the Channel Tunnel and the Thames Barrier.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Sexual health charities say all under 25s should be offered an HIV test whenever they visit a GP or hospital – they say it would help to get more people diagnosed earlier.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Bank of Japan said manufacturing production had weakened
Japanese export growth picked up for the first time in nine months in November, in part due to a weaker yen, official figures have shown.
Exports grew by 9.1% compared with a year earlier, the finance ministry said, compared with 7.8% in October.
However, analysts remain concerned about the strength of Japan’s economy.
Also on Wednesday, the government forecast economic growth of 1.5% next year, a sharp fall on the 3.1% it predicts for this year.
It also forecast that consumer prices will stop falling – they have been on a downward spiral for 20 consecutive months.
However, this would not mean the battle against deflation is over, the government said.
Deflation is particularly damaging to economic growth because it undermines consumer demand, as individuals tend to wait until prices fall further before making purchases.
Despite the improved November figures, analysts remain unconvinced that export growth can be sustained.
“As the global economy is clearly slowing, although it is not deteriorating, Japan’s annual export growth may turn flat between January and March, which would weigh on the economy’s growth,” said Takeshi Minami at the Norinchukin Research Institute.
He warned that if the economy does slow, “the government could hardly do anything about it, with little room left to boost fiscal spending”.
Last month, the government passed a $61bn (£39bn) stimulus package, the latest in a series of measures designed to boost the economy by creating jobs.
On Tuesday, Japan’s central bank kept interest rates at between zero and 0.1% in order to boost the country’s fragile recovery, while in October it announced a 5tn yen ($60bn; £40bn) asset purchase scheme designed to boost demand.
Japan’s economy expanded at an annual pace of 4.5% between July and September, but many economists attribute this relatively strong growth to one-off factors.
Most expect growth to be weaker in the final three months of the year.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Supporters of the bill argued shop-workers were at increased risk of assault
Related stories
Plans to bring in a specific offence for assaulting workers who deal with the public face defeat at Holyrood.
Labour’s Hugh Henry brought the backbench bill, saying employees such as shop-workers or train and bus conductors needed extra protection.
However, ministers say people are already protected under common law support, whether they work with the public or not.
MSPs will vote on the Protection of Workers Bill in parliament.
Mr Henry said the legislation was backed by shop-workers, major retailers and transport workers.
He added: “MSPs of all parties have decided to toughen the law on alcohol and nicotine and MSPs expect shop-workers to play their part in ensuring that drunk people are not served and that children do not get served.
“This will put pressure on shop-workers and it’s right that we play fair by them and ensure that they get the protection they deserve.”
It is already a specific offence to assault or obstruct people providing emergency care, such as doctors and nurses.
Mr Henry’s bill has won support from shop-workers union Usdaw, the Scottish Grocers’ Federation and the Co-operative Group.
However, Holyrood’s economy committee, which has been scrutinising the bill, said it would not extend the legal protection currently in force and recommended it be voted down.
But the committee called for consideration to be given to new prosecution and sentencing guidelines in relation to assaults on workers who deal with the public, to tackle the perception that aggravating circumstances are not taken seriously.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

People in the UK were more negative about the future than the global average
Power and prosperity are shifting to the east and to emerging economic nations, a new global poll says.
The survey of economic prospects for 2011 suggests the biggest number of optimists live in countries like China, Brazil and India.
The survey, conducted by leading pollsters associated with Gallup International, suggests the most downhearted country is the UK.
The survey questioned 64,000 people in 53 countries.
It measures levels of optimism about personal well-being and the state of the economy in the coming 12 months.
Globally, opinion is evenly divided about whether 2011 will be a year of prosperity, with 30% saying Yes and 28% No, while 42% believe it will be unchanged.
BBC World Affairs Correspondent Adam Mynott says there are marked differences between the Bric countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – and the rich G7 of the US, Canada, Germany, France, UK, Italy and Japan.
The survey team has drawn up a Global Barometer of Hope and Despair. People in 19 of the countries are generally optimistic about their well-being next year and 34 countries are pessimistic. Our correspondent says it is striking to note that most wealthy countries are firmly in the gloomy sector.
The UK was particularly downbeat in four key questions.
Will 2011 be a year of prosperity? UK – 8% Yes; World average 30%Will unemployment rise? UK 37% Yes; World average 17%Will you find a job quickly if you become unemployed? UK 17% Yes; World average 31%Will 2011 be better than 2010? UK 23% Yes; World average 42%
Gallup says its findings suggest: “While wealth is still concentrated in Europe and North America, there is a shift in power and prosperity from the West of the 20th Century to the East”.
