Compensation case lasts 27 years

John O'Dowd MLAThe figures were revealed in response to John O’Dowd’s question in the Assembly

A Northern Ireland family’s medical negligence case has lasted 27 years while 55 others have been ongoing for longer than 15 years, it has emerged.

The figures were given in an Assembly written answer in response to a question on Northern Ireland health bodies by Sinn Fein MLA John O’Dowd

Mr O’Dowd said legal fees over 27 years could run into millions of pounds.

He said he knew of one family who had been waiting 16 years for their medical negligence case to be heard.

“They are seeking compensation for their son who has been left severely disabled after medical treatment went wrong,” he said.

“The case is continually cancelled just before it reaches court, leaving the family in limbo.

“Meanwhile, the lawyers are paid and in one case, for this last 27 years, legal fees have been continually paid out.”

Mr O’Dowd said he had only been provided with the cost of legal fees for the past two years – almost £2m – but the figures for 27 years “could be frightening”.

The Written Reply reveals that the Health and Social Care Board has 55 cases which have been ongoing for between 15 and 27 years.

The board has paid out legal fees amounting to £233,459 for cases ongoing for 15-plus years, £140,595 for cases initiated 11-15 years ago and £81,159 for cases taken in the past 5-10 years.

Among the various regional bodies, the Western HSC Trust has paid £204,184 for actions taken in the past 5-10 years and £49,843 for cases initiated 11-15 years ago.

Belfast HSC Trust legal fees for ongoing cases initiated in the past 5-10 years have so far cost £154,877.

A spokesperson for the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety said:”Every effort is made by hospital staff to ensure that the highest standards of care are provided to all patients.

“Over 2.5 million patients are cared for in NI hospitals each year.

“Inevitably, there will be a small number of occasions, particularly in emergencies involving critically ill patients with complex needs, where problems occur.

“The Department is keen to ensure that cases of clinical negligence are kept to a minimum, and that those who have suffered harm as a result are properly compensated for it.”

The spokesperson said the DHSSPS played no active role in the management of claims and litigation cases.

“Claims management is totally devolved to the Health and Social Care Board and Health and Social Care Trusts,” the spokesperson said.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Explosives expert

Terry Jupp, the MOD expert killed in a 2002 test-firing exercise in EssexTerry Jupp rarely talked about his job

An inquest jury has found that explosives expert Terry Jupp died following top-secret trials which were not appropriately planned. He died eight years ago after mixing chemicals at a testing station in Essex.

Terry Jupp was a chemist. He worked for the Ministry of Defence.

He did not talk about his job. He could not as much of what he did was highly classified, top-secret work in the interests of national security.

“We didn’t know anything,” his mother, Anne Jupp, told BBC News.

“I think I did ask him once. I said: ‘What sort of job do you do, Terry?’

“‘Something to do with plastics,’ he replied.”

His sister, Alison Davis, says she was stunned but incredibly proud to find out exactly what her brother did.

Homemade bombs

The secret world of Terry Jupp slowly began to emerge as he lay fatally injured in hospital. Between 60 and 90% of his body was burned when he was engulfed in a fireball at the MoD’s test firing range – operated by private contractor QinetiQ – at Foulness Island in Essex.

As part of a joint US-UK counter-terrorism project, the 46-year-old had been conducting experiments with improvised explosives – homemade bombs – to assess the capabilities of organisations such as al-Qaeda.

“It was avoidable – it should never have happened”

Bill Warren Retired MoD laboratory manager

Mr Jupp, a senior chemist with the Forensic Explosives Laboratory, had been working with a 10kg (22lb) mixture of three substances in a paint container when it unexpectedly ignited.

The plan had been to prime the mixture and then take it to a remote part of the range where it would be detonated, far away from the small group of scientists and experts.

There had already been several similar test firings, using different combinations and ratios of various materials.

But on 14 August 2002 something went tragically wrong and Mr Jupp died from his injuries six days later, leaving behind his wife Pat and two children, then aged 11 and 15.

Shrouded in secrecy

For eight years his family had unanswered questions, and now the inquest has provided some explanations about what went wrong and why.

