Sport England is offering hundreds of tickets to youngsters
Related Stories
Young people are to be given the chance to win free tickets for next year’s Olympic Games in London, in return for taking part in sport.
To qualify for the ballot they will have to join in the Sportivate mass participation scheme.
Sportivate aims to give 14- to 25-year-olds the chance of six to eight weeks of sports coaching.
The whole programme will cost £32m and is designed to get 300,000 youngsters playing sport.
Sport England chief executive Jennie Price said: “Lots of young people think sport isn’t for them.
“I would like them to have the chance to discover whether there is a sport they really enjoy, so this programme is all about choice.
“Everyone who takes part will receive high-quality coaching – giving them the confidence and skills which will make them want to keep playing in the future.”
To be eligible for free Olympics tickets participants must complete the sports course, missing no more than one session, and then participate for three months.
An eight-week judo course in Lincoln, wakeboarding courses in the Cotswolds and an eight-week introduction to golf for disabled teenagers and young adults in Bedfordshire are among the courses on offer.
There is also mixed tennis sessions for 17- to 24-year-olds in Newcastle-upon-Tyne and football sessions for women in Trowbridge, Wiltshire.
Athletics courses in Tooting Bec, south London, and parkour introductory courses at Waveney in Suffolk are also available.
Sport England hope the 49 county sports partnerships and local providers and sports clubs, who will run the scheme on the ground, will help those taking part to continue with sport after they have completed their course.
A team of top athletes, current and retired, will act as sporting champions and visit Sportivate sessions to share their experiences.
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

For many, teenagers playing tinny music to each other on public transport on their mobile phones can be intensely irritating. Why do they do it?
With mobile phones in many a teenager’s pocket, the rise of sodcasting – best described as playing music through a phone in public – has created a noisy problem for a lot of commuters.
“All you can hear is ‘dush, dush, dush, dush’. It’s irritating. So many times I end up with a headache,” says Tracey King, who has signed up to the Shhh! Scheme set up by bus company Arriva Yorkshire to stop the noise on their services.
“As teenagers, they don’t seem to have the capability to think about others. I have heard older women turning round and saying ‘will you turn that down?’ and sometimes they will… and other times I’ve heard them with abuse and swearing at other people.”
As mayor of London, Ken Livingstone called for the “absolute prohibition on playing music from a mobile system” as far back as in 2006. Young people can now have their zip cards – which allow them free travel in the capital – revoked for “anti-social behaviour”, which includes playing loud music.
The issue has even been discussed in the House of Lords. In 2006, the Piped Music and Showing of Television Programmes Bill was presented to Parliament, calling for “the wearing of headphones by persons listening to music in the public areas of hospitals and on public transport” to be made compulsory, although it never made it into law.
What is sodcasting?Sodcasting is described by The Urban Dictionary as “The act of playing music through the speaker on a mobile phone, usually on public transport. Commonly practiced by young people wearing polyester, branded sportswear with dubious musical taste.”The term is believed to have been first used by Pascale Wyse in the Guardian in his series Wyse Words, a list of words that do not exist but should. He stated that sodcasters are terrified of not being noticed, so they spray their audio wee around the place like tomcats.
So why do people do it? Is it just an act of youthful rebellion?
“I don’t think it is intrinsically anti-social, what I would say is that it is a fascinating human phenomenon of marking social territory,” says Dr Harry Witchel, author of You Are What You Hear.
“With young people, usually loud music corresponds very strongly to owning the space.
“They are creating a social environment which is suitable for them and their social peers. But for those not in this group – a 50-year-old woman for example – instead of confidence, she’ll feel weakness and maybe even impotence as there’s nothing that she can do about it.”
“With young people, usually loud music corresponds very strongly to owning the space”
Dr Harry Witchel Author, You Are What You Hear
But hasn’t this always been the case? Most people who remember the 80s can remember someone with a boom box perched on one shoulder, pumping out the latest songs to anyone within earshot. Some take this tradition back even further.
“I reckon I was an early sodcaster,” says the poet and broadcaster Ian McMillan.
“It was way back in the distant 1970s. As a teenager I was a big fan of the kind of music that made my mother say ‘Will you turn that rubbish off?’, and my dad hiss ‘I wouldn’t mind if it had a proper tune.’
“The fact is that I wasn’t allowed to listen to [my favourite artists] in the house so I had to listen to them outside using a tape player.”
But Dr Witchel says something slightly different was happening back then.
“When people went around with their ghetto blasters, you could argue that it was for the pure pleasure of the music they loved,” he says.
“There is no excuse for why you would want to listen to tinny music, except if you were establishing territory. It just sounds rubbish. It must sound rubbish to them.”
A group of school children on the 277 bus in Hackney, East London, don’t all think that what they are doing is wrong.
“I wouldn’t agree [that it was anti-social],” says one.
“The people who think it’s anti-social don’t really listen to this type of music.”
A second agrees that the bus would be dull without a little bit of music.
“Fair enough, it might be anti-social but the bus is always quiet,” she says. “You need something to listen to, right? We give you [something] to listen to.”
Some youth workers argue that what the youngsters are doing is largely innocent.
“I don’t think they [the sodcasters] are being selfish at all,” says Dmitry Fedotov, of the Youth Association.
“I think if young people see sound as preferable to no sound then, if anything, they’re going to be thinking they’re doing people a favour.”
And something is changing within the music industry itself. With the increase of songs being played through phones, more attention is being spent on the parts of the music that can be heard loudest though phone speakers.
“I think we’re starting to see evidence that musicians and producers are thinking about the technology by which their music is listened to,” says music journalist Dan Hancox, who has written extensively on the subject of sodcasting.
Rapper Giggs is said to be the most sodcasted artist, though quantifying this is very difficult
“It’s something that has been described as treble culture.
“It is the idea that in this particular technological era, things that are transmittable on low fidelity (low quality) speakers are being heard more and more in pop music, quite a bit of RnB and hip hop – things which traditionally had a large and important bass element to them.”
So, if this phenomenon is here to stay, what can be done by those who want a little bit of peace and quiet on their journey?
“Legislation is not the answer, and nor is citizen power, as anyone who has ever approached a sodcaster to ask them to stop will know all too well,” wrote Julian Treasure, chairman of the Sound Agency, on his blog.
“I believe the heart of the solution is in teaching listening skills in schools. If we teach our children how to listen properly to the world – and especially to each other – they will understand the consequences of their own sound and be far more responsible in making it.”
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
