NZ earthquake mapped from space

InSar map Alos/Comet)The coloured bands, or fringes, represent movement towards or away from the spacecraft
Related Stories

The upheaval wrought by the 22 February earthquake in Christchurch, NZ, is illustrated in new radar imagery.

The Magnitude 6.3 tremor killed more than 160 people and shattered a city already reeling from a previous seismic event in September.

Data from the Japanese Alos spacecraft has been used to map the way the ground deformed during the most recent quake.

It shows clearly that the focus of the tremor was right under the city’s south-eastern suburbs.

The type of image displayed on this page is known as a synthetic aperture radar inteferogram.

“To get an earthquake right under their city will have been a surprise to nearly every single person”

John Elliott Oxford University

It is made by combining a sequence of radar images acquired by an orbiting satellite “before” and “after” a quake.

The technique allows very precise measurements to be made of any ground motion that takes place between the image acquisitions.

The coloured bands, or fringes, represent movement towards or away from the spacecraft.

In this interferogram, the peak ground motion is almost 50cm of motion towards the satellite.

“It’s like a contour map but it’s showing to the south-east of Christchurch that the ground motion is towards Alos. That’s uplift,” explained Dr John Elliott from the Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes and Tectonics (Comet) at Oxford University, UK.

“And then right under Christchurch, we see subsidence. That’s partly due to liquefaction but it’s mainly due to the way the Earth deforms when you snap it like an elastic band.”

Liquefaction is a phenomenon that afflicts loose sediments in an earthquake and is akin to a lateral landslide.

It is a major issue for Christchurch because the city is built on an alluvial plain, and this type of ground will amplify any shaking during a tremor.

Christchurch earthquakeBBC News reader Gillian Needham took this image of central Christchurch moments after the quake struck New Zealand’s second city on 22 February (local time)

Scientists are using the Alos information to understand better the future seismic hazards in this part of New Zealand.

It has become obvious from recent events that Christchurch sits close to “blind faulting” – faulting that is at risk of rupture, but which betrays little evidence of its existence at the surface, meaning the potential danger it poses is not properly recognised.

“It means much more work needs to be done around Christchurch,” said Dr Elliot.

“People knew they could get earthquakes further into the mountains [in the west of South Island]; that’s how they’ve been built in some ways, through earthquakes and all the faulting.

“But to get an earthquake right under their city will have been a surprise to nearly every single person.”

The interferogram is noticeably incomplete – there are several areas where the fringing is missing. There are a number of reasons for this.

To the east is ocean, and this technique does not work over water.

To the west, the issue is related to the satellite track and the fact that it views the Earth in strips. Hence, you get bands of data.

But the more interesting and more relevant omissions are in Christchurch itself.

Dr Elliot commented: “Here, the patches are the result of de-correlation between the acquisition images, where we just can’t match them – they’re too different.

“There are a few reasons for that. Usually it’s the result of vegetation growth, but here it could be due to more extreme shaking or liquefaction.”

Quake mapTuesday’s quake was less energetic but more destructive

Researchers are investigating the relationship between September’s Magnitude 7.1 quake and last month’s 6.3 event.

The latter is very much considered to be an aftershock from the first, even though they were separated by six months.

The former occurred about 40km to the west, rupturing a similar length of fault. The most recent quake ruptured about 15km of fault.

What scientists need to know now is the nature of any “seismic gap” between the two; that is, a segment of fault which was not broken in either tremor but which may have been loaded with additional strain because of both those events.

JaxaThe Advanced Land Observing Satellite (Alos) was launched in 2006

[email protected]

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Sony gets PS3 hack case details

PlayStation 3Sony has said it can identify PS3 users running hacked consoles
Related Stories

Sony has been given permission to obtain details of people who downloaded files needed to hack the PlayStation 3.

A judge in San Francisco granted the electronics giant a subpoena that would allow it to see a list of IP addresses.

The software, used to crack the PS3’s operating system, was posted on the website of George Hotz, who is also known as Geohot.

Sony is suing Mr Hotz, claiming his hacks breach copyright laws, and could allow users to play pirated games.

Court documents, obtained by Wired magazine, show that the company successfully petitioned to obtain IP addresses from the web-hosting company Bluehost.

The details could be used to trace the real-world geographical locations of users who accessed George Hotz’s website, Geohot.com.

However, it may not be Sony’s intention to take legal action against those found to have downloaded the software crack.

Sources with knowledge of the case said there was unlikely to be the appetite for a prolonged and expensive series of legal challenges.

