TV producer defends all-white Midsomer Murders

Turville village - used to film many Midsomer episodesMidsomer Murders is set in rural England
Related Stories

One of the creators of ITV1’s Midsomer Murders has claimed it “wouldn’t work” if there was racial diversity in the village life it portrays.

Producer Brian True-May told the Radio Times the long-running drama was a “last bastion of Englishness” and should stay that way.

He said he had not previously been tackled about the issue.

A study in 2006 found the programme to be “strikingly unpopular” with viewers from ethnic minorities.

Mr True-May told the magazine: “We are a cosmopolitan society in this country, but if you watch Midsomer you wouldn’t think so.

“I’ve never been picked up on that, but quite honestly I wouldn’t want to change it,” he said.

Of his all-white portrayal of rural life in Britain’s murder capital he said: “Maybe I’m not politically correct”.

The programme – which has run for 14 series – appealed to a “certain audience”, he said.

Mr True-May added: “We just don’t have ethnic minorities involved. Because it wouldn’t be the English village with them. It just wouldn’t work.”

“If it’s incest, blackmail, lesbianism, homosexuality… terrific, put it in”

Brian True-May Producer

Asked why “Englishness” could not include other races who are well represented in modern society, he said: “Well, it should do, and maybe I’m not politically correct.

“I’m trying to make something that appeals to a certain audience, which seems to succeed. And I don’t want to change it.”

Midsomer Murders, based on the books by Caroline Graham, was launched in 1997 and has featured 251 deaths, 222 of which were murders.

The producer has banned swearing, violence and sex scenes from the show but has tackled diversity issues other than ethnicity.

“If it’s incest, blackmail, lesbianism, homosexuality… terrific, put it in, because people can believe that people can murder for any of those reasons,” he told Radio Times.

Actor Jason Hughes, who has played the programme’s DS Jones, said he had pondered why Midsomer continued to have no ethnic minorities.

“I’ve wondered that myself and I don’t know,” he said.

“This isn’t an urban drama and it isn’t about multiculturalism. That’s not to say that there isn’t a place for multiculturalism in the show. But that’s really not up to me to decide.

“I don’t think that we would all suddenly go, ‘a black gardener in Midsomer? You can’t have that’. I think we’d all go, ‘great, fantastic’.”

Actor John Nettles’s final appearance on the drama was watched by an average of 7.1 million viewers last month.

The 67-year-old bowed out of the series after 14 years playing DCI Tom Barnaby. He will be replaced by Neil Dudgeon, who will play his character’s cousin.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Clinton and Libyan rebel in talks

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arriving at Le Bourget airport near Paris (14 March 2011)Mrs Clinton’s meeting with Mr Jibril was conducted at a hotel in Paris

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has met Libyan opposition leader Mahmoud Jibril and discussed ways the US can aid efforts to depose embattled Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

The talks in Paris lasted for about 45 minutes, a US official said but gave no details of what options were discussed.

The developments came as G8 ministers met in Paris to consider calls for a no-fly zone over Libya.

A senior US official said the US had made no decision to back the move.

Mr Jibril is an official in the newly formed Interim Governing Council, which is based in the rebel-held eastern Libyan city of Benghazi.

‘Talk, little action’

Rebel leaders have appealed for international help in limiting Col Gaddafi’s resources as his forces maintain their onslaught on rebel positions in the east of Libya.

But the BBC’s Kim Ghattas, travelling with Hillary Clinton, says that while all sides are insisting there is a sense of urgency about the situation in Libya, at the G8 gathering there seemed to be only more calls for talks and meetings, little concrete action.

It is abundantly clear the US does not want to be dragged into enforcing a no-fly zone or any other military action without a firm commitment by others that they will participate actively, our correspondent says.

A senior American official said that while the Arab League had called for a no fly zone, it had also rejected any foreign military intervention in Libya.

The US, said the official, wanted to know more about what this meant. He added Washington was encouraging the Arab League to take the lead on actions it wanted to see carried out.

Among the biggest opponents of a no-fly zone is Turkey, whose Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told an international forum in Istanbul on Monday that intervention might be “counter-productive” and could have “dangerous consequences”.

Although not a member of the G8, Turkey is part of Nato, which is expected to consider a no-fly zone on Tuesday. The G8 is made up of the US, Russia, Britain France, Germany and Italy, along with Canada and Japan.

Hillary Clinton heading to Cairo on Tuesday where she will meet members of the new Egyptian government and attend a series of public events.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Grieve warns papers on contempt

Joshua RozenbergBy Joshua Rozenberg

Dominic Grieve QCDominic Grieve QC warns some newspapers have behaved in a dangerous way.
Related Stories

The media could be prevented from naming people arrested by the police but not yet charged, the attorney general has told the BBC.

