Cost of Euro mobile roaming falls

Man talking on phone on beachThe European Commission wants to make roaming rates the same as domestic rates by 2015
Related Stories

The cost of making and receiving mobile phone calls while travelling in Europe has come down again.

From today, operators cannot charge more than 32p per minute (plus VAT) for outgoing calls, and 10p per minute (plus VAT) for incoming calls.

The new tariffs are the latest in a series of annual price reductions forced on the mobile industry by the European Commission.

Brussels has said it aims to equalise roaming and domestic charges by 2015.

Price regulation was introduced in 2007 by the then commissioner for information society and media, Viviane Reding.

Since then, the maximum call charge has been reduced by approximately 6% per year.

A group of UK mobile operators – O2, Vodafone, Orange and T-Mobile – attempted to challenge the Commission’s price-cutting agenda, taking their case to the European Court of Justice.

However, their complaint was dismissed in June 2010.

Along with the lower rates for phone calls, the commission also reduced the wholesale rate of mobile data from 80 euro cents (72p) to 50 euro cents (45p) per megabyte.

Whereas the price cap on voice calls applies directly to the way consumers are billed, the data changes only affect what operators charge each other. There is an expectation, rather than obligation to pass-on the savings.

Operators are compelled to place a 50 euro (£45) cap on users’ data consumption, in order to avoid unexpectedly high bills. Customers who wish to continue their data roaming can request to have the limit removed.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Inquiry into exam errors launched

Examination roomOfqual waited for the exam season to end before beginning its inquiry
Related Stories

Exams regulator Ofqual has launched an inquiry into a string of errors in this summer’s exam papers.

The regulator said it would be trying to find the root causes of the 10 blunders that have emerged over the past few weeks.

Three exam boards in England and one in Northern Ireland have experienced problems with errors in their papers.

Deputy chair of Ofqual, Sandra Burslem, said the body had made it clear that exam paper errors were unacceptable.

She said: “Ofqual’s priorities during the exam season were to make sure the awarding organisations did everything possible to prevent further errors and to make sure that, where errors have occurred, the marking of papers neither unfairly advantages or disadvantages the candidates involved.

“Now that the taking of exams is over we turn our attention to an inquiry.”

She said the inquiry would hold the exam boards to account for their mistakes by finding out what had caused the errors and how they could be put right.

It would also look at the need for any necessary improvements and arrangements for risk management. And it would set out any decisions on further regulatory action related to the errors.

She added: “The regulators will not hesitate to take regulatory action as necessary at any stage to protect the interests of students.”

So far 10 errors have been identified on exam papers from three exam boards in England, OCR, AQA and Edexcel, and one board in Northern Ireland, CCEA.

Ofqual said it would continue to work to ensure that any candidates faced with exam errors were not unfairly disadvantaged or advantaged as a result.

National Union of Students vice-president for further education Toni Pearce welcomed the inquiry, saying: “It is vital that students are able to have full confidence in the exam paper in front of them.

“We have heard from many students worried about the added stress of wondering if a difficult question is in fact unanswerable.

“It is unacceptable for exam boards to let even one error slip through and they should be forced to compensate every student who feels they have been disadvantaged by exam board error.”

Dr Jim Sinclair, director of the Joint Council for Qualifications, which represents exam boards, said the council welcomed the inquiry and would continue to work with the regulators to identify the causes of the errors.

“This inquiry builds on the rigorous investigations awarding bodies are carrying out within their own organisations.

“The examination system is huge, and the questions and papers that contained errors – although unacceptable – represent a tiny proportion of the total number. Each year awarding bodies set more than 60,000 questions.”

He said awarding bodies deeply regretted the errors that occurred and apologised to students who took the papers.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Nortel sells patents for $4.5bn

Apple logo seen on a window outside of the New York flagship Apple storeThe auction drew interest from major tech companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and Intel
Related Stories

Bankrupt telecoms firm Nortel has sold its remaining patent portfolio for $4.5bn (£2.8bn) to a consortium of six firms including Apple and Microsoft.