But many of the details remain shrouded in secrecy.

The inquest jury had to sign a non-disclosure agreement, the lawyers had to be security vetted, and while Mr Jupp’s family were allowed access throughout, the media and public were excluded during the most sensitive evidence.

The American participants – almost all of whom refused to come and testify – were given anonymity, referred to only by letters of the alphabet.

We were told nothing of the US organisations said to have initiated and funded the trials, except that one of them was a branch of the National Security Council in Washington DC.

Map showing scene of accident

As for the lethal mixture that killed Mr Jupp, it consisted of substances known only as A, B and C.

It was said that such secrecy was required because it would be “catastrophic to both the UK and US national security if the results of the tests were compromised in any way by the criminal or terrorist fraternity”.

There is, of course, always a risk when handling explosives, but was Mr Jupp just unlucky or could more have been done to prevent this terrible accident?

Bill Warren, a laboratory manager involved in research and development for the Ministry of Defence and later the defence company QinetiQ, said: “It was avoidable. It should never have happened. He was let down.”

Mr Warren, now retired, says it certainly was not Mr Jupp’s fault.

“I knew Terry. He wasn’t a cowboy. He was professional, very experienced,” he added.

Before any large-scale trials of potentially dangerous chemicals are carried out, he said tests of very small amounts of the ingredients should first be conducted in a laboratory.

He told the inquest he had checked his database going back 40 years but had no record of any small-scale test on the fatal mixture.

‘Pain never goes’

A month after the fatal accident, Mr Warren was asked to test the substances involved. He used just 27 grams (just under an ounce) but within 10 minutes of it being mixed together, it spontaneously ignited.

He described it as a whoosh, a rapid burning, like a firework going off.

So did Mr Jupp know what he was working with?

The inquest heard he was not wearing full protective clothing and the paint container used had the wrong ingredients listed on the label.

There were allegations that the list of proposed test firings was changed at the last minute. The Americans claimed the fatal mix was not on the original list and was not authorised by them.

Dr Maurice Marshall, a renowned explosives specialist and the man in charge on the day, flatly denies these claims.

He told the inquest jury Mr Jupp knew what he was doing and had not expressed any concerns. He said no-one involved had thought there was a safety hazard.

After a police investigation, Dr Marshall and another scientist working with him, Bob Weighill, were charged with the manslaughter of Mr Jupp through gross negligence. All charges were later dropped.

Following the inquest verdict, Mr Jupp’s family believe they finally have some idea of what happened and why.

“It’s eight years,” his mother Anne said. “But the pain never goes.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Roaming iPhone glitch continues

O2 signageBoth O2 and Apple say they are investigating the issue

The mobile operator O2 says it is still investigating iPhone customer complaints that they have been wrongly charged for data roaming while abroad.

Customers have complained that the switch that deactivates data roaming doesn’t work, a fault O2 was first made aware of in May.

Neither of the other UK networks that carry the iPhone, Orange and Vodafone, says it has been hit with the problem.

Apple forum posts suggest the problem may lie with O2’s “visual voicemail”.

The fault can cause big bills for customers who receive emails and web pages when they are overseas – even though they didn’t choose to receive them.

The default setting on the iPhone should prevent data from loading up abroad. However, customers on the Apple and other forums are complaining that e-mails and web pages are sometimes downloading when they are abroad – even when the data roaming setting is off.

O2 says it is “investigating these reports with Apple”.

One recent post on an Apple online forum reported that: “Even with data roaming off, I received a visual voicemail message which appeared to then trigger the downloading of 25 e-mails and enabled selective web browsing and app activity. I’m going to call my network operator (O2) tomorrow, but others have complained about this bug that first appeared with the 3G iPhone and was fixed by an update.”

An Apple spokesperson told BBC News that “we are aware that some O2 customers have reported receiving unexpected data roaming charges and are investigating. To avoid unexpected data roaming charges while traveling outside the UK, O2 customers can turn off Cellular Data in their iPhone settings.”

Adrian Mars, an independent technology journalist, said he has some sympathy with the mobile operator.