Dominic Grieve QC may ask Parliament to introduce a ban on identifying uncharged suspects.

Mr Grieve said that pressure for a change in the law of England and Wales might grow if “frenzied” pre-charge publicity increased.

But he promised he would act only if it became absolutely necessary.

In an interview for Radio 4’s Law in Action, Mr Grieve – the government’s senior law officer – was careful not to refer to individual cases.

But there was considerable media interest when detectives investigating the murder of Joanna Yeates, the landscape architect whose body was discovered near Bristol on Christmas Day, arrested her landlord Christopher Jefferies.

Mr Jefferies was released after questioning and the police confirmed earlier this month that he will not be facing charges. Another man has been accused of the murder and is awaiting trial.

The attorney general said that newspapers were required by law to avoid prejudicing prosecutions.

But in some cases he said they had been acting “in a way that could be quite dangerous”.

‘Public disquiet’

Competition from bloggers and the internet had led newspapers to behave in a way that caused him anxiety.

“It seems to me that there was a degree of self-restraint which used to exist in national newspapers,” he said. That seemed to have almost entirely vanished, he added.

Instead, there was “frenzied interest” in high-profile arrests until someone was charged or released, when the publicity abruptly stopped.

Asked whether it was necessary to tighten the law, Mr Grieve referred to recent moves in Parliament by Anna Soubry, a backbench Conservative MP, to give defendants anonymity between arrest and charge.

“There may be some merit in this proposal,” Mr Grieve said. “But we did also feel that there were some potential problems. Being unable to name a suspect could cause problems for an investigation.”

The attorney general said he would “mull over” whether a change in law was needed.

Asked whether such a reform was possible or practicable, Mr Grieve replied:

“It’s a possibility. And I do think that if we get too many examples of publicity which appears to reach a frenzied point, causing public disquiet, then the pressure may well grow for that sort of change to the law.”

But Mr Grieve insisted that he would be extremely reluctant to restrict the right of news organisations “to express themselves freely” unless this was “absolutely necessary”.

LISTEN TO THE PROGRAMME

Law In Action is on BBC Radio 4 on Tuesday 15 March 2011 at 1600 GMT and Thursday 17 March 2011 at 2000 GMT

Listen via the BBC iPlayer Download the podcast

The attorney general recently took proceedings against the publishers of the Daily Mail and the Sun after they had mistakenly published a prejudicial photograph of a man on trial for murder. He was shown holding a gun.

Mr Grieve welcomed a finding by the High Court that the newspapers were in contempt of court.

The court ruled that it was no defence for news organisations to say that jurors had been ordered not to do internet research on the background to the case they were trying.

There was a difference between researching past coverage of a case and reading daily reports of the trial online, Mr Grieve said.

This was becoming increasingly common and it was not something that he would seek to prevent.

Law In Action is on BBC Radio 4 on Tuesday 15 March 2011 at 1600 GMT and Thursday 17 March at 2000 GMT. Listen via the BBC iPlayer or download the podcast.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Europe reviewing nuclear projects

Activist at an anti-nuclear demonstration, March 14 2011, Cologne, GermanyTens of thousands of anti-nuclear protesters demonstrated in Germany on Saturday

Nuclear projects in Europe are being reviewed in light of the emergency in Japan, sparked by a massive earthquake and tsunami.

The German and the Swiss governments have suspended decisions on their nuclear programmes, and the European Commission is holding a meeting of ministers and experts on Tuesday.

Thousands of anti-nuclear activists rallied on Saturday in Germany.

A nuclear plant in Fukushima has been hit by a third explosion in four days.

The blast occurred at reactor 2 at the Fukushima Daiichi plant – 250km (155 miles) north-east of Tokyo – which engineers had been trying to stabilise after two other reactors exploded.

Thousands of people are believed to have died following Friday’s 9.0-magnitude quake and tsunami. Millions are spending a fourth night without water, food, electricity or gas and more than 500,000 people have been left homeless.

BBC Europe correspondent Chris Morris, in Brussels, said some of the decisions now being made in Europe were motivated by politics.

In Germany, where Chancellor Angela Merkel has suspended an agreement to extend the life of Germany’s nuclear power stations, there are important state elections looming.

Tens of thousands of anti-nuclear activists demonstrated at the weekend against plans to extend the life of Germany’s reactors.

Protesters in Stuttgart formed a human chain reaching 45km (27 miles) for the event, which had been planned before the current nuclear crisis in Japan because it was already a key election issue.