The other consortium members are Sony, Research In Motion, Ericsson, and EMC.

The auction of Nortel’s assets had been hotly contested, with Google and Intel losing out.

The sale included more than 6,000 patents and patent applications including areas such as data networking and semiconductors.

“The size and dollar value for this transaction is unprecedented, as was the significant interest in the portfolio among major companies around the world,” said George Riedel, chief strategy officer at Nortel.

Google had opened the bidding in April at $900m.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Is the British roundabout conquering the US?

Roundabout in Carmel, Indiana

Sit in on a driving lesson in the American roundabout capital, Carmel

A roundabout revolution is slowly sweeping the US. The land of the car, where the stop sign and traffic light have ruled for decades, has started to embrace the free-flowing British circular.

A few moments after entering Carmel, it’s clear why the city has been described as the Milton Keynes of the US.

As the sat-nav loudly and regularly points out, there’s often a roundabout up ahead.

But unlike in the English town famous for its roundabouts, driving into this pretty city on the outskirts of Indianapolis also involves passing several under construction.

Mayor Jim Brainard

“We are saving thousands of gallons of fuel per roundabout per year”

Mayor Jim Brainard

The city is at the forefront of a dizzying expansion, across several American states, of the circular traffic intersection redesigned in 1960s Britain and then exported globally. The first arrived in the US in 1990 and about 3,000 have sprung up since.

The Mayor of Carmel, Jim Brainard, has become America’s evangelist-in-chief on the matter. He has demolished 78 sets of traffic light intersections in his city and replaced them all with those round islands so familiar to drivers in the UK. Four more will be finished in the coming months.

“We have more than any other city in the US. It’s a trend now in the United States. There are more and more roundabouts being built every day because of the expense saved and more importantly the safety.”

He quotes a study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety which suggests there is on average a 40% decrease in all accidents and a 90% drop in fatal ones when a traffic intersection is replaced by a roundabout.

The long-term financial saving is about £150,000, he says, due to reduced maintenance costs, and there are also fuel savings.

“Not just the cars that aren’t idling at traffic lights, but starting from a dead stop takes up more fuel also, so we are saving thousands of gallons of fuel per roundabout per year,” says the Republican mayor.

“And aesthetically, we think they’re much nicer. If one is looking out their living room window, would you prefer to see a blinking traffic light all night or a beautifully landscaped roundabout with a fountain and flowers?”

Roundabouts v Rotaries

A British roundabout and the rotary at the Arc de Triomphe

The modern roundabout gives way on entry and priority to cars already on itThey are usually smaller than rotariesAnd vehicles usually travel at lower speedsRotaries may have traffic lights and stop signsMarble Arch in London and the Arc de Triomphe in Paris are found on rotary systems

The mayor’s unlikely passion began while studying in the UK, and his strong Anglophile credentials are in evidence from a glance around his office – a book by Prince Charles entitled Vision of Britain lies on the coffee table.

“I remembered those roundabouts in England and it raised the question in my mind – why don’t we do this? I remembered they worked better than traffic lights so I started to do a bit of research and convinced my traffic engineers to try some.”

There was scepticism at first, he says, but public education is critical and there was a newsletter and video campaign to tell people about the safety and environmental advantages.

Before every roundabout, there are squiggly lines on the road and on roadside signs to warn drivers which lane they need to be in.

The mayor’s ambition is to replace the city’s remaining 43 traffic lights too, apart from one. The traffic lights on the corner of Main Street and Range Line Street will survive – not because a plaque at the spot claims the country’s first automatic traffic signals were installed here in 1923, but the street’s just too narrow to fit a roundabout.

Leading roundabout statesWashingtonColoradoCaliforniaFloridaKansasOregonMarylandIndianaWisconsinArizona

The ornate fountain roundabouts of Carmel are a far cry from the large, one-way rotary systems conceived in the US and in Europe in the early 20th Century but which largely fell out of favour due to congestion problems.