“The big problem here is that Apple has a policy of not admitting to known faults in the phone so the operators are really stuck,” he said

“They don’t know whether there is a fault there.”

O2 will be faced with a difficult choice in deciding whether to refund customers who complain they have been hit with undeserved data roaming charges, as Mars acknowledges.

“It’s terrible. Looking at the bulletin boards, some have got their money back; some are saying they have.

“But until Apple holds up their hands and say these are the circumstances when it happens it will be very hard for them to know what to do.”

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

MoD criticised over blast death

Terry JuppThe MoD scientist died following top secret explosive tests

An expert died following top-secret explosives tests which were not properly planned and organised, an inquest jury has ruled.

Ministry of Defence scientist Terry Jupp died six days after the accident in August 2002 at the Foulness Island site in Essex.

The 46-year-old suffered between 60 and 90% burns when 10kg of an undisclosed mixture of chemicals suddenly ignited.

It happened during a joint US-UK counter-terrorism project.

The jury at the inquest in Southend, Essex, made a number of criticisms of the experiments in which Mr Jupp, from Hatfield in Hertfordshire, was involved.

They concluded that planning and risk assessment procedures had not been carried out properly, and that a small-scale test involving the potentially dangerous chemicals should first have taken place.

Related stories

Speaking after the narrative verdict had been delivered, Mr Jupp’s widow Pat said listening to the evidence had been “extremely harrowing”, but the inquest had been “fair and thorough” and she was “very pleased” with the outcome.

“I think the jury got it right. I don’t want anything like this to ever happen again,” she said.

“The Ministry of Defence have lost a highly experienced, loyal, dedicated scientist.

“I feel very proud in the knowledge that he helped to save thousands of lives doing the research work that he carried out.”

“We aim to take every step we can to control and minimise the risks – clearly in this case the measures in place at the time did not safeguard Mr Jupp”

Frances Saunders Chief Executive, DSTL

After the inquest, Frances Saunders, chief executive of the MoD’s Defence, Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL), said: “(We) note and acknowledge… the findings of the jury.

“Terry Jupp was carrying out work of national importance, helping to protect the UK, its armed forces and its people and I want to acknowledge publicly his contribution to this vital research.

“Some of the work that DSTL does is, by its very nature, extremely hazardous. But we aim to take every step we can to control and minimise the risks – clearly in this case the measures in place at the time did not safeguard Mr Jupp.

“We take the health and safety of our employees and the public very seriously and since Mr Jupp’s tragic death we have done everything we can to prevent such incidents happening again.”

The coroner, Peter Dean, had asked jurors to consider a number of questions relating to planning and risk assessment.

One key issue raised at the inquest was whether Mr Jupp knew what chemicals he was mixing at the time of the explosion.

The jury concluded that he did know and had been reassured by risk assessments and his knowledge of explosives.

Mr Jupp was working with a 10kg (22lb) mixture of three substances in a paint container when it unexpectedly ignited.

Pat Jupp

Pat Jupp said her husband Terry was a “loyal and dedicated scientist”

The jury heard he was engulfed in a fireball, causing horrific injuries from which he never recovered.

A subsequent test involving 27g (less than one ounce) of the mixture produced a violent and sudden ignition, described by one scientist as like a firework going off.

The jury also decided that adequate regard had not been paid to personal protective equipment on the test site, and highlighted communication and organisational problems.

Mr Jupp was involved in tests aimed at combating terrorists in the months following the 9/11 attacks in New York.

Much of the hearing was held in secret to prevent sensitive information falling into the hands of terrorists, and the chemicals involved in the fatal test were referred to only as A, B and C.

One witness said the results could be “catastrophic” if information about the testing fell into the wrong hands.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Ferrari recalls cars after fires

Burning Ferrari 458The owner of this 458 noticed the fire while he was driving along in Paris

Ferrari has decided to recall all of the 458 Italia cars it made this year, following reports of a number of the luxury cars catching fire.

Ferrari said its engineers had flown around the world to investigate five reports of “thermal incidents”.