Meanwhile the Swiss government has delayed decisions on new nuclear plants there, and an Austrian minister has called for new safety tests on nuclear reactors across the continent.

Anti-nuclear Austria also has long-standing concerns about the safety of nuclear plants in former communist countries on its borders, said our correspondent.

“But there is also real concern about the lessons from the Japanese earthquake”.

Mrs Merkel had conceded that, following events in Japan, it was not possible to “go back to business as usual”, he said.

“The reaction may be a temporary one – much will depend on how the crisis in Japan is resolved.

“If there was anything we can learn we will learn it because safety is our number one concern”

Chris Huhne UK energy secretary

“But – as Europe seeks to remove carbon based fuels from its economy – there is a long term debate about finding the right mix between nuclear energy and energy generated from renewable sources.

“There’s no doubt that the events of the last few days haven’t done the nuclear industry any favours,” he added.

On Tuesday the European Commission will host a meeting of energy ministers and nuclear experts in Brussels, to assess nuclear safety issues.

The commission said responsibility for the safety of nuclear power lay primarily with individual member states.

But with nearly 150 nuclear reactors across the continent, it wanted to take stock of events in Japan, and review safety measures.

Many governments are cautious about immediate decisions, pointing out at that most of Europe is far less seismically active than Japan, said Chris Morris.

UK Energy Secretary Chris Huhne said lessons needed to be learned that were based on the facts.

That could include employing much more caution on where nuclear plants are sited.

“Frankly there are enormous differences but we have to learn everything we can from the Japanese experience to make sure if there was any human error, if there was any regulatory slip up, if there was anything we can learn we will learn it because safety is our number one concern,” he told the BBC.

Map showing effects of Japanese earthquake

Following the latest explosion in Japan there were fears of a meltdown.

Radiation levels near the plant rose, and staff working at the reactor 2 were evacuated.

On Monday, a hydrogen blast at the Fukushima Daiichi’s reactor 3 injured 11 people and destroyed the building surrounding it. It followed a blast at reactor 1 on Saturday.

Meanwhile, the relief operation is continuing in the north-east.

About 2,000 bodies were found washed ashore on beaches in Miyagi prefecture on Monday, in which officials estimate that 10,000 people have died.

About 1,000 were found on the Ojika peninsula and another 1,000 in the town of Minamisanriku, which was flattened by the tsunami.

Thousands are still unaccounted for – including hundreds of tourists – while many remote towns and villages remain cut off.

To see the enhanced content on this page, you need to have JavaScript enabled and Adobe Flash installed.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Thousands ‘may overstay visas’

Related Stories

Up to 181,000 migrants who should have left the UK since December 2008 could still be here, according to UK Border Agency estimates.

The agency “does not do enough” to check people have left once their visas expire, the National Audit Office said.

The NAO said the agency should set national targets on tackling those who overstay their visas.

Immigration Minister Damian Green said radical reforms were being brought in and abuses would be clamped down upon.

The UK Border Agency is responsible for running the points-based immigration system for non-EU workers.

Since it was introduced in 2008, 182,000 migrants from outside the European Economic Area have been allowed to enter the UK for work – and a further 179,000 already in the UK have been given leave to remain.

Whitehall’s spending watchdog, The National Audit Office, said while the system was largely well designed and helped meet immigration aims, it was not yet providing full value for money due to inefficient systems and customer service.

It said the agency had to rely on employers to police the points-based system but did not have an “adequate grip” on what they were doing.

While the agency claimed most employers were “compliant” – it could not say how many it had visited to check this, the report said.

Only 15% of the 22,000 employers were visited before they were granted a licence to employ migrant workers and visits were not well managed because of conflicting demands on officers and confusion about their role.

“The agency has not taken enough systematic action to ensure, where it can, that migrants leave the UK when they are no longer entitled to remain”

National Audit Office report

People already in the UK who saw their applications for a visa extension rejected, were not routinely chased up to check they had left, the report said.

One region – North East, Yorkshire and the Humber – had been contacting people to tell them they should leave and claimed to have encouraged 2,000 to leave voluntarily.

But apart from high risk individuals – like convicted criminals – “the agency has not taken enough systematic action to ensure, where it can, that migrants leave the UK when they are no longer entitled to remain”, the report says.

“This has been due partly to a lack of exit checks, making it difficult to identify overstayers and to IT systems which cannot identify individuals needing to renew their visas.

“The agency estimates there may be up to 181,000 migrants in total (not just entering through the system) in the UK whose permission to remain has expired since December 2008.”

However it said that figure is expected to be reduced, because data was being matched with the e-Borders project, a system to count everyone entering and leaving the UK.

