Referendum ‘No’ campaign launched

Welsh assembly buildingTrue Wales believes further powers should not be passed from Westminster to Cardiff
Related stories

The campaign against granting the Welsh assembly more law-making powers in the March referendum is to be officially launched.

True Wales describes itself as a grassroots movement opposed to devolving more law-making powers.

It will launch its No campaign at Newbridge Rugby Club, in Caerphilly county, later.

The Yes campaign, which is backed by all four main parties, was launched earlier this month.

True Wales spokeswoman Rachel Banner said: “This referendum is more than just a tidying-up exercise.

“We don’t want more laws. What we need is for AMs to focus on education and health and the economy and to build up these things so we can have a prosperous Wales.

“We don’t believe new laws will achieve that.”

The campaign launch takes places at 1730 GMT.

The referendum will be held on 3 March.

It will be the third devolution referendum in Wales. The first, in 1979, saw proposals to create an assembly heavily defeated.

But the second, in 1997, resulted in a narrow Yes vote which led to the opening of the assembly in 1999.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

UK faces £1bn fines over EU cash

Related stories

The UK faces up to £1bn of penalties from the European Commission because of mistakes by government departments.

The National Audit Office says £398m of “financial corrections” have already been made and a further £601m has been set aside to cover further penalties.

The EC withholds the money from countries it believes has not met rules on allocating money from the EU.

Most of the penalties from 2008/9 were due to well publicised problems with agricultural schemes, the NAO says.

But the Department for Communities, the Wales Office, Scotland Office and Northern Ireland Office also attracted penalties for their use of the European Regional Development Fund.

The NAO report is the first time all the withheld payments have been added together for the time period – they relate to mistakes made before March 2009 but go back years.

In the NAO report on Britain’s use of EU funds, Auditor General Amyas Morse said the “irregular” payments meant he had to qualify his verdict on the accounts.

Some payments are disallowed every year but the NAO says £1bn is unusually high.

The government says that the penalties came under a previous administration.

Sources say efforts have been made to improve accounting, and reduce the number of mistakes paying out EU money and they are optimistic future penalties will not be so large.

In a written ministerial statement, Economic Secretary to the Treasury Justine Greening said the government was “determined to ensure sound financial management of all EU funds”.

She added: “The government is fully committed to transparency in the use of EU funds in the UK and to strong accountability for receipts of EU funding to the UK Parliament, to strengthen the audit and Parliamentary scrutiny of the UK’s use of EU funds.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Boy George returns Cypriot icon

Boy George (r) with Bishop Porfyrios of Neapolis and the Christ icon. Photo by John KaponiBoy George (r) said the icon had “graced” his home for 26 years
Related stories

Musician Boy George has agreed to return an icon of Christ to the Church of Cyprus that came into his possession after the 1974 Turkish invasion.

The former Culture Club singer bought the piece from a London art dealer in 1985 without knowing its origin.

Boy George – real name George O’Dowd – said he was “happy the icon is going back to its original rightful home”.

“I have always been a friend of Cyprus and have looked after the icon for 26 years,” he added.

“I look forward to seeing the icon on display in Cyprus for the moment and finally to the Church of St Charalambos from where it was illegally stolen.”

The goodwill gesture came about after the church in New Chorio-Kythrea village gave evidence proving it was its rightful owner.

Bishop Porfyrios of Neapolis expressed “joy and gratitude” as the singer handed over the icon at the St Anagyre church in north London.

The gesture, he said, had “contributed to the efforts of the Church of Cyprus for the repatriation of its stolen spiritual treasures”.

Thousands of religious artefacts went missing from northern Cyprus following Turkey’s invasion of the island and its subsequent partition.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

No tweeting in Commons, MPs told

Related stories

MPs have been told they should not use Twitter while sitting in the the House of Commons.

Deputy Speaker Lindsay Hoyle said they ought not to “be tweeting from the chamber to let the outside world know what is going on”.

The warning followed a complaint made by Labour’s Kevin Brennan about Lib Dem MP Julian Huppert.

More than 100 MPs use Twitter to communicate with their constituents and other followers.