Then forward-thinking British traffic engineers like Frank Blackmore tinkered with the designs and the UK established the modern roundabout by introducing a mandatory “Give way” rule for cars entering.

The US still has the older versions, called rotaries or circles, in cities like Washington DC and they remain quite unpopular, a confusing sprawl of signals, stop signs and concentric lanes.

The simpler British version first came to the US in 1990 in Nevada and it is these which are now proliferating. California has built nearly 200 in the last two or three years.

Countries with British-style roundaboutsFrance (has about 30,000, the most in the world)AustraliaNew ZealandThailandUSBelgiumIraqJordan

The problems Americans have navigating them was satirised in the film European Vacation starring Chevy Chase, who takes his family sightseeing in London but gets stuck until nightfall on a roundabout next to Big Ben.

There is some truth in that caricature. Some drivers in Carmel have been known to wait for the whole roundabout to clear before entering, says driving instructor Mike Ward, but learners soon get used to them.

But police in the city say the number of accidents on them, often caused by confusion or unfamiliarity, is still a lot fewer and less serious than at a traffic light.

The people of Carmel seem happy living in the country’s unofficial roundabout capital. The mayor, who has made roundabouts a central plank of his manifesto, is on the verge of earning his fifth term in office.

Roundabout in CarmelRoundabouts in Carmel have to look good

“I think they’re awesome,” says Blair Clark, who has lived in the area for 26 years. “They keep the traffic flowing, you don’t have to stop, you save gas and there are less accidents.”

Another driver, filling up his gas tank, says: “We’re proud of our city and proud of our roundabouts.”

But beyond Carmel, there has been greater resistance to them. One newspaper columnist in Atlanta says this undesirable European import will lead to higher taxes and accidents.

And Dan Neil, a motoring journalist at the Wall Street Journalist who personally welcomes their arrival, thinks there is something deep in the American psyche which is fundamentally opposed to them.

“This is a culture predicated on freedom and individualism, where spontaneous cooperation is difficult and regimentation is resisted.

A UK view of US roundaboutswell landscapedlower speedsbetter for cyclists and pedestrians

Clive Sawers, British traffic engineer who has consulted US cities on roundabouts

“You see it in the way Americans get in line, or as the Brits say, queue. We don’t do that very well.

“Behind the wheel, we’re less likely to abide by an orderly pattern of merging that, though faster for the group, make require an individual to slow down or, God forbid, yield.”

Americans tend to be orthogonal in their thinking and behaviour, he says.

“We like right angles, yes and no answers, Manichean explanations. Roundabouts require more subtlety than we’re used to.”

Un-American or not, it’s only a matter of time before they are covering every US state, says Gene Russell, a leading civil engineering professor at Kansas State University.

So while the Americans give the British fast food, rock and roll and baby showers, in return they get free-flowing, circular traffic intersections. A fair cultural exchange?

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Quiz of the week’s news

7 days quiz

It’s the Magazine’s 7 days, 7 questions quiz – an opportunity to prove to yourself and others that you are a news oracle. Failing that, you can always claim to have had better things to do during the past week than swot up on current affairs.

Graphic of a number seven

1.) Multiple Choice Question

Police in Newquay, Cornwall, say they will be confiscating certain items this summer in a crackdown on anti-social behaviour. Which of these is not on their list?

Policeman in Newquay Sexually explicit inflatablesClothes with offensive slogansNovelty handcuffsSex toys

2.) Multiple Choice Question

“I hadn’t planned on doing it… it was just, yeah, sort of off the cuff.” Said who?

Duke of Cambridge, Wimbledon queue and Andy Murray A Murray fan who queued for 75 hours for a ticketAndy Murray bowing to the Royal BoxPrince William, joining a Mexican wave

3.) Multiple Choice Question

A handbag belonging to the former British Prime Minister Lady Thatcher has fetched £25,000 ($40,000) at a charity auction in London. Who bought it?