Rather, the subpoena document suggests that Sony wants to discover the number and location of the downloaders in order to establish jurisdiction in its case against Mr Hotz.

“SCEA [Sony Computer Entertainment America] needs to determine how rampant the access to and use of these circumvention devices has been in California in order to rebut Mr Hotz’s suggestion that his illicit conduct was not aimed at the forum state,” the document reads.

The subpoena also grants Sony the right to access information relating to the case from Twitter, Google Blogspot and YouTube.

The company had previously been granted a restraining order against Mr Hotz, banning him from revealing techniques to manipulate the PlayStation 3’s operating system.

The 21-year-old, along with a number of other individuals, is charged with violating several copyright-related laws, including the Digital Millennium Copyright Act

He is also accused of offences under the United States’ Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Mr Hotz denies that he set out to help software pirates, claiming instead that he was championing the ‘home brew’ community – users who write their own software for the PS3.

Sony has said it is now able to remotely identify users who are running hacked PlayStation 3 consoles and that it will ban persistent offenders from using its online services.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The burden placed on parents

Cartoon of parents and child

Modern parents are under pressure with long working hours, childcare dilemmas and family break-ups. But what is the impact on children and what can be done about it?

I’ve got three young children and a full-on job. I’d always thought that these early years were the hardest and now would be the time when I should be around the most.

But in fact I’m quickly learning that the older kids get the more they need you.

My children who are six, five and three want me to take them to school and collect them afterwards. They want me to listen to them reading, help with their drawings, go on school trips and turn up at their plays.

In short they want my time and attention, something that the childcare expert, Penelope Leach, says will continue all the way through the teenage years.

Find out more

Sophie Raworth

Parents Under Pressure, presented by Sophie Raworth, is on BBC Two Monday 7 March 2011 1900 GMTCatch up on iPlayer after broadcast

“Would you be surprised to hear that children left on their own regularly until parents get home from work do less homework, are more likely to drink alcohol and tend to get themselves into inappropriate sexual situations? It’s not rocket science,” says Leach.

For millions of families trying to make ends meet, being around a lot can be difficult. Stay-at-home mothers are now in a minority because up to 70% of women with children under the age of one go back to work. When both parents work, you need childcare and that is rarely simple to sort out.

When I had my first child nearly seven years ago, I couldn’t bear the idea of leaving her when my maternity leave was over. When I was pregnant, I’d planned to send my baby to a local daycare centre, but once Ella was born, I couldn’t do it. I wanted her to be in her own home.

So like thousands of other working mothers, I relied on my parents and in laws until I stumbled across a nursery school teacher who has worked as our nanny ever since. But I know I am very lucky – that kind of childcare is expensive.

Mother feeding babyMany parents do not realise that the demands for quality time never decrease

For a lot of working parents, childminders and daycare are the cheapest and only option. But some academics have been sounding warnings about the downside of nursery care.

Philippa Brewer-Dalziel went back to work full-time when her first child, Keane, turned two. Her hours were long and it meant Keane was at nursery from 7.30am until 6pm five days a week. She noticed a big change in her son’s behaviour.

“He didn’t want to start coming home with me. I think it was just because he wasn’t spending enough time with me. Even though I was his mum, I almost became a stranger to him,” she says.

In the end Philippa became so concerned that she reduced the number of hours she was working. Keane’s now five and is at school. But she’s still worried about his behaviour and thinks that the amount time he spent in daycare may have had a role to play.

“Nothing winds me up more than when someone tells me how to raise my own kids”

Shannon Sommarsby Parent

“Keane became quite aggressive and quite angry towards myself and my partner Darrell. And it flowed over into school and it came to a point where the school were concerned.”

Keane’s behaviour is getting better now. It’s been suggested for some time that spending too much time in nursery care can make children more aggressive and badly behaved. But now experts are worried about what happens when these daycare kids start school.

The child development specialist, Prof Jay Belsky, says that bad behaviour can spread through the classroom ‘like a virus’.

“What you see is a kind of contagion effect. So that the more kids there are in the room with more childcare experience, the more aggressive and disobedient all the children in the room are.”

Other experts disagree. Professor Edward Melhuish, a psychologist from the University of London, believes daycare can be a positive experience but what’s key is the quality of the care. He says children sent to good nurseries can be up to six months ahead of other kids when they reach school age.

“High quality pre-school education does all children a lot of good and the consequences for disadvantaged children are particularly important,” Prof Melhuish says.