As a result, it will be asking the owners of more than 1,200 of the supercars to bring them in for modification work.

Related stories

The 458 Italia typically costs about £170,000 ($260,000).

There were reported incidents in California, Paris, Switzerland, China and one other unnamed location.

Ferrari said the problem had been traced to adhesive used in the wheel-arch assemblies.

In certain circumstances, the glue can begin to overheat, smoke and even catch fire, a spokesman told BBC News.

In extreme cases, the melting of the adhesive can lead the heat shield – the liner which protects the engine – to deform and move closer to the exhaust, causing the lining to catch fire.

The handful of owners who first reported the fires – and that were later confirmed to be due to this problem – will now receive a new model, Ferrari said.

For the rest, their cars will be modified to replace the adhesive with mechanical fasteners.

Ferrari launched an investigation last month after photos purporting to show 458 models on fire or burnt out emerged.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

BBC staff vote for pension strike

BBC Television CentreThe BBC announced its pension proposals in June

BBC staff members have voted in favour of strike action in a dispute over pensions.

Bectu and the National Union of Journalists said more than 90% of members had voted for a walk out.

But the unions said the decision on whether to strike would be postponed for two weeks while it discussed alternative proposals with the BBC.

In June, the BBC announced plans to overhaul its pension scheme to try and tackle a £2bn deficit.

Jeremy Dear, general secretary of the NUJ, said: “This is an unprecedented result in favour of strike action and a clear rejection of the BBC’s proposals.

“We have agreed to give the BBC two weeks to come back with an improved offer or face a concerted campaign of industrial action.”

Gerry Morrissey, general secretary of Bectu, added: “This is a significant mandate for strikes, which demonstrates how out of touch BBC executives are with their staff.

“We hope they will now come up with more realistic proposals, otherwise we will have no alternative but to call industrial action.”

Jeremy Dear

The General Secretary of the NUJ Jeremy Dear said a decision on strike action has been postponed

Director General Mark Thompson said in an e-mail to staff on Wednesday that an alternative proposal would be announced in the middle of September.

“We would like to meet your concerns as far as we can,” he told staff – but warned, “our room for manoeuvre is limited”.

The unions have promised a “concerted campaign of industrial action” if agreement is not reached.

The BBC’s current pension proposals include closing its remaining scheme to new joiners and imposing a cap on the amount pensionable salaries of existing members can grow to 1% per year.

The corporation said the changes were essential to tackle the ballooning deficit in the pension scheme, which stood at £470m two years ago.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

BBC loses court battle over Stig

The StigThe Stig has never removed his helmet on the show

The BBC has lost a legal fight to stop publication of a book which reveals the identity of Top Gear’s driver The Stig.

The High Court in London refused to grant the BBC an injunction blocking the publication by HarperCollins of an autobiography of former Formula Three driver Ben Collins.

The book, called The Man In The White Suit, claims Mr Collins is the mystery driver on the BBC Two show.

Related stories

The BBC began legal action against HarperCollins last week.

It says it won’t confirm or deny that Ben Collins either was or remains The Stig.

But Top Gear presenter James May, who was a studio guest on BBC London when High Court’s decision was announced, made light of the situation.

He said: “Obviously I’m now going to have to take some legal action of my own, because I have been the Stig for the past seven years, and I don’t know who this bloke is, who’s mincing around in the High Court pretending it’s him.”

Ben Collins

Racing driver Ben Collins was in court for part of the hearing

The Stig is famous for his racing overalls and dark-visored helmet. His identity has long been a closely-guarded secret on Top Gear – one of the BBC’s most popular shows in the UK and around the world.

Several racing drivers have been linked to the role, including former Formula One world champions Damon Hill and Michael Schumacher.

Mr Collins, 33, from Redland, Bristol, was in court for part of Wednesday’s hearing.

The first Stig, Perry McCarthy, was dropped in 2003 after his identity was uncovered.

Press speculation

During the case this week – which took place behind closed doors – the BBC had argued that the planned book would breach confidentiality obligations.

After more than a day of legal submissions before Mr Justice Morgan, HarperCollins lawyers emerged on Wednesday to say the case had concluded in their favour.