Thatcher's handbag A man said to be a fanThe Ronald Reagan museumA Russian oligarch

4.) Multiple Choice Question

After a mini-heatwave, thunderstorms struck the South East of England on Tuesday. Which of these was not struck by a bolt out of the blue?

Lightning Gatwick Airport control towerSouthern Railway train servicesTelevision coverage of Wimbledon

5.) Multiple Choice Question

Californian firemen created a video-cutie when they filmed the rescue of a four-week-old kitten from a metal pipe. But what did they name the animal?

Rescued kitten PiperSqueezyMetallica

6.) Multiple Choice Question

And sticking to the theme of animal names, Blue Peter has made its final broadcast from London ahead of its move to Salford. Which of the show’s pets featured in a pop song?

Jason the SiameseJason the Siamese catGeorge the tortoiseGeorge the tortoiseShep the Border CollieShep the Border Collie

7.) Multiple Choice Question

Which age group did figures reveal this week is driving most of Facebook’s growth in the UK?

Computer keyboard Under 18s30 to 40-year-oldsOver-50s

Answers

It’s novelty handcuffs. The crackdown is because residents are worried that the behaviour of drunken revellers in Newquay is forcing families away from the town centre. It was Andy Murray. The player said he had only been told by a reporter that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were attending when he came off the practice courts. But he wasn’t entirely convinced. It’s the man believed to be a fan. The black glossy leather bag was owned by Lady Thatcher for more than 30 years and was on her arm during Cold War-era negotiations with the former American president, Ronald Reagan, and the then leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev. Air passengers at the West Sussex airport faced delays, as did passengers on several rail lines, including the Southern London to Brighton route. The roof over Wimbledon’s centre court did spring a leak but there was no lightning. Piper was freed with the help of a mechanical cutter and has been adopted by a local television station employee. Although the firefighters have visiting rights. John Noakes’ catchphrase “get down Shep” was incorporated into a pop song of the same name by The Barron Knights in 1978, reaching number 44 in the charts. It’s the over-50s. According to research by Nielsen, in the last year the number of over-50s using the site has increased by 84%.

Your Score

0 – 3 : Ignore

4 – 6 : Like

7 – 7 : Friend

For past quizzes including our weekly news quiz, 7 days 7 questions, expand the grey drop-down below – also available on the Magazine page (and scroll down).

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Doctors call for Baby P inquiry

Peter ConnellyPeter Connelly died in August 2007 at the age of 17 months after being subjected to sustained abuse
Related Stories

Doctors have demanded a government investigation into why London’s Great Ormond Street Hospital kept information from the original Baby Peter inquiry.

They have backed a similar call from Home Office minister and Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone, who wants the hospital’s chief executive to quit.

The hospital failed to share findings of a highly critical report into St Ann’s Clinic in Haringey.

Abused toddler Peter Connolly was treated there two days before he died.

During a serious case review into Peter Connelly’s death in August 2007, Great Ormond Street commissioned an independent investigation by two of the country’s most experienced paediatricians, Professor Jo Sibert and Dr Deborah Hodes.

But it produced an edited version of their report and passed that – not the original – to the review.

Now a number of unidentified consultants have written to the medical journal The Lancet calling for “strong ministerial intervention” to establish what happened.

They say that because the trust board has denied allegations so strongly, “it is now impossible to raise such questions internally”.

Great Ormond Street HospitalGreat Ormond Street Hospital should not be seen to bury its mistakes, the doctors wrote in the letter

The letter adds: “Hence our need to ask publicly: If there is nothing to hide, no wrongdoing, why not commission an independent investigation to make the executive’s innocence indisputable?”

They did not want the hospital “to be seen as an organisation that buries its mistakes”, they added.

“In addition we are alarmed about the way in which senior management has treated individuals who have voiced concerns, not just in the case of Baby P, but also in relation to other clinical risks within the Trust.