Parent reading to childThere are many distractions for the modern parents

Shannon Sommarsby and Alastair Swaffer believe daycare has been nothing but a positive experience for their two-year-old twins.

Charlotte and Fraser have been going to nursery from eight in the morning until five in the afternoon since they were four months old. But Shannon says they love it, they get to meet other children, they learn to interact.

“Nothing winds me up more than when someone tells me how to raise my own kids because no-one knows our kids apart from us,” Shannon says.

The problem is that no-one seems to be able to tell you conclusively if daycare is good or bad for our children. There seem to be so many ifs and buts. In the end you do just have to make your own choice.

Even at home, spending quality time with your children can be quite difficult. With long working hours, mobile phones, computers, television and so much else going on, it’s easy for parents to be distracted.

Some schools are becoming increasingly aware of this problem, and the effect it has on some pupils’ behaviour. Fairlight School in Brighton is one of 40 around the country taking part in a new American scheme called Fast – families and schools together.

Electronic distractions

It’s about parents learning to enjoy proper time with their children. Once a week they spend a few hours in school, when lessons are over, cooking tea for the kids and chatting as families.

One of the tasks during the session requires parents to spend 15 minutes focusing all their attention on the child as they play and letting them lead the way – they can’t tell their child what to do, tell them off or criticise.

I gave it a go the next day at home with one of my kids at the kitchen table. My computer kept flashing in the background, my mobile beeped in my bag with texts and emails. My other two children wanted my attention. Suddenly 15 minutes without moving seemed like rather a long time.

The headmaster at Fairlight School, Damien Jordan, says parents, despite their best intentions, often don’t give their children enough proper time.

“If you ask children what they want, it’s time with their parents. They don’t have to be taken off on all these fantastic trips and go to places that cost money. They actually want to spend time enjoying themselves, laughing with their parents, cooking with their parents, things that don’t cost a fortune.”

My trip to Fairlight school did make me think. When I got back I banished my laptop from the kitchen and I do now try to put my phone away when I’m playing with the kids. These are small gestures, but I can see how they can make a difference.

Ultimately it’s not lots of toys, trips and techniques that my children want, it’s me.



Comments

You are not currently signed in. Sign in or register.

posting

All posts are pre-moderated and must obey the house rules

 

All Comments (31) loading

31. HippMama

This comment is awaiting moderation. Explain.

30. everhopeful89

This comment is awaiting moderation. Explain.

29. evilbungle

This comment is awaiting moderation. Explain.

28. Madmcdan

This comment is awaiting moderation. Explain.

27. Willo77

This comment is awaiting moderation. Explain.

 

Comments 5 of 31

loading Show more

 

You are not currently signed in. Sign in or register.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

‘Light sheets’ image life in 3D

3D microscope image

Images taken from the research team’s 3D microscope

Related Stories

Painting a better picture of life going about its business at the microscopic scale requires a trick of the light.

A report in Nature Methods describes how “light sheets” allow researchers to take images of cellular processes in action, in unprecedented detail.

These slivers of light illuminate just the part of a living cell that is in focus, and 3D images are made from many of these thin planes stacked up.

The approach could provide a previously unachievable view of living things.

“We have for the first time a technology that allows you to look at the three-dimensional complexity of what’s going on”

Eric Betzig

That is because the very best imaging methods known so far do their work on cells that are fixed in place and whose cellular machinery has ground to a halt.

“Most of the techniques I’ve developed look at dead cells,” said Eric Betzig, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) physicist who led the research.

“You can get a lot of information looking at fixed, dead cells – high-resolution information – but you’d still like to be able to see dynamics,” he told BBC News.

“There’s a lot you can learn from actually watching things wiggle around.”

The principal techniques in cell biologists’ toolboxes are known as confocal and wide-field microscopy. But they suffer from two shortcomings, both caused by the nature of the light that is used to illuminate the sample.

One is that spatial resolution – the size down to which objects like cell components can be distinctly resolved – is not the same in all directions, leading to “elongated blobs” in images.

But another is the fact that cells do not appreciate being in the limelight for long.

(E Betzig, T Planchon, L Gao)The technique allows an array of cellular processes to be seen in action

“When you try to study live cells for any length of time, the light itself starts to harm the cells, and eventually they literally curl up and die,” Dr Betzig explained.

“So there needs to be some way of getting around that.”

The solution is known as plane illumination.

Instead of shining light through a sample from the bottom and looking at what passes through it, plane illumination aims to shoot light in from the side in a thin sheet, only in the plane on which a microscope is focused.