Mr Hoyle’s Commons intervention came after Mr Brennan demanded to know why Mr Huppert had tweeted that shadow education secretary Andy Burnham had refused to meet education access advocate Simon Hughes, a Lib Dem.

The Deputy Speaker replied: “What I can say is that it is for me to keep order in the chamber.

“I am glad you have brought it to my attention. I am sure no honourable member will be tweeting from the chamber to let the outside world know what is going on.”

Mr Brennan, who represents Cardiff West, raised the point of order during a debate on the government’s abolition of the Educational Maintenance Allowance for teenagers in England.

The Labour MP, who has his own Twitter account, said: “The honourable member for Cambridge is tweeting from chamber right now that the shadow secretary of state has refused to meet the honourable member for the Liberal Democrats on the front bench when in fact the shadow secretary of state has already met him and is prepared to meet him at any time.

“Is it in order during the course of a debate for a member to seek to make points about participants in that debate without doing it here so everybody can hear the points that they are making and have the opportunity to rebut them?”

Mr Huppert’s tweet read: “Ah, Andy Burnham’s real agenda leaks out. Simon Hughes, in charge of developing a better replacement, offers to work with him. He refuses.”

In a separate tweet, the Cambridge MP added: “Very disappointing; labour want a fight, not a solution. I realise this is opposition, but I’d hoped for a more constructive approach!”

Labour’s Stella Creasy, MP for Walthamstow, responded to Mr Huppert’s comments using her own Twitter account, saying: “You claim Andy (Burnham) has refused to work with Simon Hughes when (the) opposite is true. Using p’mentary privilege to spin perhaps?”

She added: “Think you’ll find they’ve (Burnham and Hughes) already met – or is Hughes going rogue and not telling his party about negotiations?”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Miliband attacked on Lords delays

Related stories

Labour’s leader in the Lords has denied behaving like a “dinosaur” over a bill to change the way MPs are elected, as peers faced another marathon debate.

Lord Hunt denied using delaying tactics, saying the bill had to be given “proper Parliamentary scrutiny.”

But Lords Leader Lord Strathclyde said Lord Hunt and “his dinosaur pals” were trying to prevent it from coming into force before the next election.

The third of the three days of debate is due to get under way at 1530 GMT.

It comes amid signs of a possible deal between the two sides.

The BBC’s Deputy Political Editor James Landale said there had been a “change of atmosphere” in the Lords after Monday’s all-night sitting, with “a sense that both sides are beginning to contemplate the possibility of pulling back from the brink”.

Labour and the coalition also agreed to end Tuesday’s debate earlier than expected, as private talks between the two front benches opened up again, he added.

He said the most likely compromise would be allowing the size of constituencies to vary by 10% rather than the 5% proposed in the bill.

Lord Hunt told BBC Radio 5 live: “The opposition stands ready to discuss the bill with the government,” adding: “Let’s hope in the next few days we can have some constructive discussions.”

But he appeared unwilling to give ground on Labour’s central demand for the part of the bill that would reduce the number of MPs from 650 to 600 and redraw constituency boundaries, so that the they each contain about 75,000 voters, to be split off from the part dealing with an AV referendum and debated separately.

WHAT IS ALTERNATIVE VOTE

Under the AV system, voters rank candidates in their constituency in order of preference.

Anyone getting more than 50% of first-preference votes is elected.

If no-one gets 50% of votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their backers’ second choices allocated to those remaining.

This process continues until one candidate has at least 50% of all votes in that round.

Landale: Deal on the cards Vote reform: Where parties stand Q&A: Alternative Vote referendum

“We are not at all opposed to a referendum on the alternate vote in May but we do object to its linking to this second part of the bill, which is very much about trying to fix constituency boundaries to help the Conservative Party at the next election,” he said.

He denied Labour peers were behaving like “dinosaurs” by tabling more than 100 amendments, adding: “We are progressive, we want to see reform in Parliament but you have to have proper scrutiny and that is what we are giving it.”

Conservative peer Lord Strathclyde, the Lords Leader, said he did not believe “a word” of Lord Hunt’s claims.