“We urge that there is strong ministerial intervention to order an investigation into these matters, including the treatment of whistleblowers.”

The edited version of the report omitted key findings and damning criticisms including:

The head of the clinic, Dr Sukanta Bannerjee, claimed the case was a “clinically risky situation”Child protection arrangements caused “grave concern”The doctor who examined Peter two days before his death, Dr Sabah Al-Zayyat, was under-qualified, and should not have been appointed by Great Ormond Street because she had “little experience and training in child protection”

Recommendations for the urgent appointment of consultants to key child protection posts were also withheld from the review.

Ms Featherstone has accused the hospital of a cover-up and called on the health secretary to launch an inquiry.

Great Ormond Street Hospital has rejected the allegations, saying it had “no reason to believe that any of its staff, with the approval or without the approval of management, sought to mislead the serious case review or otherwise hide deficiencies in the service”.

In a letter to The Lancet, medical directors Barbara Buckley and Martin Elliott say Ms Featherstone’s claims are “incorrect and unsubstantiated.”

They write: “We know that a great many of our staff – doctors, nurses, and others – are incredibly angry at the way the reputation of the hospital and its chief executive, Jane Collins, have been called into question.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Bribery Act targets corrupt firms

Cash in pocketCompanies prosecuted by the SFO must show they have adequate procedures in place to stop bribes
Related Stories

Legislation aimed at making it easier to prosecute companies who make corrupt payments abroad has come into force.

The Bribery Act overhauls existing laws dating back to 1889 and creates offences that carry prison terms of up to 10 years and unlimited fines.

It makes it illegal to offer or receive bribes and to fail to prevent bribery.

Both British and foreign companies are covered, provided they have some operations in the UK. The act also applies to individuals.

The government says the act will cement the UK’s position as a global leader in the fight against business corruption.

The legislation was due to come into force in April 2011, but it was delayed over business concerns about whether corporate hospitality could be seen as a bribe.

Analysis

It was the halting, in late 2006, of the Serious Fraud Office investigation into alleged bribery payments greasing the Al Yamamah arms deal between the UK and Saudi Arabia which focused the need to reform the UK’s antiquated bribery laws.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development was critical, especially as the UK had signed up to its anti-bribery convention in the late 1990’s. Prosecutions of companies were all but unheard of, and to prove a case prosecutors had to show that the bribery on the ground was perpetrated by a “controlling mind” of the company ie: someone high up. That was difficult

The new act creates offences of offering or receiving bribes, and a tough new offence of “failing to prevent bribery”. If a company is prosecuted for that, its only defence is if it can show it has “adequate procedures” in place to stop bribes. That will involve new policies, training and cost.

Government guidance says that corporate hospitality that is reasonable and proportionate, will not be seen as a bribe.

As a result, the government issued additional guidance on the act.

In its guide to the Bribery Act, the Ministry of Justice says: “Very generally, [bribery] is defined as giving someone a financial or other advantage to encourage that person to perform their functions or activities improperly or to reward that person for having already done so.”

In March Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke assured companies the act would be implemented in a “workable, common sense” way.

He has since assured companies that they can take clients to events such as Wimbledon and the Grand Prix, so long as the hospitality is reasonable and proportionate.

The government said it did not expect “genuine hospitality” or similar expenditure to fall under the act.

Companies prosecuted under the act must show they have “adequate procedures” in place to stop bribes.

“Adequate procedures” may include providing anti-bribery training to staff, carrying out risk assessments for the markets being operated in, or carrying out due diligence on the people being dealt with.

A survey released in June 2011 by the consultants KPMG suggests that a third of UK companies have not yet conducted an anti-bribery and corruption risk assessment.

The survey also found that 71% of companies believed there are some places in the world where business cannot be done without engaging in bribery and corruption.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

How defectors come in from the cold

It is 60 years since British spies Burgess and Maclean sensationally fled to the Soviet Union, and now top Libyan football figures have defected to the rebels. But how do defectors adjust to their new lives?