The report also noted that checking facts supplied by people applying for work visas was difficult – is particular verifying salaries with HM Revenue and Customs and checking supporting documents.

The agency also points out that, even when documents were not forged, they did not always show what they were intended to. For example, people could borrow money to prove they had the funds to look after themselves in the UK.

“We are also committed to reintroducing exit checks by 2015”

Damian Green Immigration Minister

Half of all staff said they found it difficult to check that documents were valid but had no discretion to refuse an application unless they could prove they were fake.

It found that the system had met in part its aim of attracting “tier one” migrants like investors and entrepreneurs and estimated that 60% of them worked in skilled or highly skilled jobs.

On the skilled workers – a category that includes jobs like IT professionals, doctors and teachers – the system had “largely met” employers’ needs.

But the report noted that about a third of employers wanted to recruit more foreign workers than they were allowed to.

It also criticises the UK Border Agency for being too slow at processing companies’ sponsor applications and for not giving migrants enough guidance in filling in the forms and supplying documentation.

And it noted that the agency paid £4m to the IT firm Fujitsu in 2007 for applications which were never used.

Immigration Minister Damian Green said radical reforms were already being introduced, including a cap on economic migrants and changes to student visas.

“We are also committed to reintroducing exit checks by 2015,” he said.

“Counting people in and out of the country will give us better control over those that overstay.

“We are determined to reduce net migration to the tens of thousands, and clamp down on immigration abuses.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Female prisoner numbers ‘double’

Cornton Vale prisonWomen are being given longer sentences than 10 years ago, the researchers found
Related Stories

The number of women in Scottish prisons has almost doubled over the past 10 years, researchers have said.

A study found that Scottish courts were increasingly likely to give custodial sentences to woman and for longer.

Women over 30 were more likely to be handed a prison sentence by courts than younger women.

But the researchers, from Glasgow and Stirling universities, said there was no evidence that women were committing more crimes.

The study, by professors Gill McIvor and Michele Burman, was published by the Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.

It found that between 1999-2000 the average daily female prison population in Scotland was 210, but by 2008-2009 this had risen to 413.

The average length of custodial sentences in the same time period had gone up from 228 days to 271 days.

While sentences of three months had decreased sharply, there had been a big increase in sentences of between six months and two years.

“The dramatic increase in the use of custodial remands and sentences for women is a significant concern”

Prof Gill McIvor Report author

The greatest reduction in the use of imprisonment for women was in the under-21 age group.

But the researchers said that data from five police forces in Scotland showed that the number of recorded crimes involving women had remained relatively stable, with some fluctuations in Strathclyde and Fife.

There was also no evidence that the seriousness of women’s crime had increased, though there were rises in minor assaults and breaches of the peace, the study found.

The researchers said they attributed growth in the female prison population to increased use of custodial sentences – rather than changes in offending – but said the reason for the harsher sentences were not “immediately obvious”.

Prof Gill McIvor said: “The growth in female imprisonment in Scotland cannot be disputed.

“There is, however, no evidence that it has occurred because more women are entering the criminal justice system or being convicted of more serious crimes.

“Given that most female offending does not involve serious offences, the dramatic increase in the use of custodial remands and sentences for women is a significant concern.”

Last year, the governor of Scotland’s only women’s prison, Cornton Vale, admitted that most of those held there should not be in jail.

Teresa Medhurst said many prisoners had such complex problems they actually felt safer in prison than at home.

The Chief Inspector of Prisons, Brig Hugh Monro, said the jail was “in crisis” and “drifting” in a report published in January 2010.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

UK’s aid policy ‘anti-Christian’

Man and boy in camp after Pakistan floodingThe report raised the question of aid and human rights guarantees
Related Stories

A Roman Catholic cardinal has accused the UK government of operating an “anti-Christian foreign policy”.

Cardinal Keith O’Brien has attacked plans to increase aid to Pakistan to more than £445m, without any commitment to religious freedom for Christians.

Speaking in Glasgow, Cardinal O’Brien called on Foreign Secretary William Hague to seek human rights guarantees.

The Foreign Office said it raised concerns and lobbied governments about persecution wherever it arose.

The cardinal’s call came as a report by Vatican-approved agency Aid to the Church in Need suggested 75% of religious persecution around the world is directed against Christians, affecting 100 million people.

The church highlighted the assassination of Pakistani Minority Affairs Minister Shahbaz Bhatti at the start of March.

Mr Bhatti was the only Christian member of the cabinet in Pakistan.

“We ask that the religious freedoms we enjoy to practice our faith, will soon be extended to every part of the world”

Caridnal Keith O’Brien

Cardinal O’Brien said: “I urge William Hague to obtain guarantees from foreign governments before they are given aid.