“The Top Gear audience has always made it clear that they enjoy the mystery surrounding the identity of The Stig and the BBC felt it important to do all it could to protect that anonymity”

BBC statement

Solicitor Robin Shaw said: “The judge has said he is not going to grant an injunction in this case. Reasons are to follow and will be given in a private judgement.”

A BBC statement said: “The Top Gear audience has always made it clear that they enjoy the mystery surrounding the identity of The Stig and the BBC felt it important to do all it could to protect that anonymity.

“The BBC brought this action as we believe it is vital to protect the character of The Stig which ultimately belongs to the licence fee payer.

“Today’s judgement does not prevent the BBC from pursuing this matter to trial and the BBC will not be deterred from protecting such information from attack no matter when or by whom it should arise.”

The court case follows newspaper speculation last month that The Stig’s true identity was Mr Collins, based on the financial reports of his company.

At the time, the BBC said it was “no surprise” that Ben Collins’ company listed Top Gear amongst its work as the driver had “appeared numerous times on the programme and he often supplied other drivers for both the programme and Top Gear Live”.

Last week, HarperCollins said it would “vigorously defend” its right to publish the book, adding it was “disappointed that the BBC has chosen to spend licence fee payers’ money to suppress this book”.

However Top Gear executive producer Andy Wilman attacked the publisher, writing on the Top Gear website that the BBC had a right to protect Stig’s anonymity “from a bunch of chancers” who were “hoping to cash in on it”.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Stars poised for Venice film gala

Quentin TarantinoQuentin Tarantino heads up this year’s jury

Film stars from Hollywood and around the world are gathering for the start of the 67th Venice Film Festival.

Darren Aronofsky’s psychological thriller Black Swan, starring Natalie Portman, will open the gala.

Director Quentin Tarantino heads up this year’s jury to detemine the awards, including main Golden Lion prize, which Aronofsky won in 2008 for The Wrestler.

Some 79 movies are expected to premiere over the festival’s 11-day run.

Tarantino said his time in Venice would be more work than play.

“There’s a lot of really exciting movies, it’s a fantastic line-up,” he told the Reuters news agency.

“I’ve been on a few juries and I love it. It’s a joy to me. But it’s work. We’re not here for vacation,” he added.

Natalie PortmanNatalie Portman stars as a ballerina in psychological thriller Black Swan

The gala is opening with an unprecedented triple-header – after Aronofsky’s film will be a screening of Hong Kong director Andrew Lau’s The Legend of the Fist: The Return of Chen Zhen, followed by a special midnight screening of Robert Rodriguez’s Machete, starring Jessica Alba.

Director Sofia Coppola’s comeback movie, Somewhere, is among the 22 movies being shown in competition.

Actor and director Casey Affleck will present his documentary, I’m Still Here, about his brother-in-law actor Joaquin Phoenix’s decision to retire in 2008 and reinvent himself as a hip-hop musician.

The festival will close on 11 September with an adaptation of Shakespeare’s The Tempest, starring Dame Helen Mirren as a female Prospero, alongside Russell Brand.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Blair admits role in 2007 defeat

Tony Blair books for saleGordon Brown replaced Blair as Prime Minister a few weeks after the election

Tony Blair has suggested that Scottish Labour might have won the last Holyrood election if he had not been prime minister and party leader.

The SNP broke Labour’s dominance of the Scottish Parliament in 2007, when it won 47 seats, one more than its rival.

In his memoirs Mr Blair said Labour lacked self-belief in the Holyrood campaign but that his own leadership may have cost Labour votes.

Gordon Brown may have been more able to return Labour to power, he said.

In his book, A Journey, the former prime minister said: “With a new leader we could have done better, and in particular it is possible with Gordon we would have won in Scotland.

“Jack McConnell [former Labour leader and First Minister] was loyal and decent enough to deny this to me, but I wasn’t sure he meant it.”

Mr Brown replaced Mr Blair a few weeks after the defeat.

Mr Blair also used his memoir to voice concerns about the SNP’s ability to hold on to power.