The economies of the Bric countries – with the exception of Russia – typically enjoy rapid growth rates, with gross domestic product expansion of 10% not untypical in China.
In contrast, the developed economies have largely struggled back into positive figures as the credit crisis of 2008 has receded.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Some elite urban universities such as LSE attract more students from disadvantaged backgrounds
Pupils on free school meals are 55 times less likely to go to Cambridge or Oxford than those from private schools, the Sutton Trust has said.
The charity said it feared rising fees and the axing of a support programme would make it harder for poor students to get into England’s top universities.
It also raised concerns about proposed measures to widen participation.
The government said closing the gap was a key priority, which it was tackling with “radical measures”.
The Sutton Trust has published the percentages of pupils who qualified for free lunches when they were at school – a measure of deprivation – attending each of England’s universities.
The proportion was 0.8% at both Oxford and Cambridge, while more than 40% of their students came from independent schools.
And in general, pupils from private schools were 22 times more likely to go to a top university than those who had been on free school meals, the Trust said.
The Trust said the greatest factor determining how many poorer students go to university is the fact that so few of them get the grades they need – something many top institutions also point out.
“”The prospects for less privileged students getting into top universities will get more difficult with the almost tripling of tuition fees, and the ending of the Aimhigher scheme”
Peter Lampl, Chairman, Sutton Trust
However, the Trust said that some highly selective universities, particularly in urban areas, such as Kings College London (5.3%) and the London School of Economics (4%), had a higher proportion of free school meals students than some less selective institutions, for example Portsmouth (3%), Lincoln (3%) and Oxford Brookes (1.7%) universities.
The universities with the most students who had been eligible for free school meals were urban, less selective institutions including London South Bank University (24.7%) and the University of East London (23.1%).
From 2012, universities will be able to charge up to £9,000 a year tuition fees.
These will be paid up-front by the government as a loan, which graduates will then begin to repay once their earnings reach £21,000.
Ministers have outlined plans under which the government would pay the first year’s tuition fees for students eligible for free school meals.
Universities wanting to charge tuition fees of more than £6,000 a year would then have to fund the student’s second year.
But the Sutton Trust said it was concerned that this would have “little impact on the country’s most prestigious universities outside the country’s major urban areas”, because of the low numbers of the poorest students attending them.
It also said it feared that if universities were required to provide a contribution for such students, the least well-funded universities would be hit the hardest, as they often take more disadvantaged students.
The figures also show a significant gap between the most privileged pupils and the rest – many of whom will be children from middle income households, the Sutton Trust said.
It said that fair access for both low and middle-income students should remain a focus.
The report also raised concerns about the coalition’s decision to scrap AimHigher, a government body which runs programmes to encourage young people from disadvantaged backgrounds into higher education.
Instead, universities will be expected to fund such activities themselves.
“The prospects for less privileged students getting into top universities will get more difficult with the almost tripling of tuition fees, and the ending of the Aimhigher scheme,” said Sir Peter Lampl, Chairman of the Sutton Trust.
“Together these reforms amount to a completely new and uncertain landscape for university access for less privileged students.”
The Trust said that sanctions on universities failing to make sufficient progress on access should have “real teeth”.
Oxford and Cambridge Universities both cited research showing that of 176 students on free school meals who got three As at A-level in 2007, 45 went to Oxford or Cambridge.
Oxford said it had one of the most extensive outreach programmes in the country, while Cambridge said it remained committed to engaging with disadvantaged groups.
The Russell Group of research-intensive universities said it invested millions of pounds in bursaries and other initiatives designed to help the least advantaged students have the best possible chance of winning a place.
It said the new fee regime was “fair and progressive in protecting low earners” and noted that participation from all socio-economic groups had increased since fees were raised in 2006.
But the Million+ group representing new universities echoed concerns that institutions with larger numbers of disadvantaged students would be hit by the requirement to fund their second year fees.
“Universities which currently achieve the most in terms of social mobility… will lose out financially and will have no alternative but to charge higher fees from all students to deliver the match-funding,” said its chief executive, Pam Tatlow.
The Department for Education said narrowing the attainment gap was a “key priority”, which it was tackling with “radical measures” including introducing a pupil premium targeted at the children from the poorest backgrounds.
The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said its goal was that no-one should be put off higher education on financial grounds.
“All graduates will pay back less per month than now and the poorest 25% of graduates will pay back less in total,” a spokesperson said.
A new £150m National Scholarship Programme would tackle the sorts of problems identified by the Sutton Trust, the spokesperson added.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