“To increase aid to the Pakistan government when religious freedom is not upheld and those who speak up for religious freedom are gunned down is tantamount to an anti-Christian foreign policy.

“Pressure should now be put on the government of Pakistan – and the governments of the Arab world as well – to ensure that religious freedom is upheld, the provision of aid must require a commitment to human rights.”

He said the report’s estimate of persecution against Christians was “intolerable and unacceptable”.

“We ask that the religious freedoms we enjoy to practice our faith, will soon be extended to every part of the world and that the tolerance we show to other faiths in our midst will be reciprocated everywhere,” he added.

“We will continue to press for religious freedoms to be upheld in Pakistan and around the world”

Alistair Burt Foreign Office Minister

Foreign Office Minister Alistair Burt said: “Freedom of religion is a fundamental human right and we condemn and deplore religious persecution in any form.

“The effective promotion of human rights, including freedom of religion, is at the heart of our foreign policy.”

He said Britain raised concerns and lobbied governments about religious freedom and persecution wherever it occurred, including in Pakistan.

“It is vital that Pakistan guarantees the rights of all its citizens, regardless of their faith or ethnicity,” he added.

“We will continue to press for religious freedoms to be upheld in Pakistan and around the world.”

The report also highlights the Christian population of Iraq, which it says has gone from an estimated 1.4 million to as low as 150,000 over the past 25 years.

Archbishop Bashar Warda of Erbil, in Iraq, said: “The Persecuted and Forgotten report and the work of Aid to Church in Need are critical to us as members of the worldwide Christian community.

“This information will significantly contribute to building international support and solidarity for Christians around the world where our human rights and our religious freedom have been stripped away.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The ‘puppet-master’

Cabinet office doors

What goes on in the Cobra committee behind the Cabinet Office’s doors?

Related Stories

The Secrets of Whitehall reveals it is the cabinet secretary who holds the real power in government.

A seasoned Whitehall observer once said: “All the great Whitehall offices are about something. The Treasury is about money, the Home Office is about crime and the Cabinet Office is about power.”

The Cabinet Office is the secret powerhouse of British politics. With the key task of keeping the government show on the road, it likes to do its work out of the limelight.

But a year ago the Cabinet Office became the centre of the political and media world when negotiating teams from the Tories and Lib Dems went to a series of meetings there to hammer out the Cameron-Clegg coalition deal.

Its entrance on 70 Whitehall briefly became the most photographed front door in Britain, eclipsing even the black door of Number 10.

Behind the Cabinet Office’s green doors you find the sinister-sounding Cobra – the government’s high tech anti-terrorist intelligence and emergency centre.

Michael Cockerell and Sir Gus O’Donnell, the Cabinet SecretaryCurrent incumbent Sir Gus O’Donnell has been called “the man who really holds the ring”

The task of overseeing the security of the state is delegated by the prime minister personally to his top civil servant, the cabinet secretary.

Working from one of the grandest offices in Whitehall, the cabinet secretary is the most powerful unelected member of the government – the real-life Sir Humphrey from the programme Yes, Prime Minister, and he pulls the invisible strings across the whole of government.

There have only been 10 cabinet secretaries since the Cabinet Office was formed nearly a century ago, but there have been three times that many different governments.

The relationship between the Sir Humphreys and their prime ministers form a hidden history of modern Britain.

In Whitehall where knowledge is power, the cabinet secretary knows the most of all.

“To beat the record of the first Cabinet Secretary, Sir Maurice Hankey, I would have to do another 17 years – and I am not going to do that”

Sir Gus O’Donnell Cabinet Secretary

He (they have always so far been men) is allowed to see the papers of previous governments, a privilege not even extended to the prime minister, to whom the cabinet secretary is the chief adviser and “father confessor”. He sits at the right hand of the prime minister in all cabinet meetings.

My documentary for BBC Four tells the story of these discreet but hugely influential figures, most of whose names are unknown to public. For until recently they remained in the shadows – the anonymous keepers of the government’s secrets.

The Cabinet Office itself was born in 1916 during World War I which revealed the shambles of communication between the Cabinet and the military, with orders being confused and not acted on.

Things came to a climax with the disastrous battle of the Somme, which cost 57,000 British lives in its first hour and led directly to the creation of the Cabinet Office.

The first cabinet secretary was a marine called Maurice Hankey, known in Whitehall as the “Man of Secrets”.

The then Prime Minister Lloyd George gave Hankey the key task of completely reorganising the way his government was run.

A streamlined war cabinet was created and Hankey’s job was to ensure its decision were circulated and carried out across Whitehall.