The image is formed from what bounces off the sample and up toward the microscope’s lens.

This plane illumination has been used to great effect before, but the new publication takes the approach to a level of resolution both in space and in time that is unprecedented.

The secret is the use of what are known as Bessel beams (recently highlighted in a report detailing how lasers can be used as “tractor beams”).

Rather than being uniform across their width, Bessel beams have a strong, narrow central point and are much weaker at the side.

The team also used what is known as a two-photon approach to ensure that the central portion of the beam – what Dr Betzig calls the “long pencil of light” – is the only part that contributes to an image.

By scanning their Bessel beams rapidly across living samples and flashing them on and off, the team could build up two-dimensional pictures as tiny strips of their sample were illuminated.

By then slightly shifting upward and downward the plane at which the microscope was focused, a number of these 2D slices could be acquired, and “stacked together” to create a 3D image.

The team can create 200 of these slices in a second, forming an image of whole, living cells – and single cell parts – caught in the act of, for instance, cell division and signalling.

While a wealth of other imaging techniques can offer higher resolution, the team’s effort is superlative for the study of living cells.

They have improved the resolution through the sample – the fineness of detail they can see – by more than a factor of three over prior cell-imaging techniques, and they can acquire images far faster.

“We have for the first time a technology that allows you to look at the three-dimensional complexity of what’s going on, at the sort of rates at which things happen within cells,” Dr Betzig said.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Most expensive painting on show

The painting being hung up at Tate ModernThe new owner of the building have never revealed his or her identity
Related Stories

The world’s most expensive painting ever sold at auction is going on show in the UK for the first time on Monday.

The work, called Nude, Green Leaves and Bust, was painted in 1932 by Pablo Picasso and is based on his muse, Marie-Therese Walter.

The painting, which was sold in New York last year for $106.5m (£65.5m), will go on display at the Tate Modern in London.

Tate director Nicholas Serota: “This is an outstanding painting by Picasso.”

“I am delighted that through the generosity of the lender we are able to bring it to the British public for the first time.”

Mr Serota said: “Nude, Green Leaves and Bust is one of the sequence of paintings of Picasso’s muse, Marie-Therese Walter, made by the artist at Boisgeloup, Normandy, in the early months of 1932.

“They are widely regarded as amongst his greatest achievements of the inter-war period.”

The painting has been borrowed from the unnamed private collector who bought it.

It is not known what security precautions have been taken at the gallery to protect it from thieves and vandals.

A Picasso exhibition will open at Tate Britain next year.

Picasso first met Ms Walter, a model in 1927 and she became his mistress. He began to paint her four years later.

She died in 1977, four years after Picasso.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Adele’s top chart reign continues

AdeleAdele currently has three singles in the UK Top 40 Chart

British singer Adele’s reign in the single and album UK Top 40 has continued, as she remains at number one in both charts.

The star’s single, Someone Like You, has now been number one for three weeks, whilst her second album, 21, has held the top spot for six weeks.

She held off competition from Jessie J and Liam Gallagher’s new band Beady Eye in the album chart.

Clare MaGuire and Alexis Jordan also had new albums in this week’s top 10.

Adele recently became the first living artist since The Beatles to have two top five hits in both charts simultaneously.

This week her debut album 19 slipped two places to number four, while her other single Rolling in the Deep fell one place to number five.

She has a third single in the top 40 – a cover of Bob Dylan’s Make You Feel My Love – which is now at number 27, having fallen two places.

This year’s critic’s choice Brit Award winner Jessie J was at number two in both charts.

Top five singles this weekSomeone Like You – AdelePrice Tag – Jessie JS&M – RihannaBorn This Way – Lady GagaRolling In The Deep – Adele

The singer’s debut album Who You Are went straight to second place, followed by Beady Eye’s record Different Gear Still Speeding.

Rihanna was at number five, followed by Bruno Mars and Clare MacGuire’s new release Light After Dark.

In eighth place was Mumford & Sons with See No More, Cee Lo Green’s Lady Killer was at number nine and volume four of a collection of hits taken from the hit US series Glee rounded off the top ten.

In the singles chart this week, the highest new entry was the Foo Fighter’s new single, Rope, which debuted at number 22.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Gaddafi’s LSE lecture ‘horrific’

David Miliband on the Andrew Marr ShowDavid Miliband said it was important the inquiry the LSE inquiry was held
Related Stories

Former Foreign Secretary David Miliband has said it is “horrific” that a London School of Economics lecture in his father’s name was delivered by Saif Gaddafi.