You have spent years in the half-light, betraying those closest to you. And now your secret is out.

Spirited away to the foreign power you covertly served all along, you know you can never return to the homeland that now reviles you as a traitor.

With your loyalties out in the open, you must make a life for yourself in your adopted nation. How?

In June 1951, the press was filled with speculation about the whereabouts of two missing British diplomats, Guy Burgess and Donald Maclean, who had disappeared the previous month.

The pair, it would later transpire, were in the Soviet Union, having fled from their imminent exposure as double-agents passing state secrets to Moscow.

These two urbane, upper-middle class Englishmen – part of the notorious Cambridge Five spy ring – would now have to adjust to life in a regime they had idealised as a workers’ paradise.

It was not a task for which both men were equally suited.

Cambridge FiveA Communist spy ring recruited at Cambridge University in the 1930sThey secured sensitive government posts from which they passed valuable intelligence to the Soviet UnionGuy Burgess and Donald Maclean were exposed in 1951 while working at the Foreign OfficeKim Philby, who had worked in senior positions both within the Foreign Office and the intelligence services, was exposed five years laterIn 1964 a former member of the intelligence services, Anthony Blunt, was named as a fourth member of the ring. The identity of a fifth member, John Cairncross, a former MI6 officer, was not confirmed until 1990BBC History: The Cambridge Spies

Maclean assimilated enthusiastically into Communist Moscow, establishing himself as a European security expert whom his colleagues affectionately nicknamed Donald Donaldovitch.

Burgess, however, proved less adaptable. As depicted in Alan Bennett’s television play An Englishman Abroad, he slumped into lonely alcoholism, scarcely bothering to learn Russian and continuing to order his suits from Saville Row. He drank himself to death aged 52.

Their contrasting experiences raise the question of how a defector should go about constructing a new life.

Despite the end of the cold war, defectors are, after all, back in the news.

After Col Gaddafi’s foreign minister and former spy chief Moussa Koussa defected to the UK, Foreign Secretary William Hague urged other Libyan officials to follow suit, promising they would be “treated with respect” in Britain.

In the wake of this call, a group of 17 leading Libyan football figures, nation’s goalkeeper, and three other national team members, announced their defection to the rebels within Libya.

One adopted Briton in a position to offer defectors guidance is former KGB Colonel Oleg Gordievsky, who worked for MI6 as a double agent for 11 years until he came under suspicion from Soviet authorities in 1985.

Gordievsky had been based at the USSR’s embassy in London when he was ordered back to Moscow on a pretext and interrogated. But, in an astonishing escape which rivals any episode in espionage fiction, he managed to reach the border with Finland and was smuggled across by British officials.

Oleg Gordievsky

“I had no problems because I was friends with British people… I was used to British culture”

Oleg Gordievsky Double agent

Feted for his daring as well as the invaluable information he provided, Gordievsky settled happily into life in the Surrey commuter belt. He wrote a series of books and articles and, he says, felt gratified to be welcomed into London’s intelligence and literary community.

Indeed, such was his familiarity with UK customs – he had been posted to London in 1982 – and the length of his service for MI6 prior to, he dislikes the label “defector”. Gordievsky insists he had been British all along.

But he admits that his first wife, Leyla, did not share his motivation to embrace his adopted country. Their marriage collapsed after she managed to join him in the UK.

“I had no problems because I was friends with British people for 11 years,” he says. “I was used to British culture and the British way of life.

“But my wife, who joined me later – she had problems and had to go back to Russia because she couldn’t find balance in her life in Britain.

“I was very happy to be in Britain, British culture.”

Indeed, both ideological commitment and a sense that one continues to be useful to one’s adopted country appear to be crucial to sustaining defectors in exile.

The journalist and historian Phillip Knightley met Kim Philby, another of the Cambridge spies, shortly before his death in Moscow in 1988.

The Soviet authorities had never entirely trusted Philby and denied him the senior KGB post he had been expecting.