At the end of the war Hankey was voted a bonus equivalent to £1m in today’s money.

Michael Cockerell in the Cabinet Office's historic cockpit passageThe historic cockpit passage links the Cabinet Office and Number 10

All five of the surviving cabinet secretaries, including the current holder Sir Gus O’Donnell, talked to me candidly about their way of operating within Whitehall’s secret citadel.

And they told of how they got on – or not – with the different prime ministers they served.

The Cabinet Office itself is joined to Number 10 by a passageway with a high-security entrance.

Sir Gus himself has now served three different prime ministers, but he told me: “To beat the record of the first Cabinet Secretary, Sir Maurice Hankey, I would have to do another 17 years – and I am not going to do that.”

But he added: “I still love it. It’s the most fantastic job, with new challenges every day.”

The coalition government has made Sir Gus the highest profile cabinet secretary so far.

He takes the stage at public events with the prime minister and his deputy, looking every inch the third among equals.

Indeed, at a recent event, the deputy prime minister introduced the cabinet secretary as “the man who really holds the ring”. Maurice Hankey would have been proud.

The Real Sir Humphrey, the first of Michael Cockerell’s new three-part series The Secret World of Whitehall, is on BBC Four at 2100 GMT Wednesday 16 March.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Regime concerns raised at prison

HMP Full SuttonFull Sutton is a maximum security prison holding some of the country’s most dangerous offenders

An inspection at a high security jail has criticised the treatment of some of Britain’s most dangerous prisoners.

Inspectors who visited Full Sutton prison near York in November said the regime in the jail’s segregation unit was “inadequate”.

But they said that, overall, staff were “to be commended on their work in very challenging circumstances”.

The report also praised rigorous security procedures, which it said were proportionate to the risks faced.

The report, published by the Chief Inspector of Prisons on Tuesday, stressed that since its last inspection in 2007, Full Sutton had “made significant progress but some concerns remain”.

It was written after an unannounced inspection carried out between 27 October and 5 November.

The report said: “While we were satisfied that a sharp increase in recorded use of force was explicable and justified, we had some concerns over some arrangements for dealing with the most challenging and difficult prisoners.

“Thus the regime in the segregation unit was inadequate and there continued to be a confused approach to behaviour management.”

The inspectors said they were not confident that use of special accommodation and mechanical restraints were always appropriate.

Although relationships between most staff and prisoners had improved since the previous inspection in 2007, the prison “needed to address the negative perceptions of Muslim and black and ethnic minority prisoners”, the report said.

Safety arrangements had improved, with better management of early days in the prison, satisfactory suicide and self-harm prevention work and more robust anti-violence work, the report said.

As a result, most prisoners reported feeling safe.

“This is an essentially positive report on a high security prison tasked with holding some of the country’s most serious and dangerous offenders,” the inspectors said.

Michael Spurr, chief executive of the National Offender Management Service, said: “It demonstrates that the governor and staff at Full Sutton are managing long-term prisoners very effectively on behalf of the public.

“Significant progress has been made since the last inspection in the areas of safety, purposeful activity and relationships between staff and prisoners all having improved.

“Work is in hand to address the other issues raised by the inspection.”

Last month a 35-year-old man was charged with killing inmate Colin Hatch at Full Sutton. Hatch had been serving a life sentence for killing a seven-year-old boy.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Pay plan for public sector heads

Will HuttonWill Hutton has been working on the review since May 2010

Senior public servants’ pay should be performance-related, but not subject to a cap, an independent review has said.

At least 10% of pay should only be awarded at the end of the year if objectives were met, a government-commissioned Fair Pay Review said.

Will Hutton, who led the review, ruled out a link between executives’ pay and the average pay of their staff.

But public limited companies and public sector bodies should publish details of pay level comparisons, he said.

In May, Mr Hutton, of the Work Foundation, was asked to review public sector pay, especially the disparities between the lowest and the highest paid.

“Strikingly, Mr Hutton – a campaigner over many years for a more egalitarian distribution of income – has come down against the imposition of any cap on pay in public services”

Read Robert Peston’s latest blog

He has proposed an “earn back” scheme for about 2,000 senior staff. This would put a proportion of their basic pay at risk if they failed to meet pre-arranged performance targets.

But excellent performers who exceeded these targets should be eligible for extra pay.

“No pay system can be fair if it fails to reflect individual performance,” Mr Hutton said.

Once implemented at senior level, such a system should be considered on a voluntary basis for middle managers, he concluded.

Other recommendations include:

abandoning “arbitrary” benchmarks, such as comparisons with the pay of the Prime Ministermore opportunities for managers to move across different public servicesexecutive pay details published in online form.