“It’s right that the two issues should be in the same bill because they will affect the same general election, which will be the next general election.

“The only reason why Philip and his pals, his dinosaur pals, in the House of Lords, are so opposed to it is because they know that if they can delay then they know that the Boundaries Commission can not do the work in order to get it ready for the next general election.”

He insisted the proposed redrawing of constituency boundaries would create a “fairer” system and would not necessarily benefit the Conservatives at the next election, as Labour have claimed.

He accused Labour of “bringing the House of Lords into disrepute” with their delaying tactics.

For the referendum on the introduction of the Alternative Vote (AV) for Westminster elections to take place as planned on 5 May, the bill needs to be law by 16 February.

This is because the Electoral Commission needs a full 10 weeks, as set out in previous legislation, to fully prepare for a referendum.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Hunt outlines ‘local TV’ services

Jeremy HuntJeremy Hunt will promise a “voice” for communities
Related stories

Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt is to invite companies to run local TV stations and make the proposed new services a reality.

Addressing broadcasting executives at the Oxford Media Convention, he is due to say the initial schemes will be focused on “10 to 12” major cities.

He will ask firms to register an interest by 1 March.

Licences for local – rather than regional – television services are to be handed out before the end of 2012.

Mr Hunt has long championed the concept of US-style local television, where many cities, rather than wider regions, have their own local news and entertainment coverage.

In a speech to the convention, he will say: “To make this vision a reality I am today inviting existing and new media providers to come forward with suggestions as to how this network channel – or local TV ‘spine’ – could work.

“It is crazy that a city like Sheffield, for example, does not have its own television station like it would have in most other developed countries”

Jeremy Hunt Culture Secretary

“For consumers what this will mean is a new channel dedicated to the provision of local news and content. One that will sit alongside other public service broadcasters, offering a new voice for local communities, with local perspectives that are directly relevant to them.

“We will not be prescriptive. We will wait for the necessary technical assessment to be completed and we will listen to the commercially viable proposals that come forward.

“Our goal is to be able to award the relevant licences by the end of 2012, and for local TV to be up and running soon after.”

A panel set up to examine the idea said local television channels might start by broadcasting in only 10 to 12 areas, adding that it would take “significant effort” to make the plan a success.

In an interview at last year’s Edinburgh International Television Festival, Mr Hunt described the UK media as “chronically over-centralised”.

He said: “It is crazy that a city like Sheffield, for example, does not have its own television station like it would have in most other developed countries.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Fluoridation decision ‘unlawful’

Running tapFluoridation supporters say the move would reduce tooth decay
Related stories

A decision to add fluoride to tap water in Southampton will go before the High Court later.

Resident Geraldine Milner began a legal challenge against the decision made in 2009 by the South Central Strategic Health Authority (SCSHA).

The SCSHA, which believes the move will improve dental health, gave the go-ahead despite a public consultation showing 72% opposed the idea.

The judicial review will decide if SCSHA properly considered the views.

During the consultation opponents had voiced concerns over the impact fluoride may have on people’s health.

But SCSHA said it was “satisfied that, based on existing research, water fluoridation is a safe and effective way to improve dental health”.

Stephen Peckham, chairman of Hampshire Against Fluoridation, said: “Local anger about the SCSHA’s decision has grown since 2009.

“People feel that fluoridation is being imposed on them without their consent or approval.

“If Ms Milner had not taken this action the SHA would have just steam-rolled ahead with a total disregard for the evidence and local opinion.”

“About five-and-a-half million people in this country have been drinking fluoridated water”

Dr Jeyanthi John Southampton City Primary Care Trust

Southampton City Primary Care Trust first proposed the move to increase the level of fluoride in water to one part per million.

Dr Jeyanthi John, consultant in dental public health for the trust, said: “Water fluoridation schemes have been in place in this country for some 40 odd years and shown to have proven benefits.

“About five-and-a-half million people in this country have been drinking fluoridated water.”

Professor Michael Lennon, who chairs the British Fluoridation Society, said: “Tooth decay remains in some parts of our country quite a substantial problem.