Bridge of spies

Glienicke bridge

During the cold war, the Glienicke bridge linked West Berlin with Potsdam in the east, allowing both sides to exchange prisonersIn 1962, Soviet spy Rudolf Abel was swapped for US pilot Francis Gary Powers at the bridgeTwo years later, Konon Molody, who masterminded the Portland spy ring in south-west England, was exchanged for MI6 agent Greville WynneIn 1985, 23 American agents were traded at the bridge for four Warsaw Pact officers. Further exchanges were made the following year

As a result, Knightley recalls him as a broken, pathetic figure, pining nostalgically for “Coleman’s mustard, the Times, the crossword and English cricket”.

But what Knightley believes kept Philby, who did not live to see the collapse of the Berlin Wall, going was his unswerving Marxist-Leninist views and his conviction that he had done the right thing.

“All of the defectors I have ever met complained about the way they were treated – they didn’t feel they had enough recognition, they didn’t feel they were properly compensated,” Knightley says.

“If you are told you have got to live in a place for the rest of your life, you are bound to be discomfited.

“You are cut off from your previous life completely. You have the stigma of being a traitor for the rest of your life.”

Not all highly-prized defectors, of course, have been spies. When the ballet dancer Rudolf Nureyev fled the USSR for France in 1961, according to some sources, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev personally signed an order to have him killed.

And on the other side, host governments have an incentive to keep their assets in good spirits – whether or not they are defectors.

According to Prof Keith Jeffery, the official historian of MI6, intelligence agencies are haunted by the memory of Peter Wright. The former MI5 officer revealed the secrets of the service in his book Spycatcher after becoming disgruntled with his pension arrangements.

As a consequence, Prof Jeffery argues, agencies are keen to make sure that anyone under their care still feels important.

“There’s a marketing dimension to it,” he says. “They do put a lot of effort into keeping (defectors) happy because they hope this would encourage others to do the same.

“It’s very important to keep them happy. While they’re happy they’ll tell you stuff.”

It seems defectors, like the rest of us, just need to feel wanted.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Man shot dead outside Bristol pub

A man in his early 20s has been shot dead outside a Bristol pub, police have confirmed.

The shooting happened at about 0410 BST outside the Coach House pub in Stapleton Road, St Pauls.

Police say a man and a woman are being treated at Bristol Royal Infirmary for injuries which are not thought to be life-threatening.

Tens of thousands of people had been in St Pauls on Saturday celebrating the annual carnival.

The road at the scene of the shooting has been closed in both directions between Warwick Road and Oxford Place.

Keti Sarguna, who lives just off Stapleton Road, said she had heard the shots.

She said: “I heard a commotion and I heard shots going off. It didn’t sound like gun shots at all, it sounded like fireworks.

“Police are searching the area right now. Everything’s shut off. We just know we have to go around the back.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Call for cross-party care talks

Woman helping an elderly man to his doorMinisters are looking to revamp the social care system in England
Related Stories

Politicians should hold cross-party talks on reforming the care system for the elderly in England, charities say.

The 26 charities, including Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society, say political leaders “must not let reform fall off the table for another generation”.

In a letter to the Sunday Telegraph they call for a “timetable for reform”.

The Dilnot review of the funding of social care – due to be published on Monday – is expected to recommend a cap on how much people are required to pay.

The charities wrote: “We cannot stick our heads in the sand and ignore the stark demographic reality of a rapidly ageing population and people with disabilities and long-term conditions living longer.

“Our political leaders must take this opportunity. Otherwise the terrible stories of the last months, of neglect and abuse of the most vulnerable, will only grow worse.”

BBC correspondent Phil Lavelle says it is a huge political issue, with an estimated 20,000 people having to sell their homes every year to pay for care.

Andrew Dilnot, chairman of the Commission on Funding of Care and Support, has told the BBC: “If a cap were put in place we could take away the fear that people would lose everything that they had built up and in particular people seem reasonably anxious that they might lose all the value of their house.