The government suggested a ratio so top public servants were normally paid no more than 20 times that of their lowest paid employees.

“To really boost fairness in the public sector, and our society as a whole, we need to tackle low wages”

Dave Prentis Unison general secretary

In his initial findings in December, Mr Hutton endorsed the idea, but the final report reversed this recommendation as it would be unworkable and only affect a small number of workers.

Instead, he said, there should be greater transparency over senior pay. He recommended that all executives’ full pay should be revealed online, together with an explanation of job weight and performance.

“Organisations delivering public services should publish their pay multiples each year, and disclose and explain executive pay and how it relates to job responsibilities and individual performance,” Mr Hutton said.

“This will allow an informed public debate on senior pay; citizens will be able to hold organisations to account on how senior pay reflects individuals’ due desert.”

He said that this should be a model across the whole economy, so he recommended that public limited companies should also be required to publish the ratio of pay between the highest paid and other employees each year.

Chancellor George Osborne said: “The government is committed to striking a balance between value for money for taxpayers and fair pay for public sector workers. We will give careful consideration to his recommendations and respond in detail in due course.”

Dave Prentis, general secretary of Unison, said: “The focus on top pay is a missed opportunity. To really boost fairness in the public sector, and our society as a whole, we need to tackle low wages – not just income inequality.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Child vital sign measures ‘wrong’

Vital signs monitorA child’s heart and breathing rates are important signs for diagnosing illnesses.
Related Stories

Guidelines for children’s heart and breathing rates are inaccurate and not based on evidence, according to researchers.

These measurements are often used to decide treatment, but the study in the Lancet says current rules would mean half of healthy 10-year-olds were diagnosed with abnormal vital signs.

The study analysed data from 143,346 children.

Experts say the work could help clinicians.

How rapidly a child is breathing and the speed of their heart are important tools for diagnosing illness.

These measurements are compared with charts which show normal and unhealthy levels.

“Children with fast heart rates are not being picked up and some are being diagnosed with a fast rate when they’re normal”

Dr Matthew Thompson Oxford University

However, the researchers say the healthy ranges have been passed down from one generation of doctors to the next, but have not been based on evidence.

Their analysis looked at 69 studies on the vital signs of nearly 150,000 healthy children from around the world.

One of the problems in the field is that health levels shift during childhood.

The study showed that on average, heart rates were 145 beats per min in one-month-olds, while it was 113 beats per min in two-year-olds.

The authors produced new charts showing the healthy vital signs at different ages and compared these with the current guidelines.

Dr Matthew Thompson, from the University of Oxford, said: “Children with fast heart rates are not being picked up and some are being diagnosed with a fast rate when they’re normal.

“Our findings suggest that current consensus-based reference ranges should be updated with new thresholds on the basis of our proposed centile charts, especially for those age groups where there are large differences between current ranges and our centile charts, indicating that many children are likely to be misclassified.”

Rosalind Smyth, from the University of Liverpool and Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, said this study should lead to more research to determine the barrier between normal and abnormal vital signs.

She said: “These studies will lead to revised algorithms, risk scores, and guidelines, which will incorporate these limits.

Such instruments will then need to be extensively validated in different settings and populations before they can be incorporated into clinical practice.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

‘Too many’ die of stomach bleeds

EndoscopyEndoscopy should be performed within 24 hours of admission to hospital with a suspected bleed

Experts are issuing guidance to stop unnecessary deaths from gastric bleeding, a medical emergency affecting around 30,000 people a year in the UK.

One in 10 die as a result of these bleeds, partly because doctors are unsure about how best to manage them, say six leading medical bodies.

The advice sets out the minimum standards all patients should expect, like urgent investigation to locate the bleed and treatment to stop it.

And it calls for equitable services.

“There is a great inequity in service provision across the UK”

Dr Kel Palmer of the British Society of Gastroenterology

Dr Kel Palmer of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), one of the six organisations behind the guidance, said: “The audit we carried out clearly highlighted that there is a great inequity in service provision across the UK.”

He said that while it was understandable that some smaller hospitals might struggle to provide first class services around the clock, they should have plans in place to transfer these most urgent cases to nearby hospitals with the necessary facilities.

“We have defined minimal standards which all patients should expect and defined criteria for safe transfer to hospitals where emergency therapy can be applied,” he said.

As a minimum, any patient with a suspected bleed should, within 24 hours of admission, have an investigation called an endoscopy where a flexible tube housing a small camera is guided down into the stomach via the mouth.

And all hospitals should be able to offer life-saving treatments such as interventional radiology or specialist surgery at any time of the night or day, recommend the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, the Association of Upper GI Surgeons, the Royal College of Nursing, the Royal College of Physicians, the Royal College of Radiologists and the BSG.

