A deal to sell the Teesside Corus steel plant which was mothballed with the loss of more than 1,000 jobs is being discussed.
Teesside Cast Products was partially mothballed in February when a consortium pulled out of a deal.
Thai steel company SSI has now signed a memorandum of understanding to buy the Redcar site from Corus.
The news was welcomed by union leaders and politicians.
Geoff Waterfield, site multi-union chairman, said: “This is fabulous news. We are all over-joyed.
“It’s been a difficult time for everybody and we have been bound by confidentiality arrangements. Now we can meet and start talking to SSI and Corus.”
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Anthony Farley left an eight month old son, Ieuan Meek
A motorist has admitted causing a sledger’s death by not being in possession of a driving licence or insurance.
However, Alwyn Smith has denied failing to stop at the scene of the fatal collision in Tredegar.
Anthony Farley, 19, of Bettws, Newport, was killed when a plastic sheet he was sledging on collided with a car in snow last February.
Smith, of Abergavenny, told a court he thought he had hit a pothole.
The case, which was heard at Newport Crown Court, will now be dealt with back at the magistrates’ court.
Mr Farley was enjoying Wales’ winter snowfall with his cousin David Roberts when the tragedy happened.
Anthony Farley’s cousin David Roberts, 24, described what happened and his own injuries
The pair were using a polythene sheet to slide down a roadside bank on Tredegar’s Ystad Deri Estate.
Mr Farley’s family are angry that the case still hasn’t reached a conclusion and staged a demonstration outside the court.
They lit candles in memory of the teenage father. His mother-in-law said the family has been ripped apart by the tragedy.
Mr Roberts suffered multiple injuries – and still needs regular physiotherapy following the collision.
He denies what they were doing on that day was dangerous.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Andrew Gibson died after the attack at the Escapade nightclub in Darlington
A youth who killed a Scots soldier who was due to be sent to Afghanistan has been detained for two-and-a-half years.
John Flannigan, 17, punched 19-year-old Andrew Gibson in the back of the head during a drunken attack at Escapade nightclub in Darlington, County Durham.
He admitted manslaughter following the attack on 11 December 2009.
Teesside Crown Court heard the guardsman, from Cumbernauld, was hit as “pay back” for punching the teenager minutes before.
The court was shown CCTV footage of Flannigan lashing out with his fist and Mr Gibson falling to the ground.
He hit his head on the dance floor of the club, causing fatal injuries.
“We are extremely disappointed at the length of sentence handed down and plan on appealing this through the Crown appeal process”
Gibson family
Mr Gibson, from Cumbernauld, near Glasgow, was based at Catterick Garrison, North Yorkshire, and was due to return home for Christmas.
He was on a last night out with friends before heading home to his familyin Scotland.
The soldier had been due to be posted to Afghanistan in the New Year with his regiment and friends said he was “very happy and looking forward” to going.
Rachel Masters, prosecuting, said a witness saw Flannigan punch the soldier, causing his head to “bounce off the floor”.
Mr Gibson was taken to the James Cook Memorial Hospital, in Middlesbrough, but died six days later.
Flannigan told police that he punched Mr Gibson after he had hit him.
He said: “That’s him that’s hit me, so I hit him.”
Asked by detectives whether it was “pay back”, Flannigan replied: “Yeah, that’s what I thought.”
Judge Peter Fox QC, told Flannigan: “I sentence you on the factual basis, which the prosecution have accepted, that you had minutes before been struck once to the face by Mr Gibson.
“When you recognised him as being the person responsible for having struck you, you believed there would be further trouble and you threw your punch.”
In a statement, Mr Gibson’s parents criticised the length of Flannigan’s sentence.
Describing their son as a “dedicated soldier”, Linda and Freddy Gibson said: “His dream of going to Afghanistan in the service of his Queen and country was taken away from him.
“The sentence delivered today is definitely not enough.
“We are extremely disappointed at the length of sentence handed down and plan on appealing this through the Crown appeal process.
“Andrew’s death has affected our lives and also those of his friends and family – we have been handed a life sentence of pain, grief and ‘what ifs’.”
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Cyclists on the UK’s roads travelled 3.1 billion miles last year and many will have done so with safety at the forefront of their minds. Lights and reflectors are a legal obligation after dark, and reflective jackets an increasingly common sight.
But it’s the cycle helmet that is undoubtedly the most debated piece of kit. Helmets are not compulsory in the UK, unlike in Australia and parts of the US, yet the government encourages cyclists to wear one.
Find out moreBBC Radio 4’s More or Less is on Fridays at 1330 BST and Sundays at 2000 BSTOr listen again using the link below
More or Less
But is it really safer to wear a helmet when cycling?
Just a brief look at the blogosphere shows you what a hotly contested question this is. Unfortunately, the published evidence doesn’t make the debate much clearer.
While many cyclists wouldn’t leave home without clamping on their helmet, Dr Ian Walker, a professor of traffic psychology, has long believed head protection can work against someone on a bicycle.
Dr Walker conducted a study looking into how cyclists wearing a helmet affect the behaviour of drivers. He found that for those wearing a helmet, motorists drove much closer when overtaking.
“In absolute terms they got 8-9cm closer than they did when I wasn’t wearing one,” he explains, “And the proportion of vehicles getting within a really close distance went up considerably.”
He also decided to don a long, flowing wig to disguise himself as a female and found that drivers left him more space when passing. He says this further proves that drivers react to cyclists’ appearance.
His findings have led Dr Walker to conclude that drivers use a cyclist’s physical appearance to judge the specific likelihood of the rider behaving predictably. They alter their overtaking space accordingly.
He suggests drivers think helmeted cyclists are more sensible, predicable and experienced, so therefore the driver doesn’t need to give them much space when overtaking. Non-helmeted cyclists, especially non helmeted “women” are less predictable and experienced, according to this study.
Skull protection
But it’s not only motorists who alter their behaviour. Other research has looked at how helmeted cyclists take more risks, believing their head protection will compensate for this.
“I’m not convinced I saw any evidence of that,” says Dr Walker. “I don’t take any more risks when wearing a helmet and I think other cyclists would say the same.”
A recent report commissioned by the Department for Transport rejected all behavioural research, including that of Dr Walker, saying that none of the studies was robust enough to prove that helmets affect behaviour.
“It’s plain and simple that helmets are effective”
Angela Lee Bike Helmets Trust
This Department for Transport report studied all the evidence available and concluded that “the effectiveness of helmets in single-vehicle collisions was estimated to be 50%”.
But the report’s authors admit that “it should be remembered that there was no specific evidence to support these estimates”.
They do include a study into 100 police fatality reports which led them to say that helmets could prevent 10-16% of cyclist fatalities. But this was also an estimate based on a small study.
The problem is that the data available about injured cyclists, from the police or hospital admissions, does not record whether they were wearing helmets or not. It is therefore difficult to draw definitive conclusions in favour of helmets.
But for many cyclists, any such evidence comes second place to first-hand experience.
Angela Lee, chief executive of the Bike Helmet Initiative Trust and a nurse consultant in paediatric trauma, says it’s clear that helmets make cycling safer.
“It’s plain and simple that helmets are effective,” Ms Lee continues. “If you think of people who have mobile phones, computers, I bet they all have covers on to protect them. You have a skull protecting your brain and if you know anything about computers you know that if you damage a computer you can’t load the programme. That’s exactly the same with your brain.”
Wearing a helmet does seem like common sense – if it doesn’t encourage you or other road users to take extra risks. But in the absence of really compelling evidence either way, it’s up to individuals to make their own choices.
Me? I wear a helmet, and I’ll continue to do so.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