Gordon Brown and his wife Sarah at Donald Dewar's funeralBlair said he felt alienated at Mr Dewar’s funeral as it was dominated by Brown

He said party leader and First Minister Alex Salmond “would be far harder to remove” than to stop in the first place.

“I knew once Alex Salmond got his feet under the table, he could play off against the Westminster government and embed himself,” he said.

Blair, who was born and educated in Scotland, also said Nationalists contrived to make him feel alien in Scotland.

He also described feeling like an “outsider” at the funeral of Scotland’s inaugural first minister Donald Dewar because it was a very Scottish affair which was dominated by Gordon Brown.

The Scottish Parliament was established by Mr Blair’s government in 1999, but he admitted never being passionate about devolution.

However, Mr Blair said he thought and hoped it was “the right thing to do”.

The SNP’s Westminster leader Angus Robertson said the admissions were an embarrassment for current Scottish Labour leader Iain Gray.

“As well as being a disaster for the Labour Party – exposing their internal feuds, splits, and jealousies in full technicolor – Tony Blair’s book is also a humiliation for Iain Gray,” he said.

“As well as Blair effectively conceding that he cost Labour the election in 2007, he also says that – compared to when the SNP won last time – it will be ‘far harder’ for Labour to defeat the SNP next year.”

You can watch Tony Blair’s interview with Andrew Marr on BBC Two on Wednesday 1 September at 1900 BST.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Obama hails US operation in Iraq

US President Barack Obama

President Barack Obama: “The Iraqi people now have lead responsibility for the security of their country”

President Barack Obama has hailed the end of US combat operations in Iraq, saying his country has paid a “a huge price” to “put Iraq’s future in its people’s hands”.

In a rare Oval Office address, he said he had been “awed” by the sacrifice of the US military.

But he said America’s “most urgent task” was now to “restore our economy”.

The US has marked the change in a ceremony in Baghdad, attended by Vice-President Joe Biden.

The outgoing US military commander, Gen Raymond Odierno, handed over to Gen Lloyd Austin, who will be in charge of the 50,000 troops remaining in the country to “advise and assist” Iraqi forces.

“American engagement with Iraq will continue with the mission that begins today – Operation New Dawn,” Mr Biden said.

“As the name suggests, this ceremony not only marks the change of a command, but the start of a different chapter in the relationship with Iraq.”

The vice-president later told CBS News that he believed Iraqi politicians were “close” to agreeing on forming a new coalition government, nearly six months after March’s election produced no conclusive winner.

“I’ve met with every one of the groups that won portions of the vote in the elections and I’m absolutely convinced that they are nearing the ability of forming a government, that will be a government representing the outcome of the election which was very much divided,” he added.

In his televised address to the nation on Tuesday, President Obama said the US would continue to support Iraq’s government and people.

Joe Biden in Baghdad

US Vice-President Joe Biden spoke at a handover ceremony in Baghdad

“Operation Iraqi Freedom is over, and the Iraqi people now have lead responsibility for the security of their country,” Mr Obama said.

The BBC’s Paul Adams in Washington says he may want to concentrate on the issues that really matter to his electorate – those that will influence voters in critical midterm elections in two months’ time.

But the president knows he is going to be a war-time president for some time to come, our correspondent adds.

In his speech, Mr Obama said: “The US has paid a huge price to put the future of Iraq in the hands of its people.

“We have sent our young men and women to make enormous sacrifices in Iraq, and spent vast resources abroad at a time of tight budgets at home… Through this remarkable chapter in the history of the US and Iraq, we have met our responsibility. Now, it is time to turn the page.”

“Rhetorical flourishes might have been out of place in any case. This was unadorned with soaring words though not lacking in strategy”

Read Mark’s thoughts in full

Mr Obama said he had spoken earlier in the day to former President George W Bush, who led the US into war and was accused of mishandling the subsequent occupation.

“It’s well known that he and I disagreed about the war from its outset,” Mr Obama said.