Currently, almost half of hospitals lack out-of-hours endoscopy, and interventional X-ray treatments are even less available.

Around a quarter of patients are admitted to units with no relevant surgical team.

And the lack of clarity concerning safe transfer of patients to referral centres where effective treatments are available means a significant number of patients are denied early access to potentially life-saving treatments, say the experts.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Supermarkets agree to health deal

Supermarket trolley - (copyright National Consumer Council)The seven largest supermarket chains are signing up to the responsibility deal
Related Stories

More than 170 companies – including the leading supermarket chains – have signed up to the “responsibility deal” to encourage healthier lifestyles.

The full details will be unveiled later, but pledges on calorie counts on menus and clearer labelling on drinks are expected to be made.

The voluntary agreements for England cover four themes – physical activity, food, alcohol and health at work.

Ministers said the approach would achieve more than legislation could.

They will highlight the agreement to ensure 80% of alcoholic drinks carry labels about the number of units they contain by 2013. At the moment just 15% do.

Speaking ahead of the publication of the responsibility deal, Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: “Industry has agreed to take action on a voluntary basis.

“The alternative is to use legislation and this means taking the EU route, which could take years. We want to do more at greater speed.”

He was forced to defend the approach after six health groups pulled out of the alcohol strand on Monday, arguing the government was being too soft on the industry.

Alcohol Concern said the deal represented “the worst possible deal for everyone who wants to see alcohol harm reduced”.

The move represented a blow to the government’s attempt to forge a partnership between health, government and industry.

But news that seven major supermarkets, including Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Asda and Waitrose, were on board means the deal will have a reach into virtually every household in the country.

One of the pledges is likely to see Asda promise not to promote alcohol at the front of their stores.

“Customers make the final decision about what goes in their baskets but retailers do a lot to help shoppers look after their own and their families’ health”

Andrew Opie British Retail Consortium

The retailer will also promise to invest £1m in community projects.

Meanwhile, over the weekend Heineken announced it would cut the alcohol content of one of its major brands after signing up to the responsibility deal.

The firm, which makes drinks including Foster’s, John Smith’s, Strongbow and Bulmers, will also carry unit information on all its branded drinking glasses.

Other drink firms, including Diageo and Carlsberg, will also put their name to pledges.

A host of restaurant chains, including McDonald’s and KFC, are also expected to agree to introduce calorie details on menus, while manufacturers will promise to further reductions in the salt and fat content of foods.

These are schemes that are already being rolled out, but the firms will promise to go further, faster than they have to date.

And a number of big employers, including Mars and Unilever, will promise to share their expertise in managing workplace health with small companies.

Andrew Opie, of the British Retail Consortium, said the deal was a “significant development”.

He added: “Customers make the final decision about what goes in their baskets but retailers do a lot to help shoppers look after their own and their families’ health.”

But shadow public health minister Diane Abbott said: “The truth is that you cannot conflate corporate responsibility with public health.

“While the government needs to work very closely with business and industry, all the big changes in public health over the last 200 years have been done in the face of huge corporate and commercial interests.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Doctors discuss ‘risky’ NHS plans

HospitalLib Dem activists say the NHS plans are being imposed by the Conservatives
Related Stories

Doctors are to debate toughening their opposition to the government’s plans to overhaul the NHS in England.

The emergency meeting of the British Medical Association (BMA) comes amid grassroots anger about the plans which could see increased competition.

BMA leader Dr Hamish Meldrum said doctors were worried about the “very dangerous” plans.

The Department of Health said it wanted to “work closely” with the BMA and was committed to the future of the NHS.

The union fears increased competition from the private sector could harm hospitals, perhaps even forcing some to close.

Dr Meldrum said he would prefer to see the NHS as the preferred provider instead of having a level playing field with the big health companies.

Ahead of the meeting, he told the BBC it was now time to be “ratcheting up” the concerns.

He said this had not been done before as the full details only recently emerged when the government published the Health Bill earlier this year.

“We want to put more pressure on the government to change what are flawed and very risky proposals for the NHS,” he said.

The meeting comes after Liberal Democrat delegates rejected the plans at the party’s spring conference last weekend.

Members voted not to support a “damaging and unjustified” shake-up, which will see GPs get control of much of the NHS budget along with the scrapping of primary care trusts and strategic health authorities.

A Department of Health spokeswoman said: “We are absolutely committed to the future of the NHS.

“We hope to continue to work closely with the BMA and all other health professionals to cut bureaucracy and give doctors the power and freedom to make the service more responsive to patient needs.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.