“If we take Southampton, in an average year more than 500 young children will be admitted to hospital for dental extractions… that is quite a traumatic experience.

“[If fluoride was added to the water] it would reduce tooth decay in children by about 40%, in adults by 30% and [we] would start to see a difference within three years.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Bill marks ‘fightback over NHS’

GP writing a prescriptionThe reforms were first set out in a white paper published last summer
Related stories

The government is preparing to publish details of the biggest overhaul of the NHS in England in more than 60 years, amid mounting criticism of the changes.

The Health and Social Care Bill, which will be laid before Parliament later, paves the way for GPs to get control of most of the NHS budget by 2013.

Unions warn the plans could undermine the health service, while MPs say they have taken the NHS by “surprise”.

But the government argues the changes will improve care and accountability.

This will be the key message the Department of Health stresses as the bill is unveiled.

After spending the past week defending the plans from attacks by unions, Health Secretary Andrew Lansley wants to stress the positives by detailing how he believes they will transform the NHS for the better.

GP view: How patients may benefit

Dr Ken Aswani, a GP in Waltham Forest, on the outskirts of London, is at the forefront of the changes. He is the lead doctor in one of the consortia which is piloting the changes for the government.

“We will be looking to build on what we have been doing in recent years. That means getting services out of hospital and into the community where they are more accessible.”

One example of this that is already up and running is in dermatology care. There are now three clinics linked to GP centres across the borough where nurses, specially-trained GPs and hospital consultants work together to see people with skin problems.

Dr Aswani says: “It is much quicker now and patients do not have to travel as far. Feedback shows they really value this and these changes will allow us to do much more of this sort of thing.”

Speaking ahead of the publication of the draft legislation, he said: “Our ambition is simple – to deliver care for patients which is the best of anywhere in the world on the NHS.”

The reforms were first set out in a white paper published last summer and will lead to a radical overhaul of the health service.

Managers working for primary care trusts (PCTs) are currently responsible for planning and buying local services from hospital care to district nursing, but under the changes consortia of GPs will take on responsibility for this from 2013.

Pilots are already starting and once the process is complete, two tiers of management – PCTs and the 10 regional health authorities – will be scrapped.

The bill has been eagerly awaited by those in the NHS to see just how much power will be devolved to doctors, how they will be held accountable and what safeguards will be put in place.

In the lead up to its publication, fears were voiced by the NHS Confederation that hospitals could go bust as the plans include opening up the NHS to “any willing provider”.

GP view: How patients could suffer

Dr Helena McKeown, a GP based in Wiltshire, describes herself as a sceptic. She believes one danger is that consortia may decide that some of the more marginal services are not a priority for funding. “Patients could see local bunion services go, for example, or orthodontics.”

She also fears local hospitals could be hit as private sector providers look to win more NHS contracts. She gives the example of ophthalmology departments which rely on cataract operations as a vital source of income and an area for eye surgeons to gain experience for more complex work.

“Private firms will want the cataracts as they are less risky and less complex, but the consequence of that is the local hospital department could suffer.

“This could happen all across the hospital. I see it as like that game Jenga – if you pull too many blocks out the whole thing topples down.”

Critics have also questioned whether GPs have the experience and skills to handle such huge budgets – they will have control of about 80% of the budget.

On Tuesday, the Commons health committee criticised the scale and speed of the reforms, saying the NHS had not been able to plan properly.

A host of unions, including the British Medical Association and Royal College of Nursing, have expressed their “extreme concerns” that greater commercial competition in the NHS would end up undermining care.

The government has responded by saying it is all part of a managed transition to devolve decision-marking closer to the patient so services are designed in a better way.

Ministers have also been quick to point out that despite the criticisms from unions, more than 140 groups of GPs have put themselves forward for the pilots, covering more than half the population of England.

The timing of the reforms has also been questioned. While the NHS will be getting small funding rises in the next four years, it is still being asked to making savings – £20bn by 2014.

Peter Carter, of the Royal College of Nursing, said: “This reform programme could come off the rails, as people concentrate on saving money rather than delivering quality care.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.