“They still have to pay something but much less than if they end up with high care needs as it is at the moment.”

Labour leader Ed Miliband has previously offered to engage in cross-party talks, promising to enter with an “open mind”.

A quarter of people aged over 65 can expect a bill of more than £50,000 for their care, and one in 10 pays more than £100,000.

The cap could cost the Treasury between £2bn and £3bn – the same as the cuts to public sector pensions.

At the moment, the support provided by councils is means-tested so that anyone with assets of more than £23,250 has to pay for all the cost of their care.

It means thousands of people a year are forced to sell their homes when they go into a care home.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Thai opposition ‘set for big win’

Election posters for Abhisit Vejjajiva (left) and Yingluck ShinawatraAbhisit Vejjajiva accuses Yingluck Shinawatra of being a proxy for her brother
Related Stories

People are set to vote in a general election in Thailand, billed as a test of the nation’s fragile democracy.

Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva’s Democrats face a tough battle against the Pheu Thai party, which is allied to ousted former leader Thaksin Shinawatra and led by his sister, Yingluck.

Thailand has endured six years of often bloody political protests and there is tight security for the vote nationwide.

About 170,000 police officers have been deployed outside polling stations.

Last year, protesters shut down parts of Bangkok for two months in a bid to force the government to resign. When the army stepped in to clear the capital’s streets it degenerated into violence, leaving 91 people dead.

Many of the red-shirted demonstrators were supporters of Mr Thaksin, whose government was toppled in a military coup in 2006.

The BBC’s Karishma Vaswani in Bangkok says Sunday’s election is a chance for Thais to end years of political uncertainty.

The last few years have seen street protests, airport closures, and violent clashes between the supporters of the two main factions of Thai politics, our correspondent says.

Thailand’s troublesSept 2006: Army overthrows government of Thaksin Shinawatra, rewrites constitutionDec 2007: Pro-Thaksin People Power Party wins most votes in electionAug 2008: Mr Thaksin flees into exile before end of corruption to trialDec 2008: Mass yellow-shirt protests paralyse Bangkok; Constitutional Court bans People Power Party; Abhisit Vejjajiva comes to powerMar-May 2010: Thousands of pro-Thaksin red shirts occupy parts of Bangkok; eventually cleared by army; dozens killed

The country’s image and economy have both suffered, its reputation for being a bastion of democracy in south-east Asia has been severely tarnished, she adds.

More than 40 parties are fielding 3,832 candidates for the 500-seat lower house of parliament, the House of Representatives.

In a two-tier system of voting, 375 legislators will be elected by constituency, while 125 candidates will be chosen from lists according to the proportion of votes each party receives nationwide on a separate ballot. There are some 47 million eligible voters.

Despite the wide variety of parties, only the Democrats and Pheu Thai are believed to have a realistic chance of capturing an outright majority. Opinion polls point to a win by Pheu Thai.

Our correspondent says Yingluck Shinawatra is a political novice, and her popularity seems to rest on the fact she is campaigning on the policies of her brother, who many believe is Pheu Thai’s real leader.

He is living in self-imposed exile in Dubai to avoid corruption conviction, and has made it clear that he is keen to return to his homeland.

At a rally in Bangkok late on Friday Ms Yingluck said: “Please give a chance to this woman to serve the country. Please give a chance to this woman to bring reconciliation back to this country.”

She urged a “free and fair election” and said she was confident of winning an outright majority.

Mr Abhisit has said a vote for Pheu Thai is a vote for Mr Thaksin, and pointed out the party’s own slogan was “Thaksin thinks, Pheu Thai does”.

At his final campaign rally, he said the country must “get rid of the poison of Thaksin”.

“As long as Thaksin thinks, Pheu Thai has to do it – to find ways to give Thaksin back his seized 46bn baht ($1.5bn),” he added.

Our correspondent says there is a lot at stake.

Whoever wins will have to bring a divided nation back together again, and try to heal Thailand’s wounded democracy, she adds.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.