“Yet no one could doubt President Bush’s support for our troops, or his love of country and commitment to our security. As I have said, there were patriots who supported this war, and patriots who opposed it. And all of us are united in appreciation for our servicemen and women, and our hope for Iraq’s future.”

Mr Obama said the drawdown in Iraq allowed the US military to divert resources to the fight in Afghanistan, where he said the US remained committed to defeating al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

But he reiterated the mission in that country would last “a limited time” before Afghan security forces would have to take over.

Iraq War Timeline2003 – Saddam Hussein captured; No WMDs found; Insurgency builds2004 – Attacks on Shia shrines inflame sectarian tensions; Abu Ghraib abuse scandal; Transition government formed2005 – Elections favour Shia and Kurds; Sunnis refuse to back constitution; Violence rages2006 – Samarra attack inflames sectarian violence; Al-Qaeda leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi killed; Sadr City bombs kill 200; Saddam hanged2007 – President Bush’s troop “surge”; Blackwater shootings; UK hands Basra to Iraqi forces2008 – Sunni bloc rejoins government; Iraqis battle Sadr militia in Basra; US hands over Anbar; pact for US troops to leave by end of 20112009 – Provincial elections held; US forces leave towns and cities; Hundreds killed in Baghdad attacks2010 – Political vacuum after parliamentary election; US combat troops withdraw; 50,000 remain in Iraq

“As was the case in Iraq,” he said, “we cannot do for Afghans what they must ultimately do for themselves.”

The withdrawal of combat troops from Iraq came despite continuing violence and instability there.

Speaking earlier on Tuesday, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki lauded the US withdrawal, saying Iraq was now “sovereign and independent”.

“Our security forces will take the lead in ensuring security and safeguarding the country and removing all threats that the country has to weather, internally or externally,” he said.

Violence in Iraq is down from the peak seen during the sectarian conflict in 2006-2007, although the number of civilian deaths rose sharply in July.

While many Iraqis have welcomed the withdrawal, others say they believe it is happening too soon and that the country is not ready to manage its own security.

The last US combat brigade left Iraq nearly two weeks ago, well ahead of the 31 August target set by President Obama to cut the number of US troops in Iraq below 50,000.

All US forces must be gone by the end of next year.

troops graphic

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Ancient funeral feast unearthed

Tortoise shells found at Hilazon Tachtit (Munro)Over 70 tortoise skeletons were found in one of the depressions, many of them with almost intact shells

The remains of a huge 12,000 year old feast have been found in a cave in Northern Israel.

Archaeologists working in Hilazon Tachtit found what they thought was a late Palaeolithic campsite, when they discovered tools and animal bones.

However they soon realised they were looking at a large burial site, with huge numbers of animal bones.

They found the remains of at least three aurochs – giant extinct cattle – and over 70 tortoise skeletons.

The site, from the era known as the Natufian phase, had at least 28 human bodies, ranging from babies to those who would have been elderly for the time – aged about 45.

Natalie Munro from the University of Connecticut in the US and Leore Grossman from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem were especially interested to find two pit-like depressions in the centre of the cave that were too small for habitation.

Instead, the depressions contained these animal bones. One depression had the auroch remains which had been butchered. The other contained the tortoise bones and shells, which were mostly intact, and some of which were burned.

The team drew the conclusion that the tortoises had been cooked and the meat had then been removed. This was the best evidence that the animals had been killed and cooked for eating, not killed as a sacrifice.

In the depressions they found three adult bodies – one was definitely a middle-aged woman and two others were likely also female – one of these was buried with the body of a foetus.

Hilazon Tachtit cave (Munro)The excavation took place in Hilazon Tachtit cave in Northern Israel

The middle aged woman probably died of natural causes, and was buried with a strange assortment of individual animal bones. These included the pelvis of a leopard, the wingtip of an eagle, and the skull of a stone marten – all animals with distinctive fur or feathers.

The woman herself had some unusual physical characteristics, probably congenital malformations which very likely led to a life-long limp.

Although the researchers couldn’t recover any soft material from the clay soil, this combination of unusual features made them think that the woman had a particular significance for the culture, and that her burial was commemorated with a feast.