The university has been criticised for accepting money from the Libyan regime of Saif’s father, Col Muammar Gaddafi. An inquiry is to be held by Lord Woolf.

LSE director Sir Howard Davies has resigned over the controversy.

The Ralph Miliband memorial lecture was given by Saif Gaddafi last May.

Mr Miliband, who died in 1994, was a Marxist academic at the LSE who fled to Britain in the 1940s to avoid persecution from the Nazis.

His elder son told BBC1’s Andrew Marr Show: “It’s horrific.

“The Ralph Miliband Programme at the LSE was founded by a former student of my dad’s in the 1950s.

“He’d learnt more in the seminars of my dad – who was obviously on the left – about the right because my dad believed in showing all sides of opinion.

“The idea of Saif Gaddafi giving a lecture under his name is just horrific to him and horrific to the whole family, obviously.”

Mr Miliband added: “I think there’s a wider issue – the LSE has announced an inquiry into whether at any stage their academic independence has been compromised.

“It’s very important that that’s carried through.”

Sir Howard resigned as LSE director last week, admitting that the decision to accept £300,000 for research from a foundation run by Saif Gaddafi had “backfired”.

Saif GaddafiSaif Gaddafi delivered the lecture in May 2010

Senior figures at the LSE say they are “embarrassed” to have made deals with and accepted donations from elements of the Gaddafi regime, but many observers think such actions are the inevitable result of pressure to find wealthy partners.

However the university said in a statement: “We are not ashamed of trying to help the people of Libya develop their economy and their infrastructure to improve their health services.”

Former Lord Chief Justice Lord Woolf’s independent inquiry is due to look into the extent of LSE’s links with Libya.

The Ralph Miliband lecture programme was set up in 1996 after an anonymous benefaction to LSE, specifying that it be used in memory of the socialist.

The LSE’s website still contains the description of Saif Gaddafi’s speech published before the lecture.

It reads: “Saif al-Islam Alqadhafi is currently Chairman of the Gaddafi International Foundation for Charity and Development based in Tripoli, Libya.

“He received his PhD from the London School of Economics in 2009.

“The topic of his thesis was The Role of Civil Society in the Democratization of Global Governance Institutions.”

The lecture was entitled: “Libya, past, present and future.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Bank reforms must not fail – King

Mervyn KingMervyn King suggests banks have not learnt from the financial crisis

Failure to push through reforms of the banking sector could lead to another financial crisis, Bank of England governor Mervyn King has warned.

Mr King told the Daily Telegraph banks were focusing on short-term profits at the expense of their customers.

He also questioned their insistence on paying bonuses to staff.

BBC chief economics correspondent Hugh Pym said his comments were significant because the Bank of England was about to take over banking regulation.

Mr King’s remarks come weeks after Chancellor George Osborne signed Project Merlin.

Our correspondent said that under Project Merlin it was agreed that in return for lending more money and showing restraint on bonuses the government would not take any more action on pay and profits.

Mr King said over the past two decades too many people in financial services had thought “if it’s possible to make money out of gullible or unsuspecting customers that’s perfectly acceptable”.

“I wish I’d spoken out more forcefully about the build-up of leverage”

Mervyn King Governor of the Bank of England

He said: “Why do banks in general want to pay bonuses? It’s because they live in a ‘too big to fail’ world in which the state will bail them out on the downside.”

Mr King said: “We’ve not yet solved the ‘too big to fail’ or, as I prefer to call it, the ‘too important to fail’ problem.

“The concept of being too important to fail should have no place in a market economy.”

A former economics professor at Cambridge, Harvard and the London School of Economics, Mr King joined the Bank of England in 1991.

Mr King also said there was “too much weight put on the importance and value of takeovers” and that “it doesn’t make sense to destroy a company with reputation” in the hunt for short-term profits.

He also drew a contrast between manufacturing companies, which largely care about their workforces, customers and products, and the banks.

“There’s a different attitude towards customers. Small and medium firms really notice this: they miss the people they know,” he said.

In the interview he also reflected on the 2008 banking crisis.

He said the Northern Rock crisis could have been avoided if Britain had had a “statutory resolution process”.

He said: “We had been war-gaming one but the legislation wasn’t ready.

“If we had not stepped in for RBS and HBOS all the British banks would have suffered runs. They didn’t understand the nature of the risks they were taking.”

He admits to feeling some guilt about the crisis, saying: “I wish I’d spoken out more forcefully about the build-up of leverage.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.