Evidence of such huge feasts has previously been found only in later archaeological sites, including some Neolithic sites in other areas of Israel, so this research, published in PNAS, is the earliest evidence for feasting on this scale.

The people who left these remains would have expended a great deal of effort to catch these huge wild cattle, and gather large numbers of tortoises.

All over the modern world, feasting rituals still celebrate the dead, including Western wakes and the Mexican Day of the Dead, when relatives hold dinners in cemeteries.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Imperial College expands overseas

Nanyang Technological UniversityThe new medical school will be based at Nanyang Technological University

Imperial College is going to open a medical school in Singapore, in partnership with a local university.

This will be the first time that the London university has delivered a course overseas.

The medical course, which will accept its first intake in 2013, will teach about 150 students a year.

Financial pressures have restricted the expansion of universities in the UK – but there has been a steady growth in overseas operations.

The medical school in Singapore – which will become the third in the country – will be run jointly by Imperial College London and Nanyang Technological University.

But the funding for setting up the new institution will come from Nanyang Technological University.

Imperial College will receive a fee for its expertise – as well as covering the costs of staff involvement.

The founding dean of the new institution will be Professor Stephen Smith, principal of Imperial’s Faculty of Medicine.

The ambition in Singapore is for a medical school teaching a total of 750 students on five year courses.

Doctors training at the new institution will have joint degrees from both universities.

Universities across the UK have faced financial pressures which have restricted their expansion, with tens of thousands of applicants missing out on places this summer.

And there are particular limits on medical schools, with a limit of 7.5% of students coming from overseas.

Opening a department overseas allows more students from outside the UK to be taught by Imperial College.

A spokeswoman for the university says the project in Singapore will raise its global profile – and this will be a way of looking to future opportunities overseas.

“We are extremely proud to be working with Singapore, a country we have long admired for its support and application of world class science, engineering and medicine,” said the rector of Imperial College, Sir Keith O’Nions.

“I hope that this agreement will allow us to share new ideas and innovations for teaching medicine and will open the door to a range of collaborations across our disciplines.”

This is the latest example of the globalisation of higher education, with UK universities opening departments to meet the growing international demand for university qualifications.

Among the pioneers of this in the UK has been the University of Nottingham, which has campuses in China and Malaysia.

This allows thousands of students in Asia to get a UK degree without having to leave their home country.

This week, the University of Nottingham said that education authorities in Hong Kong had expressed interest in developing such an international university.

Lancaster University has announced a dual degree course with an institution in Pakistan and University College London is planning a department in Australia.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

EU presses China over fake goods

Chinese seizure of counterfeit cigarettes - 2005 file picThe EU says it is struggling to stem a massive flow of illegal Chinese cigarettes

The EU has urged China to step up the fight against black market exports, saying counterfeit cigarettes alone are depriving the EU of 10bn euros (£8bn) in tax revenue annually.

The EU Commissioner for Taxation and Customs, Algirdas Semeta, is in Shanghai to discuss customs co-operation with Chinese officials.

He described China as “the main source of counterfeit cigarettes in the EU”.

Most fake or pirated goods seized in the EU last year were Chinese.

The European Commission says goods from China accounted for 64% of the seizures. Besides cigarettes, the main items were fake labels, clothing and accessories, shoes, toys and blank CDs and DVDs.

According to Mr Semeta, the 10bn euros in lost revenue from cigarettes “impacts significantly on legitimate business interests”.

China is the EU’s second biggest trading partner after the US and EU-China trade totalled some 300bn euros last year.

The 27-nation bloc is also the biggest market for Chinese exports, about 20% of which are sent to Europe.

The EU’s trade deficit with China last year reached 133bn euros, yet China is the EU’s fastest growing export market.

“As world players we also have world responsibilities. This is as true for China as it is for the EU,” Mr Semeta said.

He called for “practical results” from an action plan to protect intellectual property, signed with China last year.

The EU also wants to expand a pilot project called Smart and Secure Trade Lanes (SSTL), which tests the security of containers in ports and enhances EU-Chinese customs co-operation.

This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.